Effect of a Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program
Primary Purpose
Compassion Fatigue
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program (CFRP)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Compassion Fatigue focused on measuring Oncology-hematology nurses, compassion fatigue, burnout, compassion satisfaction, perceived stress, resilience
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Nurses working in inpatient oncology-hematology, outpatient chemotherapy, or BMT unit Exclusion criteria
- Providing care for pediatric oncology patients
- Being a nurse manager
- Not providing direct patient care
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
Short-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program
Long-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program
Control
Arm Description
Experimental I received a short-term program (five hours per day for two days, ten hours in total).
Experimental II received a long-term program (five weeks, two hours per week, ten hours in total).
No intervention was applied to the control group.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Professional Quality of Life Scale-IV (ProQoL), "change" is being assessed.
Professional Quality of Life Scale-IV (ProQoL): It is a self-reporting instrument consisting of thirty items and three subscales: Compassion Fatigue (CF), Sompassion Satisfaction (CS), and burnout. The scale has no total score. Each subscale is evaluated separately.
Scores above 17 indicate high CF levels while scores below 8 indicate low,
Scores below 18 indicate low burnout levels while scores above 27 indicate high
Scores above 42 indicate high CS levels while those below 33 indicate low
Perceived Stress Scale, "change" is being assessed.
Perceived Stress Scale: The lowest possible score is 0 and the highest is 40. A high total score is considered a high level of perceived stress.
Resilience Scale for Adults, "change" is being assessed.
Resilience Scale for Adults: a lowest possible score of 33 and a highest of 165. A high total score is considered a high level of resilience.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04372303
Brief Title
Effect of a Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program
Official Title
Effect of a Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program on Nurses' Professional Quality of Life, Perceived Stress, Resilience: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 8, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 8, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 8, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Koc University Hospital
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study aimed to conduct a short- and long-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program and compare its impact on nurses' professional quality of life, perceived stress and resilience. The research was conducted between January 2017 and January 2019 as a randomized controlled trial. The sample comprised 125 oncology-hematology nurses randomly assigned to a Experimental I (short-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program), Experimental II (long-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program) or control group. Data was collected using Personal Information Form, Professional Quality of Life Scale-IV (ProQOL-IV), Perceived Stress Scale, and Resilience Scale for Adults. Measurements were obtained during pre- and post-test and at three-, six- and twelve-month follow-ups. Research hypotheses were analyzed using multilevel models.
Detailed Description
The research was conducted with nurses from the oncology-hematology inpatient services, outpatient chemotherapy units and bone marrow transplant (BMT) units of three private hospitals in Istanbul between January 2017 and January 2019. No sample selection models were applied, and out of 153 nurses working in these services, 125 nurses meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Nurses were randomly assigned to the Experimental I, Experimental II, or control group in order to prevent interaction between the subjects working in the same hospital. Of the nurses, 34 completed the short-term program (Experimental I), 49 completed the long-term (Experimental II), and 42 were assigned to the control group.
Data collection: Data was collected using Personal Information Form, Professional Quality of Life Scale-IV (ProQOL-IV), Perceived Stress Scale, and Resilience Scale for Adults Study procedure This study's principal investigator had participated online in a CFRP, developed by Eric Gentry (Licensed Mental Health Counselor) (2002), and received the certificate, and then conducted the program with the nurses. Meetings were held with each institution's directorate of nursing services to determine the training schedules and content. The schedules were planned in accordance with the hospital administration's preferences and by taking nurses' busy schedules into consideration. Preliminary tests were applied to Experimental I, Experiment II, and the control group before the training. Experimental I received a short-term program (five hours per day for two days, ten hours in total) while Experimental II received a long-term one (five weeks, two hours per week, ten hours in total). No intervention was applied to the control group. After the training, a post-test, and three-, six-, and twelve-month follow-up assessments were conducted for all groups.
Program Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program The purpose of the program: The purpose of the program is to provide oncology-hematology nurses with knowledge and skills that will increase their level of resilience by helping them recognize compassion fatigue, cope with its consequences and work effectively.
The objectives of the training program
Nurses, who successfully complete the program will be able to:
Explain the historical development of compassion fatigue among caregivers,
Define the developmental process of compassion fatigue,
Specify the risk factors for compassion fatigue,
Explain the symptoms of compassion fatigue,
Raise awareness about their personal history,
Explain the concept of stress and its impact on the body,
Apply compassion fatigue resilience skills acquired in the program,
Professionally create a self-directed resilience plan. Validity and reliability/Rigour The included scales have been tested for validity and reliability for various settings and countries. The investigators chose three private hospitals in Istanbul, which are considered to be close to each other, such as institution (etc. working conditions) and the sociodemographic and professional characteristics of nurses (etc. age, educational status, clinical experience, willingness to work in oncology, voluntarily career choice) that are known to affect dependent variables. Then, the investigators randomly assigned each hospital to the Experimental I, Experimental II, or control group in order to prevent interaction between the nurses working in the same hospital. Finally, the program was conducted by the principal investigator who had participated online in a CFRP, and received the certificate.
Data analysis: SPSS 25.0 software package was used to analyze data. A chi-square test and one-way ANOVA determined whether the scales and information on demographic characteristics and work environment differed among pre-initiative groups; in other words, to measure homogeneity. Variables found to be statistically significant were included in the model as a correction factor for primary hypotheses. Primary research hypotheses were analyzed using multilevel models (MLM). This analysis method has some advantages over others, such as repeated measures ANOVA.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Compassion Fatigue
Keywords
Oncology-hematology nurses, compassion fatigue, burnout, compassion satisfaction, perceived stress, resilience
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
125 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Short-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Experimental I received a short-term program (five hours per day for two days, ten hours in total).
Arm Title
Long-term Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Experimental II received a long-term program (five weeks, two hours per week, ten hours in total).
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
No intervention was applied to the control group.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program (CFRP)
Intervention Description
The purpose of Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program (CFRP) is to provide oncology-hematology nurses with knowledge and skills that will increase their level of resilience by helping them recognize compassion fatigue, cope with its consequences and work effectively.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Professional Quality of Life Scale-IV (ProQoL), "change" is being assessed.
Description
Professional Quality of Life Scale-IV (ProQoL): It is a self-reporting instrument consisting of thirty items and three subscales: Compassion Fatigue (CF), Sompassion Satisfaction (CS), and burnout. The scale has no total score. Each subscale is evaluated separately.
Scores above 17 indicate high CF levels while scores below 8 indicate low,
Scores below 18 indicate low burnout levels while scores above 27 indicate high
Scores above 42 indicate high CS levels while those below 33 indicate low
Time Frame
Change from Baseline up to 1 year
Title
Perceived Stress Scale, "change" is being assessed.
Description
Perceived Stress Scale: The lowest possible score is 0 and the highest is 40. A high total score is considered a high level of perceived stress.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline up to 1 year
Title
Resilience Scale for Adults, "change" is being assessed.
Description
Resilience Scale for Adults: a lowest possible score of 33 and a highest of 165. A high total score is considered a high level of resilience.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline up to 1 year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria
Nurses working in inpatient oncology-hematology, outpatient chemotherapy, or BMT unit Exclusion criteria
Providing care for pediatric oncology patients
Being a nurse manager
Not providing direct patient care
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
No, because hospitals told us, the investigators have to keep secret their nurses individual data.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23803277
Citation
Traeger L, Park ER, Sporn N, Repper-DeLisi J, Convery MS, Jacobo M, Pirl WF. Development and evaluation of targeted psychological skills training for oncology nurses in managing stressful patient and family encounters. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Jul;40(4):E327-36. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.E327-E336.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23294820
Citation
Tarantino B, Earley M, Audia D, D'Adamo C, Berman B. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of a pilot integrative coping and resiliency program for healthcare professionals. Explore (NY). 2013 Jan-Feb;9(1):44-7. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2012.10.002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25694849
Citation
Deible S, Fioravanti M, Tarantino B, Cohen S. Implementation of an integrative coping and resiliency program for nurses. Glob Adv Health Med. 2015 Jan;4(1):28-33. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2014.057.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26330434
Citation
Rushton CH, Batcheller J, Schroeder K, Donohue P. Burnout and Resilience Among Nurses Practicing in High-Intensity Settings. Am J Crit Care. 2015 Sep;24(5):412-20. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015291.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
6668417
Citation
Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983 Dec;24(4):385-96. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16097398
Citation
Friborg O, Barlaug D, Martinussen M, Rosenvinge JH, Hjemdal O. Resilience in relation to personality and intelligence. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2005;14(1):29-42. doi: 10.1002/mpr.15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33009840
Citation
Pehlivan T, Guner P. Effect of a compassion fatigue resiliency program on nurses' professional quality of life, perceived stress, resilience: A randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs. 2020 Dec;76(12):3584-3596. doi: 10.1111/jan.14568. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32627860
Citation
Kunzler AM, Helmreich I, Chmitorz A, Konig J, Binder H, Wessa M, Lieb K. Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 5;7(7):CD012527. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012527.pub2.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Effect of a Compassion Fatigue Resiliency Program
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs