search
Back to results

Artificial Pancreas - Adolescent Physiology & Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation (AP APPLE)

Primary Purpose

Type 1 Diabetes

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Artificial Pancreas (AP)
Sponsored by
University of Virginia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Type 1 Diabetes focused on measuring Artificial Pancreas (AP), Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM), Insulin Pump, Closed Loop Control, Multiple Daily Injections (MDI), Control-IQ Technology, Triple Tracer Study, Glycemic Only

Eligibility Criteria

11 Years - 12 Years (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 11 to <13 years (at time of enrollment) with a parent/guardian (18+ yo) who is willing to participate with the child
  2. At least Tanner 2 pubic hair (boys), Tanner 2 breast development (girls)
  3. HbA1c <10 clinically obtained within the last 6 weeks; if the participant is unable to go to the laboratory or clinic because of stay-at-home orders, the entry hemoglobin A1c level can be assessed via outside laboratory (e.g. LabCorp), home HbA1c device, recent clinically-obtained HbA1c in past month..
  4. Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year
  5. Currently using insulin for at least six months
  6. Both prior pump and MDI users will use insulin parameters such as carbohydrate ratio and correction factors consistently on their pump in order to dose insulin for meals or corrections
  7. Access to internet and willingness to upload data during the study as needed
  8. For females, not currently known to be pregnant or breastfeeding
  9. If female and sexually active, must agree to use a form of contraception to prevent pregnancy while a participant in the study. A negative serum or urine pregnancy test will be required for all females of childbearing potential. Participants who become pregnant will be discontinued from the study. Also, participants who during the study develop and express the intention to become pregnant within the timespan of the study will be discontinued.
  10. Willingness to suspend use of any personal CGM for the duration of the clinical trial once the study CGM is in use
  11. Willingness to switch to lispro (Humalog) or aspart (Novolog) if not using already, and to use no other insulin besides lispro (Humalog) or aspart (Novolog) during the study, if randomized to the Control-IQ group.
  12. Total daily insulin dose (TDD) at least 10 U/day and not more than 100 U/day
  13. Willingness not to start any new non-insulin glucose-lowering agent during the course of the trial (including metformin, GLP-1 agonists, pramlintide, DPP-4 inhibitors, biguanides, sulfonylureas and naturaceuticals)
  14. An understanding and willingness to follow the protocol and signed informed consent
  15. Participants must have Internet access and a computer system that meets the requirements for uploading the study equipment.
  16. Contact with primary diabetes physician to discuss study details and the participant's care, with study team continuing to feel that the participant is appropriate for study inclusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Hemoglobin A1c >10% clinically obtained within the past 6 weeks
  2. A known medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol such as the following examples:

    1. Severe renal impairment, end-stage renal disease, or dialysis
    2. Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past six months
    3. Presence of a known adrenal disorder
    4. Abnormal liver function test results (Transaminase>2 times the upper limit of normal); testing required for subjects taking medications known to affect liver function or with diseases known to affect liver function
    5. Uncontrolled thyroid disease
    6. Concurrent use of any non-insulin glucose-lowering agent.
    7. Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder.
  3. History of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in the 6 months prior to enrollment
  4. Severe hypoglycemia resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness in the 6 months prior to enrollment
  5. Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant during the trial
  6. Currently being treated for a seizure disorder
  7. Planned surgery during study duration
  8. Treatment with any non-insulin glucose-lowering agent (including metformin, GLP-1 agonists, pramlintide, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors, biguanides, sulfonylureas and naturaceuticals)
  9. A known medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol
  10. Use of an insulin delivery mechanism that is not downloadable by the subject or study team
  11. (Randomized substudy only) Current use of an automated insulin delivery system (besides LGS and PLGS) such as Medtronic 670G, Control-IQ or DIY system (or unwillingness to discontinue automated insulin delivery for three months before enrollment and the duration of the trial).
  12. Having a family member(s) employed by Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. or Dexcom, Inc.
  13. Current enrollment in another clinical trial, unless approved by the investigator of both studies or if clinical trial is a non-interventional registry trial.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Virginia Center for Diabetes TechnologyRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

No Intervention

Arm Label

Randomized substudy: Artificial Pancreas Therapy

Randomized substudy: Usual Care + CGM

Triple Label Surveillance substudy (observational arm)

Arm Description

Participants will use a study assigned Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ Technology.for two years.

Participant will use their usual diabetes care along with a study CGM.

Participants will remain on own baseline diabetes management (e.g. automated insulin delivery system, non-AID pump, MDI)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Randomized substudy: The 24-month HbA1c between AP system and Usual Care+CGM groups, performed as regression, adjusted for baseline HbA1c.
Measure of HbA1c
Combined Triple Label Surveillance and Randomized substudies: Change in insulin sensitivity (Si) over time
Changes in Si (from triple-label, mixed-meal test) over time between baseline and 24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Triple Label tracer (both substudies): Change in Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP)
Change in EGP over baseline, 12 and 24 months
Triple Label tracer (both substudies): Change in Rate of Glucose Appearance (Ra)
Change in Ra over baseline, 12 and 24 months
Triple Label tracer (both substudies): Change in Rate of Glucose Disappearance (Rd)
Change in Rd over baseline, 12 and 24 months
Randomized Substudy: Comparison of Glycemic Control (below also) - Time in range, overall
Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: overall
Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 0-6
Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 0-6
Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 6-12
Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 6-12
Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 12-18
Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 12-18
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI overall
Overall total daily insulin
Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 18-24
Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 18-24
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 0-6 months
Total daily insulin, months 0-6
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 6-12 months
Total daily insulin, months 6-12
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 12-18 months
Total daily insulin, months 12-18
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 18-24 months
Total daily insulin, months 18-24
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin total
Overall total basal insulin
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 0-6 months
Total basal insulin, months 0-6
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 6-12 months
Total basal insulin, months 6-12
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 12-18 months
Total basal insulin, months 12-18
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 18-24 months
Total basal insulin, months 18-24
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio overall
Overall insulin:carb ratio
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 0-6 months
Insulin:carb ratio, months 0-6
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 6-12 months
Insulin:carb ratio, months 6-12
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 12-18 months
Insulin:carb ratio, months 12-18
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 18-24 months
Insulin:carb ratio, months 18-24
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor overall
Overall insulin sensitivity factor
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 0-6 months
Insulin sensitivity factor months 0-6
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 6-12 months
Insulin sensitivity factor months 6-12
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 12-18 months
Insulin sensitivity factor months 12-18
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 18-24 months
Insulin sensitivity factor months 18-24
Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time 70-180 mg/dL
Time 70-180 mg/dL
Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time <70 mg/dL
Time <70 mg/dL
Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time >180 mg/dL
Time >180 mg/dL
Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time >250 mg/dL
Time >250 mg/dL
Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Number of hypoglycemia events
Number of hypoglycemia events/24 hours of CGM data available
Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Total daily insulin injected
Total daily insulin injected (pump users only in Usual Care+CGM group)
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months
Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months
Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Randomized substudy: Triple Label Tracer, Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months
Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Randomized substudy: Triple Label Tracer, Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months
Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months
Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months
Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Change in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months
Change in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Change in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months
Change in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Peripheral SI at 24 months
Difference in Peripheral SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Peripheral SI at 12 months
Difference in Peripheral SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Peripheral SI at 24 months
Change in Peripheral SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Peripheral SI at 12 months
Change in Peripheral SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months
Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months
Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months
Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months
Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Glucose uptake at 24 months
Difference in Glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Glucose uptake at 12 months
Difference in Glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Glucose uptake at 24 months
Change in Glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Glucose uptake at 12 months
Change in Glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months
Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months
Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months
Change in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months
Change in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Division of diabetes management responsibilities, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Division of diabetes management responsibilities, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Division of diabetes management responsibilities, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Division of diabetes management responsibilities, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Family conflict, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Family conflict, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Family conflict, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Family conflict, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Peer influence, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Peer influence, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Diabetes distress, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Problem Areas in Diabetes, child version (26 items, possible score 26-156, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Diabetes distress, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Problem Areas in Diabetes, child version (26 items, possible score 26-156, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Diabetes distress, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Problem Areas in Diabetes, parent version (18 items, possible score 18-54, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Diabetes distress, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Problem Areas in Diabetes, parent version (18 items, possible score 18-54, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Fear of hypoglycemia, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Fear of hypoglycemia, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Fear of hypoglycemia, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Fear of hypoglycemia, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Depression, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Child Depression Inventory-II short form (12 items, possible score 0-20, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Depression, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Child Depression Inventory-II short form (12 items, possible score 0-20, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Depression in child, assessed by parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Child Depression Inventory-II parent (17 items, possible score 0-36, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Depression in child, assessed by parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Child Depression Inventory-II parent (17 items, possible score 0-36, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Technology acceptance, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, child version (17 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Technology acceptance, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, child version (17 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Technology acceptance, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, parent version (21 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Technology acceptance, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, parent version (21 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Health-related quality of life, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
T1D and Life, youth version (23 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Health-related quality of life, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
T1D and Life, youth version (23 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Health-related quality of life, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
T1D and Life, parent version (30 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Health-related quality of life, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
T1D and Life, parent version (30 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Both substudies: Change in HbA1c
Change in HbA1c over baseline, 12 and 24 months
Both substudies: Change in percent time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR)
Change in TIR over baseline, 12 and 24 months
Both substudies: Change in percent time >180 mg/dL
Change in percent time >180 mg/dL over baseline, 12 and 24 months
Both substudies: Change in percent time <70 mg/dL
Change in percent time <70 mg/dL over baseline, 12 and 24 months

Full Information

First Posted
July 20, 2020
Last Updated
May 8, 2023
Sponsor
University of Virginia
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), DexCom, Inc., Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04510506
Brief Title
Artificial Pancreas - Adolescent Physiology & Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation
Acronym
AP APPLE
Official Title
Artificial Pancreas - Adolescent Physiology & Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 19, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 18, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 18, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Virginia
Collaborators
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), DexCom, Inc., Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study designed to assess changes in control of Type 1 Diabetes in pubertal adolescents over a two year period. There are two arms/substudies, the first being a longitudinal randomized controlled trial and the second an observational study.
Detailed Description
The investigators will recruit adolescents with type 1 diabetes age 11-<13 years and one parent to participate in this 24-month study. While this is admittedly a long enrollment time, study commitments following enrollment will be limited to three in-person or video visits at yearly intervals and one virtual or in-person device training session to improve adherence. Participants must be pubertal, as puberty appears to contribute significantly to the insulin resistance that is likely related to worsened blood glucose control. Pubertal assessments will occur at yearly intervals. The first of the two arms/substudies ("Randomized" substudy) is a longitudinal randomized controlled trial for which participants will be randomized to either continue their current diabetes therapy (with the addition of use of a Dexcom CGM, forming the "Usual Care+CGM" Control Group; this includes both adolescents using non-automated insulin delivery (AID) insulin pumps or multiple daily injections [MDI]). The Experimental Group will use an AP system (Tandem's Control-IQ system) during the two-year duration of the study. The primary outcome of the Randomized substudy will be HbA1c between intervention groups at the 24-month visit. The second arm/substudy ("Triple Label Surveillance" substudy) is an observational study. Both arms/substudies perform a "Triple Label" mixed meal study assessing glucose flux and insulin resistance that requires visits to the Clinical Research Unit. All participants will undergo a Triple-Labeled Glucose Assessment at months 0, 12 and 24. This assessment evaluates the degree of insulin resistance including in the hepatic and peripheral compartments. During Visit 2, all participants (for both the Triple Label sub-study and the Glycemia-Only sub-study) will complete multiple questionnaires assessing aspects of adolescent psychology and sociology. HbA1c will also be collected using a local lab. The primary outcome of the study overall (combined Triple Label Surveillance and Randomized substudies) is the change in insulin resistance between baseline and the 24-month visit. CGM glucose data will be collected continuously via remote connection during the entire study. At months 6 and 18, participants will be contacted to obtain insulin management information and will have HbA1c measures assessed at a local clinic or laboratory. Additional scheduled phone calls will occur in the month before the in-person study visits to request HbA1c and confirm body composition/Triple-Labeled Glucose Assessment scheduling and discuss use of CGM and activity tracker. Participants will be contacted in the event of insufficient CGM or AP system use. For the Randomized substudy, in the Eperimental Group, insufficient use is defined as <60% AP use over a 3-month period. For the Control Group, less than 1 month of CGM data over a 3-month period is considered insufficient. If participants do not meet minimum use criteria in 2 successive periods, the participant will be discontinued from the study. The investigators are targeting completion of 42 child/parent dyads combined between the Randomized substudy and the Triple Label Surveillance sub-study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Type 1 Diabetes
Keywords
Artificial Pancreas (AP), Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM), Insulin Pump, Closed Loop Control, Multiple Daily Injections (MDI), Control-IQ Technology, Triple Tracer Study, Glycemic Only

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This is a longitudinal randomized controlled study designed to assess changes in control of Type 1 Diabetes in pubertal adolescents over a two year period.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Randomized substudy: Artificial Pancreas Therapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will use a study assigned Tandem t:slim X2 with Control-IQ Technology.for two years.
Arm Title
Randomized substudy: Usual Care + CGM
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Participant will use their usual diabetes care along with a study CGM.
Arm Title
Triple Label Surveillance substudy (observational arm)
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Participants will remain on own baseline diabetes management (e.g. automated insulin delivery system, non-AID pump, MDI)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Artificial Pancreas (AP)
Intervention Description
The AP system used in this trial is the Tandem t:slim insulin pump with Control-IQ Technology. This system is FDA approved for use starting at age 14 years.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Randomized substudy: The 24-month HbA1c between AP system and Usual Care+CGM groups, performed as regression, adjusted for baseline HbA1c.
Description
Measure of HbA1c
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Combined Triple Label Surveillance and Randomized substudies: Change in insulin sensitivity (Si) over time
Description
Changes in Si (from triple-label, mixed-meal test) over time between baseline and 24 months
Time Frame
Baseline, 12 months, 24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Triple Label tracer (both substudies): Change in Endogenous Glucose Production (EGP)
Description
Change in EGP over baseline, 12 and 24 months
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Triple Label tracer (both substudies): Change in Rate of Glucose Appearance (Ra)
Description
Change in Ra over baseline, 12 and 24 months
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Triple Label tracer (both substudies): Change in Rate of Glucose Disappearance (Rd)
Description
Change in Rd over baseline, 12 and 24 months
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Randomized Substudy: Comparison of Glycemic Control (below also) - Time in range, overall
Description
Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: overall
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 0-6
Description
Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 0-6
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 6-12
Description
Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 6-12
Time Frame
months 6-12
Title
Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 12-18
Description
Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 12-18
Time Frame
months 12-18
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI overall
Description
Overall total daily insulin
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Glycemic Control - Time in range, months 18-24
Description
Time in range 70-180 mg/dL: months 18-24
Time Frame
months 18-24
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 0-6 months
Description
Total daily insulin, months 0-6
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 6-12 months
Description
Total daily insulin, months 6-12
Time Frame
months 18-24
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 12-18 months
Description
Total daily insulin, months 12-18
Time Frame
months 12-18
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, TDI 18-24 months
Description
Total daily insulin, months 18-24
Time Frame
months 18-24
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin total
Description
Overall total basal insulin
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 0-6 months
Description
Total basal insulin, months 0-6
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 6-12 months
Description
Total basal insulin, months 6-12
Time Frame
months 6-12
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 12-18 months
Description
Total basal insulin, months 12-18
Time Frame
months 12-18
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, basal insulin 18-24 months
Description
Total basal insulin, months 18-24
Time Frame
months 18-24
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio overall
Description
Overall insulin:carb ratio
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 0-6 months
Description
Insulin:carb ratio, months 0-6
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 6-12 months
Description
Insulin:carb ratio, months 6-12
Time Frame
months 6-12
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 12-18 months
Description
Insulin:carb ratio, months 12-18
Time Frame
months 12-18
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin:carb ratio 18-24 months
Description
Insulin:carb ratio, months 18-24
Time Frame
months 18-24
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor overall
Description
Overall insulin sensitivity factor
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 0-6 months
Description
Insulin sensitivity factor months 0-6
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 6-12 months
Description
Insulin sensitivity factor months 6-12
Time Frame
months 6-12
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 12-18 months
Description
Insulin sensitivity factor months 12-18
Time Frame
months 12-18
Title
Glycemic Control - Insulin doses, insulin sensitivity factor 18-24 months
Description
Insulin sensitivity factor months 18-24
Time Frame
months 18-24
Title
Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time 70-180 mg/dL
Description
Time 70-180 mg/dL
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time <70 mg/dL
Description
Time <70 mg/dL
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time >180 mg/dL
Description
Time >180 mg/dL
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Time >250 mg/dL
Description
Time >250 mg/dL
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Number of hypoglycemia events
Description
Number of hypoglycemia events/24 hours of CGM data available
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Glycemic Control - Differences in CGM readings over prior month, Total daily insulin injected
Description
Total daily insulin injected (pump users only in Usual Care+CGM group)
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months
Description
Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months
Description
Difference in overall insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Randomized substudy: Triple Label Tracer, Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months
Description
Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Randomized substudy: Triple Label Tracer, Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months
Description
Change in insulin sensitivity (SI) at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months
Description
Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months
Description
Difference in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Change in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months
Description
Change in overall Hepatic SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Change in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months
Description
Change in overall Hepatic SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Peripheral SI at 24 months
Description
Difference in Peripheral SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Peripheral SI at 12 months
Description
Difference in Peripheral SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Peripheral SI at 24 months
Description
Change in Peripheral SI at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Peripheral SI at 12 months
Description
Change in Peripheral SI at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months
Description
Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months
Description
Difference in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months
Description
Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months
Description
Change in Endogenous glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Glucose uptake at 24 months
Description
Difference in Glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Glucose uptake at 12 months
Description
Difference in Glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Glucose uptake at 24 months
Description
Change in Glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Glucose uptake at 12 months
Description
Change in Glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months
Description
Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months
Description
Difference in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months
Description
Change in Meal glucose uptake at 24 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Triple Label Tracer, Change in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months
Description
Change in Meal glucose uptake at 12 months, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Division of diabetes management responsibilities, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Division of diabetes management responsibilities, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Division of diabetes management responsibilities, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Division of diabetes management responsibilities, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Diabetes Family Responsibility Questionnaire (17 items, possible score 17-51, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Family conflict, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Family conflict, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Family conflict, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Family conflict, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Peer influence, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Peer influence, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Diabetes Family Conflict Scale (19 items, possible score 19-57, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Diabetes distress, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Problem Areas in Diabetes, child version (26 items, possible score 26-156, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Diabetes distress, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Problem Areas in Diabetes, child version (26 items, possible score 26-156, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Diabetes distress, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Problem Areas in Diabetes, parent version (18 items, possible score 18-54, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Diabetes distress, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Problem Areas in Diabetes, parent version (18 items, possible score 18-54, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Fear of hypoglycemia, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Fear of hypoglycemia, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Fear of hypoglycemia, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Fear of hypoglycemia, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (25 items, possible score 0-100, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Depression, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Child Depression Inventory-II short form (12 items, possible score 0-20, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Depression, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Child Depression Inventory-II short form (12 items, possible score 0-20, lower is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Depression in child, assessed by parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Child Depression Inventory-II parent (17 items, possible score 0-36, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Depression in child, assessed by parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
Child Depression Inventory-II parent (17 items, possible score 0-36, lower is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Technology acceptance, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, child version (17 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Technology acceptance, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, child version (17 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Technology acceptance, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, parent version (21 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Technology acceptance, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
INsulin delivery Systems, Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations, parent version (21 items, possible score 0-100, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Health-related quality of life, child, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
T1D and Life, youth version (23 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Health-related quality of life, child, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
T1D and Life, youth version (23 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), child, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Health-related quality of life, parent, difference in score at 24 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
T1D and Life, parent version (30 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Health-related quality of life, parent, difference in score at 12 months (adjusted for baseline)
Description
T1D and Life, parent version (30 items, possible score 0-2500, higher is better), parent, AP system vs. Usual Care+CGM
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Both substudies: Change in HbA1c
Description
Change in HbA1c over baseline, 12 and 24 months
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Both substudies: Change in percent time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL (TIR)
Description
Change in TIR over baseline, 12 and 24 months
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Both substudies: Change in percent time >180 mg/dL
Description
Change in percent time >180 mg/dL over baseline, 12 and 24 months
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Both substudies: Change in percent time <70 mg/dL
Description
Change in percent time <70 mg/dL over baseline, 12 and 24 months
Time Frame
24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
11 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
12 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 11 to <13 years (at time of enrollment) with a parent/guardian (18+ yo) who is willing to participate with the child At least Tanner 2 pubic hair (boys), Tanner 2 breast development (girls) HbA1c <10 clinically obtained within the last 6 weeks; if the participant is unable to go to the laboratory or clinic because of stay-at-home orders, the entry hemoglobin A1c level can be assessed via outside laboratory (e.g. LabCorp), home HbA1c device, recent clinically-obtained HbA1c in past month.. Clinical diagnosis, based on investigator assessment, of type 1 diabetes for at least one year Currently using insulin for at least six months Both prior pump and MDI users will use insulin parameters such as carbohydrate ratio and correction factors consistently on their pump in order to dose insulin for meals or corrections Access to internet and willingness to upload data during the study as needed For females, not currently known to be pregnant or breastfeeding If female and sexually active, must agree to use a form of contraception to prevent pregnancy while a participant in the study. A negative serum or urine pregnancy test will be required for all females of childbearing potential. Participants who become pregnant will be discontinued from the study. Also, participants who during the study develop and express the intention to become pregnant within the timespan of the study will be discontinued. Willingness to suspend use of any personal CGM for the duration of the clinical trial once the study CGM is in use Willingness to switch to lispro (Humalog) or aspart (Novolog) if not using already, and to use no other insulin besides lispro (Humalog) or aspart (Novolog) during the study, if randomized to the Control-IQ group. Total daily insulin dose (TDD) at least 10 U/day and not more than 100 U/day Willingness not to start any new non-insulin glucose-lowering agent during the course of the trial (including metformin, GLP-1 agonists, pramlintide, DPP-4 inhibitors, biguanides, sulfonylureas and naturaceuticals) An understanding and willingness to follow the protocol and signed informed consent Participants must have Internet access and a computer system that meets the requirements for uploading the study equipment. Contact with primary diabetes physician to discuss study details and the participant's care, with study team continuing to feel that the participant is appropriate for study inclusion. Exclusion Criteria: Hemoglobin A1c >10% clinically obtained within the past 6 weeks A known medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol such as the following examples: Severe renal impairment, end-stage renal disease, or dialysis Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past six months Presence of a known adrenal disorder Abnormal liver function test results (Transaminase>2 times the upper limit of normal); testing required for subjects taking medications known to affect liver function or with diseases known to affect liver function Uncontrolled thyroid disease Concurrent use of any non-insulin glucose-lowering agent. Hemophilia or any other bleeding disorder. History of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in the 6 months prior to enrollment Severe hypoglycemia resulting in seizure or loss of consciousness in the 6 months prior to enrollment Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant during the trial Currently being treated for a seizure disorder Planned surgery during study duration Treatment with any non-insulin glucose-lowering agent (including metformin, GLP-1 agonists, pramlintide, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT-2 inhibitors, biguanides, sulfonylureas and naturaceuticals) A known medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator might interfere with the completion of the protocol Use of an insulin delivery mechanism that is not downloadable by the subject or study team (Randomized substudy only) Current use of an automated insulin delivery system (besides LGS and PLGS) such as Medtronic 670G, Control-IQ or DIY system (or unwillingness to discontinue automated insulin delivery for three months before enrollment and the duration of the trial). Having a family member(s) employed by Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. or Dexcom, Inc. Current enrollment in another clinical trial, unless approved by the investigator of both studies or if clinical trial is a non-interventional registry trial.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lianna Smith
Phone
434-297-7651
Email
lhs7px@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Laura L. Kollar, RN
Phone
434-982-6479
Email
llk7m@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark D. DeBoer, MD, MSc, MCR
Organizational Affiliation
UVA Center for Diabetes Technology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22904
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mark D DeBoer, MD
Phone
434-924-9833
Email
mdd5z@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lianna Smith
Phone
434-297-7651
Email
lhs7px@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marc D Breton, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ananda Basu, MD FRCP
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chaira Fabris, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Boris P Kovatchev, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Melissa Schoelwer, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jaclyn Shepard, PsyD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Pending
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Generally will be available after publications completed.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
No restrictions for access.

Learn more about this trial

Artificial Pancreas - Adolescent Physiology & Psychology Longitudinal Evaluation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs