The Use of REZUM System in Chinese Male Patients With LUTS Secondary to Benign Prostate Enlargement
Primary Purpose
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Hong Kong
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
REZUM system
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men aged between 50 - 80 years
- clinically indicated for surgical treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with active urinary tract infection or in retention of urine
- Patients with bleeding disorder or on anti-coagulation
- Patients with bladder pathology including bladder stone and bladder cancer
- Patients with urethral stricture
- Patients with neurogenic bladder and/or sphincter abnormalities
- Patients with previous nonpharmacological prostate treatment, Prostate cancer
- Fail to give informed consent
Sites / Locations
- Prince of Wales Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Use of REZUM system
Arm Description
Surgery of benign prostatic hyperplasia by REZUM system
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 6 months after treatment
IPSS score ranging from 0-35 (the higher the worse)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Complications rate
Complications rate after study intervention
Post-op total score in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Change in total score of IPSS, score ranging from 0-35 (the higher the worse)
Post-op quality of life score
Change in quality of life assessed by change in International Prostate QOL score (ranges from 0 to 6, the higher the worse)
Post-op International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) score
Change in total score of International Index of Erectile Function 5 score (ranges from 0 to 25)
Post-op Overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) score
Change in total score of Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (ranges from 0 - 15, the higher the worse)
Post-op pain score
Post-treatment pain score ranges from 0 to 10
Change in voiding function in uroflowmetry
It is assessed by maximum flow rate in uroflowmetry
Change in urodynamic
Change in urodynamic function assessed by flowrate
Change in prostate size
Prostate size is assessed by transrectal ultrasound of prostate
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04340934
First Posted
April 8, 2020
Last Updated
June 2, 2021
Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04340934
Brief Title
The Use of REZUM System in Chinese Male Patients With LUTS Secondary to Benign Prostate Enlargement
Official Title
The Use of REZUM System in Chinese Male Patients With Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Secondary to Benign Prostate Enlargement
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Due to funding
Study Start Date
May 13, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 29, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 29, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Men with enlarged prostates commonly experience lower urinary tract symptoms and may go on to develop complications such as acute urinary retention (AUR). Surgery is the standard treatment option required to remove the enlarged prostates and to rectify such complications. Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) was first performed over 80 years ago and is still regarded as the "gold standard" for the treatment of benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) in prostates between 30 and 80ml. While TURP results in an improvement in symptoms, perioperative morbidity and long-term complications can include postoperative bleeding, urinary retention, incontinence, urethral strictures, erectile dysfunction, and ejaculatory dysfunction. Rezūm is a system uses water steam energy to remove the particular part of the prostate that enlarges and causes symptoms due to BPH. Rezum involves a radiofrequency (RF) generator system and an endoscopic device that is introduced into the body via the urethra. Radiofrequency energy from the generator will heat up a controlled amount of water inside the system and converting the water into vapour or steam. The thermal energy created outside the body is delivered into the prostate tissue through the tiny needle at the tip of the endoscopic device. Small amount of steam will then be injected into the tissue and energy will be released during the conversion of steam to water. The energy will heat up the prostate tissue and result in gradually removal of the targeted obstructive prostate tissue. The treatment procedure takes approximately 3-7 minutes and can be performed as day surgery. No radiofrequency energy is delivered into the body, other than the prostate. Throughout the procedure normal saline (salty water) is running into the urethra through the scope to help ensure better views and to prevent the urethra from overheating. Voiding symptom will gradually improve after the procedure. From clinical study based in Caucasian population, patients had improved urinary flow rate by on average 50% and also improvement in quality of life scores. The treatment results could last for at least 4 years. However, information regarding the use of Rezum in Chinese and Asian is lacking. This study is proposed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Rezum in our population.
Detailed Description
Benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) is a non-malignant growth of the prostate gland that can lead to a range of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and in some cases eventually leading to retention of urine. In patients failing to wean off catheter after retention of urine due to BPE, surgical intervention is the standard treatment.
Surgical intervention options have evolved from electrosurgical resection to the use of lasers for enucleation and ablation [1]. Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) was first performed over 80 years ago and is still regarded as the "gold standard" for the treatment of BPE in prostates between 30 and 80ml [2]. While TURP results in a statistically significant improvement in symptoms score and and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), perioperative morbidity and long-term complications can include postoperative bleeding, urinary retention, incontinence, urethral strictures, erectile dysfunction, and ejaculatory dysfunction [3].
Rezum system use the principle of thermodynamic principle of convective energy transfer, which is different to other conductive heat transfer techniques like transurethral microwave therapy or transurethral needle ablation. [4] In the Rezum system, radiofrequency power is used to create thermal energy in the form of water vapor, which in turn deposits the stored thermal energy during the change from steam phase to liquid after injected into the prostatic tissue. The Rezum system contained a generator with a radiofrequency power supply to create water vapor from sterile water and a single-use transurethral delivery device. The tip of the delivery device contains an 18-gauge needle where 12 small emitter holes spaced circumferentially for dispersion of water vapor into the targeted prostatic tissue. The injection is at a pressure slightly higher than interstitial pressure. Due to the convective properties of water vapor, the injected steam will disperse rapidly and homogenously through the tissue and releases stored thermal energy into prostatic tissue. The released thermal energy will cause tissue necrosis. The most important character of the treatment is when the transition zone is treated, its energy will only deposit within the zonal anatomy of the prostate. Studies by histologic and MRI imaging had shown that after treatment, the thermal lesions were only limited to the transition zone without extension to the peripheral zone, bladder, rectum or striated urinary sphincter [5,6]. It was shown that 6 mo after treatment the total prostate volume was reduced by 28.9% and the resolution of thermal lesions as determined with Gadolini- um-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was almost complete. [6] A small pilot study had shown that Rezum could provide safe and effective treatment upto one year for men with LUTS due to BPE. [7] In the first multicentre, randomised, controlled study 197 men were enrolled and randomised in a 2:1 ratio to treatment with the Rezum system or control. [8] The sham procedure (control) was rigid cystoscopy with imitated treatment sounds. The primary efficacy end point was met at 3 months with relief of symptoms measured by a change in International prostate symptom score (IPSS) of 50% for the treatment arm compared to 20% for the control group (p < 0.0001). In the thermal treatment arm, the maximal uroflow rate increased significantly by 67% from 9.9 ml/s to 16.1 ml/s (p < 0.0001) after 3 months. The clinical beneficial outcome was sustained throughout the study period with an improvement of 54% at the 12-mo follow up. In the latest updated report on the 4-year outcome, the improvement in voiding (as measured by IPSS and uroflowmetry) was sustained to 4 years with surgical retreatment rate of only 4.4%. [9] Therefore, Rezum was proven to be an effective treatment for BPH.
However, all studies focused on the application of Rezum in patients with LUTS are from Caucasian population. Therefore, in this study, investigator plan to evaluate the feasibility and safety of Rezum in the management of Chinese male patients with LUTS secondary to BPE. This could provide information on the tolerability and effectiveness of the treatment in local population.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
3 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Use of REZUM system
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Surgery of benign prostatic hyperplasia by REZUM system
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
REZUM system
Intervention Description
Rezūm is a system uses water steam energy to remove the particular part of the prostate that enlarges and causes symptoms due to BPH. Rezum involves a radiofrequency (RF) generator system and an endoscopic device that is introduced into the body via the urethra.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 6 months after treatment
Description
IPSS score ranging from 0-35 (the higher the worse)
Time Frame
at baseline, 6 months after study intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complications rate
Description
Complications rate after study intervention
Time Frame
30 days after study intervention
Title
Post-op total score in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS)
Description
Change in total score of IPSS, score ranging from 0-35 (the higher the worse)
Time Frame
At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after study intervention
Title
Post-op quality of life score
Description
Change in quality of life assessed by change in International Prostate QOL score (ranges from 0 to 6, the higher the worse)
Time Frame
At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after study intervention
Title
Post-op International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5) score
Description
Change in total score of International Index of Erectile Function 5 score (ranges from 0 to 25)
Time Frame
At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after study intervention
Title
Post-op Overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) score
Description
Change in total score of Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (ranges from 0 - 15, the higher the worse)
Time Frame
At 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after study intervention
Title
Post-op pain score
Description
Post-treatment pain score ranges from 0 to 10
Time Frame
Day 0, on the day of study intervention
Title
Change in voiding function in uroflowmetry
Description
It is assessed by maximum flow rate in uroflowmetry
Time Frame
At baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after study intervention
Title
Change in urodynamic
Description
Change in urodynamic function assessed by flowrate
Time Frame
At baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after study intervention
Title
Change in prostate size
Description
Prostate size is assessed by transrectal ultrasound of prostate
Time Frame
At baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after study intervention
10. Eligibility
Sex
Male
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Men aged between 50 - 80 years
clinically indicated for surgical treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with active urinary tract infection or in retention of urine
Patients with bleeding disorder or on anti-coagulation
Patients with bladder pathology including bladder stone and bladder cancer
Patients with urethral stricture
Patients with neurogenic bladder and/or sphincter abnormalities
Patients with previous nonpharmacological prostate treatment, Prostate cancer
Fail to give informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chi Fai NG, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Prince of Wales Hospital
City
Shatin
Country
Hong Kong
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
4445912
Citation
Stepanova LA. Comparative evaluation of two methods of calculating zooplankton production exemplified on the Lake Il'men population. Sov J Ecol. 1974 Sep;4(6):476-82. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25613154
Citation
Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A, Drake MJ, Madersbacher S, Mamoulakis C, Oelke M, Tikkinen KAO, Gravas S. EAU Guidelines on the Assessment of Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms including Benign Prostatic Obstruction. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1099-1109. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.038. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16469429
Citation
Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)--incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol. 2006 Nov;50(5):969-79; discussion 980. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.042. Epub 2006 Jan 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28734706
Citation
Magistro G, Chapple CR, Elhilali M, Gilling P, McVary KT, Roehrborn CG, Stief CG, Woo HH, Gratzke C. Emerging Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):986-997. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25674555
Citation
Dixon CM, Rijo Cedano E, Mynderse LA, Larson TR. Transurethral convective water vapor as a treatment for lower urinary tract symptomatology due to benign prostatic hyperplasia using the Rezum((R)) system: evaluation of acute ablative capabilities in the human prostate. Res Rep Urol. 2015 Jan 30;7:13-8. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S74040. eCollection 2015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25987496
Citation
Mynderse LA, Hanson D, Robb RA, Pacik D, Vit V, Varga G, Wagrell L, Tornblom M, Cedano ER, Woodrum DA, Dixon CM, Larson TR. Rezum System Water Vapor Treatment for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Validation of Convective Thermal Energy Transfer and Characterization With Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 3-Dimensional Renderings. Urology. 2015 Jul;86(1):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.03.021. Epub 2015 May 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26216644
Citation
Dixon C, Cedano ER, Pacik D, Vit V, Varga G, Wagrell L, Tornblom M, Mynderse L, Larson T. Efficacy and Safety of Rezum System Water Vapor Treatment for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Urology. 2015 Nov;86(5):1042-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.046. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26614889
Citation
McVary KT, Gange SN, Gittelman MC, Goldberg KA, Patel K, Shore ND, Levin RM, Rousseau M, Beahrs JR, Kaminetsky J, Cowan BE, Cantrill CH, Mynderse LA, Ulchaker JC, Larson TR, Dixon CM, Roehrborn CG. Minimally Invasive Prostate Convective Water Vapor Energy Ablation: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Study for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. J Urol. 2016 May;195(5):1529-1538. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.10.181. Epub 2015 Nov 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30677455
Citation
McVary KT, Rogers T, Roehrborn CG. Rezum Water Vapor Thermal Therapy for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: 4-Year Results From Randomized Controlled Study. Urology. 2019 Apr;126:171-179. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.041. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31180311
Citation
Cantrill CH, Zorn KC, Elterman DS, Gonzalez RR. The Rezum system - a minimally invasive water vapor thermal therapy for obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. Can J Urol. 2019 Jun;26(3):9787-9793.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
The Use of REZUM System in Chinese Male Patients With LUTS Secondary to Benign Prostate Enlargement
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs