search
Back to results

Effects of a New Diagnostic Test on the Care of Prostate Cancer Patients: The ProMark™ Clinical Utility Study

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ProMark Information and Test Results
Sponsored by
Qure Healthcare, LLC
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring prostate cancer, risk assessment, clinical utility

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provide consent to participate in the study
  • Currently practicing board certified urologist
  • Have practiced as a board-certified urologist for greater than 2 or less than 30 years.
  • English-speaking
  • Community / non-academic based practice setting
  • ≥50 PCa patients under care annually
  • Access to the internet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not board certified in urology
  • Academic based practice
  • Have previously used ProMark for prostate cancer care delivery
  • Have practiced as a board-certified urologist for less than 2 or greater than 30 years.
  • Follow <50 PCa patients annually
  • Non-English speaking
  • Unable to access the internet

Sites / Locations

  • QURE Healthcare

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

ProMark Information and Results

Standard Practice

Arm Description

Participants in the intervention arm will receive information (both print and webinar format) about ProMark in between Round 1 and Round 2 data collection, as well as appropriate ProMark test results for each of the vignette-based simulated patients that they care for in the second round of data collection.

Physicians will care for online virtual patients as they normally would in practice.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Combined diagnostic and treatment CPV® (Clinical Performance and Value) vignette domain score
Difference in difference between the control and the intervention groups in the diagnosis-treatment quality of care as measured by their combined domain CPV scores (ranging from 0% to 100%) for the 9 patient types in aggregate and by case type.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
June 13, 2014
Last Updated
September 14, 2020
Sponsor
Qure Healthcare, LLC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04550416
Brief Title
Effects of a New Diagnostic Test on the Care of Prostate Cancer Patients: The ProMark™ Clinical Utility Study
Official Title
Effects of a New Diagnostic Test on the Care of Prostate Cancer Patients: The ProMark™ Clinical Utility Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Qure Healthcare, LLC

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objectives of this study are to assess clinical practice variation in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment among urologists and how ProMark™ affects clinical practice decision-making. The study uses a randomized controlled study design of urologists. Urologists will be randomly assigned to a control and intervention arm. Pre-intervention/baseline assessment: will be done using prostate cancer CPV® vignettes and a physician questionnaire to both control and intervention arms. Intervention: 2-4 weeks after baseline introduce ProMark™ to the intervention group of urologists using a protocol to be determined by Metamark and QURE. Post-intervention: 6 weeks post-intervention, a second round of prostate cancer CPV® vignettes will be administered to both control and intervention arms. The ProMark™ test will be available to "order" for all physicians taking the vignettes. The Clinical Performance and Value Vignettes (CPV®) used in this study simulate a clinical encounter for a man presenting with prostate cancer. Each urologist will provide responses to open-ended questions regarding clinical care they would provide for that patient. These responses are scored in five domains (taking a medical history, performing a physical examination, ordering appropriate tests, making a diagnosis and prescribing treatment against explicit evidence and criteria as determined by the literature and medical associations. Results are presented as percentage correct. Each case will take approximately 15-20 minutes to complete. All case responses will be completed online and kept confidential. The study hypotheses are: Clinical practice, specifically decisions around prostate cancer treatment post-diagnosis, will vary widely among urologists. This variation in practice will demonstrate the need a new diagnostic, such as ProMark™, would fulfill. ProMark™ will improve clinical decision making of urologists for prostate cancer patients with a Gleason Score of 3+3=6 and 3+4=7 by improving the diagnosis and/or treatment CPV® domain score post-intervention versus baseline comparing intervention and control groups The investigators will estimate the effect of ProMark™ on the primary outcomes comparing treatment and control groups using a difference-in-difference analysis comparing differences between groups before and after intervention. The investigators will control for potential confounders, such as age, gender, and other physician and practice characteristics.
Detailed Description
Secondary outcome measure include: Difference in overall Clinical Performance and Value Vignettes (CPV®) scores post-intervention versus baseline comparing intervention and control groups Difference between intervention and control for use of active surveillance. Change in utilization of resources in terms of surgery, radiation (in any form), chemotherapy (in any of its forms) between intervention and control groups.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer
Keywords
prostate cancer, risk assessment, clinical utility

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
217 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
ProMark Information and Results
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants in the intervention arm will receive information (both print and webinar format) about ProMark in between Round 1 and Round 2 data collection, as well as appropriate ProMark test results for each of the vignette-based simulated patients that they care for in the second round of data collection.
Arm Title
Standard Practice
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Physicians will care for online virtual patients as they normally would in practice.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
ProMark Information and Test Results
Intervention Description
Participants in the intervention arm will receive information (both print and webinar format) about ProMark in between Round 1 and Round 2 data collection, as well as appropriate ProMark test results for each of the vignette-based simulated patients that they care for in the second round of data collection.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Combined diagnostic and treatment CPV® (Clinical Performance and Value) vignette domain score
Description
Difference in difference between the control and the intervention groups in the diagnosis-treatment quality of care as measured by their combined domain CPV scores (ranging from 0% to 100%) for the 9 patient types in aggregate and by case type.
Time Frame
12 to 16 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Provide consent to participate in the study Currently practicing board certified urologist Have practiced as a board-certified urologist for greater than 2 or less than 30 years. English-speaking Community / non-academic based practice setting ≥50 PCa patients under care annually Access to the internet Exclusion Criteria: Not board certified in urology Academic based practice Have previously used ProMark for prostate cancer care delivery Have practiced as a board-certified urologist for less than 2 or greater than 30 years. Follow <50 PCa patients annually Non-English speaking Unable to access the internet
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John W Peabody, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
QURE Healthcare
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
QURE Healthcare
City
San Rafael
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94901
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
http://www.metamarkgenetics.com
Description
Study Sponsor web page
URL
http://www.qurehealthcare.com
Description
Web page for organization implementing the study.

Learn more about this trial

Effects of a New Diagnostic Test on the Care of Prostate Cancer Patients: The ProMark™ Clinical Utility Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs