Portal Vein Embolization Using Coils Plus TAGM vs Multiple Coils for Patients With Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma or Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Primary Purpose
Portal Vein Occlusion, Cholangiocarcinoma, Perihilar, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PVE with coils plus TAGM
PVE with multiple coils
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Portal Vein Occlusion focused on measuring Portal vein embolization, Trisacryl gelatin microspheres, Coils, Major hepatectomy, Liver hypertrophy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female patients > 18 years and ≤ 70 years of age.
- Diagnosis of pCCA or HCC (through imaging, serology, and/or histological biopsy)
- Performance status: Karnofsky score ≥ 70
- Candidates for right portal vein embolization for potential major hepatectomy with curative intent. Volumetric indication for PVE is less than 40% of standardized FLR.
- Selective biliary drainage on FLR side for patients with pCCA should be performed when total bilirubin level is above 85.5μmol/L or bile duct dilation of FLR presents. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization should be performed between 1 and 4 weeks before PVE for patients with HCC.
- Criteria of liver function: Child-Pugh A-B7 level, serum total bilirubin < 85.5μmol/L after biliary drainage in pCCA, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase ≤ 3 times the upper limit of normal value.
- Patients who can understand this trial and have signed the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with apparent cardiac, pulmonary, cerebral and renal dysfunction, which may affect the treatment.
- Patients with a history of any other malignant tumor, or allergic to iodine or gelatin.
- Subjects participating in other clinical trials.
- Platelet count < 80×109/L and/or moderate or severe esophageal varices.
- ICGR15 ≥ 15% for HCC patients
- Obstructive jaundice lasts for >2 months before PVE for pCCA patients.
- Tumor becomes unresectable by local progression and/or distant metastasis presents before PVE.
- Right portal vein is occluded by tumor invasion or embolus before PVE.
- Free portal vein pressure >20 mmHg or porto-hepatic vein fistula at the beginning of PVE procedure.
Sites / Locations
- Easter hepatobiliary surgery hospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
PVE with coils plus TAGM
PVE with multiple coils
Arm Description
PVE with coils proximally plus TAGM distally and subsequent major hepatectomy
PVE with multiple coils and subsequent major hepatectomy
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
PVE related morbidity
The rate of major and minor PVE-related complications
Hypertrophy degree of standardized FLR
The difference of standardized FLR ratios before and 2 weeks after PVE
Secondary Outcome Measures
Hepatectomy completion rate
The rate of completed major hepatectomy in each Arm group
Liver failure rate after major hepatectomy
The rate of liver failure measured by 50-50, TB peak 7mg, and ISGLS criteria
Immunohistochemical stainings of liver parenchyma
Immunohistochemical stainings of hypertrophic and atrophic parenchyma including anti-albumin, anti-PCNA, TUNEL staining, etc.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04386772
First Posted
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
June 15, 2020
Sponsor
Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04386772
Brief Title
Portal Vein Embolization Using Coils Plus TAGM vs Multiple Coils for Patients With Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma or Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Official Title
Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization Using Coils Plus TAGM vs Multiple Coils for Patients With Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma or Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Randomized Controlled Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
May 27, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2022 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to investigate the differences of safety and liver hypertrophy between portal vein embolization (PVE) using coils plus tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TAGM) and multiple coils in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) or with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Detailed Description
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) both are common primary hepatobiliary tumors, which often require extensive hepatic resection and challenge perioperative management as surgery remains the only chance of long-term survival for such patients. PVE induces effective hypertrophy on one side of the liver parenchyma ahead of a planned liver resection of the other side which becomes atrophic.
Technically, the percutaneous transhepatic approach becomes the standard of care for PVE. PVEs themselves with different embolization materials could vary in the degree of liver hypertrophy, though some techniques, such as TAE, HVE and stem cell, have been already used in combination with PVE and could promote the hypertrophy. Several aspects on the use of PVE are insufficiently studied and most recommendations are based on low-grade evidence. Large clinical studies that compare the effect of different embolic materials on the hypertrophy response are lacking. PVE using multiple coils to completely occlude all the target segmental and sectional branches is a conventional and fundamental approach in our center, which ensured a reliable hypertrophy response with a low PVE-related morbidity and post-hepatectomy liver failure rate in the past decades. PVE using with tris-acryl gelatin microspheres (TAGM) distally and coils proximally, which needs more interventional experience, has become one of standard approaches in our center. However, the study of high-grade evidence regarding the hypertrophy effect of PVE with TAGM and coils is still lacking.
In this randomized study, the investigators aim to compare PVE using TAGM plus coils to PVE using coils alone, in term of PVE-related complications, hypertrophy degree, hepatectomy completion rate, post-hepatectomy liver failure rate, features of immunohistochemical examination on parenchyma, for patients stratified by either pCCA or HCC.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Portal Vein Occlusion, Cholangiocarcinoma, Perihilar, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Liver; Hypertrophy, Acute
Keywords
Portal vein embolization, Trisacryl gelatin microspheres, Coils, Major hepatectomy, Liver hypertrophy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
56 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
PVE with coils plus TAGM
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
PVE with coils proximally plus TAGM distally and subsequent major hepatectomy
Arm Title
PVE with multiple coils
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
PVE with multiple coils and subsequent major hepatectomy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
PVE with coils plus TAGM
Intervention Description
PVE with TAGM distally and coils proximally and subsequent scheduled major hepatectomy. Sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and PVE for patients with HCC. Selective biliary drainage on future liver remnant (FLR) side for patients with pCCA when obstructive jaundice is present.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
PVE with multiple coils
Intervention Description
Procedure: PVE with multiple coils PVE with multiple coils proximally and distally and subsequent scheduled major hepatectomy. Sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and PVE for patients with HCC. Selective biliary drainage on FLR side for patients with pCCA when obstructive jaundice is present.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
PVE related morbidity
Description
The rate of major and minor PVE-related complications
Time Frame
During and 2 weeks after PVE procedure
Title
Hypertrophy degree of standardized FLR
Description
The difference of standardized FLR ratios before and 2 weeks after PVE
Time Frame
2 weeks after PVE procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hepatectomy completion rate
Description
The rate of completed major hepatectomy in each Arm group
Time Frame
The end of hepatectomy procedure
Title
Liver failure rate after major hepatectomy
Description
The rate of liver failure measured by 50-50, TB peak 7mg, and ISGLS criteria
Time Frame
3 months after hepatectomy
Title
Immunohistochemical stainings of liver parenchyma
Description
Immunohistochemical stainings of hypertrophic and atrophic parenchyma including anti-albumin, anti-PCNA, TUNEL staining, etc.
Time Frame
During (sampling) and immediately after hepatectomy (IHC examination)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female patients > 18 years and ≤ 70 years of age.
Diagnosis of pCCA or HCC (through imaging, serology, and/or histological biopsy)
Performance status: Karnofsky score ≥ 70
Candidates for right portal vein embolization for potential major hepatectomy with curative intent. Volumetric indication for PVE is less than 40% of standardized FLR.
Selective biliary drainage on FLR side for patients with pCCA should be performed when total bilirubin level is above 85.5μmol/L or bile duct dilation of FLR presents. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization should be performed between 1 and 4 weeks before PVE for patients with HCC.
Criteria of liver function: Child-Pugh A-B7 level, serum total bilirubin < 85.5μmol/L after biliary drainage in pCCA, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase ≤ 3 times the upper limit of normal value.
Patients who can understand this trial and have signed the informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with apparent cardiac, pulmonary, cerebral and renal dysfunction, which may affect the treatment.
Patients with a history of any other malignant tumor, or allergic to iodine or gelatin.
Subjects participating in other clinical trials.
Platelet count < 80×109/L and/or moderate or severe esophageal varices.
ICGR15 ≥ 15% for HCC patients
Obstructive jaundice lasts for >2 months before PVE for pCCA patients.
Tumor becomes unresectable by local progression and/or distant metastasis presents before PVE.
Right portal vein is occluded by tumor invasion or embolus before PVE.
Free portal vein pressure >20 mmHg or porto-hepatic vein fistula at the beginning of PVE procedure.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Feng SHEN, MD, PhD
Phone
0086-21-81875005
Email
shenfengehbh@sina.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Bin YI, MD, PhD
Phone
0086-21-81887805
Email
billyyi11@163.com
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Easter hepatobiliary surgery hospital
City
Shanghai
State/Province
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200438
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bin YI, MD
Phone
021-81887565
Email
billyyi11@163.com
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Portal Vein Embolization Using Coils Plus TAGM vs Multiple Coils for Patients With Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma or Hepatocellular Carcinoma
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs