search
Back to results

PRONing to Facilitate Weaning From ECMO in Patients With Refractory Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PRONECMO)

Primary Purpose

ARDS

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Prone positionning
Supine position
Sponsored by
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for ARDS focused on measuring ECMO Weaning, PRONING

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe ARDS refractory to conventional therapy placed on VV-ECMO support in the preceding 48h.
  2. Obtain informed consent from a close relative or surrogate. According to the specifications of emergency consent, randomization without the close relative or surrogate consent could be performed.

    Close relative/surrogate/family consent will be asked as soon as possible. The patient will be asked to give his/her consent for the continuation of the trial when his/her condition will allow.

  3. Social security registration

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age <18 and >75
  2. Pregnancy and breastfeeding woman
  3. Initiation of VV-ECMO >48 h
  4. Resuscitation >10 minutes before ECMO
  5. Irreversible neurological pathology
  6. End-stage chronic lung disease
  7. ARDS secondary to an abdominal surgery
  8. Contraindications for PP
  9. Irreversible ARDS with no hope for lung function recovery
  10. Patient moribund on the day of randomization, SAPS II >90
  11. Liver cirrhosis (Child B or C)
  12. Chronic renal failure requiring hemodialysis
  13. Lung transplantation
  14. Burns on more than 20 % of the body surface

Sites / Locations

  • Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Prone positionning

Supine position

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time to successful ECMO weaning within the 60 days following randomization
ECMO weaning will be considered successful only if the patient survives without ECMO, or lung transplantation 30 days after ECMO removal. Thus all ECMO weaning from randomization to 60 days after randomization will be considered, and the qualification for successful ECMO weaning will need 30 days of follow-up after ECMO removal (thus until day 90 after randomization for an ECMO weaning performed on day 60 after randomization). Patients still under ECMO 60 days after randomization will be censored. A protocolized management regarding weaning of VV-ECMO will be applied to both groups The planned analysis will model the risk of successful ECMO ablation in the presence of competing risk (death and weaning failure).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mortality
Total duration of ECMO support
Number of ECMO-free days
Duration of ICU stay
Duration of hospitalization
Time to improvement in respiratory respiratory system compliance
Time to get a respiratory system compliance > 30 mL/cmH2O
Number of days with organ failure
defined by SOFA score
Number of days alive without organ failure
defined by SOFA score
Number of ventilator assist pneumonia, bacteriemia, and cannula infection episodes
Number of days with hemodynamic support with catecholamines
Number of days alive without hemodynamic support with catecholamines
Number of days with mechanical ventilation
Number of days alive without mechanical ventilation
Acute core pulmonale diagnosis
by echocardiography
Need for VA ECMO
Incidence of intervention side effects
(accidental decannulation, non-scheduled extubation during the procedure, hemoptysis, endotracheal tube obstruction, cardiac arrest, pressure sore, and death
Occurrence of refractory hypoxemia on ECMO

Full Information

First Posted
September 28, 2020
Last Updated
February 28, 2023
Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04607551
Brief Title
PRONing to Facilitate Weaning From ECMO in Patients With Refractory Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Acronym
PRONECMO
Official Title
PRONing to Facilitate Weaning From ECMO in Patients With Refractory Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 3, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 7, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
ECMO has emerged as a promising intervention that may provide more efficacious supportive care to patients with refractory severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The largest randomized trial of ECMO for severe forms of ARDS was recently published and demonstrated no significant benefit from early initiation of ECMO with respect to 60-day mortality, when compared with a strategy of conventional mechanical ventilation (MV) (ref EOLIA). However, a rescue ECMO option was used by 28% of the controls, which is likely to have diluted the potential positive effect of ECMO. One may argue that a less restrictive primary endpoint, such as death or rescue ECMO, would have yielded positive findings. Meanwhile, improvements in technology have made ECMO safer and easier to use, allowing for the potential of more widespread application in patients with ARDS. VV-ECMO can be used as a life-saving rescue therapy in patients with ARDS when MV cannot maintain adequate oxygenation or CO2 elimination. Alternatively, VV-ECMO may be used in patients who remain hypoxemic during MV (i.e., PaO2/FiO2<80 mmHg) despite optimization of MV (including the application of high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), neuromuscular blockers, and prone positioning) and allow "lung rest" by lowering airway pressures and tidal volume to ameliorate ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Prone positioning (PP) has been used for more than 30 years in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and in particular with ARDS. Initially, PP in ARDS patients was proposed as an efficient mean to improve oxygenation, sometimes dramatically, in a large number of patients. In addition, it is now clear, and data are still accumulating, that PP is also able to prevent VILI which is as important as maintaining safe gas exchange in mechanical ventilation. Therefore, PP is a strategy that covers the two major goals of ventilator support in ARDS patients, maintaining safe oxygenation and preventing VILI and reducing mortality at the end. This latter objective makes sense on ECMO as one of the main objective of this device is to markedly reduce VILI by resting the lung. Considering that PP is a valuable and safe therapy to reduce VILI, its combination with ECMO could enhance VILI prevention. In recent preliminary studies, it was reported that the combination of VV-ECMO and PP was associated with a dramatic improvement in oxygenation, in pulmonary and thoracic compliance and in chest X-ray findings. It may thus facilitate the weaning of ECMO and can be performed without compromising the safety of the patients. Lung recruitment and improvement in ventilation/perfusion mismatch on prone position may both contribute to improve oxygenation. PP may therefore be efficient to hasten the weaning of VV-ECMO when atelectasis and ventilation/perfusion mismatch occur under ultra-protective ventilation even in patients in whom pre-ECMO PP failed. In addition, it could also enhance ventilator induced lung injury prevention on ECMO.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
ARDS
Keywords
ECMO Weaning, PRONING

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
170 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Prone positionning
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Supine position
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Prone positionning
Intervention Description
4 to 5 persons required for the procedure, one of them being dedicated to the management of the head of the patient, the endotracheal tube, the jugular ECMO cannula and the ventilator lines and another dedicated to the femoral ECMO cannula. The person at the head of the bed will coordinate the steps. The other persons will stand at each side of the bed. The direction of the rotation will be decided giving priority to the side of the central venous lines. The length of vascular and ventilator lines will be checked for appropriateness, the endotracheal tube and gastric tube will be secured, and the patient's knees, forehead, chest, and iliac crests will be protected using adhesive pads. The patient will be then moved along the horizontal plane to the opposite side of the bed selected for the direction of rotation. Patients will be proned at least four times during the first days on ECMO. Each prone session will stand for at least 16 hours
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Supine position
Intervention Description
Patients assigned to supine will remain in a semi-recumbent position.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to successful ECMO weaning within the 60 days following randomization
Description
ECMO weaning will be considered successful only if the patient survives without ECMO, or lung transplantation 30 days after ECMO removal. Thus all ECMO weaning from randomization to 60 days after randomization will be considered, and the qualification for successful ECMO weaning will need 30 days of follow-up after ECMO removal (thus until day 90 after randomization for an ECMO weaning performed on day 60 after randomization). Patients still under ECMO 60 days after randomization will be censored. A protocolized management regarding weaning of VV-ECMO will be applied to both groups The planned analysis will model the risk of successful ECMO ablation in the presence of competing risk (death and weaning failure).
Time Frame
Day 60
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mortality
Time Frame
Day 7, Day 14, Day 30, Day 60, Day 90
Title
Total duration of ECMO support
Time Frame
Between inclusion visit (day 1) and day 60, Between inclusion visit and day 90,
Title
Number of ECMO-free days
Time Frame
Between day 1 and Day 60/Day 90
Title
Duration of ICU stay
Time Frame
Between day 1 and Day 60/Day 90
Title
Duration of hospitalization
Time Frame
Between day 1 and Day 60/Day 90
Title
Time to improvement in respiratory respiratory system compliance
Time Frame
Through study completion
Title
Time to get a respiratory system compliance > 30 mL/cmH2O
Time Frame
Between day 1 and Day 60/Day 90
Title
Number of days with organ failure
Description
defined by SOFA score
Time Frame
Between day 1 and Day 60
Title
Number of days alive without organ failure
Description
defined by SOFA score
Time Frame
Between day 1 and Day 60
Title
Number of ventilator assist pneumonia, bacteriemia, and cannula infection episodes
Time Frame
Through study completion
Title
Number of days with hemodynamic support with catecholamines
Time Frame
Between day 1 and Day 60
Title
Number of days alive without hemodynamic support with catecholamines
Time Frame
Between day 1 and Day 60
Title
Number of days with mechanical ventilation
Time Frame
Between day 1 and Day 60
Title
Number of days alive without mechanical ventilation
Time Frame
Between day 1 and Day 60
Title
Acute core pulmonale diagnosis
Description
by echocardiography
Time Frame
Between day 1 and D60
Title
Need for VA ECMO
Time Frame
Between day 1 and Day 60/Day 90
Title
Incidence of intervention side effects
Description
(accidental decannulation, non-scheduled extubation during the procedure, hemoptysis, endotracheal tube obstruction, cardiac arrest, pressure sore, and death
Time Frame
Between day 1 and Day 60
Title
Occurrence of refractory hypoxemia on ECMO
Time Frame
Through study completion, an average of 3 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Severe ARDS refractory to conventional therapy placed on VV-ECMO support in the preceding 48h. Obtain informed consent from a close relative or surrogate. According to the specifications of emergency consent, randomization without the close relative or surrogate consent could be performed. Close relative/surrogate/family consent will be asked as soon as possible. The patient will be asked to give his/her consent for the continuation of the trial when his/her condition will allow. Social security registration Exclusion Criteria: Age <18 and >75 Pregnancy and breastfeeding woman Initiation of VV-ECMO >48 h Resuscitation >10 minutes before ECMO Irreversible neurological pathology End-stage chronic lung disease ARDS secondary to an abdominal surgery Contraindications for PP Irreversible ARDS with no hope for lung function recovery Patient moribund on the day of randomization, SAPS II >90 Liver cirrhosis (Child B or C) Chronic renal failure requiring hemodialysis Lung transplantation Burns on more than 20 % of the body surface
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75013
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

PRONing to Facilitate Weaning From ECMO in Patients With Refractory Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs