search
Back to results

Comparison Trial of Open-tip Pulsed Needle Biopsy and Conventional Core Biopsy in Axillary Lymph Nodes (COMPULSE)

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Open-tip pulsed needle biopsy (NeoNavia Biopsy System)
Core needle biopsy (CNB)
Sponsored by
NeoDynamics AB
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Breast Cancer focused on measuring Breast Cancer, Axillary Lymph Nodes, Biopsy

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women in screening and symptomatic clinics aged >35 years with breast masses scored as:

    • M4 or M5 (mammographically suspicious or highly suspicious of malignancy) and U5 (ultrasonically highly suspicious of malignancy)
    • and/or MRI5 (highly suspicious of malignancy on magnetic resonance imaging) and U5
    • and/or have histologically proven breast cancer
  • and who have ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes which are indeterminate or suspicious for metastatic disease (A3, 4 or 5), as determined by individual breast unit criteria
  • have given written informed consent for the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are on anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs (inc. aspirin) or have known clotting disorders
  • Previous ipsilateral axillary surgery
  • Target lymph node not suitable for needle biopsy due to its close proximity to critical structures such as major blood vessels
  • Unable to give written informed consent in English

Sites / Locations

  • Basildon University HospitalRecruiting
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Thirlestaine Breast Centre, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS FoundationRecruiting
  • Darlington Memorial HospitalRecruiting
  • University Hospital of North Durham
  • Western General Hospital, Lothian NHS TrustRecruiting
  • Northwick Park HospitalRecruiting
  • Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
  • St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustRecruiting
  • King Edward VII's Hospital, BARTS Health NHS TrustRecruiting
  • Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustRecruiting
  • North Manchester General HospitalRecruiting
  • Southend University Hospital
  • The Royal Marsden, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
  • Royal Cornwall Hospital
  • High Wycombe HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Open-tip pulsed needle biopsy

Conventional core needle biopsy (CNB)

Arm Description

Biopsy procedure using the NeoNavia biopsy system. The needle used in this study is of the same outside diameter as a standard biopsy needle used in the breast or axilla (14-gauge) but does not have a notched trochar like a conventional spring-loaded device. It does not have a redundant portion of needle beyond the sampling zone and takes full circumference cylindrical cores. A pneumatic system powered by a floor-standing base unit connected via a handheld driver to the biopsy device provides impulses to the needle, allowing the operator to advance the needle through tissue with little manual force (NeoNavia biopsy system, NeoDynamics, Sweden).

Standard of care core needle biopsy used currently in clinics for biopsy procedures

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Comparison of adequacy rate of tissue sampling of axillary lymph nodes under local anaesthetic with open-tip pulsed needle biopsy (OT-PNB) and conventional 14-gauge core needle core biopsy (CNB)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Comparison of pain scores for the two biopsy techniques immediately post-procedure and the maximum from days 1-3 post-procedure
Pain questionnaire administered to the participant immediately following the procedure and 4-14 days post procedure (relating to days 1-3 post procedure). Scale 0-10; 0 means no pain, 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Comparison of complication rates between the two techniques
Collection of AE's, SAE's and device deficiencies
Comparison of the willingness of patients to undergo the procedure again if necessary
Questionnaire administered to the participant on clinic visit for biopsy result
Comparison of number of tissue samples taken with the two techniques and the number of device insertions per subject
Biopsy procedure data collected in real time
Comparison of the time taken for the two techniques (first biopsy device entry to last withdrawal)
Biopsy procedure data collected in real time
Comparison of the total weight of tissue obtained with the two techniques and the average weight per device insertion
Samples are weighed in clinic or pathology following the procedure
Users views upon whether the pulse technology of the NeoNavia® device facilitates accurate needle passage through the tissues to an optimum sampling position
Yes/No, questionnaire given to radiologist
Users views upon whether the pulse technology of the NeoNavia® device facilitates stabilisation of the target and control of the needle position
Yes/No, questionnaire given to radiologist
Comparison of sensitivity of preoperative axillary assessment of ultrasonically indeterminate or abnormal axillary lymph (calculated from the proportion of women with axillary metastatic disease at surgery).
14-200 days
Comparison of intended outcome of biopsy procedure, i.e. number of samples to be taken from respective lymph node, and actual outcome
Biopsy procedure data

Full Information

First Posted
July 22, 2020
Last Updated
May 30, 2023
Sponsor
NeoDynamics AB
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04500262
Brief Title
Comparison Trial of Open-tip Pulsed Needle Biopsy and Conventional Core Biopsy in Axillary Lymph Nodes
Acronym
COMPULSE
Official Title
Comparison Trial of Open-tip Pulsed Needle Biopsy and Conventional Core Biopsy in Axillary Lymph Nodes
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
July 13, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
NeoDynamics AB

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to compare performance and safety of a newly developed 14-gauge open-tip pulsed biopsy needle with a conventional 14-gauge core biopsy needle for sampling of radiologically indeterminate or suspicious axillary lymph nodes in women with radiologically suspected breast cancer. This is a Sponsor-initiated multicentre randomised trial. At the time of radiological breast cancer diagnosis women with ultrasonically abnormal lymph nodes undergo axillary sampling using the NeoNavia biopsy system or a common CNB device. This is in accordance with clinical routine and current clinical guidelines. The NeoNavia biopsy system is approved for use in the axillary lymph nodes.
Detailed Description
It is the standard of care in the United Kingdom for women with suspected or confirmed breast cancer to undergo ultrasound of the ipsilateral axilla prior to surgery in order to detect nodal metastatic disease. Women with invasive breast cancer and normal axillary ultrasound will then undergo operative sentinel lymph node biopsy. This is usually at the same time as the surgical removal of the breast cancer by wide local excision or mastectomy but may be done as a separate procedure before (e.g. where neoadjuvant chemotherapy is planned) or after (e.g. if a non-operative diagnosis of invasive breast cancer was not made prior to surgery). Women who are found to have a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (i.e. have axillary metastatic disease) normally undergo axillary node clearance (ANC) at a subsequent operation. This policy may change in the future, as evidence from the American Z0011 study suggests that women with low volume axillary metastatic disease do as well with no further axillary surgery plus standard adjuvant treatment as those that undergo ANC. Women who have abnormal lymph nodes on axillary ultrasound undergo tissue sampling with core needle biopsy (CNB), usually 14 Gauge (14G) under local anaesthetic or with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). Women with proven axillary nodal metastases will then usually undergo axillary node clearance at the same operation as surgical removal of the primary tumour. The number of women who need to undergo more than one operation can therefore be minimised by maximising the number of women with axillary metastatic disease in whom this diagnosis is made preoperatively. Meta-analyses of published studies and more recent studies suggest that ultrasound has a sensitivity of ~60% and specificity of ~80% for the detection of metastatic lymph nodes. Although no randomised comparisons of 14G core needle biopsy (CNB) and FNAC have been performed, several studies have suggested that CNB is more accurate. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of nodes subsequently proven at surgery to contain metastases has a sensitivity of ~80% and a specificity of 100% and is more likely to be positive in those women with a higher nodal burden. Numerous studies suggest that increasing the volume of tissue removed may increase the diagnostic yield. Recently a new biopsy device indicated for the use in breast and axillary lymph nodes (NeoNavia biopsy system, NeoDynamics, Sweden) has become available. It incorporates a pneumatic needle insertion mechanism that is intended to provide better control of needle progression and enable stepwise insertion without noticeable deformation or displacement of surrounding tissue as visualized under ultrasound. Furthermore a new method of tissue acquisition is employed that has pre-clinically shown a significantly higher sampling yield compared to CNB. These characteristics indicate that the device could be well suited for axillary lymph node biopsies. Initial clinical results indicate that in axillary lesions deemed "technically difficult", i.e. where prior US-guided biopsies with CNB or FNA had yielded non-diagnostic histology results, the NeoNavia device performed successfully, thereby significantly altering clinical management.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer
Keywords
Breast Cancer, Axillary Lymph Nodes, Biopsy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
479 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Open-tip pulsed needle biopsy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Biopsy procedure using the NeoNavia biopsy system. The needle used in this study is of the same outside diameter as a standard biopsy needle used in the breast or axilla (14-gauge) but does not have a notched trochar like a conventional spring-loaded device. It does not have a redundant portion of needle beyond the sampling zone and takes full circumference cylindrical cores. A pneumatic system powered by a floor-standing base unit connected via a handheld driver to the biopsy device provides impulses to the needle, allowing the operator to advance the needle through tissue with little manual force (NeoNavia biopsy system, NeoDynamics, Sweden).
Arm Title
Conventional core needle biopsy (CNB)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard of care core needle biopsy used currently in clinics for biopsy procedures
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Open-tip pulsed needle biopsy (NeoNavia Biopsy System)
Intervention Description
Ultrasound-guided biopsy using 14G open-tip pulsed biopsy needle
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Core needle biopsy (CNB)
Intervention Description
Ultrasound-guided biopsy using standard of care core needle biopsy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of adequacy rate of tissue sampling of axillary lymph nodes under local anaesthetic with open-tip pulsed needle biopsy (OT-PNB) and conventional 14-gauge core needle core biopsy (CNB)
Time Frame
After histopathological analysis of tissue samples, up to 1 week after biopsy
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of pain scores for the two biopsy techniques immediately post-procedure and the maximum from days 1-3 post-procedure
Description
Pain questionnaire administered to the participant immediately following the procedure and 4-14 days post procedure (relating to days 1-3 post procedure). Scale 0-10; 0 means no pain, 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Time Frame
1-14 days
Title
Comparison of complication rates between the two techniques
Description
Collection of AE's, SAE's and device deficiencies
Time Frame
0-14 days post-biopsy
Title
Comparison of the willingness of patients to undergo the procedure again if necessary
Description
Questionnaire administered to the participant on clinic visit for biopsy result
Time Frame
4-14 days post-biopsy
Title
Comparison of number of tissue samples taken with the two techniques and the number of device insertions per subject
Description
Biopsy procedure data collected in real time
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Comparison of the time taken for the two techniques (first biopsy device entry to last withdrawal)
Description
Biopsy procedure data collected in real time
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Comparison of the total weight of tissue obtained with the two techniques and the average weight per device insertion
Description
Samples are weighed in clinic or pathology following the procedure
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Users views upon whether the pulse technology of the NeoNavia® device facilitates accurate needle passage through the tissues to an optimum sampling position
Description
Yes/No, questionnaire given to radiologist
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Users views upon whether the pulse technology of the NeoNavia® device facilitates stabilisation of the target and control of the needle position
Description
Yes/No, questionnaire given to radiologist
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Comparison of sensitivity of preoperative axillary assessment of ultrasonically indeterminate or abnormal axillary lymph (calculated from the proportion of women with axillary metastatic disease at surgery).
Description
14-200 days
Time Frame
post-surgery
Title
Comparison of intended outcome of biopsy procedure, i.e. number of samples to be taken from respective lymph node, and actual outcome
Description
Biopsy procedure data
Time Frame
1 day

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Women in screening and symptomatic clinics aged 18 years or older with breast masses scored as 1 of the following: M3, M4 or M5 (mammographically uncertain, suspicious or highly suspicious of malignancy) MRI5 (highly suspicious of malignancy on MRI) U3, U4 or U5 (ultrasonically uncertain, suspicious or highly suspicious of malignancy) have histologically proven breast cancer who have ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes which are described as indeterminate or suspicious for metastatic disease and indicated for biopsy, as determined by individual breast unit criteria are able to give informed consent for the study Exclusion Criteria: Previous ipsilateral axillary surgery Target lymph node not suitable for needle biopsy due to its close proximity to critical structures such as major blood vessels Unable to give written informed consent in English
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kai-Uwe Schässburger, Ph.D.
Phone
+46(0)8 522 79 664
Email
kai-uwe.schassburger@neodynamics.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sarah Vinnicombe, Dr
Organizational Affiliation
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Basildon University Hospital
City
Basildon
ZIP/Postal Code
SS16 5NL
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jessica Eades
Facility Name
Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Cambridge
ZIP/Postal Code
CB2 0QQ
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Terminated
Facility Name
Thirlestaine Breast Centre, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation
City
Cheltenham
ZIP/Postal Code
GL53 7AS
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sarah Vinnicombe, Dr
Facility Name
Darlington Memorial Hospital
City
Darlington
ZIP/Postal Code
DL36HX
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bob Kent
Facility Name
University Hospital of North Durham
City
Durham
ZIP/Postal Code
DH1 5TW
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Terminated
Facility Name
Western General Hospital, Lothian NHS Trust
City
Edinburgh
ZIP/Postal Code
EH4 2XU
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Melanie Smith, Dr
Facility Name
Northwick Park Hospital
City
Harrow
ZIP/Postal Code
HA1 3UJ
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mia Morgan, Dr
Facility Name
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
City
Hull
ZIP/Postal Code
HU165JQ
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joanna Wieczorek, Dr
Facility Name
St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
City
Leeds
ZIP/Postal Code
LS9 7TF
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nisha Sharma, Dr
Facility Name
King Edward VII's Hospital, BARTS Health NHS Trust
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
W1G 6AA
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tamara Suaris, Dr
Facility Name
Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M23 9LT
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gillian Hutchinson, Dr
Facility Name
North Manchester General Hospital
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
M8 5RB
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alison Darlington, Dr
Facility Name
Southend University Hospital
City
Southend
ZIP/Postal Code
SS00RY
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tania Mercado, Dr
Facility Name
The Royal Marsden, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
City
Sutton
ZIP/Postal Code
SM2 5PT
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Withdrawn
Facility Name
Royal Cornwall Hospital
City
Truro
ZIP/Postal Code
TR13LJ
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Withdrawn
Facility Name
High Wycombe Hospital
City
Wycombe
ZIP/Postal Code
HP11 2TT
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chin Lian NG, Dr

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25009748
Citation
Houssami N, Turner RM. Staging the axilla in women with breast cancer: the utility of preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy. Cancer Biol Med. 2014 Jun;11(2):69-77. doi: 10.7497/j.issn.2095-3941.2014.02.001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29063297
Citation
Topps AR, Barr SP, Pikoulas P, Pritchard SA, Maxwell AJ. Pre-operative Axillary Ultrasound-Guided Needle Sampling in Breast Cancer: Comparing the Sensitivity of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan;25(1):148-153. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6090-1. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18993074
Citation
Britton PD, Provenzano E, Barter S, Gaskarth M, Goud A, Moyle P, Sinnatamby R, Wallis M, Benson JR, Forouhi P, Wishart GC. Ultrasound guided percutaneous axillary lymph node core biopsy: how often is the sentinel lymph node being biopsied? Breast. 2009 Feb;18(1):13-6. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2008.09.003. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22119100
Citation
Macaskill EJ, Purdie CA, Jordan LB, Mclean D, Whelehan P, Brown DC, Evans A. Axillary lymph node core biopsy for breast cancer metastases -- how many needle passes are enough? Clin Radiol. 2012 May;67(5):417-9. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.10.006. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27040801
Citation
Maxwell AJ, Bundred NJ, Harvey J, Hunt R, Morris J, Lim YY. A randomised pilot study comparing 13 G vacuum-assisted biopsy and conventional 14 G core needle biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in women with breast cancer. Clin Radiol. 2016 Jun;71(6):551-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.02.024. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21304082
Citation
Giuliano AE, Hunt KK, Ballman KV, Beitsch PD, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz PW, Leitch AM, Saha S, McCall LM, Morrow M. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2011 Feb 9;305(6):569-75. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.90.
Results Reference
background
Citation
POSNOC - A Trial Looking at Axillary Treatment in Early Breast Cancer (POSNOC). ClinicaltrialsGov n.d. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02401685 (accessed February 18, 2019)
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16632729
Citation
Alvarez S, Anorbe E, Alcorta P, Lopez F, Alonso I, Cortes J. Role of sonography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer: a systematic review. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 May;186(5):1342-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0936.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21597359
Citation
Houssami N, Ciatto S, Turner RM, Cody HS 3rd, Macaskill P. Preoperative ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of axillary nodes in invasive breast cancer: meta-analysis of its accuracy and utility in staging the axilla. Ann Surg. 2011 Aug;254(2):243-51. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31821f1564.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23062709
Citation
Joh JE, Han G, Kiluk JV, Laronga C, Khakpour N, Lee MC. Indications for axillary ultrasound use in breast cancer patients. Clin Breast Cancer. 2012 Dec;12(6):433-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2012.09.009. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22717665
Citation
Leenders MW, Broeders M, Croese C, Richir MC, Go HL, Langenhorst BL, Meijer S, Schreurs WH. Ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. To do or not to do? Breast. 2012 Aug;21(4):578-83. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21981897
Citation
Rattay T, Muttalib M, Khalifa E, Duncan A, Parker SJ. Clinical utility of routine pre-operative axillary ultrasound and fine needle aspiration cytology in patient selection for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Breast. 2012 Apr;21(2):210-4. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2011.09.014. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20047809
Citation
Garcia-Ortega MJ, Benito MA, Vahamonde EF, Torres PR, Velasco AB, Paredes MM. Pretreatment axillary ultrasonography and core biopsy in patients with suspected breast cancer: diagnostic accuracy and impact on management. Eur J Radiol. 2011 Jul;79(1):64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.011. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19263171
Citation
Rao R, Lilley L, Andrews V, Radford L, Ulissey M. Axillary staging by percutaneous biopsy: sensitivity of fine-needle aspiration versus core needle biopsy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 May;16(5):1170-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0421-9. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23771915
Citation
Rautiainen S, Masarwah A, Sudah M, Sutela A, Pelkonen O, Joukainen S, Sironen R, Karja V, Vanninen R. Axillary lymph node biopsy in newly diagnosed invasive breast cancer: comparative accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy versus core-needle biopsy. Radiology. 2013 Oct;269(1):54-60. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122637. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24649373
Citation
Ganott MA, Zuley ML, Abrams GS, Lu AH, Kelly AE, Sumkin JH, Chivukula M, Carter G, Austin RM, Bandos AI. Ultrasound Guided Core Biopsy versus Fine Needle Aspiration for Evaluation of Axillary Lymphadenopathy in Patients with Breast Cancer. ISRN Oncol. 2014 Feb 4;2014:703160. doi: 10.1155/2014/703160. eCollection 2014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25354962
Citation
van Wely BJ, de Wilt JH, Francissen C, Teerenstra S, Strobbe LJ. Meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided biopsy of suspicious axillary lymph nodes in the selection of patients with extensive axillary tumour burden in breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2015 Feb;102(3):159-68. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9663. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Lee J, Bishop B, Allen S. NeoNavia biopsy system: Our experience of a new device for more precise ultrasound-guided percutaneous core biopsy of axillary lymph nodes. Breast Cancer Res 2017;19(suppl 1):18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18180238
Citation
Abe H, Schmidt RA, Sennett CA, Shimauchi A, Newstead GM. US-guided core needle biopsy of axillary lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer: why and how to do it. Radiographics. 2007 Oct;27 Suppl 1:S91-9. doi: 10.1148/rg.27si075502.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18955508
Citation
Abe H, Schmidt RA, Kulkarni K, Sennett CA, Mueller JS, Newstead GM. Axillary lymph nodes suspicious for breast cancer metastasis: sampling with US-guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy--clinical experience in 100 patients. Radiology. 2009 Jan;250(1):41-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2493071483. Epub 2008 Oct 27.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://www.neodynamics.se/en/upl/files/161457
Description
Lee et al, NeoNavia biopsy system: Our experience of a new device for more precise ultrasound-guided percutaneous core biopsy of axillary lymph nodes, British Society of Breast Radiology Annual Scientific Meeting 2017
URL
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29519406/
Description
Schässburger et al. High velocity pulse biopsy device enables controllable and precise needle insertion and high yield tissue acquisition. Phys Med. 2018 Feb;46:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.12.014. Epub 2018 Jan 30.

Learn more about this trial

Comparison Trial of Open-tip Pulsed Needle Biopsy and Conventional Core Biopsy in Axillary Lymph Nodes

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs