REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant System in Full-thickness Tears (REGENETEN)
Primary Purpose
Rotator Cuff Injuries
Status
Suspended
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant augmentation
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for revision surgery
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Rotator Cuff Injuries focused on measuring Rotator cuff tendon, Full thickness tears, REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant System
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject requires Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR);
- Subjects with a diagnosis of a symptomatic primary or recurrent (revision repair subject group), large or massive tear (≥ 3 cm AP/ML) of the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendons amenable to repair. For screening purposes, a ≥ 2 cm AP/ML tear as measured on MRI will be eligible to proceed to the operative visit but will have to be confirmed as ≥ 3 cm on arthroscopy using a calibrated probe to proceed;
- Subject is > 40 years of age (no upper limit);
- Subject provides written informed consent for study participation using an Independent Ethical Committee (IEC) / Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved consent form;
- Subject is willing and able to participate in required follow-up visits and is able to complete study activities.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects who are unable to tolerate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), due to psychiatric or medical contraindications;
- Subjects with Samilson-Prieto osteoarthritis > 2;
- Subjects with current or prior infection of the ipsilateral shoulder;
- Subjects with known hypersensitivity to bovine-derived materials;
- Subjects with known inflammatory arthropathy, history of inflammatory arthropathy, or chronic joint disease;
- Subjects with prior shoulder surgery (not including rotator cuff repair [revision repair subject group only], biceps tenodesis/tenotomy, distal clavicle excision [DCE], subacromial decompression);
- Subjects with an irreparable or partially reparable rotator cuff tear;
- Subjects with a subscapularis tear requiring repair;
- Subjects requiring a concomitant labral fixation procedure;
- Subjects requiring a concomitant os acromiale fixation procedure;
- Subjects with glenohumeral joint instability (multiple dislocations/subluxations);
- Subjects with a subacromial or intra-articular injection within 3 months prior to surgery;
- Subjects with condition(s) that contraindicate or complicate outcomes of ARCR e.g., > Hamada 3 rotator cuff arthropathy on X-ray, Goutallier atrophy > Grade 3, proximal humeral fracture or scapular fracture, avascular necrosis of the humeral head or glenoid, history of immunodeficiency disorders, history of chronic inflammatory disorders, oral or injected steroid use in last 4 weeks;
- Subjects who are pregnant or breast feeding;
- Subjects who are currently involved in any injury litigation or workers compensation claims;
- Subjects who are enrolled, or plan to enroll, in another clinical trial during this study that would affect the outcomes of this study;
- Subjects with a history of noncompliance with medical treatment, physical therapy (PT)/rehabilitation, or clinical study participation
- Subject who, in the opinion of the Investigator, has an emotional or neurological condition that would pre-empt their ability or willingness to participate in the study including mental illness, mental retardation, and drug or alcohol abuse;
- Subjects who do not meet the indication or are contraindicated according to specific Smith+Nephew REGENETEN System's Instructions for Use (IFUs);
- Subject that meets the definition of a Vulnerable Subject per ISO14155:2020 Section 3.44.
Sites / Locations
- Harbin Clinic
- Rush University Medical Center
- Sinai Hospital
- Syracuse Orthopedic Specialists
- Cleveland Clinic
- Texas Orthopedic Specialists
- Houston Methodist The Woodlands
- Ashland Memorial Medical Center
- Macquarie University Hospital
- OrthoSport Victoria
- Saint John Orthopaedics
- McMaster University
- Women's College Hospital Toronto
- Hôpital Ambroise Paré
- Hôpital Pasteur 2
- Clinique Saint-Jean - Montpellier
- Bichat Hospital
- Hôpital Privé de l'Ouest Parisien
- Prince of Wales Hospital
- Singapore General Hospital
- Balgrist University Hospital
- Schulthess Klinik
- Royal Blackburn Hospital
- University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust
- Nottingham University Hospital
- University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire
- The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Southmead Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Sham Comparator
Other
Arm Label
ARCR augmented with REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant
ARCR alone
ARCR revision group
Arm Description
During the ARCR procedure, the REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant is covering the tendon and attached to the bone and the tendon with small anchors.
The rotator cuff is repaired during arthroscopic standard procedure. No product is added for healing
ARCR revision group allows treatment of subjects having recurrent tears, ARCR supplemented with REGENETEN
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
6 months retear rate
The cumulative 6 months retear rate after full-thickness ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone. Failure is defined as Sugaya Type IV or V retear/recurrence (fullthickness discontinuity seen on both coronal and oblique sagittal MRI images).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Retear rate
Cumulative 3, 6, 12, and 24 months retear rate after fullthickness ARCR augmented with REGENETEN (confirmed on MRI) versus ARCR alone. Failure is defined as Sugaya Type IV or V retear/recurrence (full-thickness discontinuity seen on both coronal and oblique sagittal MRI images).
Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)
The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is a questionnaire for the assessment of outcomes of shoulder surgery, which can reduce the observer's errors in the evaluation. It contains 12- item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures specifically designed and developed for assessing outcomes of shoulder surgery such as assessing the impact on patients' quality of life of degenerative conditions (e.g., arthritis and rotator cuff problems). The OSS consists of 12 questions each scored 0 to 4 (0=unbearable, 1=severe, 2=moderate, 3=mild, 4=none) with 4 representing the best outcome. When the 12 items are summed, this produces overall scores that run from 0 to 48, with zero (0) representing a severe shoulder problem and 48 representing no related problem. Higher scores represent better clinical outcomes.
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC)/Chinese version WORC (C-WORC) Index)
The WORC/C-WORC Index is self-administered, and includes a 5 different domains (physical symptoms, sports and recreation, work, social function, and emotions). Each question uses a visual analog scale (VAS) representing a 100-point scale ranging from 0 to 100. The maximum score is 2100 (worst possible symptoms). Zero (0) represents no symptoms at all. The final score can also be presented as a percentage by subtracting the total from 2100, dividing by 2100, and multiplying by 100. This will give you an overall percentage. The total final WORC/CWORC Index scores can, therefore, range from 0% (lowest functional status level) to 100% (highest functional status level).
Constant-Murley Score
The Constant-Murley Score is a validated assessment of pain and shoulder functionality. The Constant Score is divided into 4 subscales: pain (15 points; VAS score range of 0-15), activities of daily living (20 points; range 0=worst, 5=best), strength (25 points; 1 point given per 0.5 kg of weights raised), and range of motion - forward flexion, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder (40 points; range 0=worst, 10=best). The higher the score, the higher the quality of function.
Subjective shoulder value (SSV)
Overall performance of full-thickness ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone at Baseline and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months assessed by the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). The SSV is defined as a patient's subjective shoulder assessment expressed as a percentage of an entirely normal shoulder, which would score 100% (0% to 100% scale with 100% being normal).
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score
The EQ-5D-5L score consists of two parts: a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale. The descriptive system is used to describe the subject's health state and consists of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels to choose the most appropriate answer: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The subject is asked to indicate his/her health state by marking the most appropriate statement in each of the five areas.
The visual analogue scale records the subject's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale.The endpoints on the scale are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome as judged by the individual respondents.
Patient satisfaction Questionnaire Outcome
The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire is a simple subjective assessment of the success of surgery from the patient's perspective. Pre-Op: will be documented on a visual analogue score of 0-100. Rated by the subject with 0 is the least satisfied, 100 the most satisfied.Post-Op:This includes the VAS Patient Satisfaction Score as for pre-Op and additional five questions ask of the patient:1. How well did the surgery relieve the pain? 2. How well did the surgery increase your ability to perform regular activities? 3. How well did the surgery allow you to perform heavy work or sport activities (if allowed by Dr)? 4. How well did the surgery meet your expectations? Questions rated by the patient with excellent, very good,good, fair and poor. 5. Would you have the operation again if needed on another joint? Question rated by the patient with Definitely yes, Probably yes, Possibly not, Definitely not Rated by the subject with 0 is the least satisfied, 100 the most satisfied.
Pain, Visual analog scale (VAS) Score
Overall performance of full-thickness ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone at Baseline and at 3, 6,12 and 24 months assessed by the VAS Pain Score. Pain is assessed on a 100-point scale ranging from 0 to 100, with zero (0) representing no pain and 100 representing the worst pain imaginable
MRI Tendon Findings in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone via Sugaya Score postoperatively
The Sugaya score will be used to determine postoperative cuff integrity through magnetic resonance imaging classified into 5 categories: Type I to Type V. Type I indicates sufficient thickness with homogenously low intensity. Type II indicates sufficient thickness with partial high intensity. Type III indicates insufficient thickness without discontinuity. Type IV indicates presence of a minor discontinuity, suggesting a small full-thickness tear. Type V indicates the presence of a major discontinuity, suggesting a medium or large full-thickness tear.
MRI Tendon Findings in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone via Goutallier Classification postoperatively
The Goutallier classification will be used to classify the fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff. The Goutallier classification ranges from a grade of 0 indicating a completely normal muscles without any fatty streaks to a grade of 4 which indicates that more fat than muscle is present.
Total tendon thickness, tendon length will be assessed by MRI Tendon Findings in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone postoperatively
Tendon thickness, length will be assessed by MRI
Size of retear: anteroposterior [AP]/mediolateral [ML]) postoperatively
Size of retear will be based on MRI Tendon Findings in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone.
Shape of retear postoperatively
Shape of retear will be based on MRI Tendon Findings in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone
Outcome of Return to Work Questionnaire in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone
Generic questionnaire, covering work related questions,including demographics on laborer/sedentary.
Cumulative duration of opioid use in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone
Self-reported opioid use diary completed by the patient on a daily basis, from day 0-14, documenting opioid use. Consumption daily (YES/NO) x14 days, 'Have you taken any opioid medication today for shoulder pain?' Y/N .
Total operative time ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone
Total operative time ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone.
Sling type and mobilization time in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone
The type of sling will be collected and presented for each treatment arm summarizing if standard sling, shoulder immobilizer, abduction sling, ER sling, or other were advised and mobilization time will be calculated for both arms summarizing mobilization duration.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04450342
Brief Title
REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant System in Full-thickness Tears
Acronym
REGENETEN
Official Title
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ARCR Augmented With REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant System in Full-thickness Tears (Large or Massive) Repair Versus ARCR Alone
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Suspended
Why Stopped
Sponsor decision not related to safety.
Study Start Date
December 7, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The study is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) augmented with REGENETEN in subjects requiring full-thickness rotator cuff tear repair or revision repair versus Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair alone.
Detailed Description
This study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, controlled clinical study in the treatment of full thickness tears of the rotator cuff (large or massive ≥3 cm in AP or ML according to Cofield classification). The subjects meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria specified in the protocol will receive either ARCR augmented with REGENETEN or ARCR alone. Subjects enrolled into the revision repair subject group will receive ARCR augmented with REGENETEN. The clinical follow-up evaluation will be performed preoperatively (Baseline), 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, respectively using subjective outcome measures, objective measures of movement and an MRI scan to assess the integrity of the repair and assess the re-tear rate. Health economic data will also be collected.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rotator Cuff Injuries
Keywords
Rotator cuff tendon, Full thickness tears, REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant System
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
300 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
ARCR augmented with REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
During the ARCR procedure, the REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant is covering the tendon and attached to the bone and the tendon with small anchors.
Arm Title
ARCR alone
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
The rotator cuff is repaired during arthroscopic standard procedure. No product is added for healing
Arm Title
ARCR revision group
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
ARCR revision group allows treatment of subjects having recurrent tears, ARCR supplemented with REGENETEN
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant augmentation
Intervention Description
The Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair aims at repairing the rotator cuff following tendon tear. The REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant is a medical device intended for the management and protection of tendon injuries. The REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant is indicated for the management and protection of rotator cuff tendon injuries in which there has been no substantial loss of tendon tissue. The REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant is a bioabsorbable implant device that provides a layer of collagen over injured tendons. The implant is designed to provide a layer of collagen between a flat tendon and the surrounding tissue. After hydration, the implant is an easy-to-handle, pliable, nonfriable, porous collagen sheet.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
Intervention Description
The Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair aims at repairing the rotator cuff following tendon tear without supplement.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for revision surgery
Intervention Description
The Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can also occur in recurrent tears. The REGENETEN Bioinductive Implant will be applied during the ARCR procedure.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
6 months retear rate
Description
The cumulative 6 months retear rate after full-thickness ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone. Failure is defined as Sugaya Type IV or V retear/recurrence (fullthickness discontinuity seen on both coronal and oblique sagittal MRI images).
Time Frame
6 months post surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Retear rate
Description
Cumulative 3, 6, 12, and 24 months retear rate after fullthickness ARCR augmented with REGENETEN (confirmed on MRI) versus ARCR alone. Failure is defined as Sugaya Type IV or V retear/recurrence (full-thickness discontinuity seen on both coronal and oblique sagittal MRI images).
Time Frame
3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Title
Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)
Description
The Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) is a questionnaire for the assessment of outcomes of shoulder surgery, which can reduce the observer's errors in the evaluation. It contains 12- item patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures specifically designed and developed for assessing outcomes of shoulder surgery such as assessing the impact on patients' quality of life of degenerative conditions (e.g., arthritis and rotator cuff problems). The OSS consists of 12 questions each scored 0 to 4 (0=unbearable, 1=severe, 2=moderate, 3=mild, 4=none) with 4 representing the best outcome. When the 12 items are summed, this produces overall scores that run from 0 to 48, with zero (0) representing a severe shoulder problem and 48 representing no related problem. Higher scores represent better clinical outcomes.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC)/Chinese version WORC (C-WORC) Index)
Description
The WORC/C-WORC Index is self-administered, and includes a 5 different domains (physical symptoms, sports and recreation, work, social function, and emotions). Each question uses a visual analog scale (VAS) representing a 100-point scale ranging from 0 to 100. The maximum score is 2100 (worst possible symptoms). Zero (0) represents no symptoms at all. The final score can also be presented as a percentage by subtracting the total from 2100, dividing by 2100, and multiplying by 100. This will give you an overall percentage. The total final WORC/CWORC Index scores can, therefore, range from 0% (lowest functional status level) to 100% (highest functional status level).
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Constant-Murley Score
Description
The Constant-Murley Score is a validated assessment of pain and shoulder functionality. The Constant Score is divided into 4 subscales: pain (15 points; VAS score range of 0-15), activities of daily living (20 points; range 0=worst, 5=best), strength (25 points; 1 point given per 0.5 kg of weights raised), and range of motion - forward flexion, external rotation, abduction and internal rotation of the shoulder (40 points; range 0=worst, 10=best). The higher the score, the higher the quality of function.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Subjective shoulder value (SSV)
Description
Overall performance of full-thickness ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone at Baseline and at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months assessed by the Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV). The SSV is defined as a patient's subjective shoulder assessment expressed as a percentage of an entirely normal shoulder, which would score 100% (0% to 100% scale with 100% being normal).
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Score
Description
The EQ-5D-5L score consists of two parts: a descriptive system and a visual analogue scale. The descriptive system is used to describe the subject's health state and consists of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels to choose the most appropriate answer: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The subject is asked to indicate his/her health state by marking the most appropriate statement in each of the five areas.
The visual analogue scale records the subject's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale.The endpoints on the scale are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome as judged by the individual respondents.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Patient satisfaction Questionnaire Outcome
Description
The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire is a simple subjective assessment of the success of surgery from the patient's perspective. Pre-Op: will be documented on a visual analogue score of 0-100. Rated by the subject with 0 is the least satisfied, 100 the most satisfied.Post-Op:This includes the VAS Patient Satisfaction Score as for pre-Op and additional five questions ask of the patient:1. How well did the surgery relieve the pain? 2. How well did the surgery increase your ability to perform regular activities? 3. How well did the surgery allow you to perform heavy work or sport activities (if allowed by Dr)? 4. How well did the surgery meet your expectations? Questions rated by the patient with excellent, very good,good, fair and poor. 5. Would you have the operation again if needed on another joint? Question rated by the patient with Definitely yes, Probably yes, Possibly not, Definitely not Rated by the subject with 0 is the least satisfied, 100 the most satisfied.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Pain, Visual analog scale (VAS) Score
Description
Overall performance of full-thickness ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone at Baseline and at 3, 6,12 and 24 months assessed by the VAS Pain Score. Pain is assessed on a 100-point scale ranging from 0 to 100, with zero (0) representing no pain and 100 representing the worst pain imaginable
Time Frame
Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months
Title
MRI Tendon Findings in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone via Sugaya Score postoperatively
Description
The Sugaya score will be used to determine postoperative cuff integrity through magnetic resonance imaging classified into 5 categories: Type I to Type V. Type I indicates sufficient thickness with homogenously low intensity. Type II indicates sufficient thickness with partial high intensity. Type III indicates insufficient thickness without discontinuity. Type IV indicates presence of a minor discontinuity, suggesting a small full-thickness tear. Type V indicates the presence of a major discontinuity, suggesting a medium or large full-thickness tear.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
MRI Tendon Findings in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone via Goutallier Classification postoperatively
Description
The Goutallier classification will be used to classify the fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff. The Goutallier classification ranges from a grade of 0 indicating a completely normal muscles without any fatty streaks to a grade of 4 which indicates that more fat than muscle is present.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Total tendon thickness, tendon length will be assessed by MRI Tendon Findings in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone postoperatively
Description
Tendon thickness, length will be assessed by MRI
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Size of retear: anteroposterior [AP]/mediolateral [ML]) postoperatively
Description
Size of retear will be based on MRI Tendon Findings in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Shape of retear postoperatively
Description
Shape of retear will be based on MRI Tendon Findings in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone
Time Frame
Baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Outcome of Return to Work Questionnaire in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone
Description
Generic questionnaire, covering work related questions,including demographics on laborer/sedentary.
Time Frame
Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months
Title
Cumulative duration of opioid use in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone
Description
Self-reported opioid use diary completed by the patient on a daily basis, from day 0-14, documenting opioid use. Consumption daily (YES/NO) x14 days, 'Have you taken any opioid medication today for shoulder pain?' Y/N .
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Total operative time ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone
Description
Total operative time ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone.
Time Frame
Intra-operative time
Title
Sling type and mobilization time in ARCR augmented with REGENETEN versus ARCR alone
Description
The type of sling will be collected and presented for each treatment arm summarizing if standard sling, shoulder immobilizer, abduction sling, ER sling, or other were advised and mobilization time will be calculated for both arms summarizing mobilization duration.
Time Frame
3 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject requires Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR);
Subjects with a diagnosis of a symptomatic primary or recurrent (revision repair subject group), large or massive tear (≥ 3 cm AP/ML) of the supraspinatus and/or infraspinatus tendons amenable to repair. For screening purposes, a ≥ 2 cm AP/ML tear as measured on MRI will be eligible to proceed to the operative visit but will have to be confirmed as ≥ 3 cm on arthroscopy using a calibrated probe to proceed;
Subject is > 40 years of age (no upper limit);
Subject provides written informed consent for study participation using an Independent Ethical Committee (IEC) / Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved consent form;
Subject is willing and able to participate in required follow-up visits and is able to complete study activities.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects who are unable to tolerate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), due to psychiatric or medical contraindications;
Subjects with Samilson-Prieto osteoarthritis > 2;
Subjects with current or prior infection of the ipsilateral shoulder;
Subjects with known hypersensitivity to bovine-derived materials;
Subjects with known inflammatory arthropathy, history of inflammatory arthropathy, or chronic joint disease;
Subjects with prior shoulder surgery (not including rotator cuff repair [revision repair subject group only], biceps tenodesis/tenotomy, distal clavicle excision [DCE], subacromial decompression);
Subjects with an irreparable or partially reparable rotator cuff tear;
Subjects with a subscapularis tear requiring repair;
Subjects requiring a concomitant labral fixation procedure;
Subjects requiring a concomitant os acromiale fixation procedure;
Subjects with glenohumeral joint instability (multiple dislocations/subluxations);
Subjects with a subacromial or intra-articular injection within 3 months prior to surgery;
Subjects with condition(s) that contraindicate or complicate outcomes of ARCR e.g., > Hamada 3 rotator cuff arthropathy on X-ray, Goutallier atrophy > Grade 3, proximal humeral fracture or scapular fracture, avascular necrosis of the humeral head or glenoid, history of immunodeficiency disorders, history of chronic inflammatory disorders, oral or injected steroid use in last 4 weeks;
Subjects who are pregnant or breast feeding;
Subjects who are currently involved in any injury litigation or workers compensation claims;
Subjects who are enrolled, or plan to enroll, in another clinical trial during this study that would affect the outcomes of this study;
Subjects with a history of noncompliance with medical treatment, physical therapy (PT)/rehabilitation, or clinical study participation
Subject who, in the opinion of the Investigator, has an emotional or neurological condition that would pre-empt their ability or willingness to participate in the study including mental illness, mental retardation, and drug or alcohol abuse;
Subjects who do not meet the indication or are contraindicated according to specific Smith+Nephew REGENETEN System's Instructions for Use (IFUs);
Subject that meets the definition of a Vulnerable Subject per ISO14155:2020 Section 3.44.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chris Peach, MBBS MD FRCS (Tr&Orth)
Organizational Affiliation
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Harbin Clinic
City
Rome
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30165
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rush University Medical Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sinai Hospital
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21215
Country
United States
Facility Name
Syracuse Orthopedic Specialists
City
DeWitt
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13214
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44125
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Orthopedic Specialists
City
Bedford
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76021-5011
Country
United States
Facility Name
Houston Methodist The Woodlands
City
The Woodlands
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
17201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ashland Memorial Medical Center
City
Ashland
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
54806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Macquarie University Hospital
City
Sydney
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2109
Country
Australia
Facility Name
OrthoSport Victoria
City
Richmond
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3121
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Saint John Orthopaedics
City
Saint John
State/Province
New Brunswick
ZIP/Postal Code
E2K 4X2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
McMaster University
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L8N 4A6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Women's College Hospital Toronto
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5S 1B2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Hôpital Ambroise Paré
City
Paris
State/Province
Boulogne-Billancourt
ZIP/Postal Code
92100
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Pasteur 2
City
Nice
State/Province
Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
ZIP/Postal Code
06000
Country
France
Facility Name
Clinique Saint-Jean - Montpellier
City
Montpellier
ZIP/Postal Code
34430
Country
France
Facility Name
Bichat Hospital
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75018
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Privé de l'Ouest Parisien
City
Trappes
State/Province
Île-de-France
ZIP/Postal Code
78190
Country
France
Facility Name
Prince of Wales Hospital
City
Hong Kong
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Singapore General Hospital
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
169856
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
Balgrist University Hospital
City
Zurich
ZIP/Postal Code
8008
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Schulthess Klinik
City
Zurich
ZIP/Postal Code
8008
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Royal Blackburn Hospital
City
Blackburn
State/Province
Lancashire
ZIP/Postal Code
BB2 3HH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
City
Wythenshawe
State/Province
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M23 9LT
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Liverpool
State/Province
Merseyside
ZIP/Postal Code
L7 8XP
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust
City
Stanmore
State/Province
Middlesex
ZIP/Postal Code
HA7 4LP
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Nottingham University Hospital
City
Nottingham
State/Province
Nottinghamshire
ZIP/Postal Code
NG7 2UH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire
City
Coventry
State/Province
Warwickshire
ZIP/Postal Code
CV2 2DX
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
City
Birmingham
State/Province
West Midlands
ZIP/Postal Code
B31 2AP
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Southmead Hospital
City
Bristol
ZIP/Postal Code
BS105NB
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
REGENETEN™ Bioinductive Implant System in Full-thickness Tears
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs