search
Back to results

Management Of Large Incisional Hernia, Double Mesh Modification Of Chevrel's Technique Versus On Lay Mesh Hernioplasty

Primary Purpose

Hernia Incisional Ventral

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Egypt
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
double mesh modification of chevrel's technique
on lay mesh hernioplasty
Sponsored by
Zagazig University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hernia Incisional Ventral focused on measuring midline incisional hernia chevrel

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

• above 18 years old suffering large midline incisional hernia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • complicated incisional hernia,
  • advanced cardiac, respiratory, liver and renal diseases
  • patients with abdominal and abdominal wall malignancy
  • ASA III and IV

Sites / Locations

  • Zagazig Faculty of Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

modified chevrel technique

ON LAY mesh hernioplasty

Arm Description

22 participant with large midline incisional hernia underwent repair by double mesh modification of chevrel's technique

21 participant with large midline incisional hernia underwent repair by online mesh hernioplasty

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

incidence of skin flap ischemia
impaired capillary filling of wound skin flaps , measured by clinical examination (capillary filling time > 2 seconds)
incidence of seroma formation
presence of more than 20 ml serous fluid collected around the mesh prosthesis measured by superficial probe ultrasound
incidence of hernia recurrence
presence of hernia defect of any size in the midline or near it detected by ultrasound or coputerized tomography scan of the anterior abdominal wall

Secondary Outcome Measures

difference between operative time of both groups
the time between the start point of the operative procedure and the end of the operative procedure

Full Information

First Posted
June 7, 2020
Last Updated
June 11, 2020
Sponsor
Zagazig University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04430816
Brief Title
Management Of Large Incisional Hernia, Double Mesh Modification Of Chevrel's Technique Versus On Lay Mesh Hernioplasty
Official Title
Management Of Large Incisional Hernia, Double Mesh Modification Of Chevrel's Technique Versus On Lay Mesh Hernioplasty, A Comparative Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Zagazig University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
comparison between two groups of large midline incisional hernia, the first group managed by double mesh modification of chevrel's technique the second one managed by conventional onlay mesh repair
Detailed Description
This comparative study was carried out in general surgery unit, Zagazig university hospitals, between January 2018 and December 2020, on 43 cases with large incisional hernia, participants were randomly allocated according to the deemed option of management into two groups, group A, the modified Chevrel group, 22 participants were treated by double mesh modification of Chevrel's technique, and group B, the on-lay group, participants treated by anatomical repair and fixation of non-absorbable mesh in on-lay position. inclusion criteria > 18 years old suffering large midline incisional hernia. exclusion criteria complicated incisional hernia, advanced cardiac, respiratory, liver and renal diseases patients with abdominal and abdominal wall malignancy ASA III and IV The study condition is the large midline incisional hernia defined as hernia following mid line incision, its defect is 10 cm or more in any of its diameters. The main outcome of the study is recurrence of hernia and local complications mainly skin sloughing, seroma formation and wound infection. All the study participants signed an informed written consent, the study was approved by our local ethical committee and institutional review board All the study participants were subjected to thorough history taking and full systemic and abdominal examination chest X ray, abdomino-pelvic ultrasound examination, measuring of the defect by ultrasound or abdominal CT if needed, preoperative routine laboratory tests, fractionated heparin was given when indicated as a prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis (BMI >35, previous history of DVT,), they were given third generation cephalosporins just before the induction of anesthesia. Procedures : In participants of the double mesh modification of Chevrel's technique, after excision of the previous scar, skin and subcutaneous tissue was dissected off the hernia sac, the sac was then opened, released off intra-abdominal adhesions and resected, the real defect size was measured, the skin and subcutaneous tissue was dissected off the anterior rectus sheath, dissection was limited to less than 2 cm lateral to the hernia defect edges. Then, a bilateral vertical incisions of the anterior rectus sheath was done parallel to the midline and at maximum 2 cm far from it thus two medial anterior rectus sheath flaps could be created and dissected off the rectus abdominis muscles on both sides, dissection of both recti abdominis muscles was continued to be separated off the posterior rectus sheath opening the retro-rectus space, linea alba was reformed by suturing each of the newly formed medial anterior rectus sheath flaps to its fellow of the other side, using Vicryl\0 sutures, the flaps help tension free closure of the defect and formation of a common posterior rectus sheath, A prolene mesh was spread in the retro-rectus space, extending between the two lateral ends of the space and 4 cm beyond the vertical edges of the defect, fixed to the posterior sheath with prolene sutures . At the end the anterior rectus sheath was closed with prolene mesh tailored to the space between lateral flaps of anterior rectus sheath, and sutured to their medial edges with interrupted non absorbable sutures . In the group of on-lay mesh repair the old scar was excised, the sac was laid open at its fundus, adhesolysis was done to free the abdominal viscera from the parietal peritoneum, the sac was excised, skin and subcutaneous tissue were dissected of the anterior rectus sheath till the linea semilunaris, taking care to preserve the perforating vessels, anatomical repair was done by midline closure with prolene 1\0 non absorbable interrupted suture, a prolene mesh was fixed in on-lay position by prolene 2\0 sutures. In both groups after proper hemostasis a suction drain was left over the mesh, subcutaneous tissue was approximated by vicryl 3\0 skin closed by prolene 3\0.in the postoperative period patients received non-steroid pain killer according to need and third generation cephalosporin intravenous injection, wounds were observed after 24 hours for assessment of any local wound complications specially skin flap ischemia, after discharge patients were followed up in the outpatients clinic by the attending surgeon, follow up data including (wound complications as sloughing of skin flap, drainage amount and duration, corset feeling, parasthesia of abdominal wall and corset feeling) was collected in each visit, two months after operation an abdominal wall ultrasound examination was done for detection of early recurrence, a clinic visits or phone contact was done every 6 months till the end of the study. Continues data was presented in mean and standard deviation, statistically analyzed using t test, z test, in SPSS program 22

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hernia Incisional Ventral
Keywords
midline incisional hernia chevrel

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
two groups of patients with incisional hernia group A underwent double mesh modification of chevrel's technique, group B underwent onlay mesh hernioplasty
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
the participants don't know the procedure they will undergo
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
43 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
modified chevrel technique
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
22 participant with large midline incisional hernia underwent repair by double mesh modification of chevrel's technique
Arm Title
ON LAY mesh hernioplasty
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
21 participant with large midline incisional hernia underwent repair by online mesh hernioplasty
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
double mesh modification of chevrel's technique
Intervention Description
repair of midline incisional hernia by double mesh modification of chevrel's technique
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
on lay mesh hernioplasty
Intervention Description
repair of midline incisional hernia by online mesh hernioplasty
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
incidence of skin flap ischemia
Description
impaired capillary filling of wound skin flaps , measured by clinical examination (capillary filling time > 2 seconds)
Time Frame
24 hours postoperative
Title
incidence of seroma formation
Description
presence of more than 20 ml serous fluid collected around the mesh prosthesis measured by superficial probe ultrasound
Time Frame
24 hours after drain removal
Title
incidence of hernia recurrence
Description
presence of hernia defect of any size in the midline or near it detected by ultrasound or coputerized tomography scan of the anterior abdominal wall
Time Frame
in the first 2 years post operative
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
difference between operative time of both groups
Description
the time between the start point of the operative procedure and the end of the operative procedure
Time Frame
1 day

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: • above 18 years old suffering large midline incisional hernia. Exclusion Criteria: complicated incisional hernia, advanced cardiac, respiratory, liver and renal diseases patients with abdominal and abdominal wall malignancy ASA III and IV
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
hazem nour, MD
Organizational Affiliation
zag university
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Zagazig Faculty of Medicine
City
Zagazig
State/Province
Sharqya
ZIP/Postal Code
44519
Country
Egypt

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Management Of Large Incisional Hernia, Double Mesh Modification Of Chevrel's Technique Versus On Lay Mesh Hernioplasty

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs