search
Back to results

Ankle Robotics After Stroke

Primary Purpose

Foot Drop, Stroke, Hemiparesis

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PTR Physical Therapy while wearing Robot group (Phase II)
Physical Therapy Only (Phase II)
Cross over group for Physical Therapy n Sub-Acute group. (Phase II)
Chronic Stroke Subjects to receive robotic gait training therapy.
Sponsored by
NextStep Robotics Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Foot Drop

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages 18 and older
  • In the subacute phase of stroke recovery (>6 weeks to <6 months post-stroke) with residual hemiparesis of the lower extremity that includes symptoms of foot-drop.
  • Clear indications of hemiparetic gait by clinical observation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac history of (a) unstable angina, (b) recent (less than 3 months) myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure (NYHA category II); (c) hemodynamically significant valvular dysfunction
  • Hypertension that is a contraindication for routine physical therapy (greater than 160/100 on two assessments).
  • Medical History: (a) recent hospitalization (less than 3 months) for severe medical disease, (b) symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease, (c) orthopedic or chronic pain conditions that significantly alter gait function, (d) pulmonary or renal failure (e) active cancer
  • History of non-stroke neuromuscular disorder restricting gait.
  • Aphasia or cognitive functioning that confounds participation, defined as unable to follow 2 step commands or judgment of the medical officer or therapist.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Maryland Rehabilitation & Orthopaedic InstituteRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

PTR (Physical Therapy while wearing Robot group) (Phase II)

PT (Physical Therapy Only) (Phase II)

X-PTR, Cross over group for Physical Therapy n Sub-Acute group.

C-PTR, Chronic Stroke Subjects to receive robotic gait training therapy.

Arm Description

Subjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.

Subjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with therapist assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.

Participants enrolled in the physical therapy only group will be given the option to re-enroll as a cross over participant to receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.

Chronic stroke subjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Angle at Initial Contact
Angle at initial contact averaged across each gait cycle for each subject at a given testing time point.
Swing Dorsiflexion
Peak swing dorsiflexion averaged across each gait cycle for each subject at a given testing time point.
Number of Heel-First Foot Strikes
Number of heel-first foot strikes for each subject at a given testing time point.
Gait Velocity
Average gait velocity (meters/second) for each subject at a given testing time point.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Active range of motion for Dorsiflexion
Active range of motion measured for dorsiflexion by blinded clinician.
Ankle Muscle Strength
Measurement of ankle strength by blinded clinician using the MMT (manual muscle testing)
Number of Participants Using Assistive Devices and Ankle Foot Orthoses
Number of Participants Using Assistive Devices and Ankle Foot Orthoses
Dynamic Gait Index
Assesses gait, balance, and fall risk; ranges from 0-24; higher score is better
Berg Balance Scale
A 14-item objective measure designed to assess static balance and fall risk; ranges from 0-56; higher score is better
Stroke Impact Scale
A self-report questionnaire that evaluates disability and health-related quality of life after stroke.
Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale
A self-report measure of balance confidence in performing various activities without losing balance; ranges from 0-1600; higher score is better
CES-D (Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression)
The Center of Epidemiological Studies-Depression, a 20-item measure that asks to rate how often over the past week the patient experienced symptoms associated with depression; ranges from 0-60; high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
NIH Stroke Scale
Tool used to quantify the impairment caused by a stroke, composed of 11 items; ranges from 0-42; higher score indicates greater impairment.
Falls Efficacy Scale
A 16-item self-administered questionnaire designed to assess fear of falling; ranges 16-64; higher score indicates greater fear of falling.
Fatigue Assessment Scale
10-item scale evaluating symptoms of fatigue; ranges from 10-50; higher score indicates greater levels of fatigue.
Modified Ashworth Scale
Measures spasticity in patients; ranges from 0-4; higher score indicates more spasticity/rigidity.

Full Information

First Posted
October 14, 2020
Last Updated
January 24, 2023
Sponsor
NextStep Robotics Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04594837
Brief Title
Ankle Robotics After Stroke
Official Title
Portable Ankle Robotics to Reverse Foot Drop After Stroke
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
August 20, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
February 28, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
NextStep Robotics Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The randomized study (in Phase II of the U44) compares the efficacy and durability of 9 weeks (18 sessions) of robot-assisted physical therapy (PTR) versus physical therapy (PT) alone on foot drop as assessed by gait biomechanics (ankle angle at initial contact, peak swing ankle angle, number of heel-first strikes - % total steps, gait velocity) and blinded clinician assessment (dorsiflexion active range of motion, ankle muscle strength, assistive device needs).
Detailed Description
This proposal investigates a portable ankle robot (AMBLE) to be used during over-ground mobility training to reduce foot drop and improve walking function in hemiparetic (half-body, partially paralyzed stroke patients with foot drop (inability to properly lift and clear the foot during walking. About 30% of stroke survivors are left with permanent ankle weakness that impairs their mobility and increases fall-risk. Currently, stroke survivors with foot drop live with a cane or other assistive device, and often ankle-foot braces (AFOs) for safety. These assistive devices do not reverse or reduce the underlying neurological foot drop problem. Recognizing the crucial role of ankle function in walking and balance, and recognizing that the distal part of the lower extremity often suffers the greatest damage after a human stroke, the investigators have come up with a portable ankle robot as a tool for therapists to help shape recovery of walking. The AMBLE, and its underlying control system, uses information about how patients are walking from one step to another to assist and shape foot lifting so as to help re- train walking recovery by a process that neuroscientists call motor learning. It is the combination of the partially paralyzed stroke survivor's movement efforts with timely assistance "only as needed" by the robot that investigators and others show is the key to movement recovery after stroke. Thus, the ankle robot is not a crutch, but a learning and measuring device that incrementally "gets out of the way" of the learner to facilitate human robot learning such that the human takes over more of the volitional learning. The research team at University of Maryland has demonstrated in 4 prior studies using seated and treadmill based robot assisted training using a bulky laboratory robot programmed with a motor learning formula that can improve ankle motor control in both the early and chronic phases of stroke, and this can improve over-ground unassisted walking. A significant proportion of stroke survivors showed session by session recovery of volitional (not assisted by the robot) ankle lifting during walking across 6 weeks of three 30- 45 minute sessions of robot training while walking on a treadmill, even years after their stroke. In fact, it has been found that two weeks of 3 sessions per week ankle robotics training was the time profile for most motor learning recovery to reduce foot drop. This information has informed the design of the study described below. Previous research was done using a bulky, heavy (~8 lbs), and expensive laboratory robot that only allowed seated or treadmill based training because it was tethered by wires. This greatly limits how it can be used by physical therapists, and is not appropriately configured for ease of use by physical therapists in practice. NextStep Robotics invented and built the ankle robots motor learning programs with a lot of input from physical therapists and other rehabilitation clinicians into a portable lightweight robot that can be used over-ground anywhere with blue tooth controls that also tell the therapist precisely how well the stroke survivors is learning, step by step. It is this new portable ankle robot that is configured for use in practice that investigators seek to test in studies with physical therapists using it fully integrated into their usual outpatient stroke mobility recovery training at University of Maryland Orthopedics and Rehabilitation Institute. This U44 Award from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) is not a typical single phase randomized clinical study, but consists of Phase I that completes commercial design of the robot the first year, followed by Phase II randomized clinical trial across years 2-4 of a finalized commercial version of the ankle robot. Phase II (following completion of commercial design in Phase I) is a randomized (group assignment by chance), blinded (outcome testing done by technicians unaware of patient group assignment), two arm (2 groups) study that investigates the hypothesis that in subacute (6 weeks to 6 months) stroke subjects with foot drop, AMBLE integrated physical therapy (PTR) consisting of 18 training sessions over nine weeks is more effective than usual physical therapy (PT) to improve foot drop outcomes measured by movement analyses of walking, and by standardized clinical assessments of walking including specific foot drop outcomes as assessed by a certified PT clinician (blinded to treatment assignment), cross checked by blinded review of 2 other clinicians of films of the standardized mobility assessments to provide a consensus impartial judgement. Notably, this Phase II study focuses on sub-acute stroke recovery (6 weeks to 6 months) because it represents a therapeutic window into which conventional outpatient physical therapy is typically front-loaded to optimize outcomes. This phase of stroke rehabilitation is selected to test the AMBLE in real world settings when outpatient physical therapy typically occurs, using a treatment frequency and duration (18 physical therapy sessions across 9 weeks) that is representative of practice in Maryland and most of the United States. If wearing the AMBLE robot during physical therapy in this time-frame reduces foot drop and improves longer term outcomes measured 3 months after all robotics therapy has ended, then the investigators will apply for FDA approval for the first robotics device to actively treat foot drop after stroke.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Foot Drop, Stroke, Hemiparesis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
140 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PTR (Physical Therapy while wearing Robot group) (Phase II)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
Arm Title
PT (Physical Therapy Only) (Phase II)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with therapist assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
Arm Title
X-PTR, Cross over group for Physical Therapy n Sub-Acute group.
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants enrolled in the physical therapy only group will be given the option to re-enroll as a cross over participant to receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
Arm Title
C-PTR, Chronic Stroke Subjects to receive robotic gait training therapy.
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Chronic stroke subjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
PTR Physical Therapy while wearing Robot group (Phase II)
Other Intervention Name(s)
PTR
Intervention Description
Subjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Physical Therapy Only (Phase II)
Other Intervention Name(s)
PT
Intervention Description
Subjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with therapist assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cross over group for Physical Therapy n Sub-Acute group. (Phase II)
Other Intervention Name(s)
X-PTR
Intervention Description
Participants enrolled in the physical therapy only group will be given the option to re-enroll as a cross over participant to receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Chronic Stroke Subjects to receive robotic gait training therapy.
Other Intervention Name(s)
C-PTR
Intervention Description
Chronic stroke subjects receive 18 one-hour PT training sessions over 9 weeks while wearing the robot initially parameterized to individual deficit severity. Subjects perform over-ground mobility tasks of increasing challenge with robotic assist, as needed. Training is generally divided into 3 phases based on individual ability to address gait deficits, postural transitions, physical demand and environmental terrain.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Angle at Initial Contact
Description
Angle at initial contact averaged across each gait cycle for each subject at a given testing time point.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Title
Swing Dorsiflexion
Description
Peak swing dorsiflexion averaged across each gait cycle for each subject at a given testing time point.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Title
Number of Heel-First Foot Strikes
Description
Number of heel-first foot strikes for each subject at a given testing time point.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Title
Gait Velocity
Description
Average gait velocity (meters/second) for each subject at a given testing time point.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Active range of motion for Dorsiflexion
Description
Active range of motion measured for dorsiflexion by blinded clinician.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Title
Ankle Muscle Strength
Description
Measurement of ankle strength by blinded clinician using the MMT (manual muscle testing)
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Title
Number of Participants Using Assistive Devices and Ankle Foot Orthoses
Description
Number of Participants Using Assistive Devices and Ankle Foot Orthoses
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Title
Dynamic Gait Index
Description
Assesses gait, balance, and fall risk; ranges from 0-24; higher score is better
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Title
Berg Balance Scale
Description
A 14-item objective measure designed to assess static balance and fall risk; ranges from 0-56; higher score is better
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Title
Stroke Impact Scale
Description
A self-report questionnaire that evaluates disability and health-related quality of life after stroke.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Title
Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale
Description
A self-report measure of balance confidence in performing various activities without losing balance; ranges from 0-1600; higher score is better
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Title
CES-D (Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression)
Description
The Center of Epidemiological Studies-Depression, a 20-item measure that asks to rate how often over the past week the patient experienced symptoms associated with depression; ranges from 0-60; high scores indicating greater depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Title
NIH Stroke Scale
Description
Tool used to quantify the impairment caused by a stroke, composed of 11 items; ranges from 0-42; higher score indicates greater impairment.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Title
Falls Efficacy Scale
Description
A 16-item self-administered questionnaire designed to assess fear of falling; ranges 16-64; higher score indicates greater fear of falling.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Title
Fatigue Assessment Scale
Description
10-item scale evaluating symptoms of fatigue; ranges from 10-50; higher score indicates greater levels of fatigue.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks
Title
Modified Ashworth Scale
Description
Measures spasticity in patients; ranges from 0-4; higher score indicates more spasticity/rigidity.
Time Frame
Change from Baseline at both 9 Weeks and at 21 Weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Ages 18 and older In the subacute phase of stroke recovery (>6 weeks to <6 months post-stroke) with residual hemiparesis of the lower extremity that includes symptoms of foot-drop. - or - In the chronic phase of stroke recovery (>6 months post-stroke) with residual hemiparesis of the lower extremity that includes symptoms of foot-drop. Clear indications of hemiparetic gait by clinical observation Exclusion Criteria: Cardiac history of (a) unstable angina, (b) recent (less than 3 months) myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure (NYHA category II); (c) hemodynamically significant valvular dysfunction Hypertension that is a contraindication for routine physical therapy (greater than 160/100 on two assessments). Medical History: (a) recent hospitalization (less than 3 months) for severe medical disease, (b) symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease, (c) orthopedic or chronic pain conditions that significantly alter gait function, (d) pulmonary or renal failure (e) active cancer History of non-stroke neuromuscular disorder restricting gait. Aphasia or cognitive functioning that confounds participation, defined as unable to follow 2 step commands or judgment of the medical officer or therapist.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Josh Rudnicki
Phone
443-869-3518
Email
JRudnicki@som.umaryland.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Richard Macko, MD
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Brad Hennessie, MHA, MBA
Organizational Affiliation
NextStep Robotics Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Maryland Rehabilitation & Orthopaedic Institute
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21207
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Josh Rudnicki
Phone
443-869-3518
Email
JRudnicki@som.umaryland.edu

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Ankle Robotics After Stroke

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs