search
Back to results

Digital Variance Angiography in Diagnostic Angiographies for Effective Radiation Dose Reduction

Primary Purpose

Peripheral Arterial Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease, Femoral Artery Stenosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Hungary
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Diagnostic Angiography (DSA or DVA based on randomization result)
Sponsored by
Kinepict Health Ltd.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Peripheral Arterial Disease focused on measuring Radiation protection, X-ray angiography, Digital Variance Angiography, Digital Subtraction Angiography, Peripheral Arterial Disease, Kinepict, Image acquistion, Image quality, Radiation exposure

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with lower limb peripheral arterial disease, admitted for diagnostic angiography
  • Fontaine II- IV
  • Normal renal function: GFR> 60ml/min/m2
  • Age > 18

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute myocardial infarction
  • Severe heart/liver/renal failure
  • Iodine contrast allergy
  • Atrioventricular block
  • Coagulopathy and Hematological Bleeding Disorders

Sites / Locations

  • Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Group A: Low-dose DVA group

Group B: Normal-dose DSA group

Arm Description

Image acquisition at a reduced X-ray dose, 0.36 µGy/frame (70% reduction) image processing by DVA

Image acquisition at a normal dose (1.2 µGy/frame) image processing by DSA

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Total procedural Dose-area product(DAP)
Indicator of a patient's irradiation dosage (microGy*cm2 or Gy*cm2)
Total DSA-related DAP
Radiation load of the patient during DSA image acquistion (microGy*cm2 or Gy*cm2)
Image quality review
Blinded, anonymised and randomised qualitative review and comparison of images by multiple endovascular specialists in multiple regions using a 1-5 Likert-scale for each image. Region specific scores are compared between DSA and DVA technique.
TASC classification
Blinded, anonymised and randomised review of images by multiple endovascular specialists. Clinically relevant sides for each patient are reviewed in a separate questionnaire: each reviewer have to classify each patient's angiographic image according to the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document's second version.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Contrast media usage
The volume of the iodinated contrast agent used for enhancing the image quality (mL)
Number of protocol change
The number of occasions when the reduced radiation level protocol has to be switched back to conventional protocol in one region because of unsuitable image quality.
Procedure time
Duration of the whole procedure, from radial artery puncture till the removal of every tool (min).

Full Information

First Posted
April 6, 2020
Last Updated
September 7, 2021
Sponsor
Kinepict Health Ltd.
Collaborators
Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04343196
Brief Title
Digital Variance Angiography in Diagnostic Angiographies for Effective Radiation Dose Reduction
Official Title
Application of Digital Variance Angiography in Diagnostic Lower Limb Angiographiy for Radiation Exposure Reduction a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 21, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 30, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 30, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Kinepict Health Ltd.
Collaborators
Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Digital Variance Angiography (DVA) is a new tool in medical imaging with proven image quality reserve. The previously observed quality reserve of Digital Variance Angiography (DVA) in lower extremity angiographies, allowed to lower radiation exposure by 70 % during DSA in lower extremity diagnostic angiographies with non-inferior image quality. The aim of this study is to apply this non-inferior image quality and use it for radiation exposure reduction in diagnostic lower limb angiography. The project would prospectively block-randomise (50:50) patients, who undergo elective diagnostic angiography into two groups: a comparator group examined by means of conventional DSA using a standard care protocol (Siemens Artis Zee, Extremities Care setting, 1.2 µGy/frame) (Group B) and a study group examined by means of DVA using a low-dose protocol (0.36 µGy/frame corresponding to 70% decrease of radiation dose) (Group A). During each procedure the investigators record radiation exposure (cumulative dosage, dose area product) and contrast media usage and procedural time then compare the results of the groups. Qualitative image review is done to compare conventional DSA and reduced radiation exposure DVA images after image acquisition. Our hypothesis is that with the previously proven non-inferior image quality, the investigators will be able to reduce radiation exposure of the participants and also staff members in everyday clinical practice.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peripheral Arterial Disease, Peripheral Artery Disease, Femoral Artery Stenosis, Femoral Artery Occlusion, Popliteal Stenosis, Iliac Artery Stenosis, Crural Artery Thrombosis, Limb Ischemia
Keywords
Radiation protection, X-ray angiography, Digital Variance Angiography, Digital Subtraction Angiography, Peripheral Arterial Disease, Kinepict, Image acquistion, Image quality, Radiation exposure

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
All enrolled participants will undergo a diagnostic lower limb angiography, but the image acquisition protocol will be different. In the active comparator group a normal radiation dose will be used and the DSA images will be used for diagnosis whereas in the experimental group a low dose radiation will be applied (70% decrease compared tot he DSA protocol) and the DVA images will be used for diagnosis.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
114 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group A: Low-dose DVA group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Image acquisition at a reduced X-ray dose, 0.36 µGy/frame (70% reduction) image processing by DVA
Arm Title
Group B: Normal-dose DSA group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Image acquisition at a normal dose (1.2 µGy/frame) image processing by DSA
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Diagnostic Angiography (DSA or DVA based on randomization result)
Intervention Description
After radial/brachial/femoral artery puncture using Seldinger technique, the investigators first position a pigtail catheter above the level of the renal arteries. With Siemens Artis Zee Pure DSA machine the examiner will use a postero-anterior X-ray view for the first image, which is an aortography of some part of the iliac system. Then, the catheter will be repositioned to the aortic bifurcation and 15-18 mL contrast media (CM) with 9-10 mL/s flow for the ilio-femoral region will be injected. All of the following image series will be made from this catheter position, with a 9 mL/s flow rate. In cases for when the recorded image series will be inconclusive, image series with left/right oblique position will be recorded. All femoro-popliteal images will be recorded with 10-16 ml CM and crural regions with 12-22mml. DSA images will be calculated from all series on a dedicated Syngo workstation and used for diagnosis. DVA images will be calculated by the Kinepict Medical Imaging Tool
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Total procedural Dose-area product(DAP)
Description
Indicator of a patient's irradiation dosage (microGy*cm2 or Gy*cm2)
Time Frame
During the procedure
Title
Total DSA-related DAP
Description
Radiation load of the patient during DSA image acquistion (microGy*cm2 or Gy*cm2)
Time Frame
During the procedure
Title
Image quality review
Description
Blinded, anonymised and randomised qualitative review and comparison of images by multiple endovascular specialists in multiple regions using a 1-5 Likert-scale for each image. Region specific scores are compared between DSA and DVA technique.
Time Frame
Upon completion of enrollment, approximately 1-year period
Title
TASC classification
Description
Blinded, anonymised and randomised review of images by multiple endovascular specialists. Clinically relevant sides for each patient are reviewed in a separate questionnaire: each reviewer have to classify each patient's angiographic image according to the Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document's second version.
Time Frame
Upon completion of enrollment, approximately 1-year period
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Contrast media usage
Description
The volume of the iodinated contrast agent used for enhancing the image quality (mL)
Time Frame
During the procedure
Title
Number of protocol change
Description
The number of occasions when the reduced radiation level protocol has to be switched back to conventional protocol in one region because of unsuitable image quality.
Time Frame
During the procedure
Title
Procedure time
Description
Duration of the whole procedure, from radial artery puncture till the removal of every tool (min).
Time Frame
During the procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with lower limb peripheral arterial disease, admitted for diagnostic angiography Fontaine II- IV Normal renal function: GFR> 60ml/min/m2 Age > 18 Exclusion Criteria: Acute myocardial infarction Severe heart/liver/renal failure Iodine contrast allergy Atrioventricular block Coagulopathy and Hematological Bleeding Disorders
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Krisztián Szigeti, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Kinepict Health Ltd.
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Szabolcs Osváth, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Kinepict Health Ltd.
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
János Kiss, M.D.,Ph.D.,D.Sc.
Organizational Affiliation
Kinepict Health Ltd.
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Semmelweis University, Heart and Vascular Center
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1122
Country
Hungary

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30829769
Citation
Orias VI, Gyano M, Gog I, Szollosi D, Veres DS, Nagy Z, Csobay-Novak C, Zoltan O, Kiss JP, Osvath S, Szigeti K, Zoltan R, Sotonyi P. Digital Variance Angiography as a Paradigm Shift in Carbon Dioxide Angiography. Invest Radiol. 2019 Jul;54(7):428-436. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000555.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30325284
Citation
Gyano M, Gog I, Orias VI, Ruzsa Z, Nemes B, Csobay-Novak C, Olah Z, Nagy Z, Merkely B, Szigeti K, Osvath S, Sotonyi P. Kinetic Imaging in Lower Extremity Arteriography: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography. Radiology. 2019 Jan;290(1):246-253. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172927. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://kinepict.com
Description
Homepage for the Kinepict scientific group, source for additional information about digital variance angiography

Learn more about this trial

Digital Variance Angiography in Diagnostic Angiographies for Effective Radiation Dose Reduction

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs