search
Back to results

Treatment Efficacy of Low FODMAP Versus Low Lactose Diet in IBS Patients

Primary Purpose

IBS - Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Low Lactose Diet
Low FODMAP Diet
Sponsored by
Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for IBS - Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • functional bowel symptoms as defined by the Rome IV criteria
  • subjective lactose intolerance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pharmacologic agents to alter symptoms (laxatives, antidiarrheal agents)
  • smoking
  • antibiotic therapy within the last 4 weeks
  • gastrointestinal diseases (Celiac disease was excluded by negative serologic testing while on a gluten containing diet
  • any type of food allergy

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Group 1

    Group 2

    Arm Description

    Patients starting with a low lactose diet for 3 weeks, followed by a wash out phase of 3 week, before crossing over to the low FODMAP diet for 3 weeks

    Patients starting with a low FODMAP diet for 3 weeks, followed by a wash out phase of 3 week, before crossing over to the low lactose diet for 3 weeks.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Change from gastrointestinal symptoms in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS symptom severity score) from Baseline to "post intervention diet".
    The symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) is a validated score to evaluate the severity of an IBS. The five subscores for abdominal pain (severity and frequency), abdominal distension, satisfaction with stool habits and interference of IBS with daily life were each rated on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale and added up to a maximal sum of 500. A total score of 75 - 175 was regarded as mild, 175 - 300 as moderate and > 300 as severe IBS.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    IBS symptom severity subscore "abdominal pain severity"
    The subscore (abdominal pain severity was assessed individually, on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
    IBS- symptom severity subscore "abdominal pain frequency"
    The subscore abdominal pain frequency was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
    IBS- symptom severity subscore "abdominal distension"
    The subscore abdominal distension was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
    IBS symptom severity subscore "satisfaction with stool habits"
    The subscore satisfaction with stool habits was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less the better).
    IBS symptom severity subscore "interference of IBS with daily life"
    The subscore satisfaction with stool habits was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
    IBS symptom severity score
    The symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) is a validated score to evaluate the severity of an IBS. The five subscores for abdominal pain (severity and frequency), abdominal distension, satisfaction with stool habits and interference of IBS with daily life were each rated on a VAS 0-100 mm scale and added up to a maximal sum of 500. A total score of 75 - 175 was regarded as mild, 175 - 300 as moderate and > 300 as severe IBS.
    Stool frequency
    Patients recorded stool frequency
    Stool consistency
    Patients recorded stool consistency according to the Bristol Stool Chart (BSC) Type 1 hard lumps, Type 2 sausage shaped but lumpy, Type 3 sausage with cracks, Type 4 smooth sausage, Type 5 soft blobs, Type 6 fluffy pieces, Type 7 entirely liquid.
    Body weight
    Body weight in kg.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 15, 2020
    Last Updated
    September 2, 2020
    Sponsor
    Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04543474
    Brief Title
    Treatment Efficacy of Low FODMAP Versus Low Lactose Diet in IBS Patients
    Official Title
    Treatment Efficacy of a Low FODMAP Diet Compared to a Low Lactose Diet in IBS Patients: a Randomized, Cross-over Designed Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2020
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    March 11, 2015 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    September 19, 2017 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    December 19, 2017 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    A low FODMAP diet (LFD) has become a standard treatment in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. Compliant adherence to a LFD is challenging. The investigator looked at the effect of a LFD compared to a less restrictive low lactose diet (LLD) in a randomized cross-over trial with IBS patients.
    Detailed Description
    Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder. It affects 10 - 20% of the adult population. Pharmaceutical therapy as bulking agents, anticholinergics, antispasmodics, and antidiarrheals are mostly unsatisfactory and many gastroenterologists recommend therefore dietary management. Most patients note that various foods elicit abdominal symptoms and therefore restrict their diet . The low fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide and polyol (FODMAP) diet has currently the greatest evidence for efficacy in IBS. The rationale behind the LFD is the exclusion of poorly absorbed short-chain carbohydrates which would create an osmotic load, drag fluid into the small intestine and would be fermented by the colonic microbiome, both leading to abdominal distention and increased luminal influx. FODMAPs do not cause symptoms in healthy adults as they neither show these abnormalities in gut physiology nor suffer from visceral hypersensitivity . It is not known however whether change in symptoms is induced by a reduction in all FODMAPs or simply a single component as for example lactose. If there is a lactase deficiency, as it is the case in 2-20% of Central- / Northern Europeans, lactose cannot be hydrolysed and causes the above mentioned symptoms. Many IBS patients avoid lactose, even though only few have a lactase deficiency. Lactose intolerance but not lactase deficiency is more frequent in patients with IBS. The investigator wanted to examine if the demanding LFD is more effective than elimination of lactose alone. Our study, comparing in detail the effects of low FODMAP versus low lactose diet in IBS patients is a novelty, analysing a clinically highly relevant topic.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    IBS - Irritable Bowel Syndrome

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Crossover Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    30 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Group 1
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Patients starting with a low lactose diet for 3 weeks, followed by a wash out phase of 3 week, before crossing over to the low FODMAP diet for 3 weeks
    Arm Title
    Group 2
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Patients starting with a low FODMAP diet for 3 weeks, followed by a wash out phase of 3 week, before crossing over to the low lactose diet for 3 weeks.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Low Lactose Diet
    Intervention Description
    First, there was a run-in period (day 1-14), during which patients were randomly assigned by computer-generated bloc randomization to either the LLD or the LFD for 21 days (day 15-35). A dietician educated the participants on the first interventional diet. This phase was followed by a wash-out period of 21 days (day 36-56) with resumption of a normal balanced daily-life diet before crossing over to the alternate interventional diet (day 57-77). There were visits at the end of the washout phase with an instruction on the second interventional diet and at the end of the study.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Low FODMAP Diet
    Intervention Description
    First, there was a run-in period (day 1-14), during which patients were randomly assigned by computer-generated bloc randomization to either the LLD or the LFD for 21 days (day 15-35). A dietician educated the participants on the first interventional diet. This phase was followed by a wash-out period of 21 days (day 36-56) with resumption of a normal balanced daily-life diet before crossing over to the alternate interventional diet (day 57-77). There were visits at the end of the washout phase with an instruction on the second interventional diet and at the end of the study.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change from gastrointestinal symptoms in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS symptom severity score) from Baseline to "post intervention diet".
    Description
    The symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) is a validated score to evaluate the severity of an IBS. The five subscores for abdominal pain (severity and frequency), abdominal distension, satisfaction with stool habits and interference of IBS with daily life were each rated on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale and added up to a maximal sum of 500. A total score of 75 - 175 was regarded as mild, 175 - 300 as moderate and > 300 as severe IBS.
    Time Frame
    The IBS SSS was assessed at the end of the run in period and at the end of the intervention diets (low lactose and low FODMAP diet) at day 14, 35 and 77.
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    IBS symptom severity subscore "abdominal pain severity"
    Description
    The subscore (abdominal pain severity was assessed individually, on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
    Time Frame
    IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
    Title
    IBS- symptom severity subscore "abdominal pain frequency"
    Description
    The subscore abdominal pain frequency was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
    Time Frame
    IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
    Title
    IBS- symptom severity subscore "abdominal distension"
    Description
    The subscore abdominal distension was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
    Time Frame
    IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
    Title
    IBS symptom severity subscore "satisfaction with stool habits"
    Description
    The subscore satisfaction with stool habits was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less the better).
    Time Frame
    IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
    Title
    IBS symptom severity subscore "interference of IBS with daily life"
    Description
    The subscore satisfaction with stool habits was assessed individually on a VAS (visual analogue scale) 0-100 mm scale (the less, the better)
    Time Frame
    IBS subscores were assesses at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77.
    Title
    IBS symptom severity score
    Description
    The symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) is a validated score to evaluate the severity of an IBS. The five subscores for abdominal pain (severity and frequency), abdominal distension, satisfaction with stool habits and interference of IBS with daily life were each rated on a VAS 0-100 mm scale and added up to a maximal sum of 500. A total score of 75 - 175 was regarded as mild, 175 - 300 as moderate and > 300 as severe IBS.
    Time Frame
    IBS SSS (total) was assessed at the end of the run-in (day 14), and wash-out phase (day 56).
    Title
    Stool frequency
    Description
    Patients recorded stool frequency
    Time Frame
    Stool frequency was assessed daily throughout the study (day 1-77).
    Title
    Stool consistency
    Description
    Patients recorded stool consistency according to the Bristol Stool Chart (BSC) Type 1 hard lumps, Type 2 sausage shaped but lumpy, Type 3 sausage with cracks, Type 4 smooth sausage, Type 5 soft blobs, Type 6 fluffy pieces, Type 7 entirely liquid.
    Time Frame
    Stool consistency was assessed daily throughout the study (day 1-77).
    Title
    Body weight
    Description
    Body weight in kg.
    Time Frame
    Body weight was assesses at the beginning of the study (day 1) and at the end of each trial phase (run-in, first intervention diet, wash-out, second intervention diet) at day 14, 35, 56 and 77).

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    80 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: functional bowel symptoms as defined by the Rome IV criteria subjective lactose intolerance Exclusion Criteria: pharmacologic agents to alter symptoms (laxatives, antidiarrheal agents) smoking antibiotic therapy within the last 4 weeks gastrointestinal diseases (Celiac disease was excluded by negative serologic testing while on a gluten containing diet any type of food allergy

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Treatment Efficacy of Low FODMAP Versus Low Lactose Diet in IBS Patients

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs