search
Back to results

Assessing Efficacy of Psychotherapy Intervention With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery Patients

Primary Purpose

Anxiety Depression

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Psychotherapy
Sponsored by
NYU Langone Health
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Anxiety Depression

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients age18 years or older.
  • Patients with documented diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
  • Patients with documented need for IBD surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients younger than 18 years of age.
  • Patient who has any condition, including physical, psychological, or psychiatric condition, which in the opinion of the Investigator, would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data and renders the patient an unsuitable candidate for the study.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    No Intervention

    Arm Label

    Arm 1 (Psychotherapy, Intervention arm)

    Arm 2 (Non-Therapy, Control Arm)

    Arm Description

    Subjects undergoing a 3 step IPAA will receive the four sessions of psychotherapy preceding and following their first surgery only, and receive an additional set of questionnaires again after their third surgery.

    Subjects will receive questionnaires which will be administered remotely via telemedicine if patient and psychologist/ research team member are unable to meet in person.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Change in State - based anxiety
    State based anxiety will be measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. This measure has 40 items. Range of scores for each subtest is 20-80, the higher score indicating greater anxiety. A cut point of 39-40 has been suggested to detect clinically significant symptoms for the S-Anxiety scale.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Change in participant's level of depression
    Measured by PHQ-9- Patient Health Questionnaire. Questionnaire has 9 items scores each of the nine DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3". Subjects will achieve one out of four levels of depression severity, depending upon their scores: 0-4=minimal or none, 5-9=mild, 10-14=moderate, and 15-19=moderately severe to severe.
    Change in Quality of life of participants
    Measured by IBD QoL- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire. Questionnaire has 32 items and the higher scores indicate better quality of life.
    Increase ability to function
    Measured by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI). There is 6 items which yeilds four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism) and Activity Impairment The sum of specific health problem impairment and impairment due to other health reasons is equal to impairment due to all health reasons. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity
    Improved self efficacy in participants
    Measured by The Self-Efficacy Scale with 8 items with higher scores which will indicate greater self-efficacy.
    Change in social support of participants
    This will be measured by Social Support Survey which has 19 items to obtain a score for each of four subscales, calculate the average of the scores for each item in the subscale. Higher scores for an individual scale or for the overall support index indicate more support.
    Improvement in coping strategies
    Measured by The Brief Cope questionnaire with 28 items which are 14 subscales with 2 items each. Sum of each subscale indicates a preference for particular coping strategies, which can be characterized as either effective or less effective.
    Change in the participants perception of body image
    Measured by The Body Image Scale which includes 9 items. Participants score from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much") on each of the 9 questions so that the lowest possible total score is 0 and the highest 27, with higher scores indicating increasing body image dissatisfaction.
    Change in the participants' perception of illness
    Measured by The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire which 9 items. Five of the items assess cognitive illness representations: consequences (Item 1), timeline (Item 2), personal control (Item 3), treatment control (Item 4), and identity (Item 5). Two of the items assess emotional representations: concern (Item 6) and emotions (Item 8). One item assesses illness comprehensibility (Item 7). Assessment of the causal representation is by an open-ended response item adapted from the IPQ-R, which asks patients to list the three most important usual factors in their illness (Item 9). Responses to the causal item can be grouped into categories such as stress, lifestyle, hereditary, etc., determined by the particular illness studied, and categorical analysis can then be performed. The Brief IPQ allows very simple interpretation of scores: increases in item scores represent linear increases in the dimension measured.
    Change in pain perception
    Measured by Pain anxiety symptom scale short form 20 with 20 items. The PASS assesses pain-specific anxiety symptoms and consists of four 10-item subscales measuring cognitive anxiety responses, escape and avoidance, fearful thinking and physiological anxiety responses. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptoms.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    October 5, 2020
    Last Updated
    August 27, 2021
    Sponsor
    NYU Langone Health
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT04582071
    Brief Title
    Assessing Efficacy of Psychotherapy Intervention With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery Patients
    Official Title
    Assessing Efficacy of Psychotherapy Intervention With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery Patients
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    August 2021
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Withdrawn
    Why Stopped
    After further review and discussion, the scope of the study is being changed to better suit the patient population. No subjects were enrolled in the study.
    Study Start Date
    January 2021 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    August 2021 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    August 2022 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    NYU Langone Health

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this research study is to understand the effects of therapy in lowering anxiety and improving quality of life in patients with IBD who are undergoing surgery
    Detailed Description
    Pre- and post- surgery scores on the State Trait Anxiety Inventory will be used to measure levels of state-based anxiety as the primary outcome. Our hypothesis is that patients in the experimental group, will show a decrease in anxiety levels over the course of the four sessions, while the same group in the control group will not change significantly in their anxiety levels. It is hypothesized that this would be due to the psychotherapeutic intervention mitigating the inherent emotional stress and negative behavioral changes associated with surgery. It will be important to differentiate between the inpatient and outpatient groups, as their anxiety levels may inherently be discrepant. For patients with a three-step ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), the three sessions subsequent to surgery will be conducted only after the first surgery. This is an exploratory study in which we are investigating the possibility of a range of potential outcomes to the intervention, including overall reduction of anxiety, depression, body image and improvement in quality of life.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Anxiety Depression

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Non-Randomized
    Enrollment
    0 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Arm 1 (Psychotherapy, Intervention arm)
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Subjects undergoing a 3 step IPAA will receive the four sessions of psychotherapy preceding and following their first surgery only, and receive an additional set of questionnaires again after their third surgery.
    Arm Title
    Arm 2 (Non-Therapy, Control Arm)
    Arm Type
    No Intervention
    Arm Description
    Subjects will receive questionnaires which will be administered remotely via telemedicine if patient and psychologist/ research team member are unable to meet in person.
    Intervention Type
    Behavioral
    Intervention Name(s)
    Psychotherapy
    Intervention Description
    Psychotherapy is a term that we use to describe the use of the psychological method to understand and improve an individual's well-being and mental health. The Principal Investigator of this study, a clinical psychologist will be leading each of the sessions.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in State - based anxiety
    Description
    State based anxiety will be measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. This measure has 40 items. Range of scores for each subtest is 20-80, the higher score indicating greater anxiety. A cut point of 39-40 has been suggested to detect clinically significant symptoms for the S-Anxiety scale.
    Time Frame
    Visit 1 (2 Weeks Pre-Surgery Visit), Visit 4 (3 months after surgery) Visit 5 (Approximately 6 months post-administration of last session)
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in participant's level of depression
    Description
    Measured by PHQ-9- Patient Health Questionnaire. Questionnaire has 9 items scores each of the nine DSM-IV criteria as "0" (not at all) to "3". Subjects will achieve one out of four levels of depression severity, depending upon their scores: 0-4=minimal or none, 5-9=mild, 10-14=moderate, and 15-19=moderately severe to severe.
    Time Frame
    Visit 1 (2 Weeks Pre-Surgery Visit), Visit 4 (3 months after surgery) Visit 5 (Approximately 6 months post-administration of last session)
    Title
    Change in Quality of life of participants
    Description
    Measured by IBD QoL- Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire. Questionnaire has 32 items and the higher scores indicate better quality of life.
    Time Frame
    Visit 1 (2 Weeks Pre-Surgery Visit), Visit 4 (3 months after surgery) Visit 5 (Approximately 6 months post-administration of last session)
    Title
    Increase ability to function
    Description
    Measured by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI). There is 6 items which yeilds four types of scores: Absenteeism (work time missed), Presenteesism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness), Work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism) and Activity Impairment The sum of specific health problem impairment and impairment due to other health reasons is equal to impairment due to all health reasons. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, multiply scores by 100 to express in percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity
    Time Frame
    Visit 1 (2 Weeks Pre-Surgery Visit), Visit 4 (3 months after surgery) Visit 5 (Approximately 6 months post-administration of last session)
    Title
    Improved self efficacy in participants
    Description
    Measured by The Self-Efficacy Scale with 8 items with higher scores which will indicate greater self-efficacy.
    Time Frame
    Visit 1 (2 Weeks Pre-Surgery Visit), Visit 4 (3 months after surgery) Visit 5 (Approximately 6 months post-administration of last session)
    Title
    Change in social support of participants
    Description
    This will be measured by Social Support Survey which has 19 items to obtain a score for each of four subscales, calculate the average of the scores for each item in the subscale. Higher scores for an individual scale or for the overall support index indicate more support.
    Time Frame
    Visit 1 (2 Weeks Pre-Surgery Visit), Visit 4 (3 months after surgery) Visit 5 (Approximately 6 months post-administration of last session)
    Title
    Improvement in coping strategies
    Description
    Measured by The Brief Cope questionnaire with 28 items which are 14 subscales with 2 items each. Sum of each subscale indicates a preference for particular coping strategies, which can be characterized as either effective or less effective.
    Time Frame
    Visit 1 (2 Weeks Pre-Surgery Visit), Visit 4 (3 months after surgery) Visit 5 (Approximately 6 months post-administration of last session)
    Title
    Change in the participants perception of body image
    Description
    Measured by The Body Image Scale which includes 9 items. Participants score from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("very much") on each of the 9 questions so that the lowest possible total score is 0 and the highest 27, with higher scores indicating increasing body image dissatisfaction.
    Time Frame
    Visit 1 (2 Weeks Pre-Surgery Visit), Visit 4 (3 months after surgery) Visit 5 (Approximately 6 months post-administration of last session)
    Title
    Change in the participants' perception of illness
    Description
    Measured by The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire which 9 items. Five of the items assess cognitive illness representations: consequences (Item 1), timeline (Item 2), personal control (Item 3), treatment control (Item 4), and identity (Item 5). Two of the items assess emotional representations: concern (Item 6) and emotions (Item 8). One item assesses illness comprehensibility (Item 7). Assessment of the causal representation is by an open-ended response item adapted from the IPQ-R, which asks patients to list the three most important usual factors in their illness (Item 9). Responses to the causal item can be grouped into categories such as stress, lifestyle, hereditary, etc., determined by the particular illness studied, and categorical analysis can then be performed. The Brief IPQ allows very simple interpretation of scores: increases in item scores represent linear increases in the dimension measured.
    Time Frame
    Visit 1 (2 Weeks Pre-Surgery Visit), Visit 4 (3 months after surgery) Visit 5 (Approximately 6 months post-administration of last session)
    Title
    Change in pain perception
    Description
    Measured by Pain anxiety symptom scale short form 20 with 20 items. The PASS assesses pain-specific anxiety symptoms and consists of four 10-item subscales measuring cognitive anxiety responses, escape and avoidance, fearful thinking and physiological anxiety responses. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptoms.
    Time Frame
    Visit 1 (2 Weeks Pre-Surgery Visit), Visit 4 (3 months after surgery) Visit 5 (Approximately 6 months post-administration of last session)

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    100 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Patients age18 years or older. Patients with documented diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Patients with documented need for IBD surgery Exclusion Criteria: Patients younger than 18 years of age. Patient who has any condition, including physical, psychological, or psychiatric condition, which in the opinion of the Investigator, would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data and renders the patient an unsuitable candidate for the study.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Jessica Gerson, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    NYU Langone Health
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Yes
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
    IPD Sharing Time Frame
    Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
    IPD Sharing Access Criteria
    The investigator who proposed to use the data.Upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to Ghoncheh.Ghiasian@nyulangone.org. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

    Learn more about this trial

    Assessing Efficacy of Psychotherapy Intervention With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery Patients

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs