Comparison of Electric Heating Pad Versus Forced-air Warming to Prevent Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia
Primary Purpose
Temperature Change, Body, Hypothermia; Anesthesia
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
WARMTAC
3M Bair Hugger
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional prevention trial for Temperature Change, Body
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients over 18 years of age at the time of the preoperative visit.
- Patients who will undergo elective laparoscopic surgery
- Patients who sign the informed consent indicating that they have been informed of all relevant aspects of the trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Axillary temperature> 37.5ºC
- Active infection
- Dysfunction of the autonomic system
Sites / Locations
- Hospital del MarRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Electrical heating pad
forced-air warming device
Arm Description
Electrical heating pad (WARMTAC device). Patients will be randomized to one arm. In this arm, the WARMTAC device will be conected and warmed to 41 degrees before patients lay down.
Forced-air warming device (3M device). In this arm, the 3M blanket will be conected to forced-air machine and warmed to 41 degrees before patients lay down.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Core body temperature
temperatured recorded in esophagus
Secondary Outcome Measures
Rescues number
Compare number of rescues required by each system to avoid mild hypothermia
skin lesions
Detect possible skin complications related to heating
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04410068
Brief Title
Comparison of Electric Heating Pad Versus Forced-air Warming to Prevent Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia
Official Title
Comparison of Electric Heating Pad Versus Forced-air Warming to Prevent Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
December 23, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2021 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Parc de Salut Mar
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Compare core body temperature after laparoscopic surgery using the forced air heating system versus the WARMTAC® (a carbon fiber electric blanket).
Detailed Description
In order to prevent perioperative hypothermia, we will compare two different heating sistems, one of them is an electric pad made with carbon fiber and the other system is a forced-air blanket. Both of them will be situated under the patient during all the laparoscopic surgey.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Temperature Change, Body, Hypothermia; Anesthesia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Electrical heating pad
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Electrical heating pad (WARMTAC device). Patients will be randomized to one arm.
In this arm, the WARMTAC device will be conected and warmed to 41 degrees before patients lay down.
Arm Title
forced-air warming device
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Forced-air warming device (3M device). In this arm, the 3M blanket will be conected to forced-air machine and warmed to 41 degrees before patients lay down.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
WARMTAC
Intervention Description
Randomization to one of the arms previous to surgery.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
3M Bair Hugger
Intervention Description
Randomization to one of the arms previous to surgery.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Core body temperature
Description
temperatured recorded in esophagus
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rescues number
Description
Compare number of rescues required by each system to avoid mild hypothermia
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 12 months
Title
skin lesions
Description
Detect possible skin complications related to heating
Time Frame
through study completion, an average of 12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients over 18 years of age at the time of the preoperative visit.
Patients who will undergo elective laparoscopic surgery
Patients who sign the informed consent indicating that they have been informed of all relevant aspects of the trial.
Exclusion Criteria:
Axillary temperature> 37.5ºC
Active infection
Dysfunction of the autonomic system
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Mirea Chanza
Phone
0034667550215
Email
mchanza@parcdesalutmar.cat
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mireia Chanza, Physician
Organizational Affiliation
PSMar
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital del Mar
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08029
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
LLUIS GALLART GALLEGO
Phone
680986184
Email
lluis@gallart.cat
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30447894
Citation
Calvo Vecino JM, Casans Frances R, Ripolles Melchor J, Marin Zaldivar C, Gomez Rios MA, Perez Ferrer A, Zaballos Bustingorri JM, Abad Gurumeta A; Grupo de trabajo de la GPC de Hipotermia Perioperatoria No Intencionada de la SEDAR. Clinical practice guideline. Unintentional perioperative hypothermia. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2018 Dec;65(10):564-588. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Nov 15. English, Spanish.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12697600
Citation
Matsuzaki Y, Matsukawa T, Ohki K, Yamamoto Y, Nakamura M, Oshibuchi T. Warming by resistive heating maintains perioperative normothermia as well as forced air heating. Br J Anaesth. 2003 May;90(5):689-91. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg106.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17042850
Citation
Ng V, Lai A, Ho V. Comparison of forced-air warming and electric heating pad for maintenance of body temperature during total knee replacement. Anaesthesia. 2006 Nov;61(11):1100-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04816.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26787794
Citation
John M, Crook D, Dasari K, Eljelani F, El-Haboby A, Harper CM. Comparison of resistive heating and forced-air warming to prevent inadvertent perioperative hypothermia. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):249-54. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev412.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Comparison of Electric Heating Pad Versus Forced-air Warming to Prevent Inadvertent Perioperative Hypothermia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs