Exposure-Based Treatment for Undifferentiated Somatic Symptom Disorder (SOMEX0)
Primary Purpose
Somatic Symptom Disorder
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Exposure
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Somatic Symptom Disorder focused on measuring Exposure, Feasibility
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- DSM-5 somatic symptom disorder
- Interest in 8-week intensive psychological treatment to reduce distress and the impact of physical symptoms
- At least 18 years old
- Living in Sweden
- Fluent in Swedish
- Complete pre-treatment assessment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Preoccupation with physical symptoms better explained by another psychiatric condition such as illness anxiety disorder, panic disorder, or obsessive-compulsive disorder
- Severe psychiatric condition, such as bipolar disorder, suicidal ideation, or psychosis
- Medical risks associated with participating in exposure-based treatment, or somatic condition - or treatment for somatic condition - that is an obstacle to participating in exposure-based treatment
- Non-stable continuous pharmacotherapy (dosage changed during the past 4 weeks) and the drug is likely to affect outcome measures (primarily: antidepressants, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, nonbenzodiazepines, opioids)
- Alcohol or substance use that is a clear obstacle to therapy
- Planned absence for more than 1 week of the treatment period
Sites / Locations
- Karolinska Institutet
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Internet-delivered exposure-based treatment
Arm Description
Eight weeks of therapist-guided exposure-based treatment delivered via the Internet.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Feasibility 1: distribution of physical symptoms
Primarily according to the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15, theoretical range: 0-30, higher score indicates more distressing physical symptoms)
Feasibility 2: credibility/expectancy based on the Credibility/Expectancy scale
Theoretical range: 0-50, higher score indicates higher credibility/expectancy
Feasibility 3: adherence to the protocol in terms of at least 60% completed modules and at least 50% of participants completing at least 2 exposure exercises
Feasibility 4: patient-reported adequacy of rationale as assessed using a questionnaire developed specifically for this purpose (theoretical range: 0-10)
Was originally intended to be administered at week 3, but was administered post-treatment due to an administrative error
Feasibility 5: adequacy of the measurement strategy in terms of less than 30% missing data at post-treatment, and at least 75% finding the measurement strategy acceptable
Feasibility 6: satisfaction with treatment as indicated by a mean Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) score of at least 22
Theoretical range: 8-32, higher score indicates higher satisfaction. This sum score is based on 8 items, each scored 1-4. The original preregistered range of 7-28 was an erratum.
Feasibility 7a: adverse events measured using free-text items, primarily reported as the total number of reported events
Feasibility 7b: adverse events measured using the 20-item Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ-20)
Theoretical range: 0-80, higher score indicates more severe adverse events
Secondary Outcome Measures
Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15)
Theoretical range: 0-30, higher score indicates more distressing physical symptoms
Somatic Symptom Disorder-B Criteria Scale (SSD-12)
Theoretical range: 0-48, higher score indicates higher degree of preoccupation with symptoms
Symptom Preoccupation Scale (preliminary scale)
Under development, higher score indicates higher degree of preoccupation with symptoms
14-item Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI-14)
Theoretical range: 0-42, higher score indicates more health anxiety
Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI)
Theoretical range: 0-64, higher score indicates more anxiety sensitivity
GAD-7
Theoretical range: 0-21, higher score indicates more general anxiety
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Theoretical range: 0-27, higher score indicates more symptoms of depression
12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)
Theoretical range: 0-100, higher score indicates more disability
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)
Theoretical range: 0-40, higher score indicates more problematic alcohol use
Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT)
Theoretical range: 0-44, higher score indicates more problematic substance use
Working Alliance Inventory (WAI)
Theoretical range: 6-42, higher score indicates better relationship with the therapist
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04511286
Brief Title
Exposure-Based Treatment for Undifferentiated Somatic Symptom Disorder
Acronym
SOMEX0
Official Title
Single-Arm Feasibility Study of Exposure-Based Treatment for Undifferentiated Somatic Symptom Disorder
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 11, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 24, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 24, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Karolinska Institutet
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study investigates the feasibility of a general exposure-based treatment protocol that is intended to work for a large variety of patient groups with a clinically significant preoccupation with physical symptoms. This is a prospective single-group study based at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, where 40 adults with DSM-5 somatic symptom disorder are enrolled in 8 weeks of therapist-guided exposure-based treatment via the Internet. Exposure is based on general principles but tailored to suit the needs of each patient. Outcomes include patient-reported credibility and expectancy, adherence to the treatment protocol, client satisfaction, and negative events. Within-group effects will also be quantified and discussed in relation to the existing literature.
Detailed Description
Background:
A substantial portion of patients in routine care suffer from a recurrent preoccupation with physical symptoms, which often leads to substantial suffering and impairment. Exposure-based treatment - where the patient systematically seeks out that which gives rise to unwanted sensations, cognitions, or behavior - has been found to lead to beneficial effects in several types of symptom preoccupation. Yet, this form of treatment is rarely offered in routine care. This may be partially because existing treatment protocols have been developed for specific symptom clusters (e.g., functional somatic syndromes such as irritable bowel syndrome and fibromyalgia) or specific unwanted responses to symptoms (e.g., the fear of having a severe illness), and that many clinics do not have the resources to offer all these specialized protocols in parallel. An alternative approach could be to base exposure treatment on a more general protocol that may be tailored to suit a larger variety of patient groups who suffer from a recurrent preoccupation with physical symptoms. However, it is yet unclear if the use of such a general treatment protocol for symptom preoccupation would be feasible, for example in terms of patient-reported credibility, adherence, identification with the rationale, and general client satisfaction.
Aim:
To investigate the feasibility of delivering exposure-based treatment using a general protocol for clinically significant symptom preoccupation, without selecting patients based on any specific symptom cluster (such as a functional somatic syndrome) or specific unwanted response to physical symptoms (such as a frequent fear of illness).
Design:
This is a prospective single-group feasibility study based at Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, where 40 adults with somatic symptom disorder according to the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 5 (DSM-5) are enrolled in 8 weeks of therapist-guided exposure-based treatment that is delivered via the Internet. Various aspects of feasibility are assessed; most notably: patient-reported credibility and expectancy, adherence to the treatment protocol, client satisfaction, and negative events. Within-group effects are also quantified.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Somatic Symptom Disorder
Keywords
Exposure, Feasibility
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Prospective single-group cohort study
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
Psychological intervention, patient-reported outcomes
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
33 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Internet-delivered exposure-based treatment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Eight weeks of therapist-guided exposure-based treatment delivered via the Internet.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Exposure
Intervention Description
Systematic confrontation with stimuli associated with symptom-related distress, to achieve therapeutic changes in cognitions or behavior
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility 1: distribution of physical symptoms
Description
Primarily according to the Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15, theoretical range: 0-30, higher score indicates more distressing physical symptoms)
Time Frame
Pre-treatment assessment (within 2 weeks before treatment)
Title
Feasibility 2: credibility/expectancy based on the Credibility/Expectancy scale
Description
Theoretical range: 0-50, higher score indicates higher credibility/expectancy
Time Frame
Week 3 of treatment
Title
Feasibility 3: adherence to the protocol in terms of at least 60% completed modules and at least 50% of participants completing at least 2 exposure exercises
Time Frame
Post-treatment assessment (immediately after treatment, completed within 45 days)
Title
Feasibility 4: patient-reported adequacy of rationale as assessed using a questionnaire developed specifically for this purpose (theoretical range: 0-10)
Description
Was originally intended to be administered at week 3, but was administered post-treatment due to an administrative error
Time Frame
Post-treatment assessment (immediately after treatment, completed within 45 days)
Title
Feasibility 5: adequacy of the measurement strategy in terms of less than 30% missing data at post-treatment, and at least 75% finding the measurement strategy acceptable
Time Frame
Post-treatment assessment (immediately after treatment, completed within 45 days)
Title
Feasibility 6: satisfaction with treatment as indicated by a mean Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) score of at least 22
Description
Theoretical range: 8-32, higher score indicates higher satisfaction. This sum score is based on 8 items, each scored 1-4. The original preregistered range of 7-28 was an erratum.
Time Frame
Post-treatment assessment (immediately after treatment, completed within 45 days)
Title
Feasibility 7a: adverse events measured using free-text items, primarily reported as the total number of reported events
Time Frame
Post-treatment assessment (immediately after treatment, completed within 45 days)
Title
Feasibility 7b: adverse events measured using the 20-item Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ-20)
Description
Theoretical range: 0-80, higher score indicates more severe adverse events
Time Frame
Post-treatment assessment (immediately after treatment, completed within 45 days)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15)
Description
Theoretical range: 0-30, higher score indicates more distressing physical symptoms
Time Frame
Screening, pre-treatment assessment (within 2 weeks before treatment), weekly during treatment, Post-treatment assessment (immediately after treatment, completed within 45 days), 3 months after treatment
Title
Somatic Symptom Disorder-B Criteria Scale (SSD-12)
Description
Theoretical range: 0-48, higher score indicates higher degree of preoccupation with symptoms
Time Frame
Screening, pre-treatment assessment (within 2 weeks before treatment), weekly during treatment, Post-treatment assessment (immediately after treatment, completed within 45 days), 3 months after treatment
Title
Symptom Preoccupation Scale (preliminary scale)
Description
Under development, higher score indicates higher degree of preoccupation with symptoms
Time Frame
Screening, pre-treatment assessment (within 2 weeks before treatment), weekly during treatment, Post-treatment assessment (immediately after treatment, completed within 45 days), 3 months after treatment
Title
14-item Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI-14)
Description
Theoretical range: 0-42, higher score indicates more health anxiety
Time Frame
Screening, pre-treatment assessment (within 2 weeks before treatment), Post-treatment assessment (immediately after treatment, completed within 45 days), 3 months after treatment
Title
Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI)
Description
Theoretical range: 0-64, higher score indicates more anxiety sensitivity
Time Frame
Screening, pre-treatment assessment (within 2 weeks before treatment), post-treatment assessment Post-treatment assessment (immediately after treatment, completed within 45 days), 3 months after treatment
Title
GAD-7
Description
Theoretical range: 0-21, higher score indicates more general anxiety
Time Frame
Pre-treatment assessment (within 2 weeks before treatment), post-treatment assessment Post-treatment assessment (immediately after treatment, completed within 45 days), 3 months after treatment
Title
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Description
Theoretical range: 0-27, higher score indicates more symptoms of depression
Time Frame
Screening, pre-treatment assessment (within 2 weeks before treatment), weekly during treatments (suicidality), post-treatment assesment (immediately after treatment, completed within 45 days), 3 months after treatment
Title
12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0)
Description
Theoretical range: 0-100, higher score indicates more disability
Time Frame
Screening, pre-treatment assessment (within 2 weeks before treatment), post-treatment assessment (immediately after treatment, completed within 45 days), 3 months after treatment
Title
Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)
Description
Theoretical range: 0-40, higher score indicates more problematic alcohol use
Time Frame
Screening only
Title
Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT)
Description
Theoretical range: 0-44, higher score indicates more problematic substance use
Time Frame
Screening only
Title
Working Alliance Inventory (WAI)
Description
Theoretical range: 6-42, higher score indicates better relationship with the therapist
Time Frame
Week 3 of treatment
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
DSM-5 somatic symptom disorder
Interest in 8-week intensive psychological treatment to reduce distress and the impact of physical symptoms
At least 18 years old
Living in Sweden
Fluent in Swedish
Complete pre-treatment assessment
Exclusion Criteria:
Preoccupation with physical symptoms better explained by another psychiatric condition such as illness anxiety disorder, panic disorder, or obsessive-compulsive disorder
Severe psychiatric condition, such as bipolar disorder, suicidal ideation, or psychosis
Medical risks associated with participating in exposure-based treatment, or somatic condition - or treatment for somatic condition - that is an obstacle to participating in exposure-based treatment
Non-stable continuous pharmacotherapy (dosage changed during the past 4 weeks) and the drug is likely to affect outcome measures (primarily: antidepressants, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, nonbenzodiazepines, opioids)
Alcohol or substance use that is a clear obstacle to therapy
Planned absence for more than 1 week of the treatment period
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Erland Axelsson, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Karolinska Institutet
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Karolinska Institutet
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
17165
Country
Sweden
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
We are willing to consider reasonable requests for individual participant data (IPD) and to consult the responsible parties accordingly. However, we do not expect to be granted permission to share IPD as long as, under Swedish and European Union (EU) data protection and privacy legislation, the IPD constitutes personal data meaning that it is possible to, using the study database, link the IPD to an identifiable living natural person.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35854392
Citation
Hybelius J, Gustavsson A, Af Winklerfelt Hammarberg S, Toth-Pal E, Johansson R, Ljotsson B, Axelsson E. A unified Internet-delivered exposure treatment for undifferentiated somatic symptom disorder: single-group prospective feasibility trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Jul 19;8(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01105-0.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Exposure-Based Treatment for Undifferentiated Somatic Symptom Disorder
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs