search
Back to results

Impact of Virtual Reality Distraction on Pain and Anxiety for Bedside Abdominal VAC Dressing Change (VIRPA)

Primary Purpose

Pain, Anxiety, Satisfaction, Patient

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
VRD in addition to standardized analgesic protocol
Sponsored by
University of Lausanne Hospitals
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain focused on measuring Virtual reality, Pain, Anxiety, Satisfaction, VAC dressing change

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients requiring a bedside abdominal VAC dressing change
  • Patients above 18 years old
  • Patients able to give informed consent as documented by signature

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 years old
  • Patients with impaired cognitive status
  • Patients with known psychiatric disorders
  • Patients unable to follow the procedures of the study due to language problems
  • Not consent provided
  • Prior inclusion in the same trial (only 1 VAC dressing change per patient can be studied, the first one)
  • Pregnant patients

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Standardized analgesic protocol alone

VRD + standardized analgesic protocol

Arm Description

Abdominal VAC dressing change using an standardized analgesic protocol alone.

Abdominal VAC dressing change using standardized analgesic protocol + virtual reality device

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change of pain using a virtual reality device in addition to a standardized analgesic protocol for bedside abdominal VAC dressing change. Pain will be measured by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain (0-10) in the two groups.
Measurement of pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain with scores range from 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst possible pain), before (baseline: pre-procedure) and immediately after bedside abdominal vacuum assisted closure (VAC) dressing change in the two groups (virtual reality device + standardized analgesic protocol and standardized analgesic protocol alone) in order to demonstrate if a virtual reality device can reduce pain when used in addition to standard care.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change of anxiety using a virtual reality device along with a standardized analgesic protocol for bedside abdominal VAC dressing change. Anxiety will be measured by using, in the 2 groups, a VAS scale for anxiety along with a STAI questionnaire.
Measurement of anxiety using the validated questionnaire State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for anxiety from 0 (no anxiety) and 10 (worst possible anxiety), before (baseline: pre-procedure) and immediately after bedside abdominal vacuum assisted closure (VAC) in dressing change in the two groups (virtual reality device + standardized analgesic protocol and standardized analgesic protocol alone) in order to demonstrate if a virtual reality device can reduce anxiety used in addition to standard care.
Assessment of patients satisfaction using a virtual reality device in addition to a standardized analgesic protocol for bedside abdominal VAC dressing change. Satisfaction will be measured by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for satisfaction.
Satisfaction assessment using a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 (not satisfied at all) to 10 (very satisfied) in the two groups (virtual reality device + standardized analgesic protocol and standardized analgesic protocol alone) in order to demonstrate if a virtual reality device can increase patients satisfaction when used in addition to standard care. The assessment will be performed immediately after the procedure.

Full Information

First Posted
June 30, 2020
Last Updated
June 27, 2023
Sponsor
University of Lausanne Hospitals
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04472416
Brief Title
Impact of Virtual Reality Distraction on Pain and Anxiety for Bedside Abdominal VAC Dressing Change
Acronym
VIRPA
Official Title
Impact of Virtual Reality Distraction on Pain and Anxiety for Bedside Abdominal VAC Dressing Change - A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (VIRPA)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
April 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Lausanne Hospitals

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
We aim to study the use of a virtual reality device (VRD) in addition to our standardized analgesic care protocol for abdominal bedside VAC dressing change and we hypothesize to decrease pain and anxiety and to increase patients' comfort by this intervention.
Detailed Description
Monocentric non-blinded superiority randomized controlled trial: standardized analgesic protocol + virtual reality device vs. standardized analgesic protocol alone for abdominal VAC dressing change. The day of the procedure, each patient will receive a standardized local and systemic analgesia 30 minutes before starting the procedure. The referring surgeon will explain at this moment every step of the procedure of bedside abdominal VAC dressing change. Baseline levels of pain and anxiety will be assessed by use of VAS (0-10) and one additional questionnaire (STAI). Virtual reality device will be activated 15 minutes before the beginning of the procedure and will remain as long as the procedure is going on and for 15minutes after finishing the wound dressing. 15 minutes after removing the VRD and 30minutes after finishing the wound dressing the STAI questionnaire and VAS for anxiety, pain and satisfaction (0-10) will be completed by the patient.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Anxiety, Satisfaction, Patient
Keywords
Virtual reality, Pain, Anxiety, Satisfaction, VAC dressing change

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Monocentric non-blinded superiority randomized controlled trial: standardized analgesic protocol + virtual reality device vs. standardized analgesic protocol alone for abdominal VAC dressing change.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standardized analgesic protocol alone
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Abdominal VAC dressing change using an standardized analgesic protocol alone.
Arm Title
VRD + standardized analgesic protocol
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Abdominal VAC dressing change using standardized analgesic protocol + virtual reality device
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
VRD in addition to standardized analgesic protocol
Intervention Description
Use of VRD in addition to standardized analgesic protoco for abdominal VAC dressing change
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change of pain using a virtual reality device in addition to a standardized analgesic protocol for bedside abdominal VAC dressing change. Pain will be measured by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain (0-10) in the two groups.
Description
Measurement of pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain with scores range from 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst possible pain), before (baseline: pre-procedure) and immediately after bedside abdominal vacuum assisted closure (VAC) dressing change in the two groups (virtual reality device + standardized analgesic protocol and standardized analgesic protocol alone) in order to demonstrate if a virtual reality device can reduce pain when used in addition to standard care.
Time Frame
Baseline (pre-procedure) and immediately after the procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change of anxiety using a virtual reality device along with a standardized analgesic protocol for bedside abdominal VAC dressing change. Anxiety will be measured by using, in the 2 groups, a VAS scale for anxiety along with a STAI questionnaire.
Description
Measurement of anxiety using the validated questionnaire State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for anxiety from 0 (no anxiety) and 10 (worst possible anxiety), before (baseline: pre-procedure) and immediately after bedside abdominal vacuum assisted closure (VAC) in dressing change in the two groups (virtual reality device + standardized analgesic protocol and standardized analgesic protocol alone) in order to demonstrate if a virtual reality device can reduce anxiety used in addition to standard care.
Time Frame
Baseline (pre-procedure) and immediately after the procedure
Title
Assessment of patients satisfaction using a virtual reality device in addition to a standardized analgesic protocol for bedside abdominal VAC dressing change. Satisfaction will be measured by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) for satisfaction.
Description
Satisfaction assessment using a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 (not satisfied at all) to 10 (very satisfied) in the two groups (virtual reality device + standardized analgesic protocol and standardized analgesic protocol alone) in order to demonstrate if a virtual reality device can increase patients satisfaction when used in addition to standard care. The assessment will be performed immediately after the procedure.
Time Frame
Immediately after the procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients requiring a bedside abdominal VAC dressing change Patients above 18 years old Patients able to give informed consent as documented by signature Exclusion Criteria: Patients under 18 years old Patients with impaired cognitive status Patients with known psychiatric disorders Patients unable to follow the procedures of the study due to language problems Not consent provided Prior inclusion in the same trial (only 1 VAC dressing change per patient can be studied, the first one) Pregnant patients
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Martin Hubner, Prof
Phone
00410795561506
Email
Martin.Hubner@chuv.ch
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Beatriz Barbera Carbonell, MD
Phone
00410795568493
Email
Beatriz.Barbera-Carbonell@chuv.ch
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Martin Hubner, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
Lausanne University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital Center
City
Lausanne
ZIP/Postal Code
1011
Country
Switzerland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Martin Hubner, MD
Phone
+41 21 314 2418
Email
martin.hubner@chuv.ch

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24935079
Citation
Huang C, Leavitt T, Bayer LR, Orgill DP. Effect of negative pressure wound therapy on wound healing. Curr Probl Surg. 2014 Jul;51(7):301-31. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27073441
Citation
Ma Z, Shou K, Li Z, Jian C, Qi B, Yu A. Negative pressure wound therapy promotes vessel destabilization and maturation at various stages of wound healing and thus influences wound prognosis. Exp Ther Med. 2016 Apr;11(4):1307-1317. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3083. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9577325
Citation
Banwell P, Withey S, Holten I. The use of negative pressure to promote healing. Br J Plast Surg. 1998 Jan;51(1):79. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(98)80142-2. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30267040
Citation
Sahebally SM, McKevitt K, Stephens I, Fitzpatrick F, Deasy J, Burke JP, McNamara D. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Closed Laparotomy Incisions in General and Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2018 Nov 1;153(11):e183467. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3467. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31529194
Citation
Donlon NE, Boland PA, Kelly ME, Schmidt K, Cooke F, Neary PM, Barry KM, Reynolds JV. Prophylactic negative wound therapy in laparotomy wounds (PROPEL trial): randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Nov;34(11):2003-2010. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03398-9. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18036981
Citation
Sharar SR, Carrougher GJ, Nakamura D, Hoffman HG, Blough DK, Patterson DR. Factors influencing the efficacy of virtual reality distraction analgesia during postburn physical therapy: preliminary results from 3 ongoing studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;88(12 Suppl 2):S43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24892198
Citation
Wiederhold MD, Gao K, Wiederhold BK. Clinical use of virtual reality distraction system to reduce anxiety and pain in dental procedures. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Jun;17(6):359-65. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0203.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30618938
Citation
Atzori B, Hoffman HG, Vagnoli L, Patterson DR, Alhalabi W, Messeri A, Lauro Grotto R. Virtual Reality Analgesia During Venipuncture in Pediatric Patients With Onco-Hematological Diseases. Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 20;9:2508. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02508. eCollection 2018.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29025113
Citation
Gupta A, Scott K, Dukewich M. Innovative Technology Using Virtual Reality in the Treatment of Pain: Does It Reduce Pain via Distraction, or Is There More to It? Pain Med. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):151-159. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx109.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17305448
Citation
Riva G, Mantovani F, Capideville CS, Preziosa A, Morganti F, Villani D, Gaggioli A, Botella C, Alcaniz M. Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2007 Feb;10(1):45-56. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9993.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28539139
Citation
Anderson AP, Mayer MD, Fellows AM, Cowan DR, Hegel MT, Buckey JC. Relaxation with Immersive Natural Scenes Presented Using Virtual Reality. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2017 Jun 1;88(6):520-526. doi: 10.3357/AMHP.4747.2017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29166665
Citation
Navarro-Haro MV, Lopez-Del-Hoyo Y, Campos D, Linehan MM, Hoffman HG, Garcia-Palacios A, Modrego-Alarcon M, Borao L, Garcia-Campayo J. Meditation experts try Virtual Reality Mindfulness: A pilot study evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of Virtual Reality to facilitate mindfulness practice in people attending a Mindfulness conference. PLoS One. 2017 Nov 22;12(11):e0187777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187777. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22588767
Citation
Julian LJ. Measures of anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11(0 11):S467-72. doi: 10.1002/acr.20561. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24899241
Citation
Guo C, Deng H, Yang J. Effect of virtual reality distraction on pain among patients with hand injury undergoing dressing change. J Clin Nurs. 2015 Jan;24(1-2):115-20. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12626. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30994846
Citation
Karaman D, Erol F, Yilmaz D, Dikmen Y. Investigation of the effect of the virtual reality application on experimental pain severity in healthy. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Mar;65(3):446-451. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.3.446. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31342823
Citation
Ding J, He Y, Chen L, Zhu B, Cai Q, Chen K, Liu G. Virtual reality distraction decreases pain during daily dressing changes following haemorrhoid surgery. J Int Med Res. 2019 Sep;47(9):4380-4388. doi: 10.1177/0300060519857862. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25914482
Citation
Umezawa S, Higurashi T, Uchiyama S, Sakai E, Ohkubo H, Endo H, Nonaka T, Nakajima A. Visual distraction alone for the improvement of colonoscopy-related pain and satisfaction. World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr 21;21(15):4707-14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i15.4707.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Impact of Virtual Reality Distraction on Pain and Anxiety for Bedside Abdominal VAC Dressing Change

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs