search
Back to results

Effects of Preferential Left Ventricular Pacing on Ventriculoarterial Coupling and Clinical Course of Heart Failure (READAPT)

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Greece
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Preferential left ventricular pacing
Biventricular pacing
Sponsored by
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction focused on measuring Heart failure, Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Preferential left ventricular pacing, Ventriculoarterial coupling, Echocardiography, Cardiopulmonary exercise test

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Age 18-80 years old Provided informed consent Any cardiomyopathy type, diagnosed at least 6 months prior (to exclude recent myocarditis cases that may remit and confound outcomes) On optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months, An existing I/IIa indication for a CRT-D device Both new CRT-D implantation and an upgrade from an existing ICD or pacemaker with no prior left ventricular lead placement.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have an existing Class I recalled lead,
  2. Are anticipated to need heart transplantation within the next 9 months,
  3. Have undergone cardiac transplantation less than 40 days prior to enrolment,
  4. Have had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within 3 months of enrollment,
  5. Have had a recent myocardial infarction less than 40 days prior to enrollment, or unstable angina or cardiac revascularization less than 3 months prior to enrolment,
  6. Have documented moderate to severe/severe mitral/aortic/tricuspid/pulmonary insufficiency (noninvasive VAC calculation impossible),
  7. Exhibit a daily burden of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) of either ≥10% of total QRSs or ≥10,000 on ambulatory ECG recording21, 22 (to exclude PVC-related, potentially reversible cardiomyopathy),
  8. Are currently participating in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment arm,
  9. Have diagnosed pulmonary hypertension other than class II (left heart-related),
  10. Have known stage IV-V renal dysfunction (clearance estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation),
  11. Have permanent atrial fibrillation,
  12. Have complete atrioventricular block,
  13. Have a prolonged (>200msec) PQ interval on surface ECG (thus invalidating the option for preferential LV pacing),
  14. Are pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the duration of the study (in case of unplanned pregnancy the patient will have to be excluded from the study),
  15. Have an expected life expectancy of <12 months, or
  16. Undergo major adaptations to their pharmacological regimens during follow-up (e.g. initiation of neprilysin inhibitors).

Sites / Locations

  • First University Department of Cardiology, Hippokrateion General Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Classical biventricular pacing

Preferential left ventricular pacing

Arm Description

Commercially available LV-pacing capable CRT devices and quadripolar leads will be implanted. Right ventricular (RV) and right atrial (RA) leads will be placed according to standard practice. The LV lead will also be placed according to standard practice, targeting to a lateral, posterolateral, or anterolateral branch of the coronary sinus (CS). Interventricular delay programmed will be determined based on stroke volume maximization, and will be used as a criterion for BVP optimization. Atrioventricular delay optimization shall be automatically performed by the device.

In G2 patients, an algorithm for preferential left ventricular pacing will be activated. Following selection of the dipole maximizing stroke volume during simultaneous LV-RV pacing, subsequent V-V delay optimization shall be delegated to the algorithm. Based on previous studies, a subgroup analysis of G2 will be performed, comparing those receiving ≥50% with those receiving <50% preferential LV pacing evaluated over the total duration of the study (12 months).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Changes in patient exercise capacity
Assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test in terms of maximal oxygen consumption in ml/kg/min

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of hospitalizations for heart failure
Data retrieved from online patient file will be used to compare number of unplanned hospitalizations for worsening heart failure between groups
Left ventricular function
Assessed by ejection fraction (in %), strain echocardiography - changes in % global longitudinal peak strain and diastolic function indices (E/e')
Right ventricular function
Assessed by strain echocardiography in terms of two-dimensional % global longitudinal peak strain
Ventriculoarterial coupling for both systemic and pulmonary circulation
Assessed by the noninvasive single-beat echocardiographic method in terms of distance from 1 (value associated with maximization of stroke work for a given contractility)

Full Information

First Posted
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
June 3, 2020
Sponsor
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04420065
Brief Title
Effects of Preferential Left Ventricular Pacing on Ventriculoarterial Coupling and Clinical Course of Heart Failure
Acronym
READAPT
Official Title
CompaRative Study of the Effects of Left ventriculAr and Biventricular Pacing on inDices of cArdiac Function and Clinical Course of Heart Failure PatienTs: Rationale and Design of the READAPT Randomized Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
September 1, 2020 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Randomized trial of adult patients to study the effects of preferential left ventricular pacing on ventriculoarterial coupling of both systemic and pulmonary circulation, indices of systolic and diastolic function of both ventricles, and clinical course of patients with advances dyssynchronous heart failure.
Detailed Description
Study hypothesis is that preferential left ventricular (LV) pacing, delivered by means of the AdaptivCRT® algorithm and in conjunction with automated V-V delay adjustments, will lead to improvements over standard biventricular pacing (BVP) in the function of all cardiac chambers, reduce arrhythmic burden, improve ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC), and patient functional status. It would be interesting to study what changes in right-side VAC (RVAC) can be appreciated with the activation of the preferential LV pacing algorithm and how they relate to each other, i.e. whether LV is driven towards maximizing output whilst RV shifts to optimizing energy efficiency. READAPT is a single-center, prospective, randomized trial of heart failure patients eligible for CRT according to current European heart failure guidelines. Informed written consent is required from all study participants. Adult (aged 18-80 years old), consenting patients with any cardiomyopathy type, diagnosed at least 6 months prior (to exclude recent myocarditis cases that may remit and confound outcomes), on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months, and an existing I/IIa indication for a cardiac resynchronization therapy - defibrillator (CRT-D) device will be enrolled and randomized into 2 groups, one receiving standard CRT (Group 1 - G1), and one with activation of the preferential LV pacing algorithm (Group 2 - G2). Enrollment date will amount to the baseline assessment date, with device implantation occurring preferably within 48 hours. READAPT will include patients with both new CRT-D implantation and an upgrade from an existing defibrillator or pacemaker with no prior left ventricular lead placement.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Keywords
Heart failure, Cardiac resynchronization therapy, Preferential left ventricular pacing, Ventriculoarterial coupling, Echocardiography, Cardiopulmonary exercise test

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Patients randomized after enrollment to receive either standard biventricular pacing, or preferential left ventricular pacing (left ventricle will be resynchronized, but right ventricle will be activated through the intrinsic conduction system)
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Patient and assessor unaware of chosen programming mode and activated algorithms. The standard of care that is biventricular pacing will be provided to all participants.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
220 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Classical biventricular pacing
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Commercially available LV-pacing capable CRT devices and quadripolar leads will be implanted. Right ventricular (RV) and right atrial (RA) leads will be placed according to standard practice. The LV lead will also be placed according to standard practice, targeting to a lateral, posterolateral, or anterolateral branch of the coronary sinus (CS). Interventricular delay programmed will be determined based on stroke volume maximization, and will be used as a criterion for BVP optimization. Atrioventricular delay optimization shall be automatically performed by the device.
Arm Title
Preferential left ventricular pacing
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In G2 patients, an algorithm for preferential left ventricular pacing will be activated. Following selection of the dipole maximizing stroke volume during simultaneous LV-RV pacing, subsequent V-V delay optimization shall be delegated to the algorithm. Based on previous studies, a subgroup analysis of G2 will be performed, comparing those receiving ≥50% with those receiving <50% preferential LV pacing evaluated over the total duration of the study (12 months).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Preferential left ventricular pacing
Intervention Description
Activation of an algorithm attempting to provide preferential left ventricular pacing in an anticipatory manner, thus potentially preventing iatrogenic, pacing-related, right ventricular dysfunction, and improving coupling and outcomes in dyssynchronous heart failure patients
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Biventricular pacing
Intervention Description
Standard biventricular pacing, with V-V delay programmed based on stroke volume maximization, and A-V delay delegated to the device
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in patient exercise capacity
Description
Assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise test in terms of maximal oxygen consumption in ml/kg/min
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of hospitalizations for heart failure
Description
Data retrieved from online patient file will be used to compare number of unplanned hospitalizations for worsening heart failure between groups
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Left ventricular function
Description
Assessed by ejection fraction (in %), strain echocardiography - changes in % global longitudinal peak strain and diastolic function indices (E/e')
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Right ventricular function
Description
Assessed by strain echocardiography in terms of two-dimensional % global longitudinal peak strain
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Ventriculoarterial coupling for both systemic and pulmonary circulation
Description
Assessed by the noninvasive single-beat echocardiographic method in terms of distance from 1 (value associated with maximization of stroke work for a given contractility)
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18-80 years old Provided informed consent Any cardiomyopathy type, diagnosed at least 6 months prior (to exclude recent myocarditis cases that may remit and confound outcomes) On optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months, An existing I/IIa indication for a CRT-D device Both new CRT-D implantation and an upgrade from an existing ICD or pacemaker with no prior left ventricular lead placement. Exclusion Criteria: Have an existing Class I recalled lead, Are anticipated to need heart transplantation within the next 9 months, Have undergone cardiac transplantation less than 40 days prior to enrolment, Have had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within 3 months of enrollment, Have had a recent myocardial infarction less than 40 days prior to enrollment, or unstable angina or cardiac revascularization less than 3 months prior to enrolment, Have documented moderate to severe/severe mitral/aortic/tricuspid/pulmonary insufficiency (noninvasive VAC calculation impossible), Exhibit a daily burden of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) of either ≥10% of total QRSs or ≥10,000 on ambulatory ECG recording21, 22 (to exclude PVC-related, potentially reversible cardiomyopathy), Are currently participating in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment arm, Have diagnosed pulmonary hypertension other than class II (left heart-related), Have known stage IV-V renal dysfunction (clearance estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation), Have permanent atrial fibrillation, Have complete atrioventricular block, Have a prolonged (>200msec) PQ interval on surface ECG (thus invalidating the option for preferential LV pacing), Are pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the duration of the study (in case of unplanned pregnancy the patient will have to be excluded from the study), Have an expected life expectancy of <12 months, or Undergo major adaptations to their pharmacological regimens during follow-up (e.g. initiation of neprilysin inhibitors).
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Christina Chrysohoou, MD PhD
Phone
00306944435168
Email
chrysohoou@usa.net
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou, MD PhD
Phone
00306972708430
Email
ckantoniou@hotmail.gr
Facility Information:
Facility Name
First University Department of Cardiology, Hippokrateion General Hospital
City
Athens
State/Province
Attica
ZIP/Postal Code
11527
Country
Greece
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Manina Anastasopoulou
Phone
00302132088027
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Polychronis Dilaveris, MD PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christina Chrysohoou, MD PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou, MD PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Konstantinos Konstantinou, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Panagiotis Xydis, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Panagiota Manolakou, MD PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dimitrios Tousoulis, MD PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Study design data and anonymized individual data allowing for pooling in subsequent analyses
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data to be shared 2 years after study completion
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Request made by investigator with an active, registered clinical trial

Learn more about this trial

Effects of Preferential Left Ventricular Pacing on Ventriculoarterial Coupling and Clinical Course of Heart Failure

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs