search
Back to results

Feasibility of a RCT That Compares Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair After ACL Injury (IODA)

Primary Purpose

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Belgium
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Immediate anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Rehabilitation
Optional delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Sponsored by
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Rotational trauma to a previously uninjured knee within the preceding 4 weeks
  • Medical diagnosis of ACL insufficiency including MRI (both partial and complete ruptures)
  • Minimum of 18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has history of a previous ACL injury or knee surgery to the index knee.
  • Indication for acute surgery because of related injuries to the knee
  • Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardise participant's safety or compliance with the protocol.
  • Female who is pregnant. Since MRI assessment cannot be performed.

Sites / Locations

  • UZ Leuven
  • CHU Liège

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Rehabilitation and optional delayed ACL reconstruction

Immediate ACL reconstruction + rehabilitation

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Feasibility to recruit patients: Number of eligible patients that sign the informed consent
Number of eligible patients that sign the informed consent

Secondary Outcome Measures

Feasibility of the protocol: Number of patients that complete all assessments
Number of patients that complete all assessments (at baseline and 3 month follow-up)

Full Information

First Posted
May 25, 2020
Last Updated
May 11, 2023
Sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Collaborators
Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04408690
Brief Title
Feasibility of a RCT That Compares Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair After ACL Injury
Acronym
IODA
Official Title
A Pilot Study to Investigate the Feasibility of Conducting a Randomized Controlled Trial That Compares Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair for Treatment of Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
September 15, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 1, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Collaborators
Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Currently, most patients with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury undergo surgery. There is a general belief that surgical reconstruction is necessary to return to sport safely and to limit premature knee osteoarthrosis or additional meniscal damage. However, there is unsufficient scientific evidence for this belief. Moreover, several studies show that a reconstruction does not guarantee successful return to sports or the prevention of osteoarthritis or meniscal injuries at all. Therefore, an immediate surgery after an ACL injury is more and more questioned. The only qualitative RCT that exists (KANON trial) could not demonstrate that an immediate reconstruction is an added value (in terms of symptoms, knee function, activity level, osteoarthritis or incidental meniscal damage) compared to a conservative approach consisting of progressive rehabilitation and delayed surgery if there was persistent knee instability. In a future multicenter RCT the investigators want to 1) verify these results and 2) search for predictors that predict which patients from the conservative group do well without delayed surgery. This information is invaluable to physicians as it allows them to decide which treatment is best for the patient. Before performing a large, adequately-powered RCT that compares both treatment options, the investigators will run a pilot study that assesses the feasibility to recruit ACL patients for such RCT. This seems necessary, as many patients still believe that timely surgery is a prerequisite for restoring knee function, for returning to sports and for preventing cartilage degeneration. These preferences for surgery might affect recruitment and adherence to the protocol. Therefore, a pilot study will performed that demonstrates whether a large RCT is feasible with regard to 1) participant recruitment, 2) adherence to the treatment arm they were allocated to and 3) protocol feasibility. The findings of this pilot study will help deciding about progressing to a future definitive RCT.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
29 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Rehabilitation and optional delayed ACL reconstruction
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Immediate ACL reconstruction + rehabilitation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Immediate anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Intervention Description
No guidelines on type of ACL reconstruction will be imposed to keep the trial pragmatic. The decision of graft type and surgery technique is a clinical decision made by the orthopaedic surgeons of the participating centra. This surgery will be performed within 12 weeks after the ACL injury.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Rehabilitation
Intervention Description
All patients complete rehabilitation under supervision of their own physiotherapist. The investigators will provide some guidelines and criteria, but it is the physiotherapist's choice how to implement these guidelines in clinical practice.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Optional delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Intervention Description
If a patient complains about persistent symptomatic instability of the knee or the inability to progress in rehabilitation, delayed surgery can be considered. ACL insufficiency induced instability in combination with a positive pivot shift and an additional MRI are needed to confirm the cause of instability. This surgery will not be performed within the first 12 weeks after the ACL injury.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility to recruit patients: Number of eligible patients that sign the informed consent
Description
Number of eligible patients that sign the informed consent
Time Frame
4 months after first patient in
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility of the protocol: Number of patients that complete all assessments
Description
Number of patients that complete all assessments (at baseline and 3 month follow-up)
Time Frame
When 5 patients per site have completed the 3 month follow-up visit

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Rotational trauma to a previously uninjured knee within the preceding 4 weeks Medical diagnosis of ACL insufficiency including MRI (both partial and complete ruptures) Minimum of 18 years Exclusion Criteria: Patient has history of a previous ACL injury or knee surgery to the index knee. Indication for acute surgery because of related injuries to the knee Any disorder, which in the investigator's opinion might jeopardise participant's safety or compliance with the protocol. Female who is pregnant. Since MRI assessment cannot be performed.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Koen Peers, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
UZ Leuven
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UZ Leuven
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
CHU Liège
City
Liège
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Belgium

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35277406
Citation
Smeets A, Ghafelzadeh Ahwaz F, Bogaerts S, De Groef A, Berger P, Kaux JF, Daniel C, Croisier JL, Delvaux F, Laenen A, Staes F, Peers K. Pilot study to investigate the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial that compares Immediate versus Optional Delayed surgical repair for treatment of acute Anterior cruciate ligament injury: IODA pilot trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 11;12(3):e055349. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055349.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Feasibility of a RCT That Compares Immediate Versus Optional Delayed Surgical Repair After ACL Injury

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs