search
Back to results

Sirolimus- vs. Paclitaxel-Drug Coated Ballons in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (SIRONA)

Primary Purpose

Peripheral Artery Disease

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA)
Sponsored by
Jena University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Peripheral Artery Disease focused on measuring Peripheral Artery Disease, Sirolimus, Paclitaxel, Drug-Coated Balloon, Percuteanous Transaluminal Angioplasty, PPA, SFA, MagicTouch PTA

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject age ≥ 18
  2. Subject has been informed on the nature of the study, the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, agrees to complete the required testing, agrees to participate, and has signed an informed consent form.
  3. Rutherford category 2-4 according to the investigator's subjective evaluation
  4. Subject has a de novo or re-stenosed lesion with ≥ 70 % stenosis documented angiographically
  5. Target lesion length is ≥ 2 cm and ≤ 20 cm by visual estimate of the treating physician
  6. Multiple lesions with max. 3 cm healthy vessel segment in between lesions can be considered at the discretion of the operator as one lesion. Total lesion length should not exceed 20 cm
  7. Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 6.5 mm by visual estimation
  8. Patency of P2 and P3 segment of the popliteal artery and at least one (1) infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (< 50 % diameter stenosis) in continuity with the femoropopliteal artery
  9. Patency of ipsilateral iliac artery (≤ 30% diameter stenosis). Iliac artery stenosis > 30 % may be treated during the index procedure to ensure sufficient inflow.
  10. A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment intraluminal
  11. Vascular disease in the opposite leg that requires treatment at the time point of index procedure is allowed, but has to be treated according to randomization or with POBA.
  12. A patient can only be enrolled and randomized once with only one target lesion in the SIRONA trial. Please note that only the lesion in one limb can be treated as target lesion for index procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Failure to successfully cross the target lesion or subintimal target lesion guidewire crossing
  2. Flow-limiting dissection after pre-dilatation
  3. Angiographic evidence of severe calcification of the target vessel (contiguous calcification on both sides of the vessel)
  4. Presence of fresh thrombus in the target lesion
  5. Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s
  6. Prior vascular surgery (including atherectomy, bypass surgery) of the target limb
  7. Prior stent in the target lesion
  8. Stroke or heart attack within 3 months prior to enrollment
  9. Any vascular surgical procedure or intervention performed in the target limb within 30 days prior to or planned within 30 days post index procedure
  10. Any vascular treatment with PTX or sirolimus-coated devices 60 days prior to index procedure
  11. Target lesion requires treatment with alternative therapies such as primary stenting, laser, lithotripsy, thrombectomy, atherectomy, cryoplasty, brachytherapy, re-entry devices
  12. Enrolled in another investigational drug, device or biologic study
  13. Life expectancy of less than one year in the investigator's opinion
  14. Known allergies or sensitivity to heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies, sirolimus, paclitaxel or contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-treated prior to index procedure
  15. Significant gastrointestinal bleeding or any coagulopathy that would contraindicate the use of anti-platelet therapy
  16. Receiving dialysis or immunosuppressant therapy
  17. Pregnant or lactating females
  18. History of major amputation in the same limb as the target lesion

Sites / Locations

  • Medizinische Universität Graz, Klinische Abteilung für Angiologie
  • Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
  • Medical University Vienna, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinische Abteilung für Angiologie
  • Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Klinische Abteilung für Kardiovaskuläre und Interventionelle Radiologie
  • Hanusch-Krankenhaus
  • University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen
  • Charité Universitätsmedizin, Klinik für Radiologie
  • Fürst-Stirum-Klinik Bruchsal, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie, Diabetologie, Neurologie und Intensivmedizin
  • Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
  • Universitätsklinikum Essen, Westdeutsches Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Essen, Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie
  • DIAKO Krankenhaus gGmbH, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Neuroradiologie
  • Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie
  • Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Medizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Pneumologie
  • Klinikverbund Allgäu gGmbH, Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Oberallgäu Kempten, Klinik Immenstadt
  • University Hospital Jena
  • Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Angiologie
  • Marienhaus Klinikum Mainz, Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
  • Gefäßpraxis im Tal
  • St. Franziskus-Hospital GmbH, Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie
  • Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik für Kardiologie I, Koronare Herzkrankheit, Herzinsuffizienz und Angiologie
  • Elblandklinikum Radebeul, Gefäßzentrum
  • Imland Klinik Rendsburg, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie/Neuroradiologie
  • RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
  • MEDINOS-Kliniken Sonneberg, Gefäßzentrum
  • Kreiskrankenhaus Torgau, Abt. Innere Medizin / Angiologie

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Sirolomus DCB group

Paclitaxel DCB group

Arm Description

Intervention with Sirolimus-coated balloon catheter

Intervention with Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Patency rate (Absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization)
patency rate after one year defined as absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) due to symptoms and drop of ABI of ≥ 20% or > 0.15 when compared to post-procedure or restenosis with PVR > 2.4 evaluated by duplex ultrasound
Safety outcome
Composite of freedom from device and procedure-related death through 12 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel vessel revasculariza-tion

Secondary Outcome Measures

TLR rate
ocurrence of Target lesion revascularization (TLR) at certain time Points
Rutherford classification
Sustained clinical improvement: an improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of one class in amputation and TVR free surviving patients
Walking capacity assessment 1
patient-self-assessment of walking distance
Walking capacity assessment 2
6-minute Walking test (6MWT)
Walking capacity assessment 3
Treadmill test (optional)
Walking capacity assessment 4
Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ); 20 questions (scale 0 to 4); best score 0, worst score 80
Duplex Ultrasound
Duplex-defined binary restenosis (PSVR >2.4) of the target lesion
ABI
Ankle brachial index (ABI)
Qualilty of Life Assessment
Quality of life assessment (QoL) by EQ5D-3L questionnaire; 5 questions (scale 1 to 5), best score 5, worst score 25
Secondary Safety: freedom from all cause death, target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization
Composite of freedom from all cause death through 60 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization

Full Information

First Posted
July 14, 2020
Last Updated
October 19, 2022
Sponsor
Jena University Hospital
Collaborators
Concept Medical Inc., Vascuscience, CoreLab Black Forest, Center for Clinical Studies Jena
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04475783
Brief Title
Sirolimus- vs. Paclitaxel-Drug Coated Ballons in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease
Acronym
SIRONA
Official Title
Head-to-Head Comparison of SIROlimus Versus Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting BallooN Angioplasty in the Femoropopliteal Artery
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
April 13, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Jena University Hospital
Collaborators
Concept Medical Inc., Vascuscience, CoreLab Black Forest, Center for Clinical Studies Jena

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is a prospective, interventional, multi-center 1:1 randomized non-inferiority trial. The trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of the Magic Touch PTA sirolimus drug-coated balloon in comparison to the treatment with PTX drug-coated balloon (control device) in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease.
Detailed Description
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), in which a balloon is advanced and inflated in the obstructed artery for several seconds to minutes, has become the standard endovascular treatment for peripheral arteries. The long-term success of bare balloon PTA in the fem-oropopliteal segment is hampered by the occurrence of restenosis, which can be reduced by local antiproliferative drug delivery via the PTA balloon catheter. The rationale of this study is based on the hypothesis that the usage of the Sirolimus-coated Magic Touch Sirolimus DCB is at least equal (non-inferior) with regards to efficacy and safety in comparison with a clinically well-established PTX coated balloon. The objective of this prospective, randomized, multi-center, post-market study is to compare the Magic Touch Sirolimus DCB with Paclitaxel-coated DCB for treatment of high grade ste-notic or occluded lesions in SFA and / or P1 segment of the popliteal artery (PA) in PAD pa-tients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peripheral Artery Disease
Keywords
Peripheral Artery Disease, Sirolimus, Paclitaxel, Drug-Coated Balloon, Percuteanous Transaluminal Angioplasty, PPA, SFA, MagicTouch PTA

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
1:1-randomization, parallel design, stratified by Center.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
478 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Sirolomus DCB group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention with Sirolimus-coated balloon catheter
Arm Title
Paclitaxel DCB group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Intervention with Paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter
Intervention Type
Combination Product
Intervention Name(s)
Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA)
Intervention Description
PTA with an drug-coated balloon catheter (DCB) in the femoropopliteal artery
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patency rate (Absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization)
Description
patency rate after one year defined as absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) due to symptoms and drop of ABI of ≥ 20% or > 0.15 when compared to post-procedure or restenosis with PVR > 2.4 evaluated by duplex ultrasound
Time Frame
one year after study procedure (PTA with medical product under investigation or comparator)
Title
Safety outcome
Description
Composite of freedom from device and procedure-related death through 12 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel vessel revasculariza-tion
Time Frame
through 12 months post-procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
TLR rate
Description
ocurrence of Target lesion revascularization (TLR) at certain time Points
Time Frame
1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after study procedure
Title
Rutherford classification
Description
Sustained clinical improvement: an improvement shift in the Rutherford classification of one class in amputation and TVR free surviving patients
Time Frame
at 12 months after study procedure
Title
Walking capacity assessment 1
Description
patient-self-assessment of walking distance
Time Frame
at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after study procedure
Title
Walking capacity assessment 2
Description
6-minute Walking test (6MWT)
Time Frame
at 6, 12, 24, 48 months after study procedure
Title
Walking capacity assessment 3
Description
Treadmill test (optional)
Time Frame
at 6, 12, 24, 48 months after study procedure
Title
Walking capacity assessment 4
Description
Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ); 20 questions (scale 0 to 4); best score 0, worst score 80
Time Frame
at 6, 12, 24, 48 months after study procedure
Title
Duplex Ultrasound
Description
Duplex-defined binary restenosis (PSVR >2.4) of the target lesion
Time Frame
post-procedure and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 months or at any time of re-intervention
Title
ABI
Description
Ankle brachial index (ABI)
Time Frame
at discharge, 6, 12, 24 and 48 months
Title
Qualilty of Life Assessment
Description
Quality of life assessment (QoL) by EQ5D-3L questionnaire; 5 questions (scale 1 to 5), best score 5, worst score 25
Time Frame
at 1 month, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months
Title
Secondary Safety: freedom from all cause death, target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization
Description
Composite of freedom from all cause death through 60 months post procedure as well as freedom from both target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization
Time Frame
trough 60 months after study procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject age ≥ 18 Subject has been informed on the nature of the study, the duration of the study, agrees to attend follow-up visits, agrees to complete the required testing, agrees to participate, and has signed an informed consent form. Rutherford category 2-4 according to the investigator's subjective evaluation Subject has a de novo or re-stenosed lesion with ≥ 70 % stenosis documented angiographically Target lesion length is ≥ 2 cm and ≤ 20 cm by visual estimate of the treating physician Multiple lesions with max. 3 cm healthy vessel segment in between lesions can be considered at the discretion of the operator as one lesion. Total lesion length should not exceed 20 cm Reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 4 mm and ≤ 6.5 mm by visual estimation Patency of P2 and P3 segment of the popliteal artery and at least one (1) infrapopliteal artery to the ankle (< 50 % diameter stenosis) in continuity with the femoropopliteal artery Patency of ipsilateral iliac artery (≤ 30% diameter stenosis). Iliac artery stenosis > 30 % may be treated during the index procedure to ensure sufficient inflow. A guidewire has successfully traversed the target treatment segment intraluminal Vascular disease in the opposite leg that requires treatment at the time point of index procedure is allowed, but has to be treated according to randomization or with POBA. A patient can only be enrolled and randomized once with only one target lesion in the SIRONA trial. Please note that only the lesion in one limb can be treated as target lesion for index procedure. Exclusion Criteria: Failure to successfully cross the target lesion or subintimal target lesion guidewire crossing Flow-limiting dissection after pre-dilatation Angiographic evidence of severe calcification of the target vessel (contiguous calcification on both sides of the vessel) Presence of fresh thrombus in the target lesion Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel/s Prior vascular surgery (including atherectomy, bypass surgery) of the target limb Prior stent in the target lesion Stroke or heart attack within 3 months prior to enrollment Any vascular surgical procedure or intervention performed in the target limb within 30 days prior to or planned within 30 days post index procedure Any vascular treatment with PTX or sirolimus-coated devices 60 days prior to index procedure Target lesion requires treatment with alternative therapies such as primary stenting, laser, lithotripsy, thrombectomy, atherectomy, cryoplasty, brachytherapy, re-entry devices Enrolled in another investigational drug, device or biologic study Life expectancy of less than one year in the investigator's opinion Known allergies or sensitivity to heparin, aspirin, other anticoagulant/ antiplatelet therapies, sirolimus, paclitaxel or contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-treated prior to index procedure Significant gastrointestinal bleeding or any coagulopathy that would contraindicate the use of anti-platelet therapy Receiving dialysis or immunosuppressant therapy Pregnant or lactating females History of major amputation in the same limb as the target lesion
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ulf Teichgraeber, Prof. Dr.
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital Jena, Institute of Radiology
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Medizinische Universität Graz, Klinische Abteilung für Angiologie
City
Graz
ZIP/Postal Code
8036
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
City
Klagenfurt
ZIP/Postal Code
9020
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Medical University Vienna, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin II, Klinische Abteilung für Angiologie
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
A-1090
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Universitätsklinik für Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, Klinische Abteilung für Kardiovaskuläre und Interventionelle Radiologie
City
Wien
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Hanusch-Krankenhaus
City
Wien
ZIP/Postal Code
1140
Country
Austria
Facility Name
University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen
City
Bad Krozingen
ZIP/Postal Code
79189
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Charité Universitätsmedizin, Klinik für Radiologie
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12203
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Fürst-Stirum-Klinik Bruchsal, Klinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie, Diabetologie, Neurologie und Intensivmedizin
City
Bruchsal
ZIP/Postal Code
76646
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Institut und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
City
Dresden
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Essen, Westdeutsches Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Essen, Klinik für Kardiologie und Angiologie
City
Essen
ZIP/Postal Code
45147
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DIAKO Krankenhaus gGmbH, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Neuroradiologie
City
Flensburg
ZIP/Postal Code
24939
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie
City
Halle (Saale)
ZIP/Postal Code
06120
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Medizinische Klinik III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Pneumologie
City
Heidelberg
ZIP/Postal Code
69120
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikverbund Allgäu gGmbH, Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Oberallgäu Kempten, Klinik Immenstadt
City
Immenstadt Im Allgäu
ZIP/Postal Code
87509
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Hospital Jena
City
Jena
ZIP/Postal Code
07747
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
City
Krefeld
ZIP/Postal Code
47805
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Klinik und Poliklinik für Angiologie
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04103
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Marienhaus Klinikum Mainz, Klinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
City
Mainz
ZIP/Postal Code
55131
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Gefäßpraxis im Tal
City
München
ZIP/Postal Code
80331
Country
Germany
Facility Name
St. Franziskus-Hospital GmbH, Klinik für Gefäßchirurgie
City
Münster
ZIP/Postal Code
48145
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik für Kardiologie I, Koronare Herzkrankheit, Herzinsuffizienz und Angiologie
City
Münster
ZIP/Postal Code
48149
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Elblandklinikum Radebeul, Gefäßzentrum
City
Radebeul
ZIP/Postal Code
01445
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Imland Klinik Rendsburg, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie/Neuroradiologie
City
Rendsburg
ZIP/Postal Code
24768
Country
Germany
Facility Name
RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie
City
Rosenheim
ZIP/Postal Code
83022
Country
Germany
Facility Name
MEDINOS-Kliniken Sonneberg, Gefäßzentrum
City
Sonneberg
ZIP/Postal Code
96515
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Kreiskrankenhaus Torgau, Abt. Innere Medizin / Angiologie
City
Torgau
ZIP/Postal Code
04860
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34583746
Citation
Teichgraber U, Ingwersen M, Platzer S, Lehmann T, Zeller T, Aschenbach R, Scheinert D. Head-to-head comparison of sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty in the femoropopliteal artery: study protocol for the randomized controlled SIRONA trial. Trials. 2021 Sep 28;22(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05631-9.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Sirolimus- vs. Paclitaxel-Drug Coated Ballons in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs