A Needs-focused Palliative Care Intervention for Older Adults in ICUs (PCplanner)
Primary Purpose
Palliative Care, Critical Illness, Aging
Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PCplanner
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Palliative Care focused on measuring palliative care, Intensive Care Unit, critical illness, mobile app, care delivery, informal caregiver
Eligibility Criteria
PATIENTS
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥50 years of age
- Receive care in a study ICU for ≥24 hours
- Meets ≥1 of 9 high risk phenotypes a. Dementia (e.g., Alzheimer's, multi-infarct, other dementia etiology) b. Declining health status defined by EITHER: i. ≥2 hospital admissions in 3 months preceding current admission OR ii. >1 ICU admission in 3 months preceding current admission c. Poor functional status defined by EITHER: i. admit from Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) or Long-Term Acute Care (LTAC) facility OR ii. ≥3 activities of daily living (ADL) limitations at admission d. Severe acute illness defined by EITHER: i. cardiac arrest OR ii. multisystem organ failure (≥3 of: lung, kidney, hematological, brain, cardiac, liver) that has worsened over 48 hours (i.e., Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score increase) e. Severe acute stroke (e.g., acute intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, or traumatic brain injury) f. Acute respiratory failure (ventilation or high oxygen support for ≥24 hours) g. Acute renal failure (new hemodialysis or continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration for ≥1 hour) h. Advanced cancer (Advanced / metastatic cancer diagnosis) i. Shock (use of vasopressor or inotrope for ≥4 hours)
Exclusion Criteria (pre-consent):
- Palliative care consultation performed during the hospitalization before eligibility determination
- Current admission to ICU at the index hospital ≥8 days
- Imprisoned
- No known family or surrogate decision maker
- Death expected within 24 hours
Exclusion Criteria (post-consent):
- Patient dies before T2
FAMILY MEMBER
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥18 years of age
- Self-described as the individual (related or unrelated) who provides the most support and with whom the patient has a significant relationship (per definition of 'family' described in the Society of Critical Care Medicine 2016 Guidelines for Family-Centered Care in the Neonatal, Pediatric, and Adult ICU)
Exclusion Criteria (pre-consent):
- Lack a knowledge of English such that the potential participant is not confident that they could complete study tasks (app viewing, surveys)
- Imprisoned
- Unable to complete surveys for any reason
Exclusion Criteria (post-consent):
- Low need burden (NEST score <10) at baseline
ICU PHYSICIANS
Inclusion Criteria:
- ≥18 years of age
- Attending or fellow physician in a study ICU
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Sites / Locations
- Duke University Medical Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
No Intervention
Arm Label
Intervention
Usual care control
Arm Description
PCplanner intervention during hospitalization
Usual care
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Needs; Existential concerns; Symptoms; and Therapeutic interaction (NEST) scale total score
A palliative care needs instrument. Scores range from 0 (no needs) to 130 (higher needs)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item scale (PHQ-9)
A depression symptoms instrument. Scores range from 0 (no depression symptoms) to 27 (higher depression symptoms)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item scale (GAD-7)
An anxiety symptoms instrument. Scores range from 0 (no anxiety symptoms) to 21 (higher anxiety symptoms)
Post-Traumatic Stress Symptom (PTSS) inventory
A post-traumatic stress disorder symptom instrument. Scores range from 10 (low PTSD symptoms) to 70 (higher PTSD symptoms)
Goal concordant care
A measure of hospital days after randomization
Patient-Perceived Patient-Centeredness (PPPC) scale
A measure of patient-centeredness with scores that range from 12 (higher patient-centeredness) to 48 (lower patient-centeredness)
Post-randomization intensive care unit length of stay
A measure of intensive care unit days after randomization
Post-randomization hospital length of stay
A measure of hospital days after randomization
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04414787
First Posted
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
October 17, 2023
Sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04414787
Brief Title
A Needs-focused Palliative Care Intervention for Older Adults in ICUs
Acronym
PCplanner
Official Title
Operationalizing PCplanner, a Needs-focused Palliative Care for Older Adults in Intensive Care Units: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
February 22, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 1, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Duke University
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The quality of intensive care unit (ICU)-based palliative care is highly variable, particularly for the 2 million older adults admitted annually to ICUs. To address these care delivery barriers among older ICU patients, a mobile app platform called PCplanner (Palliative Care planner) was developed. PCplanner automates the identification of high-risk patients (e.g., dementia, declining health status, poor functioning) by directly capturing data from electronic health record (EHR) systems, cultivates family engagement with supportive information and a digital system for self-report of actual needs, and facilitates the delivery of care to those with a high burden of need by coordinating collaboration between ICU teams and palliative care specialists.
150 patients, 150 family caregivers, and 75 physicians from academic and community settings will be enrolled in a RCT designed to test the efficacy of PCplanner-augmented collaborative palliative care vs usual care. Family caregiver and clinician experiences will be explored using mixed methods to understand intervention mechanisms as well as implementation barriers within diverse case contexts. The key hypothesis is that compared to usual care, PCplanner will reduce family caregivers' unmet needs and psychological distress, increase the frequency of goal concordant treatment among older adult patients, and reduce hospital length of stay.
Detailed Description
The quality of intensive care unit (ICU)-based palliative care is highly variable, particularly for the 2 million older adults admitted annually to ICUs. However, improving care quality on a broad scale with the efficient delivery of patient-centered, need-targeted palliative care is challenging because of logistical and technological barriers. To address these care delivery barriers among older ICU patients, a mobile app platform called PCplanner (Palliative Care planner) was developed. PCplanner automates the identification of high-risk patients (e.g., dementia, declining health status, poor functioning) by directly capturing data from electronic health record (EHR) systems, cultivates family engagement with supportive information and a digital system for self-report of actual needs, and facilitates the delivery of care to those with a high burden of need by coordinating collaboration between ICU teams and palliative care specialists. In pilot comparison to a standard palliative care control, the intervention reduced unmet needs, psychological distress, and length of stay and increased goal concordant care, communication, and hospice utilization.
While these data are compelling, an efficacy evaluation of PCplanner is needed. Therefore, 150 patients, 150 family caregivers, and 75 physicians will be enrolled from academic and community settings in a project with 2 key aims: (1) Test the efficacy of PCplanner-augmented collaborative palliative care vs usual care in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) with 3-month follow up, and (2) Explore family caregiver and clinician experiences using mixed methods to understand intervention mechanisms as well as implementation barriers within diverse case contexts. The key hypothesis is that compared to usual care, PCplanner will reduce family caregivers' unmet needs and psychological distress, increase the frequency of goal concordant treatment among older adult patients, and reduce hospital length of stay.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Palliative Care, Critical Illness, Aging, Care Delivery Model, Informal Caregivers, Psychological Distress
Keywords
palliative care, Intensive Care Unit, critical illness, mobile app, care delivery, informal caregiver
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized clinical trial comparing intervention to usual care control.
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
All masking done via differential user accesses allowed by a mobile app platform.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
152 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
PCplanner intervention during hospitalization
Arm Title
Usual care control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Usual care
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
PCplanner
Intervention Description
PCplanner-augmented care. The PCplanner mobile app will allow patients / family members to report their needs in a platform viewable by ICU physicians. Should the needs not improve over time, the palliative care team will be activated to contribute to care.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Needs; Existential concerns; Symptoms; and Therapeutic interaction (NEST) scale total score
Description
A palliative care needs instrument. Scores range from 0 (no needs) to 130 (higher needs)
Time Frame
Time 1 (baseline), Time 2 (target ~3 days post-randomization), and Time 3 (target ~1 week post-randomization)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Item scale (PHQ-9)
Description
A depression symptoms instrument. Scores range from 0 (no depression symptoms) to 27 (higher depression symptoms)
Time Frame
Time 1 (baseline), Time 3 (target ~1 week post-randomization), and Time 4 (3 months post-randomization)
Title
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-Item scale (GAD-7)
Description
An anxiety symptoms instrument. Scores range from 0 (no anxiety symptoms) to 21 (higher anxiety symptoms)
Time Frame
Time 1 (baseline), Time 3 (target ~1 week post-randomization), and Time 4 (3 months post-randomization)
Title
Post-Traumatic Stress Symptom (PTSS) inventory
Description
A post-traumatic stress disorder symptom instrument. Scores range from 10 (low PTSD symptoms) to 70 (higher PTSD symptoms)
Time Frame
Time 1 (baseline) and Time 4 (3 months post-randomization)
Title
Goal concordant care
Description
A measure of hospital days after randomization
Time Frame
Time 1 (baseline), Time 2 (target ~3 days post-randomization), and Time 3 (target ~1 week post-randomization)
Title
Patient-Perceived Patient-Centeredness (PPPC) scale
Description
A measure of patient-centeredness with scores that range from 12 (higher patient-centeredness) to 48 (lower patient-centeredness)
Time Frame
Time 3 (target ~1 week post-randomization)
Title
Post-randomization intensive care unit length of stay
Description
A measure of intensive care unit days after randomization
Time Frame
Across the entire hospitalization after randomization (approximately 2 weeks)
Title
Post-randomization hospital length of stay
Description
A measure of hospital days after randomization
Time Frame
Across the entire hospitalization after randomization (approximately 2 weeks)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
PATIENTS
Inclusion Criteria:
≥50 years of age
Receive care in a study ICU for ≥24 hours
Meets ≥1 of 9 high risk phenotypes a. Dementia (e.g., Alzheimer's, multi-infarct, other dementia etiology) b. Declining health status defined by EITHER: i. ≥2 hospital admissions in 3 months preceding current admission OR ii. >1 ICU admission in 3 months preceding current admission c. Poor functional status defined by EITHER: i. admit from Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) or Long-Term Acute Care (LTAC) facility OR ii. ≥3 activities of daily living (ADL) limitations at admission d. Severe acute illness defined by EITHER: i. cardiac arrest OR ii. multisystem organ failure (≥3 of: lung, kidney, hematological, brain, cardiac, liver) that has worsened over 48 hours (i.e., Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score increase) e. Severe acute stroke (e.g., acute intracranial hemorrhage, ischemic stroke, or traumatic brain injury) f. Acute respiratory failure (ventilation or high oxygen support for ≥24 hours) g. Acute renal failure (new hemodialysis or continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration for ≥1 hour) h. Advanced cancer (Advanced / metastatic cancer diagnosis) i. Shock (use of vasopressor or inotrope for ≥4 hours)
Exclusion Criteria (pre-consent):
Palliative care consultation performed during the hospitalization before eligibility determination
Current admission to ICU at the index hospital ≥8 days
Imprisoned
No known family or surrogate decision maker
Death expected within 24 hours
Exclusion Criteria (post-consent):
- Patient dies before T2
FAMILY MEMBER
Inclusion Criteria:
≥18 years of age
Self-described as the individual (related or unrelated) who provides the most support and with whom the patient has a significant relationship (per definition of 'family' described in the Society of Critical Care Medicine 2016 Guidelines for Family-Centered Care in the Neonatal, Pediatric, and Adult ICU)
Exclusion Criteria (pre-consent):
Lack a knowledge of English such that the potential participant is not confident that they could complete study tasks (app viewing, surveys)
Imprisoned
Unable to complete surveys for any reason
Exclusion Criteria (post-consent):
- Low need burden (NEST score <10) at baseline
ICU PHYSICIANS
Inclusion Criteria:
≥18 years of age
Attending or fellow physician in a study ICU
Exclusion Criteria:
- None
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christopher Cox, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Duke University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Per NIH and Duke University policies after trial and analyses completed.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29121480
Citation
Cox CE, Jones DM, Reagan W, Key MD, Chow V, McFarlin J, Casarett D, Creutzfeldt CJ, Docherty SL. Palliative Care Planner: A Pilot Study to Evaluate Acceptability and Usability of an Electronic Health Records System-integrated, Needs-targeted App Platform. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 Jan;15(1):59-68. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201706-500OC.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33007442
Citation
Cox CE, Olsen MK, Casarett D, Haines K, Al-Hegelan M, Bartz RR, Katz JN, Naglee C, Ashana D, Gilstrap D, Gu J, Parish A, Frear A, Krishnamaneni D, Corcoran A, Docherty SL. Operationalizing needs-focused palliative care for older adults in intensive care units: Design of and rationale for the PCplanner randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Nov;98:106163. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106163. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://pcplanner.duke.edu
Description
general trial information
Learn more about this trial
A Needs-focused Palliative Care Intervention for Older Adults in ICUs
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs