search
Back to results

A Sequenced Strategy for Improving Outcomes in People With Knee Osteoarthritis Pain (SKOAP)

Primary Purpose

Knee Osteoarthrosis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Duloxetine
Intra-Articular Injection
Nerve Procedure with long acting blocks
Nerve Procedure with nerve ablation
Pain Coping Skills Training
Best Practices
Sponsored by
Johns Hopkins University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Knee Osteoarthrosis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meets American College of Rheumatology Classification criteria for knee osteoarthritis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any inability to complete study procedures, including, but not limited to low English language literacy.
  • Unstable medical condition that presents as an absolute or relative contraindication for participation (e.g., unstable angina, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, end stage renal failure, automated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator that cannot be disabled before RFA).
  • Severe untreated bleeding disorder (anticoagulants may be continued during phase II treatments in most patients)
  • Severe vision or hearing impairment or serious cognitive impairment that could interfere with consent or outcome assessment
  • Poorly controlled serious psychiatric condition
  • Active substance abuse
  • Scheduled joint replacement on the affected knee
  • History of unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with complaints of KOA pain limited to the operated knee
  • Ulcers or an open wound in the region of the index knee

Sites / Locations

  • University of AlabamaRecruiting
  • University of ArkansasRecruiting
  • University of California DavisRecruiting
  • University of California San DiegoRecruiting
  • University of ColoradoRecruiting
  • University of FloridaRecruiting
  • Mayo Clinic FloridaRecruiting
  • Emory UniversityRecruiting
  • Northwestern UniversityRecruiting
  • University of IowaRecruiting
  • Johns HopkinsRecruiting
  • Brigham and Women's HospitalRecruiting
  • University of MinnesotaRecruiting
  • Cornell UniversityRecruiting
  • University of North CarolinaRecruiting
  • Wake Forest UniversityRecruiting
  • University HospitalsRecruiting
  • Oregon Health and Science UniversityRecruiting
  • Vanderbilt UniversityRecruiting
  • University of UtahRecruiting
  • University of VirginiaRecruiting
  • University of WashingtonRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Phase 1: Best Practices

Phase 1: Best Practices + Duloxetine

Phase 1:Best Practices + Duloxetine + Pain coping skills

Phase 2: Intra-Articular Injection (HA+)

Phase 2: Nerve Procedure: Long Acting Blocks

Phase 2: Nerve Procedure: Nerve Ablation

Arm Description

Participants will receive an intervention from the best practices.

Participants will receive Duloxetine in addition to an intervention from the best practices.

Participants will receive Duloxetine and pain coping skills training in addition to an intervention from the best practices.

Participants will receive an intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid mixed with steroid and bupivacaine.

Participants will receive a nerve blocking procedure, long-acting local anesthetic, and steroid injection.

Participants will receive a nerve ablation procedure and steroid injection.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Pain Intensity as assessed by the Modified 4-item BPI Pain Scale
The Modified 4-item BPI Pain scale consists of 3 items from BPI Pain Intensity and 1 item from BPI Pain Interference. This is a continuous measure that will be calculated as the average of worst, average, current knee pain, and pain upon walking.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Pain Interference as assessed by the BPI
The BPI Pain Interference domain assesses self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life. The BPI measures how much pain has interfered with seven daily activities, including general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep. BPI pain interference is typically scored as the mean of the seven interference items. BPI Interference ranges from 0-10 with higher scores reflecting greater pain interference in activities of daily living.
Change in Physical Functioning as assessed by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
The KOOS evaluates function for participants with osteoarthritis of the knee that is related to injury and degeneration. The KOOS short form includes 12 items and measures pain, functional limitation and quality of life. Physical functioning questions cover everyday activities such as rising from sitting, standing getting in and out of the car and twisting/pivoting on the knee. Scores range from 0-100 with lower scores indicating worse knee symptoms.
Patient Global impression of Change (PGIC)
The PGIC scale evaluates all aspects of participants' health and assesses if there has been an improvement or decline in clinical status. It is a 7-item scale that ranges between "a great deal worse" to "a great deal better." Higher scores reflect greater improvement in clinical status.

Full Information

First Posted
August 5, 2020
Last Updated
July 11, 2023
Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04504812
Brief Title
A Sequenced Strategy for Improving Outcomes in People With Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
Acronym
SKOAP
Official Title
A Sequenced Strategy for Improving Outcomes in People With Knee Osteoarthritis Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
February 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
August 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Johns Hopkins University
Collaborators
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
There is an urgent public health need to reduce reliance on opioids for effective long-term pain management, particularly in knee osteoarthritis (KOA). This effectiveness trial will compare commonly recommended treatments to reduce pain and functional limitations in KOA.These results will lead to improved patient selection for treatment and inform evidence based guidelines by offering well-tested, effective, non-surgical alternatives.
Detailed Description
Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is one of the leading causes of chronic pain and disability worldwide, affecting over 30% of older adults. It represents a major global health and economic burden to individuals and society. The rates of KOA have more than doubled in the past 70 years and continue to grow sharply, given increases in life expectancy and population body mass index (BMI). Surgery is often employed to treat KOA, but it is associated with a high rate of persistent pain, and is not a permanent solution. Numerous nonsurgical therapies have been advocated to treat pain in patients with KOA yet are not often used in clinical care. The limited pain relief and functional improvement seen in a subset of knee OA sufferers has led to a high rate of opioid use and disability in this population. The overarching goal of this study is to conduct a sequential parallel group randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of conservative behavioral and non-opioid pharmacological treatments (Phase 1) and, among those that indicate interest in obtaining further treatment and those not eligible for conservative treatment, the benefits of procedural interventions (Phase 2). This study will also evaluate whether clinical and psychosocial phenotypes predict short- and longer-term treatment response. The results of this study will examine the effectiveness of each tested intervention and provide meaningful information regarding effectiveness across key subgroups of participants.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Knee Osteoarthrosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Sequential Assignment
Model Description
Using a stepped care model, Phase 1 participants will be randomly assigned to minimally invasive treatments, including best practices, best practices plus duloxetine, and best practices plus duloxetine combined with a web-based pain coping skills training program. Those who note interest in additional treatment following completion of Phase 1, as well as those that are not eligible for Phase 1 treatment, will be randomly assigned to more aggressive procedures: intra-articular hyaluronic acid, steroid and local anesthetic injection, or a nerve procedure that would either include a long acting block or nerve ablation.
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
Individuals randomized to a nerve procedure will be blinded to whether they have a long acting block or nerve ablation.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
2700 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Phase 1: Best Practices
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will receive an intervention from the best practices.
Arm Title
Phase 1: Best Practices + Duloxetine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will receive Duloxetine in addition to an intervention from the best practices.
Arm Title
Phase 1:Best Practices + Duloxetine + Pain coping skills
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will receive Duloxetine and pain coping skills training in addition to an intervention from the best practices.
Arm Title
Phase 2: Intra-Articular Injection (HA+)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will receive an intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid mixed with steroid and bupivacaine.
Arm Title
Phase 2: Nerve Procedure: Long Acting Blocks
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will receive a nerve blocking procedure, long-acting local anesthetic, and steroid injection.
Arm Title
Phase 2: Nerve Procedure: Nerve Ablation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will receive a nerve ablation procedure and steroid injection.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Duloxetine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cymbalta
Intervention Description
Duloxetine is a drug that is used to improve pain and function in people with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Duloxetine is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of depression, anxiety disorder, fibromyalgia, and joint pain. It will be titrated up from 20 or 30mg according to a schedule provided by a study provider.
Intervention Type
Combination Product
Intervention Name(s)
Intra-Articular Injection
Intervention Description
Intra-Articular Injection is an injection of 3-6 milliliter (mL) hyaluronic acid (HA) mixed with 1mL depo methylprednisolone (a steroid) and 2mL 0.5% bupivacaine (an anesthetic) into the knee.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Nerve Procedure with long acting blocks
Intervention Description
People assigned to receive this will have 1mL of a long-acting local anesthetic (a.k.a. liposomal bupivacaine or EXPAREL) and steroid injected into the knee.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Nerve Procedure with nerve ablation
Intervention Description
People assigned to receive this will have heat applied to destroy the nerve signaling pain in the knee. Steroid will be administered after the procedure to reduce the risk of neuritis.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Pain Coping Skills Training
Intervention Description
Participants will be provided with a written manual that includes login information for the pain coping skills training website. They will be expected to log into the system weekly, work through the modules, and participate in skills practice. This intervention will be conducted in combination with best practices and duloxetine.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Best Practices
Intervention Description
Best Practice includes treatments that experts recommend for knee arthritis pain. Best Practice can include topical or oral pain relievers, a structured exercise program, and weight management if BMI is over 30. Other non-invasive treatments such as acupuncture and yoga are also included.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Pain Intensity as assessed by the Modified 4-item BPI Pain Scale
Description
The Modified 4-item BPI Pain scale consists of 3 items from BPI Pain Intensity and 1 item from BPI Pain Interference. This is a continuous measure that will be calculated as the average of worst, average, current knee pain, and pain upon walking.
Time Frame
Baseline and 8 weeks post-treatment for Phase 1; Baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment for Phase 2
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Pain Interference as assessed by the BPI
Description
The BPI Pain Interference domain assesses self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life. The BPI measures how much pain has interfered with seven daily activities, including general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with others, and sleep. BPI pain interference is typically scored as the mean of the seven interference items. BPI Interference ranges from 0-10 with higher scores reflecting greater pain interference in activities of daily living.
Time Frame
Baseline and 8 weeks post-treatment for Phase 1; Baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment for Phase 2
Title
Change in Physical Functioning as assessed by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Description
The KOOS evaluates function for participants with osteoarthritis of the knee that is related to injury and degeneration. The KOOS short form includes 12 items and measures pain, functional limitation and quality of life. Physical functioning questions cover everyday activities such as rising from sitting, standing getting in and out of the car and twisting/pivoting on the knee. Scores range from 0-100 with lower scores indicating worse knee symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline and 8 weeks post-treatment for Phase 1; Baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment for Phase 2
Title
Patient Global impression of Change (PGIC)
Description
The PGIC scale evaluates all aspects of participants' health and assesses if there has been an improvement or decline in clinical status. It is a 7-item scale that ranges between "a great deal worse" to "a great deal better." Higher scores reflect greater improvement in clinical status.
Time Frame
At 8 weeks post-treatment for Phase 1; At 12 weeks post-treatment for Phase 2

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Meets American College of Rheumatology Classification criteria for knee osteoarthritis Exclusion Criteria: Any inability to complete study procedures, including, but not limited to inadequate resources to mitigate low English language literacy Unstable medical condition that presents as an absolute or relative contraindication for participation (e.g., unstable angina, poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, end stage renal failure, automated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator that cannot be disabled before RFA). Severe untreated bleeding disorder (anticoagulants may be continued during phase II treatments in most patients) Severe vision or hearing impairment or serious cognitive impairment that could interfere with consent or outcome assessment Poorly controlled serious psychiatric condition Active substance abuse Scheduled joint replacement on the affected knee History of unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with complaints of KOA pain limited to the operated knee Ulcers or an open wound in the region of the index knee
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Claudia Campbell, PhD
Phone
888-304-0711
Email
ccampb41@jhmi.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Steven Cohen, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alabama
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Email
shannagraves@uabmc.edu
Facility Name
University of Arkansas
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72205
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
501-398-8622
Email
tricoordinators@uams.edu
Facility Name
University of California Davis
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
916-416-5887
Email
cqthai@ucdavis.edu
Facility Name
University of California San Diego
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92037
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
858-822-3108
Facility Name
University of Colorado
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
734-476-1146
Email
andrew.clauw@cuanschutz.edu
Facility Name
University of Florida
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32608
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
352-273-8911
Email
agunnett@anest.ufl.edu
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic Florida
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32224
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
904-953-4529
Facility Name
Emory University
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
404-251-0759
Facility Name
Northwestern University
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
312-695-0915
Email
jordan.wood1@northwestern.edu
Facility Name
University of Iowa
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
319-356-1722
Email
chimenti-lab@healthcare.uiowa.edu
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21287
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Email
SKOAPstudy@jhmi.edu
Phone
(443) 961-7246
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02199
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
617-732-9463
Facility Name
University of Minnesota
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Email
skoap@umn.edu
Facility Name
Cornell University
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10019
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
212-746-9419
Facility Name
University of North Carolina
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27599
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
919-966-5495
Email
bradley_lauck@med.unc.edu
Facility Name
Wake Forest University
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27517
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
336-716-8791
Facility Name
University Hospitals
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Email
Rheumresearch@uhhospitals.org
Facility Name
Oregon Health and Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
503-494-2180
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
615-313-7005
Email
denise.de.la.torre@vumc.org
Facility Name
University of Utah
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84108
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
801-587-1436
Facility Name
University of Virginia
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22908
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
434-409-1058
Email
MEB2W@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
Facility Name
University of Washington
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98185
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Research Coordinator
Phone
206-221-5572
Email
abbychiu@uw.edu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
After last subject enrollment and all follow up procedures have been completed, the Helping to End Addiction Long-Term (HEAL) Pain Management Effectiveness Research Network Data Coordinating Center at the University of Utah will prepare a final study database for the trial, which will then be used for statistical analyses and publication of findings from the trial.The Trial will provide a resource of data concerning methods for managing pain and reducing opioid addiction, and the Data Coordinating Center (DCC) will produce a database that can be used by non- Effectiveness Research Network (ERN) investigators.The DCC will also prepare a data dictionary that provides a concise definition of every data element included in the database. If specific data elements have idiosyncrasies that might affect interpretation or analysis, this will be discussed in the dictionary document. Data elements that are considered unreliable will be deleted, and this will be noted in the documentation.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
These policies are expected to focus primarily on the timing of data release. The investigator's preliminary plan is to release the database (defined below) at the time of publication of the primary manuscript, or within 12 months of last patient procedure, whichever comes first. Implementation of the plan will follow the HEAL Public Access and Data Sharing Policy as outlined at https://heal.nih.gov/about/public-access-data
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Access to the releasable database housed in the NIH-assigned repository will be in accordance with procedures and regulations of the NIH or specific institute. The data coordinating center will not provide any support for investigators using the releasable database.

Learn more about this trial

A Sequenced Strategy for Improving Outcomes in People With Knee Osteoarthritis Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs