search
Back to results

Early Percutaneous Cryoablation for Pain Control After Rib Fractures Among Elderly Patients

Primary Purpose

Rib Fractures

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cryoneurolysis
Standard of Care
Sponsored by
Stanford University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rib Fractures

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion:

  • Patients greater than 65 years with any acute rib fracture of ribs 3,4,5,6,7,8, or 9.
  • Pain score higher than or equal to 5
  • Presenting and admitted to Stanford Emergency Department

Exclusion:

  • Radiographic evidence of metastasis to ribs
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score < 13
  • Patients undergoing Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures (SSRF)
  • Rib fractures located < 3cm from spinous process
  • Coagulopathy (INR >1.5, Pat < 100)
  • Other factors precluding cryoablation at Interventional Radiologist (IR) attending's discretion
  • Patients who do not have any rib fractures of ribs 3,4,5,6,7,8, or 9.

Sites / Locations

  • Stanford Hospital and ClinicsRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Image-guided percutaneous ICN (pICN): Group A

Standard-of Care : Group B

Arm Description

Patients who were admitted after a traumatic injury, with rib fractures identified, who are >= 65 years of age will be randomized to percutaneous image-guided cryoneurolysis (pICN) group within 72 hours of presentation.

Patients who were admitted after a traumatic injury, with rib fractures identified, who are >= 65 years of age will be randomized to standard-of-care group within 72 hours of presentation.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Acute Pain Assessed by Numeric Pain Score
The patient will be asked to verbalize their numeric pain score daily after discharge and at follow-up visits. Pain measured on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.
Length of hospital stay
The Length of Stay will be obtained from the patient's chart after discharge and will depend on the level of care required for recovery from their injuries.

Secondary Outcome Measures

30-day mortality
Will be obtained from chart review after discharge
Number of participants requiring ICU admission
Will be obtained from chart review after discharge
Use of Narcotic Equivalents
Oral narcotic equivalents on day of discharge.
30-day rib-specific readmission
Incidence of readmission. The patient will be admitted back to the hospital if pain level relates to rib-specific injuries such as hemothorax and pneumonia.
The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) and Pain Rating Index (PRI) Scale Score
The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) is a validated 20 question instrument to quantify subjective pain and the scoring system yields a Pain Rating Index (PRI) score between Mild, Moderate or Severe. The questionnaire will be administered to the patient by study/ clinical staff upon discharge. The scoring system yields a pain rating index (PRI) score between 0 and 50 used to temporally track pain, higher scores correspond to higher pain levels.
The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E) Score
The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) is a global scale for functional outcome that rates patient status into one of five categories: Dead, Vegetative State, Severe Disability, Moderate Disability or Good Recovery. The Extended GOS (GOSE) provides more detailed categorization into eight categories by subdividing the categories of severe disability, moderate disability and good recovery into a lower and upper category: Death (D) Vegetative state (VS) Lower severe disability (SD -) Upper severe disability (SD +) Lower moderate disability ( MD -) Upper moderate disability ( MD +) Lower good recovery (GR -) Upper good recovery (GR +) The questionnaire will be administered to the patient by study/clinical staff upon discharge.
Short Form (SF-12) Health Survey Scale Score
The 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey is a widely used composite score used to gauge overall health. The composite score is based on 8 domains scores contained in the SF-12 questionnaire, which will be administered to the patient by study/clinical staff upon discharge. Score ranges from 1 (Excellent) to 5 (Poor) , 1 (Yes, limited a lot) to 3 (No, not limited at all), 1 (Yes) 2 (No), 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely), 1 (All of the time) to 6 (None of the time) and 1 (All of the time) to 5 (None of the time).

Full Information

First Posted
July 18, 2020
Last Updated
April 12, 2023
Sponsor
Stanford University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04482582
Brief Title
Early Percutaneous Cryoablation for Pain Control After Rib Fractures Among Elderly Patients
Official Title
Early Percutaneous Cryoablation for Pain Control After Rib Fractures Among Elderly Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Stanford University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to provide long-term pain control for elderly patients with rib fractures in order to minimize their risk of complications and return them to baseline functional capacity
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to provide long-term pain control for elderly patients with rib fractures in order to minimize their risk of complications and return them to baseline functional capacity. In order to do this, we would offer a minimally invasive solution known as Cryoneurolysis. By directly applying cold Cryoneurolysis to the nerves, this can destroy nerve axons, resulting in Wallerian degeneration of the distal nerve without distorting epineural or perineurial tissue. The application of cryoneurolysis will help reduce the amount of narcotics the patient would need, and potentially lead to a better post-injury quality of life.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rib Fractures

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
We are proposing a prospective, randomized trial evaluating efficacy of image-guided percutaneous intercostal cryoneurolysis (pICN) for pain control after traumatic rib fractures in persons >=65 years. Eligible patients would be enrolled by the trauma service after consent or assent is obtained. Patients will be randomized to either pICN within 72 hours of presentation or existing standard-of-care.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
110 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Image-guided percutaneous ICN (pICN): Group A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients who were admitted after a traumatic injury, with rib fractures identified, who are >= 65 years of age will be randomized to percutaneous image-guided cryoneurolysis (pICN) group within 72 hours of presentation.
Arm Title
Standard-of Care : Group B
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients who were admitted after a traumatic injury, with rib fractures identified, who are >= 65 years of age will be randomized to standard-of-care group within 72 hours of presentation.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Cryoneurolysis
Intervention Description
Patients will be offered a minimally invasive solution known as cryoneurolysis. By directly applying a cold cryoneurolysis probe to the nerves the axon is destroyed, resulting in Wallerian degeneration of the distal nerve without distorting epineurial or perineurial tissue. Application of cryoneurolysis will help reduce the amount of narcotics the patient would need to take and instead provide them longer term pain control with minimal risk.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Standard of Care
Intervention Description
Patients will be provided regular standard of care at the Stanford Hospital with long-term follow-up provided at the Stanford Center for Reconstruction after Chest Wall Injury.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Acute Pain Assessed by Numeric Pain Score
Description
The patient will be asked to verbalize their numeric pain score daily after discharge and at follow-up visits. Pain measured on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Length of hospital stay
Description
The Length of Stay will be obtained from the patient's chart after discharge and will depend on the level of care required for recovery from their injuries.
Time Frame
Up to 1 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
30-day mortality
Description
Will be obtained from chart review after discharge
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Number of participants requiring ICU admission
Description
Will be obtained from chart review after discharge
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Use of Narcotic Equivalents
Description
Oral narcotic equivalents on day of discharge.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
30-day rib-specific readmission
Description
Incidence of readmission. The patient will be admitted back to the hospital if pain level relates to rib-specific injuries such as hemothorax and pneumonia.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) and Pain Rating Index (PRI) Scale Score
Description
The McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) is a validated 20 question instrument to quantify subjective pain and the scoring system yields a Pain Rating Index (PRI) score between Mild, Moderate or Severe. The questionnaire will be administered to the patient by study/ clinical staff upon discharge. The scoring system yields a pain rating index (PRI) score between 0 and 50 used to temporally track pain, higher scores correspond to higher pain levels.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
The Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOS-E) Score
Description
The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) is a global scale for functional outcome that rates patient status into one of five categories: Dead, Vegetative State, Severe Disability, Moderate Disability or Good Recovery. The Extended GOS (GOSE) provides more detailed categorization into eight categories by subdividing the categories of severe disability, moderate disability and good recovery into a lower and upper category: Death (D) Vegetative state (VS) Lower severe disability (SD -) Upper severe disability (SD +) Lower moderate disability ( MD -) Upper moderate disability ( MD +) Lower good recovery (GR -) Upper good recovery (GR +) The questionnaire will be administered to the patient by study/clinical staff upon discharge.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Short Form (SF-12) Health Survey Scale Score
Description
The 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey is a widely used composite score used to gauge overall health. The composite score is based on 8 domains scores contained in the SF-12 questionnaire, which will be administered to the patient by study/clinical staff upon discharge. Score ranges from 1 (Excellent) to 5 (Poor) , 1 (Yes, limited a lot) to 3 (No, not limited at all), 1 (Yes) 2 (No), 1 (Not at all) to 5 (Extremely), 1 (All of the time) to 6 (None of the time) and 1 (All of the time) to 5 (None of the time).
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: i) Patients greater than 65 years with any acute rib fracture ii) Pain score equal to or greater than 5 with deep inspiration. iii) Presenting and admitted to Stanford Emergency Department Exclusion criteria: i) Radiographic evidence of metastasis to ribs ii) Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score <13 iii) Patients undergoing SSRF iv) Rib fractures located < 3cm from spinous process v) Coagulopathy (INR >1.5, Pat < 100) vi) Other factors precluding cryoablation at IR attending's discretion vii) If only ribs broken are 1,2 or 10,11, 12
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Sydney Guthrie-Baker, BS
Phone
6507248445
Email
sydneygb@stanford.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joseph D Forrester, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Stanford University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nishita Kothary, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Stanford University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
City
Palo Alto
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
7996614
Citation
Ziegler DW, Agarwal NN. The morbidity and mortality of rib fractures. J Trauma. 1994 Dec;37(6):975-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199412000-00018.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16269301
Citation
Flagel BT, Luchette FA, Reed RL, Esposito TJ, Davis KA, Santaniello JM, Gamelli RL. Half-a-dozen ribs: the breakpoint for mortality. Surgery. 2005 Oct;138(4):717-23; discussion 723-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.07.022.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18453294
Citation
Sharma OP, Oswanski MF, Jolly S, Lauer SK, Dressel R, Stombaugh HA. Perils of rib fractures. Am Surg. 2008 Apr;74(4):310-4. doi: 10.1177/000313480807400406.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25069400
Citation
Marasco S, Lee G, Summerhayes R, Fitzgerald M, Bailey M. Quality of life after major trauma with multiple rib fractures. Injury. 2015 Jan;46(1):61-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23592156
Citation
Fabricant L, Ham B, Mullins R, Mayberry J. Prolonged pain and disability are common after rib fractures. Am J Surg. 2013 May;205(5):511-5; discusssion 515-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.12.007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24612969
Citation
Gordy S, Fabricant L, Ham B, Mullins R, Mayberry J. The contribution of rib fractures to chronic pain and disability. Am J Surg. 2014 May;207(5):659-62; discussion 662-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12691929
Citation
Holcomb JB, McMullin NR, Kozar RA, Lygas MH, Moore FA. Morbidity from rib fractures increases after age 45. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Apr;196(4):549-55. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01894-X.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15086666
Citation
Stawicki SP, Grossman MD, Hoey BA, Miller DL, Reed JF 3rd. Rib fractures in the elderly: a marker of injury severity. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 May;52(5):805-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52223.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10866248
Citation
Bulger EM, Arneson MA, Mock CN, Jurkovich GJ. Rib fractures in the elderly. J Trauma. 2000 Jun;48(6):1040-6; discussion 1046-7. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200006000-00007.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12614809
Citation
Liman ST, Kuzucu A, Tastepe AI, Ulasan GN, Topcu S. Chest injury due to blunt trauma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Mar;23(3):374-8. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00813-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29905897
Citation
Van Vledder MG, Kwakernaak V, Hagenaars T, Van Lieshout EMM, Verhofstad MHJ; South West Netherlands Trauma Region Study Group. Patterns of injury and outcomes in the elderly patient with rib fractures: a multicenter observational study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Aug;45(4):575-583. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0969-9. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29766081
Citation
Witt CE, Bulger EM. Comprehensive approach to the management of the patient with multiple rib fractures: a review and introduction of a bundled rib fracture management protocol. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Jan 5;2(1):e000064. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2016-000064. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17161098
Citation
Todd SR, McNally MM, Holcomb JB, Kozar RA, Kao LS, Gonzalez EA, Cocanour CS, Vercruysse GA, Lygas MH, Brasseaux BK, Moore FA. A multidisciplinary clinical pathway decreases rib fracture-associated infectious morbidity and mortality in high-risk trauma patients. Am J Surg. 2006 Dec;192(6):806-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.048.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24782038
Citation
de Jong MB, Kokke MC, Hietbrink F, Leenen LP. Surgical Management of Rib Fractures: Strategies and Literature Review. Scand J Surg. 2014 Jun;103(2):120-125. doi: 10.1177/1457496914531928. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29766084
Citation
Shi HH, Esquivel M, Staudenmayer KL, Spain DA. Effects of mechanism of injury and patient age on outcomes in geriatric rib fracture patients. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Mar 16;2(1):e000074. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2016-000074. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32215632
Citation
Tignanelli CJ, Rix A, Napolitano LM, Hemmila MR, Ma S, Kummerfeld E. Association Between Adherence to Evidence-Based Practices for Treatment of Patients With Traumatic Rib Fractures and Mortality Rates Among US Trauma Centers. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201316. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1316.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27912931
Citation
Pieracci FM, Majercik S, Ali-Osman F, Ang D, Doben A, Edwards JG, French B, Gasparri M, Marasco S, Minshall C, Sarani B, Tisol W, VanBoerum DH, White TW. Consensus statement: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures rib fracture colloquium clinical practice guidelines. Injury. 2017 Feb;48(2):307-321. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.026. Epub 2016 Nov 27. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32176172
Citation
Chen Zhu R, de Roulet A, Ogami T, Khariton K. Rib fixation in geriatric trauma: Mortality benefits for the most vulnerable patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jul;89(1):103-110. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002666.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18363679
Citation
Kulminski AM, Ukraintseva SV, Kulminskaya IV, Arbeev KG, Land K, Yashin AI. Cumulative deficits better characterize susceptibility to death in elderly people than phenotypic frailty: lessons from the Cardiovascular Health Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 May;56(5):898-903. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01656.x. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22695416
Citation
Farhat JS, Velanovich V, Falvo AJ, Horst HM, Swartz A, Patton JH Jr, Rubinfeld IS. Are the frail destined to fail? Frailty index as predictor of surgical morbidity and mortality in the elderly. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jun;72(6):1526-30; discussion 1530-1. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182542fab.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20497846
Citation
Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Houles M, Gillette-Guyonnet S, Soto M, Vellas B. The assessment of frailty in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med. 2010 May;26(2):275-86. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2010.02.002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23169127
Citation
Ryb GE, Dischinger PC, Burch CA, Kerns TJ, Kufera J, Andersen D. Frailty and injury causation. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:175-81.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27533913
Citation
Galvagno SM Jr, Smith CE, Varon AJ, Hasenboehler EA, Sultan S, Shaefer G, To KB, Fox AD, Alley DE, Ditillo M, Joseph BA, Robinson BR, Haut ER. Pain management for blunt thoracic trauma: A joint practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma and Trauma Anesthesiology Society. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016 Nov;81(5):936-951. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001209.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27749354
Citation
Ilfeld BM. Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks: An Update of the Published Evidence and Comparison With Novel, Alternative Analgesic Modalities. Anesth Analg. 2017 Jan;124(1):308-335. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001581.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31195982
Citation
Janssen TL, Hosseinzoi E, Vos DI, Veen EJ, Mulder PGH, van der Holst AM, van der Laan L. The importance of increased awareness for delirium in elderly patients with rib fractures after blunt chest wall trauma: a retrospective cohort study on risk factors and outcomes. BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Jun 13;19(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0248-z.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27333989
Citation
Ilfeld BM, Preciado J, Trescot AM. Novel cryoneurolysis device for the treatment of sensory and motor peripheral nerves. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016 Aug;13(8):713-25. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2016.1204229. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27745867
Citation
Keller BA, Kabagambe SK, Becker JC, Chen YJ, Goodman LF, Clark-Wronski JM, Furukawa K, Stark RA, Rahm AL, Hirose S, Raff GW. Intercostal nerve cryoablation versus thoracic epidural catheters for postoperative analgesia following pectus excavatum repair: Preliminary outcomes in twenty-six cryoablation patients. J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Dec;51(12):2033-2038. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.034. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30278932
Citation
Harbaugh CM, Johnson KN, Kein CE, Jarboe MD, Hirschl RB, Geiger JD, Gadepalli SK. Comparing outcomes with thoracic epidural and intercostal nerve cryoablation after Nuss procedure. J Surg Res. 2018 Nov;231:217-223. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.048. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31388539
Citation
Vossler JD, Zhao FZ. Intercostal nerve cryoablation for control of traumatic rib fracture pain: A case report. Trauma Case Rep. 2019 Jul 31;23:100229. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100229. eCollection 2019 Oct.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23954965
Citation
Koethe Y, Mannes AJ, Wood BJ. Image-guided nerve cryoablation for post-thoracotomy pain syndrome. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014 Jun;37(3):843-6. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0718-8. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17000825
Citation
Byas-Smith MG, Gulati A. Ultrasound-guided intercostal nerve cryoablation. Anesth Analg. 2006 Oct;103(4):1033-5. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000237290.68166.c2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31804414
Citation
Pieracci FM, Leasia K, Bauman Z, Eriksson EA, Lottenberg L, Majercik S, Powell L, Sarani B, Semon G, Thomas B, Zhao F, Dyke C, Doben AR. A multicenter, prospective, controlled clinical trial of surgical stabilization of rib fractures in patients with severe, nonflail fracture patterns (Chest Wall Injury Society NONFLAIL). J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Feb;88(2):249-257. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002559.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1235985
Citation
Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975 Sep;1(3):277-299. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30442372
Citation
Marasco SF, Martin K, Niggemeyer L, Summerhayes R, Fitzgerald M, Bailey M. Impact of rib fixation on quality of life after major trauma with multiple rib fractures. Injury. 2019 Jan;50(1):119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.11.005. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9726257
Citation
Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998 Aug;15(8):573-85. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.573.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8628042
Citation
Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Early Percutaneous Cryoablation for Pain Control After Rib Fractures Among Elderly Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs