search
Back to results

Telerehabilitation in Proximal Muscle Weakness

Primary Purpose

Telemedicine, Muscular Dystrophies, Proximal Myopathy

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Turkey
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
exercise
Sponsored by
Koç University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Telemedicine focused on measuring telerehabilitation, telehealth, muscular dystrophy, proximal muscle weakness, spinal muscular atrophy, telemedicine

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 50 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be older than 18 years
  • To have proximal muscle weakness with a diagnosis of LGMD of any kind and SMA
  • To have ability to walk independently

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of cervical and lumbar radiculopathy
  • history of cerebrovascular disease
  • history of spinal cord injury

Sites / Locations

  • Koc University School of MedicineRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Hospital based rehabilitation group

Telerehabilitation group

Arm Description

This group will perform the exercises in the hospital under the supervision of a physiotherapist

This group will perform the exercises at their home under remote supervision of a physiotherapist via internet connection

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

6 minute walk test
This is a field test evaluating submaximal aerobic capacity. The individuals are asked to walk as far as possible in a 30-meter corridor in 6 minutes. The technical standards are defined by European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society. Six minute walking distance will be recorded. Higher walking distance shows better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Vignos scale
Vignos scale evaluates the functionality of the lower extremity and walking ability. This scale evaluates the patient's ability to standup from the chair, as well as to walk assisted with a long leg device in patients who can't walk without help. 1 indicates the best condition, 10 indicates the worst.
Brooke scale
Brooke scale evaluates the functionality of the upper extremity and hand skills ranging between 1- 6. 1 indicates the best condition, 6 indicates the worst.
Barthel index
Barthel index is a scale including ten items to assess functional disability. It is used to measure the performance of the individuals in daily life activities and the degree of care the patient needs in daily activities. 4. Total score is obtained by summing scores of 10 items. 0 indicates the worst, 100 indicates the best results.
Nottingham health profile
Nottingham health profile is a self-reported quality-of-life questionnaire. It consists of 38 items and evaluates 6 dimensions related to general health: energy, pain, emotional reactions, sleep, social isolation and physical activity. It is scored between 0-100 separately for each section. 0 indicates the best condition, 100 indicates the worst. The sum of the sub-scores gives the total Nottingham Health Profile score.
The upper extremity functional index
The upper extremity functional index. It consists of 20 items: each item is scored between 0 (extreme difficulty/inability to perform) and 4 (no difficulty) depending on the ability to perform specific activities. Total score is obtained by summing scores of 20 items. 0 indicates the worst, 80 indicates the best functional status.
Short form - 36
Short form - 36 measures health related quality of life. It is a self-reported survey that evaluates individual health status with eight parameters consisting of physical function, pain, role limitations attributed to physical problems, role limitations attributed to emotional problems, mental health, social functioning, energy/ vitality, general health perception. There is not a summary score, each section is scored between 0-100, 0 indicates the worst condition, 100 indicates the best.
Muscle size and quality
All ultrasound evaluations will be performed using a MyLab Class C ultrasonic imaging system equipped with a 4-13-MHZ linear-array or 55 mm convex array according to the depth of the muscle. No compression to the skin will be applied. Evaluations will be performed by the same physiatrist who is blinded to the allocation groups. Measurements will be performed on the most affected side. Muscles assessed are supraspinatus, deltoid, biseps brachi for upper extremity; transversus abdominis, internal and external oblique for trunk; gluteus medius, quadriceps (rectus femoris, vastus intermedius, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis), medial gastrocnemius and hamstring muscles (semimembranosus, semitendinosus, biceps femoris) for the lower extremity. Qualitative analysis of all muscles will be performed using Heckmatt scale based on muscle echogenicity, grade 1 indicates normal, grade 4 the worst.

Full Information

First Posted
May 13, 2020
Last Updated
July 3, 2021
Sponsor
Koç University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04392518
Brief Title
Telerehabilitation in Proximal Muscle Weakness
Official Title
Is Telerehabilitation as Effective as the Traditional Hospital-based Rehabilitation in Patients With Proximal Muscle Weakness? - A Randomized Controlled Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 15, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 2021 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Koç University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of our study is to investigate the effectiveness of two exercise programs supervised by a physiotherapist, performed in the hospital or at their home via electronic connection in a group of LGMD and SMA patients. One exercise session will consist of breathing, posture, dynamic core stabilization, upper and lower extremity strengthening exercises. The basic exercises from each group will be performed as 1 set of 5 repetitions at the beginning and will be gradually increased according to the tolerability of the patient. Fourteen subjects will be enrolled this randomized controlled study. Demographic characteristics, Vignos scale, Brooke scale, Barthel index, upper extremity functional index, Nottingham Health profile, short form-36, 6 minute walk test and muscle thicknesses measured by ultrasound of certain muscles will be recorded.
Detailed Description
Some neuromuscular diseases with myogenic or neurogenic origin present with proximal muscle weakness. These diseases preferentially affect muscles around shoulders and hips and hence are called limb girdle neuromuscular diseases (LG-NMD). Patients have difficulty in climbing stairs or hills, and reaching high shelves. The vast majority of these diseases are X-linked recessive, autosomal recessive or dominantly inherited muscular dystrophies and are called limb girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMD). Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a disease of motor neurons, is also characterized by progressive proximal muscle weakness. Although the diseases are progressive in both conditions, regular and proper doses of exercise starting from the early stages may delay the progression of muscle weakness and may prevent joint stiffness, and contractures. The strengthening and aerobic exercise program increases overall wellness, condition and muscle strength in patients with neuromuscular diseases. The aerobic exercise program under supervision enhances oxidative capacity and muscle function without causing fatigue. Patients performing regular exercise program report an increase in their physical endurance, leg muscle strength and walking distance. Submaximal strengthening exercises combined with aerobic exercise are highly effective. Regulation of the exercise program according to the needs of the patient is the most important step. Appropriate individualized exercises should be programmed by a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician and performed under the supervision of a physiotherapist in the hospital environment in order to be effective. Otherwise, success of rehabilitation and patient compliance might be reduced. With the development of technology, patients can perform exercises at their home under remote supervision by a physiotherapist via electronic connection. Therefore, the aim of our study is to investigate the effectiveness of two exercise programs supervised by a physiotherapist, performed in the hospital or at their home via electronic connection in a group of LGMD and SMA patients. Fourteen consecutive patients from the Koç University Center for Muscle Diseases (KUCMD) diagnosed with LGMD or SMA are enrolled. Patients followed by KUCMD outpatient clinic with proximal muscle weakness who held LGMD or SMA diagnoses will be evaluated by a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician. Demographic characteristics, Vignos scale, Brooke scale, Barthel index, upper extremity functional index, Nottingham Health profile, short form-36, 6 minute walk test and muscle thicknesses measured by ultrasound of certain muscles will be recorded. Patients will be randomized into two groups. The first group will perform the exercises in the hospital under the supervision of a physiotherapist (Group 1: Hospital based rehabilitation group) and the second group will perform the exercises at their home under remote supervision of a physiotherapist via internet connection (Group 2: Telerehabilitation group). The exercise program will be administered 3 times in a week for 10 weeks. Patients will be examined by a blinded neurologist and functional assessments and ultrasonographic evaluations will be performed by a blinded physical medicine and rehabilitation physician before and after the rehabilitation program and at the 6th and 12th months following the completion of the rehabilitation. One exercise session will consist of breathing, posture, dynamic core stabilization, upper and lower extremity strengthening exercises. The basic exercises from each group will be performed as 1 set of 5 repetitions at the beginning and will be gradually increased according to the tolerability of the patient. If the patient has difficulty performing the basic exercises, modifications of the relevant exercise will be applied.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Telemedicine, Muscular Dystrophies, Proximal Myopathy
Keywords
telerehabilitation, telehealth, muscular dystrophy, proximal muscle weakness, spinal muscular atrophy, telemedicine

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
There will be two group. The first group will perform the exercises in the hospital under the supervision of a physiotherapist (Group 1: Hospital based rehabilitation group) and the second group will perform the exercises at their home under remote supervision of a physiotherapist via internet connection (Group 2: Telerehabilitation group).
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The assessor does not know the group of the patient
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
14 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Hospital based rehabilitation group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
This group will perform the exercises in the hospital under the supervision of a physiotherapist
Arm Title
Telerehabilitation group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
This group will perform the exercises at their home under remote supervision of a physiotherapist via internet connection
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
exercise
Intervention Description
Breathing, posture, dynamic core stabilization, upper and lower extremity strengthening exercises.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
6 minute walk test
Description
This is a field test evaluating submaximal aerobic capacity. The individuals are asked to walk as far as possible in a 30-meter corridor in 6 minutes. The technical standards are defined by European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society. Six minute walking distance will be recorded. Higher walking distance shows better outcome.
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Vignos scale
Description
Vignos scale evaluates the functionality of the lower extremity and walking ability. This scale evaluates the patient's ability to standup from the chair, as well as to walk assisted with a long leg device in patients who can't walk without help. 1 indicates the best condition, 10 indicates the worst.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Brooke scale
Description
Brooke scale evaluates the functionality of the upper extremity and hand skills ranging between 1- 6. 1 indicates the best condition, 6 indicates the worst.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Barthel index
Description
Barthel index is a scale including ten items to assess functional disability. It is used to measure the performance of the individuals in daily life activities and the degree of care the patient needs in daily activities. 4. Total score is obtained by summing scores of 10 items. 0 indicates the worst, 100 indicates the best results.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Nottingham health profile
Description
Nottingham health profile is a self-reported quality-of-life questionnaire. It consists of 38 items and evaluates 6 dimensions related to general health: energy, pain, emotional reactions, sleep, social isolation and physical activity. It is scored between 0-100 separately for each section. 0 indicates the best condition, 100 indicates the worst. The sum of the sub-scores gives the total Nottingham Health Profile score.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
The upper extremity functional index
Description
The upper extremity functional index. It consists of 20 items: each item is scored between 0 (extreme difficulty/inability to perform) and 4 (no difficulty) depending on the ability to perform specific activities. Total score is obtained by summing scores of 20 items. 0 indicates the worst, 80 indicates the best functional status.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Short form - 36
Description
Short form - 36 measures health related quality of life. It is a self-reported survey that evaluates individual health status with eight parameters consisting of physical function, pain, role limitations attributed to physical problems, role limitations attributed to emotional problems, mental health, social functioning, energy/ vitality, general health perception. There is not a summary score, each section is scored between 0-100, 0 indicates the worst condition, 100 indicates the best.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Muscle size and quality
Description
All ultrasound evaluations will be performed using a MyLab Class C ultrasonic imaging system equipped with a 4-13-MHZ linear-array or 55 mm convex array according to the depth of the muscle. No compression to the skin will be applied. Evaluations will be performed by the same physiatrist who is blinded to the allocation groups. Measurements will be performed on the most affected side. Muscles assessed are supraspinatus, deltoid, biseps brachi for upper extremity; transversus abdominis, internal and external oblique for trunk; gluteus medius, quadriceps (rectus femoris, vastus intermedius, vastus lateralis, vastus medialis), medial gastrocnemius and hamstring muscles (semimembranosus, semitendinosus, biceps femoris) for the lower extremity. Qualitative analysis of all muscles will be performed using Heckmatt scale based on muscle echogenicity, grade 1 indicates normal, grade 4 the worst.
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: To be older than 18 years To have proximal muscle weakness with a diagnosis of LGMD of any kind and SMA To have ability to walk independently Exclusion Criteria: history of cervical and lumbar radiculopathy history of cerebrovascular disease history of spinal cord injury
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ihsan Solaroglu, Prof
Phone
+ 90 212 338 10 39
Email
isolaroglu@ku.edu.tr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Baris Ata, Prof
Phone
+ 90 212 338 10 39
Email
bata@ku.edu.tr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Piraye Oflazer, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
Koc University School of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Koc University School of Medicine
City
İstanbul
ZIP/Postal Code
34010
Country
Turkey
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ihsan Solaroglu, Prof
Phone
+ 90 212 338 10 39
Email
isolaroglu@ku.edu.tr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Baris Ata, Prof
Phone
+ 90 212 338 10 39
Email
bata@ku.edu.tr
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ozden Ozyemisci Taskiran, Prof
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zeynep Turan, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Piraye Oflazer, Prof
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ebru Nur Yavuz, Assoc Prof

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
It was not planned to share individual participant data
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27490667
Citation
Vissing J. Limb girdle muscular dystrophies: classification, clinical spectrum and emerging therapies. Curr Opin Neurol. 2016 Oct;29(5):635-41. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000375.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26155063
Citation
Siciliano G, Simoncini C, Giannotti S, Zampa V, Angelini C, Ricci G. Muscle exercise in limb girdle muscular dystrophies: pitfall and advantages. Acta Myol. 2015 May;34(1):3-8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25313375
Citation
Narayanaswami P, Weiss M, Selcen D, David W, Raynor E, Carter G, Wicklund M, Barohn RJ, Ensrud E, Griggs RC, Gronseth G, Amato AA; Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; Practice Issues Review Panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Evidence-based guideline summary: diagnosis and treatment of limb-girdle and distal dystrophies: report of the guideline development subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the practice issues review panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Neurology. 2014 Oct 14;83(16):1453-63. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000892.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24684860
Citation
Berthelsen MP, Husu E, Christensen SB, Prahm KP, Vissing J, Jensen BR. Anti-gravity training improves walking capacity and postural balance in patients with muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014 Jun;24(6):492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25359355
Citation
Holland AE, Spruit MA, Troosters T, Puhan MA, Pepin V, Saey D, McCormack MC, Carlin BW, Sciurba FC, Pitta F, Wanger J, MacIntyre N, Kaminsky DA, Culver BH, Revill SM, Hernandes NA, Andrianopoulos V, Camillo CA, Mitchell KE, Lee AL, Hill CJ, Singh SJ. An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J. 2014 Dec;44(6):1428-46. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00150314. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
13997180
Citation
VIGNOS PJ Jr, SPENCER GE Jr, ARCHIBALD KC. Management of progressive muscular dystrophy in childhood. JAMA. 1963 Apr 13;184:89-96. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03700150043007. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
7017401
Citation
Brooke MH, Griggs RC, Mendell JR, Fenichel GM, Shumate JB, Pellegrino RJ. Clinical trial in Duchenne dystrophy. I. The design of the protocol. Muscle Nerve. 1981 May-Jun;4(3):186-97. doi: 10.1002/mus.880040304. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
3403500
Citation
Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61-3. doi: 10.3109/09638288809164103.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
10826123
Citation
Kucukdeveci AA, McKenna SP, Kutlay S, Gursel Y, Whalley D, Arasil T. The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Rehabil Res. 2000 Mar;23(1):31-8. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200023010-00004.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25322741
Citation
Aytar A, Yuruk ZO, Tuzun EH, Baltaci G, Karatas M, Eker L. The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI): cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015;28(3):489-95. doi: 10.3233/BMR-140545.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17029646
Citation
Demiral Y, Ergor G, Unal B, Semin S, Akvardar Y, Kivircik B, Alptekin K. Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36 (SF-36) in Turkish urban population. BMC Public Health. 2006 Oct 9;6:247. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-247.
Results Reference
result
Citation
Ware JE: Scoring the SF-36. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide 1993
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
7131136
Citation
Heckmatt JZ, Leeman S, Dubowitz V. Ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of muscle disease. J Pediatr. 1982 Nov;101(5):656-60. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(82)80286-2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29535573
Citation
Cho J, Lee K, Kim M, Hahn J, Lee W. The Effects of Double Oscillation Exercise Combined with Elastic Band Exercise on Scapular Stabilizing Muscle Strength and Thickness in Healthy Young Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. J Sports Sci Med. 2018 Mar 1;17(1):7-16. eCollection 2018 Mar.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25746907
Citation
Jenkins ND, Miller JM, Buckner SL, Cochrane KC, Bergstrom HC, Hill EC, Smith CM, Housh TJ, Cramer JT. Test-Retest Reliability of Single Transverse versus Panoramic Ultrasound Imaging for Muscle Size and Echo Intensity of the Biceps Brachii. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Jun;41(6):1584-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22327252
Citation
Gnat R, Saulicz E, Miadowicz B. Reliability of real-time ultrasound measurement of transversus abdominis thickness in healthy trained subjects. Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21(8):1508-15. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2184-4. Epub 2012 Feb 12. Erratum In: Eur Spine J. 2014 Apr;23(4):943.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25029916
Citation
Whittaker JL, Emery CA. Sonographic measures of the gluteus medius, gluteus minimus, and vastus medialis muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Aug;44(8):627-32. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.5315. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23456136
Citation
Strasser EM, Draskovits T, Praschak M, Quittan M, Graf A. Association between ultrasound measurements of muscle thickness, pennation angle, echogenicity and skeletal muscle strength in the elderly. Age (Dordr). 2013 Dec;35(6):2377-88. doi: 10.1007/s11357-013-9517-z. Epub 2013 Mar 2. Erratum In: Age (Dordr). 2013 Oct;35(5):2025-6.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30997529
Citation
Balius R, Pedret C, Iriarte I, Saiz R, Cerezal L. Sonographic landmarks in hamstring muscles. Skeletal Radiol. 2019 Nov;48(11):1675-1683. doi: 10.1007/s00256-019-03208-x. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27107379
Citation
Kuyumcu ME, Halil M, Kara O, Cuni B, Caglayan G, Guven S, Yesil Y, Arik G, Yavuz BB, Cankurtaran M, Ozcakar L. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the calf muscle mass and architecture in elderly patients with and without sarcopenia. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Jul-Aug;65:218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Telerehabilitation in Proximal Muscle Weakness

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs