search
Back to results

Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety of Electroducer Sleeve Medical Device for Temporary Cardiac Stimulation During Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, in All Kind of Patients

Primary Purpose

Coronary Disease, Valve Heart Disease, Pacemaker DDD

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Electroducer Sleeve
Sponsored by
Electroducer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Coronary Disease

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 99 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients ≥ 18 years old
  • Patients with a percutaneous cardiovascular intervention indication, requiring temporary cardiac stimulation
  • Procedure carried out with a 6Fr TERUMO introducer ≥ 65 mm
  • Procedure performed by femoral or radial routes
  • Patients able to understand and provide informed consent
  • Patients able to perform the planned follow-up visit one month after the procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring a definitive PM
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Patiens under judicial protection, tutorship or curatorship
  • Negative Allen test or absence of radial pulse in the artery or vein used for intervention
  • Patient participating in another interventional clinical trial.

Sites / Locations

  • GHMG

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Radial group

femoral group

Arm Description

Use of Electroducer Sleeve on radial route

Use of Electroducer Sleeve on femoral route

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

To assess the peri procedural safety of ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE device used for temporary cardiac pacing during percutaneous cardiovascular interventions, by radial and femoral routes of access.
The device safety is assessed through the occurrence of bleeding complications at the access site where the ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE was used, including: Hematoma formation (EASY Classification) and Access-site Bleeding (BARC classification).

Secondary Outcome Measures

To evaluate the occurrence of Radial Artery Occlusion
RAO evaluated by a radial artery Doppler and by a reverse Allen test
To evaluate the occurrence of allergic or adverse tissue reactions
Outcome evaluated through the clinical examination of the puncture site.
To establish the efficacy of the ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE device
Outcome evaluated through the capture in the surface electrocardiogram : each spike delivered on the guidewire is follow by its hemodynamic effect.
To evaluate the performance of the ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE device
Performance evaluated through the stimulation threshold (mA) measured with the external pacemaker
To evaluate the impact of the ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE use on the TAVI procedure duration.
Procedure duration is defined between the first vascular puncture and the last introducer removal and compared to the EASY TAVI study data
To evaluate the patient comfort with ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE use
Confort evaluated using the "Echelle Visuelle Analogique de la douleur" from 0 to 10: 0 being the absence of pain and 10 being unbearable pain.
To assess the user's overall impression of the ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE device and use.
Outcome evaluated by a satisfaction questionnaire developed by Electroducer, composed of four questions and a free comment section.

Full Information

First Posted
April 28, 2020
Last Updated
February 26, 2021
Sponsor
Electroducer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04372654
Brief Title
Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety of Electroducer Sleeve Medical Device for Temporary Cardiac Stimulation During Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, in All Kind of Patients
Official Title
Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety of Electroducer Sleeve Medical Device for Temporary Cardiac Stimulation During Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, in All Kind of Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 28, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 25, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 22, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Electroducer

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
During percutaneous cardiovascular intervention, temporary cardiac stimulation may be required. Usually this stimulation is generated via a temporary pacing catheter. In order to reduce the complexity of the procedure, a new stimulation strategy has been developed: the "Direct Wire Pacing technique".In this approach, the cardiac stimulation is provided via the guidewire connected to an external pacemaker. Previous study demonstrated the superiority of the new technique compared to the former. However this technique is likely to generate electrical pain, risk of bleeding for the patient and risk of blood exposure accident for the operators. This is why the medical device ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE has been developed. This device integrates a pacing function to the introducer and the guidewire used. The "Direct Wire Pacing technique" is simplified, secured and more reproducible.
Detailed Description
During percutaneous cardiovascular interventions such as Transcatheter Heart Valve or coronary intervention, temporary cardiac stimulation may be required. Usually this stimulation is generated via a temporary pacing catheter in the right ventricle. This procedure requires an additional venous access and the insertion of the stimulation catheter, which are both likely to generate complications. In order to reduce the complexity and increase the safety of the procedure, a new stimulation strategy has been developed: the "Direct Wire Pacing technique". In this approach, the specific venous access and the implantation of a stimulation catheter are avoided. The cardiac stimulation is provided via the guidewire inserted into the left ventricle or into the coronary arteries. This guidewire is connected to an external Pacemaker using an alligator clamp (Cathode). The Pacemaker anode is also connected using a clamp attached to a needle piercing the subcutaneous tissue, obtaining a closed electrical circuit. This technique was validated during previous studies in the TAVI context through two registries and one randomized controlled trial. This study demonstrated the superiority of the new technique by showing a reduction of the procedural duration, radiation exposure and costs; with similar efficacy and safety. However the subcutaneous needle insertion is likely to generate electrical pain, risk of bleeding for the patient and risk of blood exposure accident for the operators. This subcutaneous anode increases the stimulation threshold (mA) which can cause stimulation failures. Moreover, several technical difficulties preclude general adoption by the scientific community. This is why the medical device ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE has been developed. This device integrates a pacing function to the introducer and the guidewire used during percutaneous cardiovascular interventions. The guidewire then behaves like an intra-cardiac cathode. Thanks to the device, the complex manipulation of needles and clamps during the intervention are avoided as well as pole inversions. The "Direct Wire Pacing technique" used during the coronary and structural interventions is thus simplified, secured and more reproducible.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Disease, Valve Heart Disease, Pacemaker DDD

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Pilot, prospective, multicenter, non-comparative study in 60 patients with a percutaneous cardiovascular intervention indication which requires temporary cardiac stimulation.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Radial group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Use of Electroducer Sleeve on radial route
Arm Title
femoral group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Use of Electroducer Sleeve on femoral route
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Electroducer Sleeve
Intervention Description
The device's safety will be assessed at the radial and femoral puncture site
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To assess the peri procedural safety of ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE device used for temporary cardiac pacing during percutaneous cardiovascular interventions, by radial and femoral routes of access.
Description
The device safety is assessed through the occurrence of bleeding complications at the access site where the ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE was used, including: Hematoma formation (EASY Classification) and Access-site Bleeding (BARC classification).
Time Frame
during intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To evaluate the occurrence of Radial Artery Occlusion
Description
RAO evaluated by a radial artery Doppler and by a reverse Allen test
Time Frame
at discharge and 1 month
Title
To evaluate the occurrence of allergic or adverse tissue reactions
Description
Outcome evaluated through the clinical examination of the puncture site.
Time Frame
at discharge and 1 month
Title
To establish the efficacy of the ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE device
Description
Outcome evaluated through the capture in the surface electrocardiogram : each spike delivered on the guidewire is follow by its hemodynamic effect.
Time Frame
during intervention
Title
To evaluate the performance of the ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE device
Description
Performance evaluated through the stimulation threshold (mA) measured with the external pacemaker
Time Frame
during intervention
Title
To evaluate the impact of the ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE use on the TAVI procedure duration.
Description
Procedure duration is defined between the first vascular puncture and the last introducer removal and compared to the EASY TAVI study data
Time Frame
during intervention
Title
To evaluate the patient comfort with ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE use
Description
Confort evaluated using the "Echelle Visuelle Analogique de la douleur" from 0 to 10: 0 being the absence of pain and 10 being unbearable pain.
Time Frame
during intervention
Title
To assess the user's overall impression of the ELECTRODUCER SLEEVE device and use.
Description
Outcome evaluated by a satisfaction questionnaire developed by Electroducer, composed of four questions and a free comment section.
Time Frame
during intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
99 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients ≥ 18 years old Patients with a percutaneous cardiovascular intervention indication, requiring temporary cardiac stimulation Procedure carried out with a 6Fr TERUMO introducer ≥ 65 mm Procedure performed by femoral or radial routes Patients able to understand and provide informed consent Patients able to perform the planned follow-up visit one month after the procedure. Exclusion Criteria: Patients requiring a definitive PM Pregnant or breastfeeding woman Patiens under judicial protection, tutorship or curatorship Negative Allen test or absence of radial pulse in the artery or vein used for intervention Patient participating in another interventional clinical trial.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GHMG
City
Grenoble
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Pilot Study Evaluating the Safety of Electroducer Sleeve Medical Device for Temporary Cardiac Stimulation During Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions, in All Kind of Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs