search
Back to results

Quality Control of CE-Certified Phonak Hearing Aids - 2020_26

Primary Purpose

Hearing Loss

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
RIC (Receiver in Canal) hearing aid/ hearing instrument (HI)
Sponsored by
Sonova AG
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Hearing Loss

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hearing Loss range: N3-N4
  • experienced hearing aid user
  • willingness to wear behind the ear hearing aids
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the audiogram is not in the fitting range of the intended hearing aid
  • first time user
  • limited mobility and not in the position to attend weekly appointments in Stäfa (Switzerland)
  • participant is not able to describe experiences and hearing impressions
  • allergies against the material of the hearing aid

Sites / Locations

  • Sonova AG

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Successor of Phonak Audéo M-90

Phonak Audéo M-90

Arm Description

Phonak Hearing instrument (HI) with modified precalculation.

Phonak Audéo M-90 is the most recent RIC device from Phonak which will be fitted to the participants individual hearing loss.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Rating of the sound quality for the new and the comparative HI
Subjective rating of the overall satisfaction for sound quality by questionnaires for the new HI and the old comparative HI (%). The participants rates after one week home trial. The home trial is randomized. The questionnaire includes rating scales for the satisfaction. The participant has to rate it in percentage (100% = very satisfy, 0% = very unsatisfy)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Speech intelligibility in noisy situations (only test device)
Evaluating the speech intelligibility with the test device, using a speech in noise test, Oldenburger Satztest (OLSA) after the subject set the noise cancellation via an App on an individual limit. The results of the test are the word recognition score in SNR.
Speech intelligibility in quiet situations
Evaluating and comparing the speech intelligibility in a quiet test situation of the test device and the Marvel device. Using the "Reimtest nach Wallenberg und Kollmeier (WaKo ) (%).
Speech intelligibility in noisy situations
Evaluating and comparing the speech intelligibility in a noisy test situation of the test device and competitor. Using the OLSA (word recognition score)
Rating of sound quality
Subjective rating of the overall satisfaction for sound quality by questionnaires for the new HI and the old comparative HI (%). The participants rates after the First Fit. The questionnaire includes rating scales for the satisfaction. The participant has to rate it in percentage (100% = very satisfy, 0% = very unsatisfy)

Full Information

First Posted
July 29, 2020
Last Updated
September 9, 2020
Sponsor
Sonova AG
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04496791
Brief Title
Quality Control of CE-Certified Phonak Hearing Aids - 2020_26
Official Title
Quality Control of CE-Certified Phonak Hearing Aids - 2020_26
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 1, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 7, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 7, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sonova AG

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Phonak Hearing Devices pass through different development and study phases. At an early stage, feasibility studies are conducted to investigate new algorithms, features and functions in an isolated manner. If the benefit is proven, their performance is then investigated regarding interdependency between all available algorithms, features and functions running in parallel in a hearing aid (pivotal/pre-validation studies) and, resulting from the pre-validation studies, they get optimized. Prior to product launch, the Phonak Hearing Systems get reviewed by a final quality control in terms of clinical trials. This is a validation study, investigating improved algorithms, features, functions and wearing comfort. This will be a clinical investigation which will be conducted mono centric at Sonova AG Headquarters based in Stäfa (Switzerland).
Detailed Description
This study will investigate the combination of the features to determine if the audiological performance and quality of the new successor of the Marvel family shows an improved benefit over Phonak Audéo Marvel before going into the System Validation. Therefore this study will be a comparative study. The study will determine if hearing impaired users wearing the successor hearing aids, have better initial acceptance with the new precalculation, better sound quality and speech intelligibility, more clarity and loudness comfort in soft and loud environments compared to Phonak Marvel RIC (Receiver in channel) hearing aids. Another objective of the study is to compare the listening effort with the two different study devices.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hearing Loss

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
24 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Successor of Phonak Audéo M-90
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Phonak Hearing instrument (HI) with modified precalculation.
Arm Title
Phonak Audéo M-90
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Phonak Audéo M-90 is the most recent RIC device from Phonak which will be fitted to the participants individual hearing loss.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
RIC (Receiver in Canal) hearing aid/ hearing instrument (HI)
Intervention Description
HI is developed to support hearing impaired people in calm and complex situations and to be able to participate in communication
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rating of the sound quality for the new and the comparative HI
Description
Subjective rating of the overall satisfaction for sound quality by questionnaires for the new HI and the old comparative HI (%). The participants rates after one week home trial. The home trial is randomized. The questionnaire includes rating scales for the satisfaction. The participant has to rate it in percentage (100% = very satisfy, 0% = very unsatisfy)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Speech intelligibility in noisy situations (only test device)
Description
Evaluating the speech intelligibility with the test device, using a speech in noise test, Oldenburger Satztest (OLSA) after the subject set the noise cancellation via an App on an individual limit. The results of the test are the word recognition score in SNR.
Time Frame
4 week
Title
Speech intelligibility in quiet situations
Description
Evaluating and comparing the speech intelligibility in a quiet test situation of the test device and the Marvel device. Using the "Reimtest nach Wallenberg und Kollmeier (WaKo ) (%).
Time Frame
4 week
Title
Speech intelligibility in noisy situations
Description
Evaluating and comparing the speech intelligibility in a noisy test situation of the test device and competitor. Using the OLSA (word recognition score)
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Rating of sound quality
Description
Subjective rating of the overall satisfaction for sound quality by questionnaires for the new HI and the old comparative HI (%). The participants rates after the First Fit. The questionnaire includes rating scales for the satisfaction. The participant has to rate it in percentage (100% = very satisfy, 0% = very unsatisfy)
Time Frame
1 week

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Hearing Loss range: N3-N4 experienced hearing aid user willingness to wear behind the ear hearing aids Informed Consent as documented by signature Exclusion Criteria: the audiogram is not in the fitting range of the intended hearing aid first time user limited mobility and not in the position to attend weekly appointments in Stäfa (Switzerland) participant is not able to describe experiences and hearing impressions allergies against the material of the hearing aid
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sonova AG
City
Stäfa
ZIP/Postal Code
8712
Country
Switzerland

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Quality Control of CE-Certified Phonak Hearing Aids - 2020_26

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs