Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS): Tennant et al., 2007
validated self-report measure; scores range from 14 to 70 and higher scores indicate greater positive mental wellbeing.
Self-rated health status: Bombak, 2013
validated self-report measure; scores range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate better health
Self-rated health status: Bombak, 2013
validated self-report measure; scores range from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicate better health
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS): Smith et al., 2008
validated self-report measure; items are averaged to create a total score, ranging from 1 to 7 and higher total scores indicate higher levels of resilience.
Brief Resilience Scale (BRS): Smith et al., 2008
validated self-report measure; items are averaged to create a total score, ranging from 1 to 7 and higher total scores indicate higher levels of resilience.
Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS-12): Carleton et al., 2007
validated self-report measure; total scores range from 12 to 60 and higher scores indicate higher intolerance of uncertainty
Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS-12): Carleton et al., 2007
validated self-report measure; total scores range from 12 to 60 and higher scores indicate higher intolerance of uncertainty
Positive Affect subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale-X (PANAS-X): Watson & Clark, 1999
validated self-report measure; positive affect items (N=27) are rated on a five-point scale (1) very slightly or not at all, (2) a little, (3) moderately, (4) quite a bit, and (5) extremely and can be grouped into subscales according to Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Higher scores indicate higher levels of positive affect states.
Positive Affect subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale-X (PANAS-X): Watson & Clark, 1999
validated self-report measure; positive affect items (N=27) are rated on a five-point scale (1) very slightly or not at all, (2) a little, (3) moderately, (4) quite a bit, and (5) extremely and can be grouped into subscales according to Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Higher scores indicate higher levels of positive affect states.
UCLA 3 item loneliness scale: Russell, 1996
validated self-report measure; total scores range from 3 to 9 and higher scores indicate higher levels of loneliness
UCLA 3 item loneliness scale: Russell, 1996
validated self-report measure; total scores range from 3 to 9 and higher scores indicate higher levels of loneliness
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Zimet et al., 1988
validated self-report measure; the scale consists of three subscales (family, friends, and significant other) that contain 4 items each; each subscale score can range from 4 to 28. Items are summed, and a total score is also calculated and ranges from 12 to 84. Higher subscale and total scores indicate higher levels of perceived social support.
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS): Zimet et al., 1988
validated self-report measure; the scale consists of three subscales (family, friends, and significant other) that contain 4 items each; each subscale score can range from 4 to 28. Items are summed, and a total score is also calculated and ranges from 12 to 84. Higher subscale and total scores indicate higher levels of perceived social support.
Subjective Health Complaint Scale (SHC): Eriksen, Ihlebæk, & Ursin, 1999
validated self-report measure; a total score will be obtained for each symptom (severity x duration) with a possible range from 0 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater severity of a symptom, total number of symptoms reported, and a total score from 0 to 84 with higher scores indicating greater severity of somatic complaints.
Subjective Health Complaint Scale (SHC): Eriksen, Ihlebæk, & Ursin, 1999
validated self-report measure; a total score will be obtained for each symptom (severity x duration) with a possible range from 0 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater severity of a symptom, total number of symptoms reported, and a total score from 0 to 84 with higher scores indicating greater severity of somatic complaints.
Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ): Parrott & Hindmarch, 1980
validated self-report measure; responses are measured using a 100-mm scale and are then averaged to provide a score for each domain and higher scores indicate better sleep.
Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ): Parrott & Hindmarch, 1980
validated self-report measure; responses are measured using a 100-mm scale and are then averaged to provide a score for each domain and higher scores indicate better sleep.
Self-reported napping: Stone et al., 2018
self-report measure used in Stone et al., 2018; self-reported napping is defined as reporting at least 1 hour of napping each time and responses will be categorised as follows: no napping=coded as 0; <1 hour=coded as 1, 1-2 hours=coded as 2, and >2 hours=coded as 3.
Self-reported napping: Stone et al., 2018
self-report measure used in Stone et al., 2018; self-reported napping is defined as reporting at least 1 hour of napping each time and responses will be categorised as follows: no napping=coded as 0; <1 hour=coded as 1, 1-2 hours=coded as 2, and >2 hours=coded as 3.
Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS): Mundt et al., 2002
validated self-report measure; total scores range from 0 to 40 and higher scores indicate greater impairment
Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS): Mundt et al., 2002
validated self-report measure; total scores range from 0 to 40 and higher scores indicate greater impairment
International Physical Activity Questionnaire -short form (IPAQ-SF): Craig et al., 2003
validated self-report measure; The questionnaire can be scored categorically according to developed cut-offs to classify individuals into low, moderate, or high physical activity groups; or it can be scored continuously. Responses can be converted to Metabolic Equivalent Task minutes per week (METmin/wk), according to the IPAQ scoring protocol. MET scores across the three sub-components can be summed to indicate overall physical activity
International Physical Activity Questionnaire -short form (IPAQ-SF): Craig et al., 2003
validated self-report measure; The questionnaire can be scored categorically according to developed cut-offs to classify individuals into low, moderate, or high physical activity groups; or it can be scored continuously. Responses can be converted to Metabolic Equivalent Task minutes per week (METmin/wk), according to the IPAQ scoring protocol. MET scores across the three sub-components can be summed to indicate overall physical activity