Back to resultsMRI-Guided Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Kidney Cancer, the MRI-MARK Trial
Primary Purpose
Renal Cell Carcinoma, Stage I Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v8, Stage II Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v8
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Questionnaire Administration
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Renal Cell Carcinoma
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients may enter the study if they are diagnosed with bilateral kidney cancer, multiple lesions in the same kidney, recurrent kidney cancer, or if they have previous or current history of a separate cancer, given all other inclusion criteria met
- Have a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of any histology
- Be a suboptimal surgical or ablation candidate, as determined by patient's primary urologist at MD Anderson Cancer Center and by multi-disciplinary consensus. At or before the time of enrollment, a note documenting multidisciplinary consensus supporting active treatment will be recorded in the patient's chart
- Tumor stage of T1-T2a (i.e. 10cm or less in greatest dimension)
- Be technically and anatomically appropriate for MRI-guided SBRT, as determined by patient's primary radiation oncologist. Factors considered will include distance between tumor and bowel, tumor movement with respiration as assessed by 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) scan, and prior radiotherapy
- Multi-disciplinary consensus that active treatment is warranted
- Have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
- Have life expectancy of 2 years or more
Exclusion Criteria:
- An MRI contraindication (i.e. pacemaker, severe claustrophobia, or MRI-incompatible device)
- A pre-treatment estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 cc/min
- Visceral, nodal, or bony metastatic disease
Is pregnant or expecting to conceive within the projected duration of the trial at the screening visit
- Female subject of childbearing potential should have a negative urine or serum pregnancy within 6 weeks prior to study registration up to the first fraction of radiation
- Note: If the urine test is positive or cannot be confirmed as negative, a serum pregnancy test will be required
- Has a diagnosis of active scleroderma, lupus, or other rheumatologic disease which in the opinion of the treating radiation oncologist precludes safe radiation therapy
- Has known psychiatric or substance abuse disorders that would interfere with cooperation with the requirements of the trial
Sites / Locations
- M D Anderson Cancer Center
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Treatment (MRI-guided SBRT)
Arm Description
Patients undergo an MRI scan to check the status and location of the disease, including the motion of the tumor during breathing. Two weeks after MRI, patients undergo SBRT over 1-2 hours on 3 non-consecutive weekdays in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Time to progression
Local control will be defined as no growth (stability or regression) in the largest dimension of the treated tumor by comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images at baseline and 24 months following completion of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The local control rate will be compared to case-matched data from patients undergoing active surveillance at MD Anderson Cancer Center. In terms of the primary efficacy analysis, the local control will be evaluated along with the 95% confidence interval. For patients who progress earlier than 24 months will be considered as local control failure and will be included in the confidence interval calculation. In addition, we will estimate the probabilities of local control utilizing the Kaplan Meier method with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Preservation of renal function
Patients will undergo split function renal scans to determine glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. Change in GFR will be reported by diving the difference in GFR at baseline and at the respective follow up visit, by baseline GFR. The change of GFR at follow up visits and baseline will be evaluated by paired t-test. Mixed model will be used to explore the change of GFR over time after taking the within-subject correlation.
Treatment related toxicities
The frequency of non-laboratory non-fatigue adverse events will be determined, defined as a grade 3+ event following SBRT, attributed to SBRT, and affecting the ipsilateral kidney or an adjacent organ (contralateral kidney, liver, small bowel, large bowel, stomach, spleen, or nerves) as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
Changes in the imaging of primary tumor and treated kidney
Patients will undergo MRI of the abdomen at regular intervals (i.e. at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months) permitting analysis of changes in functional imaging biomarkers evaluating tumor and renal perfusion and diffusion, which can be correlated to clinical outcome and toxicities. Mixed model will be used to explore the change of tumor characteristics over time after taking the within-subject correlation. Multi b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) derived diffusion and perfusion changes will be evaluated over the course of therapy to assess their utility as predictors of renal insufficiency following therapy.
Pathologic response
All tumors will be biopsied at baseline. When safe and feasible, patients will undergo re-biopsy at 24 months following SBRT. Viability and percent necrosis will be determined by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Other stains such as ki67 may be included. Taking pathologic evaluation as gold standard for no viable tumor cells following SBRT, will correlate tumor biopsy results with local control by imaging. McNemar test will also be used to evaluate the agreement between local control (yes versus [vs] no) and pathologic evaluation (responder vs none). Will also calculate sensitivity and specificity of our primary endpoint of local control (no growth by computed tomography [CT] scan at 24 months).
Progression free survival
Will estimate no progression Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) at 24 months (less than 20% growth in largest tumor dimension) along with the 95% confidence interval (CI).
Distant metastasis-free survival
Will estimate the probabilities of patients remaining free from distant metastases utilizing the Kaplan Meier method with corresponding 95% CIs. The log rank test will be used to compare the survival difference between important subgroups (such as tumor categories, etc.). Cox model will be conducted to examine the clinical factor effect on time-to-event variables.
Overall survival
Will estimate the probabilities of patient survival utilizing the Kaplan Meier method with corresponding 95% CIs. The log rank test will be used to compare the survival difference between important subgroups (such as tumor categories, etc.). Cox model will be conducted to examine the clinical factor effect on time-to-event variables.
Economic strain of MRI-guided SBRT
Assessed using the validated ENRICH questionnaire. Questionnaire scores will be calculated based on standardized manual associated with the instrument. Incomplete surveys (in the event that a participant declines to answer one or more questions) will still be considered valid and will be used for study purposes. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize scores of the questionnaire. The distribution of each continuous variable will be summarized by its mean, standard deviation, median, and range. The distribution of each categorical variable will be summarized in terms of its frequencies and percentages. We will compare results at each time point to estimate financial toxicity of treatment. The association between patient clinical factor (such as T-stage or histology result) and clinical measurement (e.g., local control, pathologic response, tumor characteristics by MRI) will be examined by Wilcoxon's rank sum test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.
Planned doses
Will compare planned doses to true total doses delivered to the target and adjacent normal structures.
Correlation of normal tissue true delivered doses with grade 3+ toxicity
Will generate target structure and normal tissue dose volume histograms (DVHs) based on the simulation imaging as per routine treatment planning. Verification MR images will then be obtained immediately prior to each delivered fraction, which may or may not prompt an adaptive plan change. Will use the verification MR images and the delivered plan to generate additional target structure and normal tissue DVHs that will approximate "true" delivered dose. Will generate a cumulative true DVH based on each individual fraction, and compare this to the original planning DVH. Normal tissue toxicity will be assessed in light of both the planned and the true DVH. To assess the impact of intrafraction target and normal structure movement, MR images may also be obtained at specified time intervals during an individual treatment fraction.
Rate of cases in which the prescribed isodose line failed to cover 100% of the internal gross tumor volume (iGTV)
The frequency of non-laboratory non-fatigue adverse events will be determined per CTCAE version 5.0. These events will be correlated to the true delivered dose received by the associated organ(s). The number of cases in which the prescribed isodose line failed to cover the entirety of the iGTV will be determined, and correlated to outcomes.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04580836
First Posted
September 21, 2020
Last Updated
November 18, 2021
Sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04580836
Brief Title
MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Kidney Cancer, the MRI-MARK Trial
Official Title
MRI-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early Stage Kidney Cancer: A Single Arm Phase II Clinical Trial (MRI-MARK)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
A study with 0 ACTUAL Enrollment must have Overall Recruitment Status specified as Withdrawn
Study Start Date
August 19, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 17, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 17, 2021 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This phase II trial investigates how well MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy works in treating patients with early-stage kidney cancer. Radiation therapy uses high energy radiation to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Stereotactic body radiation therapy uses special equipment to position a patient and deliver radiation to tumors with high precision. This method may kill tumor cells with fewer doses over a shorter period and cause less damage to normal tissue. This method of radiation delivery is further refined through the incorporation of a MRI into the radiation machine to create a device known as a MRI linear accelerator. During treatment with MRI linear accelerator, continuous MRI images are obtained to allow for real-time treatment monitoring and the ability to adjust treatment plans if minor deviations in anatomy are noted. Giving MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy may help treat patients with early-stage kidney cancer.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate local control following magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for primary kidney cancer as defined by no growth by imaging at 24 months following SBRT.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To estimate preservation of renal function and to determine frequency of grade 3+ adverse events following SBRT as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
II. To characterize tumor and treated kidney changes by multiparametric MRI, including utility of diffusion and perfusion changes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) prior to and after SBRT as biomarkers of treatment response.
III. To estimate the rate of pathologic complete response as determined by tumor biopsy at 24 months following SBRT.
IV. To estimate rate of no progression by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) at 24 months (less than 20% growth in largest tumor dimension as measured by imaging).
V. To estimate the rates of overall survival and distant metastasis. VI. To evaluate economic strain following SBRT for primary kidney cancer. VII. Compare planned total doses to true total doses delivered to the target and adjacent normal structures, to correlate true delivered doses to normal structures to grade 3+ toxicity, and to determine the rate of cases in which the prescribed isodose line failed to cover 100% of the internal gross tumor volume (iGTV).
OUTLINE:
Patients undergo an MRI scan to check the status and location of the disease, including the motion of the tumor during breathing. Two weeks after MRI, patients undergo SBRT over 1-2 hours on 3 non-consecutive weekdays in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, then every 6 months thereafter until the end of the study.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Renal Cell Carcinoma, Stage I Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v8, Stage II Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v8
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Treatment (MRI-guided SBRT)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo an MRI scan to check the status and location of the disease, including the motion of the tumor during breathing. Two weeks after MRI, patients undergo SBRT over 1-2 hours on 3 non-consecutive weekdays in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Other Intervention Name(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, MR Imaging, MRI, MRI Scan, NMR Imaging, NMRI, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Intervention Description
Undergo MRI
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Questionnaire Administration
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
Other Intervention Name(s)
SABR, SBRT, Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy
Intervention Description
Undergo SBRT
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to progression
Description
Local control will be defined as no growth (stability or regression) in the largest dimension of the treated tumor by comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images at baseline and 24 months following completion of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The local control rate will be compared to case-matched data from patients undergoing active surveillance at MD Anderson Cancer Center. In terms of the primary efficacy analysis, the local control will be evaluated along with the 95% confidence interval. For patients who progress earlier than 24 months will be considered as local control failure and will be included in the confidence interval calculation. In addition, we will estimate the probabilities of local control utilizing the Kaplan Meier method with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time Frame
at 24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Preservation of renal function
Description
Patients will undergo split function renal scans to determine glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months. Change in GFR will be reported by diving the difference in GFR at baseline and at the respective follow up visit, by baseline GFR. The change of GFR at follow up visits and baseline will be evaluated by paired t-test. Mixed model will be used to explore the change of GFR over time after taking the within-subject correlation.
Time Frame
Baseline to 24 months
Title
Treatment related toxicities
Description
The frequency of non-laboratory non-fatigue adverse events will be determined, defined as a grade 3+ event following SBRT, attributed to SBRT, and affecting the ipsilateral kidney or an adjacent organ (contralateral kidney, liver, small bowel, large bowel, stomach, spleen, or nerves) as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.
Time Frame
Up to 24 months after completion of SBRT
Title
Changes in the imaging of primary tumor and treated kidney
Description
Patients will undergo MRI of the abdomen at regular intervals (i.e. at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months) permitting analysis of changes in functional imaging biomarkers evaluating tumor and renal perfusion and diffusion, which can be correlated to clinical outcome and toxicities. Mixed model will be used to explore the change of tumor characteristics over time after taking the within-subject correlation. Multi b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) derived diffusion and perfusion changes will be evaluated over the course of therapy to assess their utility as predictors of renal insufficiency following therapy.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 24 months after completion of SBRT
Title
Pathologic response
Description
All tumors will be biopsied at baseline. When safe and feasible, patients will undergo re-biopsy at 24 months following SBRT. Viability and percent necrosis will be determined by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Other stains such as ki67 may be included. Taking pathologic evaluation as gold standard for no viable tumor cells following SBRT, will correlate tumor biopsy results with local control by imaging. McNemar test will also be used to evaluate the agreement between local control (yes versus [vs] no) and pathologic evaluation (responder vs none). Will also calculate sensitivity and specificity of our primary endpoint of local control (no growth by computed tomography [CT] scan at 24 months).
Time Frame
At 24 months
Title
Progression free survival
Description
Will estimate no progression Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) at 24 months (less than 20% growth in largest tumor dimension) along with the 95% confidence interval (CI).
Time Frame
At 24 months
Title
Distant metastasis-free survival
Description
Will estimate the probabilities of patients remaining free from distant metastases utilizing the Kaplan Meier method with corresponding 95% CIs. The log rank test will be used to compare the survival difference between important subgroups (such as tumor categories, etc.). Cox model will be conducted to examine the clinical factor effect on time-to-event variables.
Time Frame
Up to 24 months
Title
Overall survival
Description
Will estimate the probabilities of patient survival utilizing the Kaplan Meier method with corresponding 95% CIs. The log rank test will be used to compare the survival difference between important subgroups (such as tumor categories, etc.). Cox model will be conducted to examine the clinical factor effect on time-to-event variables.
Time Frame
Up to 24 months
Title
Economic strain of MRI-guided SBRT
Description
Assessed using the validated ENRICH questionnaire. Questionnaire scores will be calculated based on standardized manual associated with the instrument. Incomplete surveys (in the event that a participant declines to answer one or more questions) will still be considered valid and will be used for study purposes. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize scores of the questionnaire. The distribution of each continuous variable will be summarized by its mean, standard deviation, median, and range. The distribution of each categorical variable will be summarized in terms of its frequencies and percentages. We will compare results at each time point to estimate financial toxicity of treatment. The association between patient clinical factor (such as T-stage or histology result) and clinical measurement (e.g., local control, pathologic response, tumor characteristics by MRI) will be examined by Wilcoxon's rank sum test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.
Time Frame
Baseline to 24 months
Title
Planned doses
Description
Will compare planned doses to true total doses delivered to the target and adjacent normal structures.
Time Frame
up to 1 month
Title
Correlation of normal tissue true delivered doses with grade 3+ toxicity
Description
Will generate target structure and normal tissue dose volume histograms (DVHs) based on the simulation imaging as per routine treatment planning. Verification MR images will then be obtained immediately prior to each delivered fraction, which may or may not prompt an adaptive plan change. Will use the verification MR images and the delivered plan to generate additional target structure and normal tissue DVHs that will approximate "true" delivered dose. Will generate a cumulative true DVH based on each individual fraction, and compare this to the original planning DVH. Normal tissue toxicity will be assessed in light of both the planned and the true DVH. To assess the impact of intrafraction target and normal structure movement, MR images may also be obtained at specified time intervals during an individual treatment fraction.
Time Frame
Up to 24 months after completion of SBRT
Title
Rate of cases in which the prescribed isodose line failed to cover 100% of the internal gross tumor volume (iGTV)
Description
The frequency of non-laboratory non-fatigue adverse events will be determined per CTCAE version 5.0. These events will be correlated to the true delivered dose received by the associated organ(s). The number of cases in which the prescribed isodose line failed to cover the entirety of the iGTV will be determined, and correlated to outcomes.
Time Frame
Up to 24 months after completion of SBRT
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients may enter the study if they are diagnosed with bilateral kidney cancer, multiple lesions in the same kidney, recurrent kidney cancer, or if they have previous or current history of a separate cancer, given all other inclusion criteria met
Have a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of any histology
Be a suboptimal surgical or ablation candidate, as determined by patient's primary urologist at MD Anderson Cancer Center and by multi-disciplinary consensus. At or before the time of enrollment, a note documenting multidisciplinary consensus supporting active treatment will be recorded in the patient's chart
Tumor stage of T1-T2a (i.e. 10cm or less in greatest dimension)
Be technically and anatomically appropriate for MRI-guided SBRT, as determined by patient's primary radiation oncologist. Factors considered will include distance between tumor and bowel, tumor movement with respiration as assessed by 4-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) scan, and prior radiotherapy
Multi-disciplinary consensus that active treatment is warranted
Have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2
Have life expectancy of 2 years or more
Exclusion Criteria:
An MRI contraindication (i.e. pacemaker, severe claustrophobia, or MRI-incompatible device)
A pre-treatment estimated glomerular filtration rate < 30 cc/min
Visceral, nodal, or bony metastatic disease
Is pregnant or expecting to conceive within the projected duration of the trial at the screening visit
Female subject of childbearing potential should have a negative urine or serum pregnancy within 6 weeks prior to study registration up to the first fraction of radiation
Note: If the urine test is positive or cannot be confirmed as negative, a serum pregnancy test will be required
Has a diagnosis of active scleroderma, lupus, or other rheumatologic disease which in the opinion of the treating radiation oncologist precludes safe radiation therapy
Has known psychiatric or substance abuse disorders that would interfere with cooperation with the requirements of the trial
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chad Tang
Organizational Affiliation
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
M D Anderson Cancer Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Links:
URL
http://www.mdanderson.org
Description
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Learn more about this trial
MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Kidney Cancer, the MRI-MARK Trial
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs