Difference in blood glucose incremental AUC 0-120 min between D2 verum group and no treatment group
Venous blood samples were drawn for the determination of glucose values, with sampling times at -15 min and immediately prior to the intake of the standardized breakfast (time "0") as well as 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after the "0 min" blood draw.
Food (energy) intake at ad libitum lunch, in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group
Food was weighed before the subject consumed the meal and afterwards and the energy content of the food consumed was determined.
Individual appetite sensation items (VAS for satiety, hunger, fullness, prospective consumption, desire to eat), in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - VAS values at all time points 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 210, 240 min
Visual analogue scales (VAS) for satiety, hunger, fullness, prospective consumption, desire to eat will be reported as follows:
Subjects had to record their appetite sensation before and after consumption of the standardised breakfast provided on site. VAS, 100-mm in length, were used to assess the following items:
Hunger: How hungry are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely / As hungry as I have ever felt)
Fullness: How full are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely / As full as I have ever felt)
Satiety: How satiated are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely)
Desire to eat (appetite): How strong is your desire to eat? (Very weak / Extremely low <-> Very strong / Extremely high)
Prospective consumption (Quantity): How much do you think you could (or would want to) eat right now? (Nothing at all <-> A very large amount)
Individual appetite sensation items (VAS for satiety, hunger, fullness, prospective consumption, desire to eat), in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - maximal/minimal VAS values
Visual analogue scales (VAS) for satiety, hunger, fullness, prospective consumption, desire to eat will be reported as follows:
Subjects had to record their appetite sensation before and after consumption of the standardised breakfast provided on site. VAS, 100-mm in length, were used to assess the following items:
Hunger: How hungry are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely / As hungry as I have ever felt)
Fullness: How full are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely / As full as I have ever felt)
Satiety: How satiated are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely)
Desire to eat (appetite): How strong is your desire to eat? (Very weak / Extremely low <-> Very strong / Extremely high)
Prospective consumption (Quantity): How much do you think you could (or would want to) eat right now? (Nothing at all <-> A very large amount)
Individual appetite sensation items (VAS for satiety, hunger, fullness, prospective consumption, desire to eat), in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - total AUC 0-15, 0-30, 0-45, 0-60, 0-90, 0-120, 0-180, 0-210, 0-240 min
Visual analogue scales (VAS) for satiety, hunger, fullness, prospective consumption, desire to eat will be reported as follows:
Subjects had to record their appetite sensation before and after consumption of the standardised breakfast provided on site. VAS, 100-mm in length, were used to assess the following items:
Hunger: How hungry are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely / As hungry as I have ever felt)
Fullness: How full are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely / As full as I have ever felt)
Satiety: How satiated are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely)
Desire to eat (appetite): How strong is your desire to eat? (Very weak / Extremely low <-> Very strong / Extremely high)
Prospective consumption (Quantity): How much do you think you could (or would want to) eat right now? (Nothing at all <-> A very large amount)
Individual appetite sensation items (VAS for satiety, hunger, fullness, prospective consumption, desire to eat), in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - incremental AUC 0-15, 0-30, 0-45, 0-60, 0-90, 0-120, 0-180, 0-210, 0-240 min
Visual analogue scales (VAS) for satiety, hunger, fullness, prospective consumption, desire to eat will be reported as follows:
Subjects had to record their appetite sensation before and after consumption of the standardised breakfast provided on site. VAS, 100-mm in length, were used to assess the following items:
Hunger: How hungry are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely / As hungry as I have ever felt)
Fullness: How full are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely / As full as I have ever felt)
Satiety: How satiated are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely)
Desire to eat (appetite): How strong is your desire to eat? (Very weak / Extremely low <-> Very strong / Extremely high)
Prospective consumption (Quantity): How much do you think you could (or would want to) eat right now? (Nothing at all <-> A very large amount)
Composite score ([desire to eat + hunger + (100-fullness) + prospective consumption]/4), in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - VAS values at all time points 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 210, 240 min
Composite score is calculated as follows:([desire to eat + hunger + (100 - satiety) + estimated consumption]/4).
Subjects had to record their appetite sensation before and after consumption of the standardised breakfast provided on site. Visual analogue scales (VAS), 100-mm in length, were used to assess the following items:
Hunger: How hungry are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely / As hungry as I have ever felt)
Satiety: How satiated are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely)
Desire to eat (appetite): How strong is your desire to eat? (Very weak / Extremely low <-> Very strong / Extremely high)
Prospective consumption (Quantity): How much do you think you could (or would want to) eat right now? (Nothing at all <-> A very large amount)
Composite score ([desire to eat + hunger + (100-fullness) + prospective consumption]/4), in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - maximal/minimal VAS values
Composite score is calculated as follows:([desire to eat + hunger + (100 - satiety) + estimated consumption]/4).
Subjects had to record their appetite sensation before and after consumption of the standardised breakfast provided on site. Visual analogue scales (VAS), 100-mm in length, were used to assess the following items:
Hunger: How hungry are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely / As hungry as I have ever felt)
Satiety: How satiated are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely)
Desire to eat (appetite): How strong is your desire to eat? (Very weak / Extremely low <-> Very strong / Extremely high)
Prospective consumption (Quantity): How much do you think you could (or would want to) eat right now? (Nothing at all <-> A very large amount)
Composite score ([desire to eat + hunger + (100-fullness) + prospective consumption]/4), in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - total AUC 0-15, 0-30, 0-45, 0-60, 0-90, 0-120, 0-180, 0-210, 0-240 min
Composite score is calculated as follows:([desire to eat + hunger + (100 - satiety) + estimated consumption]/4).
Subjects had to record their appetite sensation before and after consumption of the standardised breakfast provided on site. Visual analogue scales (VAS), 100-mm in length, were used to assess the following items:
Hunger: How hungry are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely / As hungry as I have ever felt)
Satiety: How satiated are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely)
Desire to eat (appetite): How strong is your desire to eat? (Very weak / Extremely low <-> Very strong / Extremely high)
Prospective consumption (Quantity): How much do you think you could (or would want to) eat right now? (Nothing at all <-> A very large amount)
Composite score ([desire to eat + hunger + (100-fullness) + prospective consumption]/4), in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - incremental AUC 0-15, 0-30, 0-45, 0-60, 0-90, 0-120, 0-180, 0-210, 0-240 min
Composite score is calculated as follows:([desire to eat + hunger + (100 - satiety) + estimated consumption]/4).
Subjects had to record their appetite sensation before and after consumption of the standardised breakfast provided on site. Visual analogue scales (VAS), 100-mm in length, were used to assess the following items:
Hunger: How hungry are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely / As hungry as I have ever felt)
Satiety: How satiated are you? (Not at all <-> Extremely)
Desire to eat (appetite): How strong is your desire to eat? (Very weak / Extremely low <-> Very strong / Extremely high)
Prospective consumption (Quantity): How much do you think you could (or would want to) eat right now? (Nothing at all <-> A very large amount)
24 hour energy intake on test days: breakfast+ad libitum lunch+diary records, in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group
After each of the site visits on test days, food and beverage intake during the time period until 24 hours after start of site visit had to be documented by the subjects in the study diary and the energy.
PPG, in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - concentration at all time points 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 min
Venous blood samples were drawn for the determination of glucose values
PPG, in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - maximal concentration
Venous blood samples were drawn for the determination of glucose values
PPG, in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - total AUC 0-15, 0-30, 0-45, 0-60, 0-90, 0-120, 0-180 min
Venous blood samples were drawn for the determination of glucose values
PPG, in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - incremental AUC 0-15, 0-30, 0-45, 0-60, 0-90, 0-180 min
Venous blood samples were drawn for the determination of glucose values
PPI, in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - concentration at all time points 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 min
Venous blood samples were drawn for the determination of insulin values
PPI, in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - maximal concentration
Venous blood samples were drawn for the determination of insulin values
PPI, in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - total AUC 0-15, 0-30, 0-45, 0-60, 0-90, 0-120, 0-180 min
Venous blood samples were drawn for the determination of insulin values
PPI, in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group - incremental AUC 0-15, 0-30, 0-45, 0-60, 0-90, 0-120, 0-180 min
Venous blood samples were drawn for the determination of insulin values
Global evaluation (by 4-point scale) of benefit by subject and the investigator, in comparison between each verum group vs no treatment group
The investigators had to evaluate the benefit of the treatment type (global scaled evaluation with "very good", "good", "moderate" and "poor").