search
Back to results

Tariquidar-ondansetron Combination in Neuropathic Pain

Primary Purpose

Neuropathic Pain

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ondansetron 16 mg with Tariquidar
Ondansetron 16 mg with Placebo
Sponsored by
Washington University School of Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Neuropathic Pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-65;
  2. Documented diagnosis of neuropathic pain due to damage or disease affecting the peripheral nervous system;
  3. At least Probable neuropathic pain grading1;
  4. Pain duration >3 months;
  5. Average pain intensity ≥4 on 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current pregnancy or lactation;
  2. Moderate-severe kidney or liver dysfunction;
  3. Active cardiac arrhythmias (non-sinus rhythm), Long QT syndrome, or QTc interval >450msec;
  4. Congestive heart failure
  5. Abnormal troponin values at screening visit;
  6. Current treatment with MAO inhibitors, mirtazapine, SSRI antidepressants, or SNRI medications duloxetine or venlafaxine;
  7. Current treatment with tapentadol, tramadol, or fentanyl;
  8. Current treatment with P-glycoprotein substrate drugs with narrow therapeutic window, e.g. digoxin;
  9. Current treatment with tricyclic antidepressant medications (e.g. amitriptyline, desipramine, imipramine) at a dose >25mg/day;
  10. Ongoing use of any of the following medications with known effects on Pgp function: carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, cyclosporine, clarithromycin, erythromycin, ritonavir, verapamil, rifampicin, St. John's wort;
  11. Current treatment with QT-prolonging drugs, and drugs known to have a significant interaction with ondansetron or other P-glycoprotein substrates (see section 2.3.3.);
  12. Current treatment with anticoagulant drugs;

Sites / Locations

  • Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes-Jewish HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Ondansetron + Tariquidar

Ondansetron + Placebo

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Concertation-time Profile of Ondansetron in Plasma
Venous blood sampling for plasma concentrations of ondansetron will be obtained: at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes from the beginning of ondansetron infusion, and compared between the two sessions (with placebo vs tariquidar)
Cerebrospinal Fluid to Plasma Concentration Ratio of Ondansetron
Cerebrospinal fluid to plasma concentration ratio of ondansetron, compared between the two sessions, with placebo vs tariquidar
Cerebrospinal Fluid Penetration of Ondansetron - Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Cerebrospinal fluid penetration of intravenous ondansetron will be determined as AUCCSF0-∞ of ondansetron, and compared between the two sessions, with placebo vs tariquidar

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Pain Intensity
Change in spontaneous pain intensity (measured on 0-10 numerical rating scale; 0=no pain, 10=worst imaginable pain) from baseline to 60-120 minutes after ondansetron IV infusion, compared between two sessions with and without tariquidar.
Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) Magnitude (ΔCPM)
The difference between self-report intensity of pain (0-100 scale) as a response to a standard contact heat stimulus, compared to the same experiment performed with ice-water conditioning applied to the contralateral extremity. A larger negative value of CPM represents more efficient pain modulation.
Correlation between CPM Magnitude (ΔCPM) and Change in Pain Intensity
The association between baseline Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) magnitude (ΔCPM) and the % pain reduction from baseline will be determined by bivariate regression.
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Score
Changes in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) total score and sub-scores (burning pain, paroxysmal pain, paresthesia/dysesthesia score) will be compared between treatment sessions. Each subscore is scored on a 0-10 scale: 0=no symptom, 10=worst imaginable symptom

Full Information

First Posted
September 21, 2020
Last Updated
April 28, 2023
Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04603066
Brief Title
Tariquidar-ondansetron Combination in Neuropathic Pain
Official Title
Administration of Ondansetron With P-glycoprotein Inhibitor Tariquidar in Patients With Neuropathic Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
January 31, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over proof of concept study. To determine the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of co-administration of 5-HT3R antagonist ondansetron with a P-glycoprotein inhibitor tariquidar, in patients with neuropathic pain.
Detailed Description
The investigators hypothesize that co-administration of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron (single 16mg dose) with p-glycoprotein inhibitor tariquidar (single 4mg/kg dose) vs placebo in a cross-over prospective randomized study, will: Be tolerable in patients with neuropathic pain. Increase the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to plasma ratio of ondansetron after intravenous administration, compare to ondansetron alone Result in a greater reduction in pain intensity than with ondansetron alone.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Neuropathic Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
Prospective, randomized, double blind, crossover study
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
32 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Ondansetron + Tariquidar
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Ondansetron + Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ondansetron 16 mg with Tariquidar
Intervention Description
In randomized order, each participant will receive two IV infusions of ondansetron, 3 weeks apart; one with placebo (D5W), and one with tariquidar (4mg/kg dose in D5W) administered IV over 60 minutes. Ondansetron will be diluted in 100mL 0.9% normal saline, and tariquidar will be diluted in 500mL D5W.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ondansetron 16 mg with Placebo
Intervention Description
In randomized order, each participant will receive two IV infusions of ondansetron, 3 weeks apart; one with placebo (D5W), and one with tariquidar (4mg/kg dose in D5W) administered IV over 60 minutes. Ondansetron will be diluted in 100mL 0.9% normal saline, and tariquidar will be diluted in 500mL D5W.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Concertation-time Profile of Ondansetron in Plasma
Description
Venous blood sampling for plasma concentrations of ondansetron will be obtained: at 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes from the beginning of ondansetron infusion, and compared between the two sessions (with placebo vs tariquidar)
Time Frame
up to 8 weeks following consent
Title
Cerebrospinal Fluid to Plasma Concentration Ratio of Ondansetron
Description
Cerebrospinal fluid to plasma concentration ratio of ondansetron, compared between the two sessions, with placebo vs tariquidar
Time Frame
up to 8 weeks following consent
Title
Cerebrospinal Fluid Penetration of Ondansetron - Area Under the Curve (AUC)
Description
Cerebrospinal fluid penetration of intravenous ondansetron will be determined as AUCCSF0-∞ of ondansetron, and compared between the two sessions, with placebo vs tariquidar
Time Frame
up to 8 weeks following consent
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Pain Intensity
Description
Change in spontaneous pain intensity (measured on 0-10 numerical rating scale; 0=no pain, 10=worst imaginable pain) from baseline to 60-120 minutes after ondansetron IV infusion, compared between two sessions with and without tariquidar.
Time Frame
up to 8 weeks following consent
Title
Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) Magnitude (ΔCPM)
Description
The difference between self-report intensity of pain (0-100 scale) as a response to a standard contact heat stimulus, compared to the same experiment performed with ice-water conditioning applied to the contralateral extremity. A larger negative value of CPM represents more efficient pain modulation.
Time Frame
up to 8 weeks following consent
Title
Correlation between CPM Magnitude (ΔCPM) and Change in Pain Intensity
Description
The association between baseline Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) magnitude (ΔCPM) and the % pain reduction from baseline will be determined by bivariate regression.
Time Frame
up to 8 weeks following consent
Title
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Score
Description
Changes in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) total score and sub-scores (burning pain, paroxysmal pain, paresthesia/dysesthesia score) will be compared between treatment sessions. Each subscore is scored on a 0-10 scale: 0=no symptom, 10=worst imaginable symptom
Time Frame
up to 8 weeks following consent

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18-65; Documented diagnosis of neuropathic pain due to damage or disease affecting the peripheral nervous system; At least Probable neuropathic pain grading1; Pain duration >3 months; Average pain intensity ≥4 on 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS). Exclusion Criteria: Current pregnancy or lactation; Moderate-severe kidney or liver dysfunction; Active cardiac arrhythmias (non-sinus rhythm), Long QT syndrome, or QTc interval >450msec; Congestive heart failure Abnormal troponin values at screening visit; Current treatment with MAO inhibitors, mirtazapine, SSRI antidepressants, or SNRI medications duloxetine or venlafaxine; Current treatment with tapentadol, tramadol, or fentanyl; Current treatment with P-glycoprotein substrate drugs with narrow therapeutic window, e.g. digoxin; Current treatment with tricyclic antidepressant medications (e.g. amitriptyline, desipramine, imipramine) at a dose >25mg/day; Ongoing use of any of the following medications with known effects on Pgp function: carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, cyclosporine, clarithromycin, erythromycin, ritonavir, verapamil, rifampicin, St. John's wort; Current treatment with QT-prolonging drugs, and drugs known to have a significant interaction with ondansetron or other P-glycoprotein substrates (see section 2.3.3.); Current treatment with anticoagulant drugs;
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Karen Frey
Phone
314 454-5980
Email
freyk@wustl.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Simon Haroutounian, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Washington University School of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes-Jewish Hospital
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Karen Frey
Phone
314-454-5980
Email
freyk@wustl.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Simon Haroutounian, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27115670
Citation
Finnerup NB, Haroutounian S, Kamerman P, Baron R, Bennett DLH, Bouhassira D, Cruccu G, Freeman R, Hansson P, Nurmikko T, Raja SN, Rice ASC, Serra J, Smith BH, Treede RD, Jensen TS. Neuropathic pain: an updated grading system for research and clinical practice. Pain. 2016 Aug;157(8):1599-1606. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000492.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20849570
Citation
Yawn BP, Wollan PC, Weingarten TN, Watson JC, Hooten WM, Melton LJ 3rd. The prevalence of neuropathic pain: clinical evaluation compared with screening tools in a community population. Pain Med. 2009 Apr;10(3):586-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00588.x. Epub 2009 Mar 17. Erratum In: Pain Med. 2011 Aug;12(8):1294.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22395856
Citation
Smith BH, Torrance N. Epidemiology of neuropathic pain and its impact on quality of life. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012 Jun;16(3):191-8. doi: 10.1007/s11916-012-0256-0.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Tariquidar-ondansetron Combination in Neuropathic Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs