search
Back to results

FES to Improve Gait in CP (CP FES Walking)

Primary Purpose

Cerebral Palsy, Spastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy, Gait

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Functional Electrical Stimulation protocol
Treadmill only protocol
Sponsored by
Shriners Hospitals for Children
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cerebral Palsy focused on measuring Cerebral Palsy, Functional electrical stimulation, Neurotherapeutic

Eligibility Criteria

10 Years - 18 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 10-18
  • Diagnosis of spastic diplegic CP
  • Gross Motor Functional Classification Scale (GMFCS) level I-III
  • Hip migration < 40%
  • Displays crouch, equinus, or jump type gait
  • At least 0° passive dorsiflexion range of motion (can come to a neutral position)
  • Sufficient visuoperceptual, cognitive and communication skills
  • Seizure-free or well-controlled seizures
  • No other neurological or musculoskeletal disorders (e.g. dystonia, severe scoliosis, hip instability)
  • Ability to travel to University of Delaware or Shriners Hospital for children multiple times per week for training and assessment
  • Ability to communicate pain or discomfort
  • Ability to consent (if 18 years old) or obtain parent/guardian consent (if under 18)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of athetoid or ataxic CP
  • Scoliosis with primary curve > 49%
  • Spinal fusions extending into pelvis
  • Lower Extremity (LE) joint instability or dislocation
  • Severe tactile hypersensitivity
  • LE botulinum (Botox) injections in the past 6 mo.
  • Implanted medical device contraindicative of FES
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe LE spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score of 4 or greater)
  • History of pulmonary disease limiting exercise tolerance (Asthma Control screen)
  • History of cardiac disease (AHA screen)
  • Excessive LE joint pain during walking
  • Severely limited joint range of motion / irreversible muscle contractures, i.e.> 10°knee flexion, >15° hip flexion contractures, or >5° plantarflexion contractures
  • LE surgery or significant injury within 1 yr.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Delaware
  • Shriner's Hospital for Children

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

FES + Treadmill

Treadmill only

Control

Arm Description

Functional Electrical stimulation walking group.

Treadmill walking group (no electrical stimulation).

Control group. After control period of 12 weeks, they are randomized into FES + Treadmill or Treadmill group.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Muscle Tone
We use the Modified Ashworth Scale to measure resistance to passive movement about a joint with varying degree of velocity (Muscle tone/spasticity). Score ranges from 0-4, with 6 choices where score of 0 means no increase in tone and score of 4 means rigid limb with no flexion or extension. Our training approach using repetitive electrical stimulation may also lower spasticity, which can also facilitate improved functional mobility.
Walking Speed
Walking speed is an indicator of functional mobility. By our training methods, we hypothesize making improvements in motor learning and gait biomechanics. Improved walking speed would indicate that such improvements have occurred.
Walking Distance
Walking distance (in a fixed period of time) is an indicator of endurance. Improved motor learning and gait biomechanics from our training methods would improve gait efficiency and thus, endurance.
Energy Expenditure
Energy expenditure is a measure of cardiovascular fitness and walking efficiency. By means of exercise at 60-80% max heart rates, it is expected that cardiovascular fitness would improve. Energy expenditure measurements allow for measurement of cardiovascular fitness.
Gross Motor Function Measure
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) is a measure of motor function that indicates disablement. Improved motor control and gait biomechanics from training should be reflected in overall gross motor function, which is assessed via the GMFM.
Balance Evaluation Systems Test
Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a measure of balance function. The BESTest will allow for assessing the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training on balance.
Timed Up-And-Go
Timed Up-And-Go (TUG) is a measure of functional mobility and will allow for assessing the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics.
Instrumented Gait Analysis
Joint Kinematics
Electromyography
Muscle activation timing measured with electromyography during gait analysis allows for mechanistic study of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait as well as comparison to typical norms.
Activities-Specific Balance Scale
The Activities-Specific Balance Scale (ABC Scale) survey allows measurement of perceived functional mobility by assessing balance confidence to perform daily activities of living without falling. 16 items are rated on a rating scale with range of 0-100. Score of 0 means no confidence and 100 means complete confidence. Average score of 16 items is the overall score. Such measures will assess the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait bio-mechanics from training.
Participation in Life Events
Participation in life events (LIFE-H) survey measures how much a person is engaging or participating with their peers and community. Weighted score ranges between 0-10 with 0 score being no accomplishment and 10 means complete accomplishment. Such measures will assess the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training.
Self-Perception
Self-Perception (Piers-Harris-2) survey measures physical and emotional well-being and self-esteem and will allow assessment of the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
August 20, 2019
Last Updated
October 15, 2020
Sponsor
Shriners Hospitals for Children
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04591288
Brief Title
FES to Improve Gait in CP
Acronym
CP FES Walking
Official Title
Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) to Improve Gait in CP Short Title
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Closed by the sponsor for not fully meeting subject recruitment targets.
Study Start Date
October 24, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Shriners Hospitals for Children

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this proposal is to mitigate the typical decline in walking function experienced by children with cerebral palsy (CP) via a Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)-assisted treadmill training intervention. In this study, the investigators intend to use thier CP FES Gait Training System to assess the neurotherapeutic effects of an FES-assisted treadmill training intervention on walking performance in children with CP. The research design consists of a randomized, controlled, two-treatment study in which the control subjects will cross-over into one of the two treatment groups. An FES-assisted training group will undergo twelve weeks of FES-assisted treadmill training using a distributive practice protocol consisting of alternating bouts of walking with and without FES assistance, followed by over ground walking reinforcement. A treadmill-only training group will undergo the same training regimen without FES-assistance. Finally, a non-intervention group will serve as a control. The investigators will analyze treatment efficacy via functional and biomechanical and measures collected pre-training, post-training and after a twelve-week follow-up period.
Detailed Description
Aim 1: Assess the neurotherapeutic effects of FES-assisted treadmill and treadmill-only training on walking function relative to each other and to the control group. 1.1 The FES-assisted treadmill and treadmill-only groups will demonstrate greater improvements in walking speed and walking distance than the control group post-training and at follow-up. The FES-assisted treadmill group will show greater improvements than the treadmill-only group. 1.2 The FES-assisted treadmill and treadmill-only groups will demonstrate greater improvement in walking energy efficiency than the control group post-training and at follow-up. The FES-assisted treadmill group will show greater improvement than the treadmill-only group. 1.3 The FES-assisted treadmill and treadmill-only groups will demonstrate greater improvements in GMFM, perceived functional mobility, quality of life and self-perception measures than the control group post-training and at follow-up. The FES-assisted treadmill group will show greater improvements than the treadmill-only group. Aim 2: Assess the differential neurotherapeutic effects of FES-assisted treadmill and treadmill-only training on walking biomechanics. The investigators will measure these effects using instrumented motion capture. 2.1 The FES-assisted treadmill group will demonstrate greater improvements in gait kinematics in stance phase (higher peak hip and knee extension and lower peak ankle dorsiflexion) and swing phase (higher peak knee extension and larger knee excursion) than the treadmill only and non-intervention groups 2.2 The FES-assisted treadmill group will demonstrate greater improvements in lower extremity kinetics (lower hip and knee extensor moments and increased ankle plantarflexion power) than the treadmill only and non- intervention groups. 2.3 The FES-assisted treadmill group will demonstrate greater improvements in spatiotemporal gait parameters (increased step length and gait velocity, decreased step width and double support time) than the treadmill- only and control groups. Aim 3: Identify predictive measures of training efficacy. 3.1 Pre-training walking speed and energy efficiency will correlate with improvements in walking performance measures of Aim 1. 3.2 Increased neuroprosthetic correction of gait biomechanics measures achieved by FES will be positively correlated with walking performance measures of Aim 1.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cerebral Palsy, Spastic Diplegia Cerebral Palsy, Gait
Keywords
Cerebral Palsy, Functional electrical stimulation, Neurotherapeutic

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
It is a randomized controlled two-treatment group clinical trial. We randomly assign subjects to either an FES-Treadmill group, a Treadmill-Only group, or a Control group. The FES-Treadmill group will undergo an FES-assisted treadmill training protocol. The Treadmill-Only group will undergo the same protocol without FES assistance. The control group will not receive treatment. Additionally, following their "no-treatment" period, we will randomize control group subjects into one of the two treatment groups. This design allows us greater power to identify treatment group differences while accommodating parents who might ordinarily not want their child to participate in a non-treatment group. Initially, each group will consist of 14 subjects. Following crossover, the FES-Treadmill and Treadmill-Only groups will consist of 21 subjects while the control group remains 14 subjects.
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
All the clinical assessments will be performed by masked Physical Therapist.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
2 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
FES + Treadmill
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Functional Electrical stimulation walking group.
Arm Title
Treadmill only
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Treadmill walking group (no electrical stimulation).
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Control group. After control period of 12 weeks, they are randomized into FES + Treadmill or Treadmill group.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Functional Electrical Stimulation protocol
Intervention Description
FES-assisted treadmill walking followed by a 12-week follow-up period. Subjects will train three times a week walking at a target speed corresponding to 60-80% of their age-predicted maximum heart rate. Each training session will consist of five six-minute walking bouts, with five-minute rest periods between bouts. Each treadmill bout consists of alternating one- minute intervals of FES on and FES off. For the last walking bout, the first three minutes will be FES-assisted on the treadmill and the last three minutes will be overground walking without FES assistance to promote carryover effects. Total walking time is 30 minutes and the entire training session lasts approximately 50 minutes.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Treadmill only protocol
Intervention Description
We will implement a 12-wk Treadmill training protocol consisting of treadmill walking followed by a 12-week follow-up period. Subjects will train three times a week walking at a target speed corresponding to 60-80% of their age. Each training session will consist of five six-minute walking bouts, with five-minute rest periods between bouts. Total walking time is 30 minutes and the entire training session lasts approximately 50 minutes.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Muscle Tone
Description
We use the Modified Ashworth Scale to measure resistance to passive movement about a joint with varying degree of velocity (Muscle tone/spasticity). Score ranges from 0-4, with 6 choices where score of 0 means no increase in tone and score of 4 means rigid limb with no flexion or extension. Our training approach using repetitive electrical stimulation may also lower spasticity, which can also facilitate improved functional mobility.
Time Frame
Three assessment points in time: a Pre Assessment before beginning training (Week 1), a Post Assessment following training (Week 14), and a Follow-Up Assessment twelve weeks after completion of training (Week 27).
Title
Walking Speed
Description
Walking speed is an indicator of functional mobility. By our training methods, we hypothesize making improvements in motor learning and gait biomechanics. Improved walking speed would indicate that such improvements have occurred.
Time Frame
Three assessment points in time: a Pre Assessment before beginning training (Week 1), a Post Assessment following training (Week 14), and a Follow-Up Assessment twelve weeks after completion of training (Week 27).
Title
Walking Distance
Description
Walking distance (in a fixed period of time) is an indicator of endurance. Improved motor learning and gait biomechanics from our training methods would improve gait efficiency and thus, endurance.
Time Frame
Three assessment points in time: a Pre Assessment before beginning training (Week 1), a Post Assessment following training (Week 14), and a Follow-Up Assessment twelve weeks after completion of training (Week 27).
Title
Energy Expenditure
Description
Energy expenditure is a measure of cardiovascular fitness and walking efficiency. By means of exercise at 60-80% max heart rates, it is expected that cardiovascular fitness would improve. Energy expenditure measurements allow for measurement of cardiovascular fitness.
Time Frame
Three assessment points in time: a Pre Assessment before beginning training (Week 1), a Post Assessment following training (Week 14), and a Follow-Up Assessment twelve weeks after completion of training (Week 27).
Title
Gross Motor Function Measure
Description
Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM) is a measure of motor function that indicates disablement. Improved motor control and gait biomechanics from training should be reflected in overall gross motor function, which is assessed via the GMFM.
Time Frame
Three assessment points in time: a Pre Assessment before beginning training (Week 1), a Post Assessment following training (Week 14), and a Follow-Up Assessment twelve weeks after completion of training (Week 27).
Title
Balance Evaluation Systems Test
Description
Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a measure of balance function. The BESTest will allow for assessing the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training on balance.
Time Frame
Three assessment points in time: a Pre Assessment before beginning training (Week 1), a Post Assessment following training (Week 14), and a Follow-Up Assessment twelve weeks after completion of training (Week 27).
Title
Timed Up-And-Go
Description
Timed Up-And-Go (TUG) is a measure of functional mobility and will allow for assessing the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics.
Time Frame
Three assessment points in time: a Pre Assessment before beginning training (Week 1), a Post Assessment following training (Week 14), and a Follow-Up Assessment twelve weeks after completion of training (Week 27).
Title
Instrumented Gait Analysis
Description
Joint Kinematics
Time Frame
Three assessment points in time: a Pre Assessment before beginning training (Week 1), a Post Assessment following training (Week 14), and a Follow-Up Assessment twelve weeks after completion of training (Week 27).
Title
Electromyography
Description
Muscle activation timing measured with electromyography during gait analysis allows for mechanistic study of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait as well as comparison to typical norms.
Time Frame
Three assessment points in time: a Pre Assessment before beginning training (Week 1), a Post Assessment following training (Week 14), and a Follow-Up Assessment twelve weeks after completion of training (Week 27).
Title
Activities-Specific Balance Scale
Description
The Activities-Specific Balance Scale (ABC Scale) survey allows measurement of perceived functional mobility by assessing balance confidence to perform daily activities of living without falling. 16 items are rated on a rating scale with range of 0-100. Score of 0 means no confidence and 100 means complete confidence. Average score of 16 items is the overall score. Such measures will assess the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait bio-mechanics from training.
Time Frame
Three assessment points in time: a Pre Assessment before beginning training (Week 1), a Post Assessment following training (Week 14), and a Follow-Up Assessment twelve weeks after completion of training (Week 27).
Title
Participation in Life Events
Description
Participation in life events (LIFE-H) survey measures how much a person is engaging or participating with their peers and community. Weighted score ranges between 0-10 with 0 score being no accomplishment and 10 means complete accomplishment. Such measures will assess the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training.
Time Frame
Three assessment points in time: a Pre Assessment before beginning training (Week 1), a Post Assessment following training (Week 14), and a Follow-Up Assessment twelve weeks after completion of training (Week 27).
Title
Self-Perception
Description
Self-Perception (Piers-Harris-2) survey measures physical and emotional well-being and self-esteem and will allow assessment of the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training.
Time Frame
Three assessment points in time: a Pre Assessment before beginning training (Week 1), a Post Assessment following training (Week 14), and a Follow-Up Assessment twelve weeks after completion of training (Week 27).

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
10 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 10-18 Diagnosis of spastic diplegic CP Gross Motor Functional Classification Scale (GMFCS) level I-III Hip migration < 40% Displays crouch, equinus, or jump type gait At least 0° passive dorsiflexion range of motion (can come to a neutral position) Sufficient visuoperceptual, cognitive and communication skills Seizure-free or well-controlled seizures No other neurological or musculoskeletal disorders (e.g. dystonia, severe scoliosis, hip instability) Ability to travel to University of Delaware or Shriners Hospital for children multiple times per week for training and assessment Ability to communicate pain or discomfort Ability to consent (if 18 years old) or obtain parent/guardian consent (if under 18) Exclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of athetoid or ataxic CP Scoliosis with primary curve > 49% Spinal fusions extending into pelvis Lower Extremity (LE) joint instability or dislocation Severe tactile hypersensitivity LE botulinum (Botox) injections in the past 6 mo. Implanted medical device contraindicative of FES Pregnancy Severe LE spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale score of 4 or greater) History of pulmonary disease limiting exercise tolerance (Asthma Control screen) History of cardiac disease (AHA screen) Excessive LE joint pain during walking Severely limited joint range of motion / irreversible muscle contractures, i.e.> 10°knee flexion, >15° hip flexion contractures, or >5° plantarflexion contractures LE surgery or significant injury within 1 yr.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Samuel CK Lee, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
University of Delaware
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Delaware
City
Newark
State/Province
Delaware
ZIP/Postal Code
19716
Country
United States
Facility Name
Shriner's Hospital for Children
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19140
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The proposed experiments will generate data for publications in high quality peer reviewed journals. We will also present our findings at national meetings of neurorehabilitation scientists and clinicians and neuroscience and motor control meetings. To have the most impact, it is important that we present our findings to both clinicians and scientists, therefore, in addition to these standard approaches, we will seek out regular opportunities to present both the rationale and results of our work to local and regional clinicians as well as local and regional stroke support groups. Once the primary hypotheses of the current proposal are tested, all data will be de-identified and be deposited in the DASH (The Data and Specimen Hub) repository.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Study protocol and data will be shared on publication of primary results
Links:
URL
https://sites.udel.edu/pt/dr-samuel-lee/
Description
Principal Investigator's Webpage

Learn more about this trial

FES to Improve Gait in CP

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs