search
Back to results

Comparison of the Efficacy of Boric Acid Mouthwashes in Different Concentrations

Primary Purpose

Impacted Third Molar Tooth

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Turkey
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Chlorhexidine mouthwash
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (0.1%)
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (0.5%)
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (1%)
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (1.5%)
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (2%)
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (2.5%)
Boric acid mouthwash (2%)
Sponsored by
Yuzuncu Yıl University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Impacted Third Molar Tooth focused on measuring postoperative complications, impacted tooth, mouthwash, boric acid, chlorhexidine

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 40 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • absence of any systemic disease
  • having impacted mandibular third molar teeth in a similar position
  • absence of allergy to any of the drugs used in the study,
  • absence of pregnancy/lactating state,
  • no history of any medication use during at least 2 week before the operation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not regularly coming to the controls,
  • not using their medicines regularly
  • using any additional medication that may affect the outcome of the study

Sites / Locations

  • Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Dentistry

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm 7

Arm 8

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Chlorhexidine gluconate

Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (0.1%)

Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (0.5%)

Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (1%)

Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (1.5%)

Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (2%)

Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (2.5%)

Boric acid mouthwash (2%)

Arm Description

Chlorhexidine is one of the most commonly used medications after tooth extraction. It exhibits a wide spectrum of antiseptic, bactericidal and bacteriostatic effects.

Due to its antibacterial properties, boric acid is effective on gram (+) and gram (-) microorganisms such as candida albicans, streptococcus mutans, staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis, enterococcus faesium, escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumonia and pseudomonas aeruginosa. With these features, it is used in periodontology, endodontics and restorative therapy as a antiseptic.

Due to its antibacterial properties, boric acid is effective on gram (+) and gram (-) microorganisms such as candida albicans, streptococcus mutans, staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis, enterococcus faesium, escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumonia and pseudomonas aeruginosa. With these features, it is used in periodontology, endodontics and restorative therapy as a antiseptic.

Due to its antibacterial properties, boric acid is effective on gram (+) and gram (-) microorganisms such as candida albicans, streptococcus mutans, staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis, enterococcus faesium, escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumonia and pseudomonas aeruginosa. With these features, it is used in periodontology, endodontics and restorative therapy as a antiseptic.

Due to its antibacterial properties, boric acid is effective on gram (+) and gram (-) microorganisms such as candida albicans, streptococcus mutans, staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis, enterococcus faesium, escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumonia and pseudomonas aeruginosa. With these features, it is used in periodontology, endodontics and restorative therapy as a antiseptic.

Due to its antibacterial properties, boric acid is effective on gram (+) and gram (-) microorganisms such as candida albicans, streptococcus mutans, staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis, enterococcus faesium, escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumonia and pseudomonas aeruginosa. With these features, it is used in periodontology, endodontics and restorative therapy as a antiseptic.

Due to its antibacterial properties, boric acid is effective on gram (+) and gram (-) microorganisms such as candida albicans, streptococcus mutans, staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis, enterococcus faesium, escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumonia and pseudomonas aeruginosa. With these features, it is used in periodontology, endodontics and restorative therapy as a antiseptic.

Due to its antibacterial properties, boric acid is effective on gram (+) and gram (-) microorganisms such as candida albicans, streptococcus mutans, staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis, enterococcus faesium, escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumonia and pseudomonas aeruginosa. With these features, it is used in periodontology, endodontics and restorative therapy as a antiseptic.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Postoperative Pain
In order to evaluate the postoperative pain, a seven-day scheduled pain diary was given to the patients. To record the level of pain, patients were instructed to rate it on a 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was used wherein 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Postoperative Swelling
Facial swelling was assessed using thread and millimeter ruler and five following measurements were taken: Distance I (from angle of the mandible to labial commissure); Distance II (from angle of the mandible to nasal border); Distance III (from angle of the mandible to external corner of the eye); Distance IV (from angle of the mandible to tragus) and Distance V (from angle of the mandible to soft pogonion).
Postoperative Trismus
The maximum mouth opening (MMO) was measured in millimeters with a caliper from the incisal edge of the right upper and lower incisor teeth. For evaluation of trismus, the percentage of difference in MMO during postoperative period was calculated by subtracting the preoperative measurement from the postoperative measurement then divided by the preoperative measurement and multiplied by 100.
Postoperative Pain
In order to evaluate the postoperative pain, a seven-day scheduled pain diary was given to the patients. To record the level of pain, patients were instructed to rate it on a 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was used wherein 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Postoperative Pain
In order to evaluate the postoperative pain, a seven-day scheduled pain diary was given to the patients. To record the level of pain, patients were instructed to rate it on a 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was used wherein 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Postoperative Swelling
Facial swelling was assessed using thread and millimeter ruler and five following measurements were taken: Distance I (from angle of the mandible to labial commissure); Distance II (from angle of the mandible to nasal border); Distance III (from angle of the mandible to external corner of the eye); Distance IV (from angle of the mandible to tragus) and Distance V (from angle of the mandible to soft pogonion).
Postoperative Trismus
The maximum mouth opening (MMO) was measured in millimeters with a caliper from the incisal edge of the right upper and lower incisor teeth. For evaluation of trismus, the percentage of difference in MMO during postoperative period was calculated by subtracting the preoperative measurement from the postoperative measurement then divided by the preoperative measurement and multiplied by 100.
Postoperative Pain
In order to evaluate the postoperative pain, a seven-day scheduled pain diary was given to the patients. To record the level of pain, patients were instructed to rate it on a 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was used wherein 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Postoperative Pain
In order to evaluate the postoperative pain, a seven-day scheduled pain diary was given to the patients. To record the level of pain, patients were instructed to rate it on a 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was used wherein 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Postoperative Pain
In order to evaluate the postoperative pain, a seven-day scheduled pain diary was given to the patients. To record the level of pain, patients were instructed to rate it on a 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was used wherein 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Postoperative Pain
In order to evaluate the postoperative pain, a seven-day scheduled pain diary was given to the patients. To record the level of pain, patients were instructed to rate it on a 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was used wherein 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Postoperative Swelling
Facial swelling was assessed using thread and millimeter ruler and five following measurements were taken: Distance I (from angle of the mandible to labial commissure); Distance II (from angle of the mandible to nasal border); Distance III (from angle of the mandible to external corner of the eye); Distance IV (from angle of the mandible to tragus) and Distance V (from angle of the mandible to soft pogonion).
Postoperative Trismus
The maximum mouth opening (MMO) was measured in millimeters with a caliper from the incisal edge of the right upper and lower incisor teeth. For evaluation of trismus, the percentage of difference in MMO during postoperative period was calculated by subtracting the preoperative measurement from the postoperative measurement then divided by the preoperative measurement and multiplied by 100.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
May 2, 2020
Last Updated
August 20, 2023
Sponsor
Yuzuncu Yıl University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04376268
Brief Title
Comparison of the Efficacy of Boric Acid Mouthwashes in Different Concentrations
Official Title
Comparison of the Efficacy of Boric Acid Mouthwashes in Different Concentrations in the Lower Third Molar Surgery in the Postoperative Period
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
January 15, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 15, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 15, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Yuzuncu Yıl University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Surgical removal of impacted third molars is one of the most frequent procedures carried out in the oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics. There are a varying range of postoperative complications including pain, edema and swelling. Antibiotics, analgesics and mouthwashes are usually prescribed for the treatment of these complications. Patients undergoing impacted third molar surgery are frequently prescribed chlorhexidine mouthwashes with/without benzydamine hydrochloride. However, there has been a search for alternatives with anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and analgesic properties as part of the oral care routine following surgical removal of impacted third molars. Thus, this multicenter study was aimed to evaluate the effects of chlorhexidine mouthwashes with different boric acid concentrations (%0.1, %0.5, %1, %1.5, %2 and %2.5), and boric acid mouthwash on the postoperative complications and compared with chlorhexidine mouthwash after the removal of impacted wisdom teeth.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Impacted Third Molar Tooth
Keywords
postoperative complications, impacted tooth, mouthwash, boric acid, chlorhexidine

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
80 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Chlorhexidine gluconate
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Chlorhexidine is one of the most commonly used medications after tooth extraction. It exhibits a wide spectrum of antiseptic, bactericidal and bacteriostatic effects.
Arm Title
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (0.1%)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Due to its antibacterial properties, boric acid is effective on gram (+) and gram (-) microorganisms such as candida albicans, streptococcus mutans, staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis, enterococcus faesium, escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumonia and pseudomonas aeruginosa. With these features, it is used in periodontology, endodontics and restorative therapy as a antiseptic.
Arm Title
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (0.5%)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Due to its antibacterial properties, boric acid is effective on gram (+) and gram (-) microorganisms such as candida albicans, streptococcus mutans, staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis, enterococcus faesium, escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumonia and pseudomonas aeruginosa. With these features, it is used in periodontology, endodontics and restorative therapy as a antiseptic.
Arm Title
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (1%)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Due to its antibacterial properties, boric acid is effective on gram (+) and gram (-) microorganisms such as candida albicans, streptococcus mutans, staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis, enterococcus faesium, escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumonia and pseudomonas aeruginosa. With these features, it is used in periodontology, endodontics and restorative therapy as a antiseptic.
Arm Title
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (1.5%)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Due to its antibacterial properties, boric acid is effective on gram (+) and gram (-) microorganisms such as candida albicans, streptococcus mutans, staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis, enterococcus faesium, escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumonia and pseudomonas aeruginosa. With these features, it is used in periodontology, endodontics and restorative therapy as a antiseptic.
Arm Title
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (2%)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Due to its antibacterial properties, boric acid is effective on gram (+) and gram (-) microorganisms such as candida albicans, streptococcus mutans, staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis, enterococcus faesium, escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumonia and pseudomonas aeruginosa. With these features, it is used in periodontology, endodontics and restorative therapy as a antiseptic.
Arm Title
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (2.5%)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Due to its antibacterial properties, boric acid is effective on gram (+) and gram (-) microorganisms such as candida albicans, streptococcus mutans, staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis, enterococcus faesium, escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumonia and pseudomonas aeruginosa. With these features, it is used in periodontology, endodontics and restorative therapy as a antiseptic.
Arm Title
Boric acid mouthwash (2%)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Due to its antibacterial properties, boric acid is effective on gram (+) and gram (-) microorganisms such as candida albicans, streptococcus mutans, staphylococcus aureus, enterococcus faecalis, enterococcus faesium, escherichia coli, klebsiella pneumonia and pseudomonas aeruginosa. With these features, it is used in periodontology, endodontics and restorative therapy as a antiseptic.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Chlorhexidine mouthwash
Other Intervention Name(s)
Kloroben Oral Rinse
Intervention Description
After anesthesia, the horizontal incision was made with no. 15 scalpel blade and a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was raised. In all surgical procedures, bone removal and/or tooth sectioning were performed under abundant irrigation. Following the extraction, granulation tissues were removed, and post extraction cavity was irrigated with sterile 0.9% saline solution. After the bleeding was controlled, the mucoperiosteal flap was repositioned by 3.0 silk sutures. The patients were postoperatively prescribed paracetamol (Parol® 500 mg, Atabay Chemical Industry, Istanbul, Turkey) to use when required with a maximum of 4 doses per day. Patients were instructed to maintain a soft diet, and refrain from mouth washing, brushing and flossing during the first 24 hour. They were also instructed to rinse their mouth with 15 ml of mouthwash for 30 seconds, 3 times a day, and continue until the 7th postoperative day.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (0.1%)
Intervention Description
After anesthesia, the horizontal incision was made with no. 15 scalpel blade and a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was raised. In all surgical procedures, bone removal and/or tooth sectioning were performed under abundant irrigation. Following the extraction, granulation tissues were removed, and post extraction cavity was irrigated with sterile 0.9% saline solution. After the bleeding was controlled, the mucoperiosteal flap was repositioned by 3.0 silk sutures. The patients were postoperatively prescribed paracetamol (Parol® 500 mg, Atabay Chemical Industry, Istanbul, Turkey) to use when required with a maximum of 4 doses per day. Patients were instructed to maintain a soft diet, and refrain from mouth washing, brushing and flossing during the first 24 hour. They were also instructed to rinse their mouth with 15 ml of mouthwash for 30 seconds, 3 times a day, and continue until the 7th postoperative day.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (0.5%)
Intervention Description
After anesthesia, the horizontal incision was made with no. 15 scalpel blade and a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was raised. In all surgical procedures, bone removal and/or tooth sectioning were performed under abundant irrigation. Following the extraction, granulation tissues were removed, and post extraction cavity was irrigated with sterile 0.9% saline solution. After the bleeding was controlled, the mucoperiosteal flap was repositioned by 3.0 silk sutures. The patients were postoperatively prescribed paracetamol (Parol® 500 mg, Atabay Chemical Industry, Istanbul, Turkey) to use when required with a maximum of 4 doses per day. Patients were instructed to maintain a soft diet, and refrain from mouth washing, brushing and flossing during the first 24 hour. They were also instructed to rinse their mouth with 15 ml of mouthwash for 30 seconds, 3 times a day, and continue until the 7th postoperative day.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (1%)
Intervention Description
After anesthesia, the horizontal incision was made with no. 15 scalpel blade and a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was raised. In all surgical procedures, bone removal and/or tooth sectioning were performed under abundant irrigation. Following the extraction, granulation tissues were removed, and post extraction cavity was irrigated with sterile 0.9% saline solution. After the bleeding was controlled, the mucoperiosteal flap was repositioned by 3.0 silk sutures. The patients were postoperatively prescribed paracetamol (Parol® 500 mg, Atabay Chemical Industry, Istanbul, Turkey) to use when required with a maximum of 4 doses per day. Patients were instructed to maintain a soft diet, and refrain from mouth washing, brushing and flossing during the first 24 hour. They were also instructed to rinse their mouth with 15 ml of mouthwash for 30 seconds, 3 times a day, and continue until the 7th postoperative day.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (1.5%)
Intervention Description
After anesthesia, the horizontal incision was made with no. 15 scalpel blade and a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was raised. In all surgical procedures, bone removal and/or tooth sectioning were performed under abundant irrigation. Following the extraction, granulation tissues were removed, and post extraction cavity was irrigated with sterile 0.9% saline solution. After the bleeding was controlled, the mucoperiosteal flap was repositioned by 3.0 silk sutures. The patients were postoperatively prescribed paracetamol (Parol® 500 mg, Atabay Chemical Industry, Istanbul, Turkey) to use when required with a maximum of 4 doses per day. Patients were instructed to maintain a soft diet, and refrain from mouth washing, brushing and flossing during the first 24 hour. They were also instructed to rinse their mouth with 15 ml of mouthwash for 30 seconds, 3 times a day, and continue until the 7th postoperative day.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (2%)
Intervention Description
After anesthesia, the horizontal incision was made with no. 15 scalpel blade and a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was raised. In all surgical procedures, bone removal and/or tooth sectioning were performed under abundant irrigation. Following the extraction, granulation tissues were removed, and post extraction cavity was irrigated with sterile 0.9% saline solution. After the bleeding was controlled, the mucoperiosteal flap was repositioned by 3.0 silk sutures. The patients were postoperatively prescribed paracetamol (Parol® 500 mg, Atabay Chemical Industry, Istanbul, Turkey) to use when required with a maximum of 4 doses per day. Patients were instructed to maintain a soft diet, and refrain from mouth washing, brushing and flossing during the first 24 hour. They were also instructed to rinse their mouth with 15 ml of mouthwash for 30 seconds, 3 times a day, and continue until the 7th postoperative day.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Chlorhexidine mouthwash with boric acid (2.5%)
Intervention Description
After anesthesia, the horizontal incision was made with no. 15 scalpel blade and a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was raised. In all surgical procedures, bone removal and/or tooth sectioning were performed under abundant irrigation. Following the extraction, granulation tissues were removed, and post extraction cavity was irrigated with sterile 0.9% saline solution. After the bleeding was controlled, the mucoperiosteal flap was repositioned by 3.0 silk sutures. The patients were postoperatively prescribed paracetamol (Parol® 500 mg, Atabay Chemical Industry, Istanbul, Turkey) to use when required with a maximum of 4 doses per day. Patients were instructed to maintain a soft diet, and refrain from mouth washing, brushing and flossing during the first 24 hour. They were also instructed to rinse their mouth with 15 ml of mouthwash for 30 seconds, 3 times a day, and continue until the 7th postoperative day.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Boric acid mouthwash (2%)
Intervention Description
After anesthesia, the horizontal incision was made with no. 15 scalpel blade and a full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was raised. In all surgical procedures, bone removal and/or tooth sectioning were performed under abundant irrigation. Following the extraction, granulation tissues were removed, and post extraction cavity was irrigated with sterile 0.9% saline solution. After the bleeding was controlled, the mucoperiosteal flap was repositioned by 3.0 silk sutures. The patients were postoperatively prescribed paracetamol (Parol® 500 mg, Atabay Chemical Industry, Istanbul, Turkey) to use when required with a maximum of 4 doses per day. Patients were instructed to maintain a soft diet, and refrain from mouth washing, brushing and flossing during the first 24 hour. They were also instructed to rinse their mouth with 15 ml of mouthwash for 30 seconds, 3 times a day, and continue until the 7th postoperative day.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Postoperative Pain
Description
In order to evaluate the postoperative pain, a seven-day scheduled pain diary was given to the patients. To record the level of pain, patients were instructed to rate it on a 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was used wherein 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
Postoperative 1st day
Title
Postoperative Swelling
Description
Facial swelling was assessed using thread and millimeter ruler and five following measurements were taken: Distance I (from angle of the mandible to labial commissure); Distance II (from angle of the mandible to nasal border); Distance III (from angle of the mandible to external corner of the eye); Distance IV (from angle of the mandible to tragus) and Distance V (from angle of the mandible to soft pogonion).
Time Frame
Postoperatif 1st day
Title
Postoperative Trismus
Description
The maximum mouth opening (MMO) was measured in millimeters with a caliper from the incisal edge of the right upper and lower incisor teeth. For evaluation of trismus, the percentage of difference in MMO during postoperative period was calculated by subtracting the preoperative measurement from the postoperative measurement then divided by the preoperative measurement and multiplied by 100.
Time Frame
Postoperative 1st day
Title
Postoperative Pain
Description
In order to evaluate the postoperative pain, a seven-day scheduled pain diary was given to the patients. To record the level of pain, patients were instructed to rate it on a 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was used wherein 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
Postoperative 2nd day
Title
Postoperative Pain
Description
In order to evaluate the postoperative pain, a seven-day scheduled pain diary was given to the patients. To record the level of pain, patients were instructed to rate it on a 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was used wherein 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
Postoperative 3rd day
Title
Postoperative Swelling
Description
Facial swelling was assessed using thread and millimeter ruler and five following measurements were taken: Distance I (from angle of the mandible to labial commissure); Distance II (from angle of the mandible to nasal border); Distance III (from angle of the mandible to external corner of the eye); Distance IV (from angle of the mandible to tragus) and Distance V (from angle of the mandible to soft pogonion).
Time Frame
Postoperatif 3rd day
Title
Postoperative Trismus
Description
The maximum mouth opening (MMO) was measured in millimeters with a caliper from the incisal edge of the right upper and lower incisor teeth. For evaluation of trismus, the percentage of difference in MMO during postoperative period was calculated by subtracting the preoperative measurement from the postoperative measurement then divided by the preoperative measurement and multiplied by 100.
Time Frame
Postoperative 3rd day
Title
Postoperative Pain
Description
In order to evaluate the postoperative pain, a seven-day scheduled pain diary was given to the patients. To record the level of pain, patients were instructed to rate it on a 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was used wherein 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
Postoperative 4th day
Title
Postoperative Pain
Description
In order to evaluate the postoperative pain, a seven-day scheduled pain diary was given to the patients. To record the level of pain, patients were instructed to rate it on a 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was used wherein 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
Postoperative 5th day
Title
Postoperative Pain
Description
In order to evaluate the postoperative pain, a seven-day scheduled pain diary was given to the patients. To record the level of pain, patients were instructed to rate it on a 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was used wherein 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
Postoperative 6th day
Title
Postoperative Pain
Description
In order to evaluate the postoperative pain, a seven-day scheduled pain diary was given to the patients. To record the level of pain, patients were instructed to rate it on a 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS) was used wherein 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
Postoperative 7th day
Title
Postoperative Swelling
Description
Facial swelling was assessed using thread and millimeter ruler and five following measurements were taken: Distance I (from angle of the mandible to labial commissure); Distance II (from angle of the mandible to nasal border); Distance III (from angle of the mandible to external corner of the eye); Distance IV (from angle of the mandible to tragus) and Distance V (from angle of the mandible to soft pogonion).
Time Frame
Postoperatif 7th day
Title
Postoperative Trismus
Description
The maximum mouth opening (MMO) was measured in millimeters with a caliper from the incisal edge of the right upper and lower incisor teeth. For evaluation of trismus, the percentage of difference in MMO during postoperative period was calculated by subtracting the preoperative measurement from the postoperative measurement then divided by the preoperative measurement and multiplied by 100.
Time Frame
Postoperative 7th day

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: absence of any systemic disease having impacted mandibular third molar teeth in a similar position absence of allergy to any of the drugs used in the study, absence of pregnancy/lactating state, no history of any medication use during at least 2 week before the operation. Exclusion Criteria: not regularly coming to the controls, not using their medicines regularly using any additional medication that may affect the outcome of the study
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Dentistry
City
Van
ZIP/Postal Code
65080
Country
Turkey

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of the Efficacy of Boric Acid Mouthwashes in Different Concentrations

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs