search
Back to results

Non Pain Contingent Spine Rehabilitation Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain

Primary Purpose

Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Pakistan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
NCSR Program
conventional physical therapy
Sponsored by
Riphah International University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Low Back Pain focused on measuring Low Back Pain, Non Pain Contingent Spine Rehabilitation

Eligibility Criteria

35 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with non-specific chronic low back pain(>3months)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Spinal surgery
  • Compression Fracture
  • Disc Herniation
  • Cauda equina
  • Pregnancy
  • Cancer
  • Progressive neurological disorder
  • Any Psychological disorder

Sites / Locations

  • Pakistan Railway General Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

NCSR Program

Conventional Physical therapy

Arm Description

Non Pain Contingent Spinal Rehabilitation

Conventional Physical Therapy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Visual Analog Scale
Visual analogue scale (VAS) is a simple and frequently used method for the assessment of variations in intensity of pain. The VAS consists of a 10cm horizontal line with the words "no pain" and "worst pain" at the line's end. VAS is a reliable and valid tool to reliable and valid tool to measure pain intensity measure pain intensity. Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week
Functional Disability: Oswestry Disability Index
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the most commonly used outcome measures for the evaluation and treatment of LBP and it is valid, reliable. Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Lumbar Range of Motion
Bubble Inclinometer. Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week
Shirado test: to assess isometric endurance of trunk flexors
To evaluate "flexor endurance" Patient in supine position asked to raise the lower extremities with 90 degrees flexion at hip and knee joint and also maintain cervical flexion, maintain this position for at least 5 minutes. Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week
Ito test: to evaluate isometric endurance of trunk extensors
To measure "extensor endurance" patient in prone position holding sternum off the treatment table and a small pillow below abdomen to decrease lordosis; and maintaining cervical flexion with pelvic stabilization and gluteal contraction maintain this position for 5 minutes. Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week
Lifting endurance
Progressive Iso inertial lifting evaluation(PILE). Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week
Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire
Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ). Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week

Full Information

First Posted
November 1, 2020
Last Updated
December 25, 2020
Sponsor
Riphah International University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04619134
Brief Title
Non Pain Contingent Spine Rehabilitation Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain
Official Title
Effects of Non Pain Contingent Spine Rehabilitation Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 20, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 20, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Riphah International University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of study is to determine effects of non pain contingent spine rehabilitation in chronic low back pain.A Randomized controlled trial will be conducted at Railway general hospital. Sample size will be 32.Participants will be divided in two groups, 16 participants in group A will receive Non pain contingent spine rehabilitation (NCSR) therapy and 16 Group B will receive conventional physical therapy. The study duration will be six months. Purposive non probability sampling technique will be applied.
Detailed Description
Low back pain is defined as pain and discomfort below the costal margin and above the inferior gluteal folds. It has different characteristics such as aching, burning, stabbing, sharp or dull, well-defined, or vague. Low back pain may have intensity varying from mild to severe . Low back pain (LBP) causes more disability than any other medical condition worldwide Low Back Pain has a significant impact on functional capacity, as pain restricts occupational activities and is a major cause of absenteeism. Chronic low Back pain is defined as chronic when pain remains for more than three months it has different characteristics. Many authors define chronic pain as pain that lasts beyond the expected period of healing. Low back pain is classified and treated according to duration of symptoms, cause, absence or presence of radiculopathy and associated anatomical and radiographic changes. Symptoms persisting for less than 4 weeks is defined as acute low back pain and in sub-acute low back pain symptoms lasts for 4-12 weeks, chronic low back pain lasts for more than 12 weeks. Back pain can also be categorized into specific and nonspecific back pain, Specific back pain has a specific cause for example fracture and infection etc. and nonspecific is of unknown etiology. Non-specific pain is most common type of back pain. The prevalence of low back pain has been reported among many people especially when resulting from work related and occupational activities 75-84% of the general population suffer from low back pain and among them, it is estimated that 5-10% of the people experience LBP resulting in severe morbidity, increased health care costs, sick leaves and individual suffering. Men and women are equally reported to be affected by this condition. Core muscles maintain spinal stability, first group include deep core muscles also called local stabilizing muscles primarily include the transversus abdominis, lumbar multifidus, internal oblique muscle and quadratus lumborum. Second group include shallow core muscles, also known as global stabilizing muscles, including the rectus abdominis, internal and external oblique muscles, erector spinae, quadratus lumborum, and hip muscles. The causes of chronic low back pain are complex, several of which are unknown one major cause involves the weakening of the shallow trunk and abdominal muscle, another cause of chronic low back pain is the weakening of deep trunk muscles, such as the lumbar multifidus and transversus abdominis. Patients usually experience pain during lifting it leads to avoidance behavior and cause disability. Less intensive and cost effective non pain contingent rehabilitation therapy could target fear avoidance behavior toward lifting and in restoration of normal function. In female patients with chronic low back pain, Primary outcome measures were recorded by visual analogue scale (VAS) and oswestry disability index (ODI) .Patterns of improvement suggested that the Non pain Contingent Spinal Rehabilitation approach is more effective than Conventional Physical Therapy in female patients with chronic low back pain. It is feasible to adapt progressive Isoinertial lifting evaluation for determining the lifting capacity, it is a valid and reliable method. Lumbar dynamic strengthening exercises are beneficial in the treatment of chronic nonspecific LBP for reduction of pain, improvement in functional ability, increase range of motion and improve core strength. Exercise intervention programs involving either muscular strength, flexibility or aerobic fitness is beneficial for nonspecific chronic low back pain. Effects of lumbar stabilization exercise on functional disability and lumbar lordosis angle in patients with chronic low back pain in 2015 Lumbar stabilization exercise and conservative program were performed 3 times a week for 6 weeks and he reported that lumbar stabilization exercise is more effective than conservative treatment for improving functional disability and lumbar lordosis angle, and significant decrease in Oswestry disability index score. Comparative effect of core muscles strength training with supine bridging over prone bridging in patients with nonspecific low back pain and concluded that prone bridging exercise is more effective in improvement of functional activities and reducing pain than supine bridging exercise program in nonspecific low back pain. Effectiveness of core stabilization exercises and routine exercise therapy in management of pain in chronic non-specific low back pain" in which he reported that Core stabilization exercise is more effective than routine physical therapy exercise in terms of greater reduction in pain in patients with non-specific low back pain. In 2013 The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of core stabilization exercises in comparison with conventional exercises on pain, functional status in patients with non-specific LBP and they concluded Core stabilization exercises found to be more effective in reducing pain and improving functional status by decreasing disability of patients with non-specific low back pain in comparison with conventional exercises. Progressive Isoinertial Lift Evaluation (PILE) method was developed by Mayer et al.in PILE protocol describes it as lifting of weight in a box from floor to waist (lumbar test) or from floor to shoulder height (cervical test) at a rate of four lifts in a 20 second interval.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Low Back Pain
Keywords
Low Back Pain, Non Pain Contingent Spine Rehabilitation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
32 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
NCSR Program
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Non Pain Contingent Spinal Rehabilitation
Arm Title
Conventional Physical therapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Conventional Physical Therapy
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
NCSR Program
Intervention Description
flexibility exercise,strengthening exercise,dynamic strengthening exercise,endurance training,counselling session
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
conventional physical therapy
Intervention Description
hot pack,flexibility training,strengthening exercise.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual Analog Scale
Description
Visual analogue scale (VAS) is a simple and frequently used method for the assessment of variations in intensity of pain. The VAS consists of a 10cm horizontal line with the words "no pain" and "worst pain" at the line's end. VAS is a reliable and valid tool to reliable and valid tool to measure pain intensity measure pain intensity. Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week
Time Frame
6th week
Title
Functional Disability: Oswestry Disability Index
Description
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is one of the most commonly used outcome measures for the evaluation and treatment of LBP and it is valid, reliable. Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week
Time Frame
6th week
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Lumbar Range of Motion
Description
Bubble Inclinometer. Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week
Time Frame
6th week
Title
Shirado test: to assess isometric endurance of trunk flexors
Description
To evaluate "flexor endurance" Patient in supine position asked to raise the lower extremities with 90 degrees flexion at hip and knee joint and also maintain cervical flexion, maintain this position for at least 5 minutes. Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week
Time Frame
6th week
Title
Ito test: to evaluate isometric endurance of trunk extensors
Description
To measure "extensor endurance" patient in prone position holding sternum off the treatment table and a small pillow below abdomen to decrease lordosis; and maintaining cervical flexion with pelvic stabilization and gluteal contraction maintain this position for 5 minutes. Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week
Time Frame
6th week
Title
Lifting endurance
Description
Progressive Iso inertial lifting evaluation(PILE). Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week
Time Frame
6th week
Title
Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire
Description
Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ). Changes from the baseline will be measured and at 4th week and then at 6th week
Time Frame
6th week

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient with non-specific chronic low back pain(>3months) Exclusion Criteria: Spinal surgery Compression Fracture Disc Herniation Cauda equina Pregnancy Cancer Progressive neurological disorder Any Psychological disorder
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maria Khalid, MSOMPT
Organizational Affiliation
Riphah International University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Pakistan Railway General Hospital
City
Rawalpindi
State/Province
Punjab
ZIP/Postal Code
46000
Country
Pakistan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27417610
Citation
Gordon R, Bloxham S. A Systematic Review of the Effects of Exercise and Physical Activity on Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain. Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Apr 25;4(2):22. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4020022.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28192789
Citation
Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians; Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Fitterman N, Harris RP, Humphrey LL, Vijan S. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26000680
Citation
Nijs J, Apeldoorn A, Hallegraeff H, Clark J, Smeets R, Malfliet A, Girbes EL, De Kooning M, Ickmans K. Low back pain: guidelines for the clinical classification of predominant neuropathic, nociceptive, or central sensitization pain. Pain Physician. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):E333-46.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25931693
Citation
Chang WD, Lin HY, Lai PT. Core strength training for patients with chronic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):619-22. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.619. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29114516
Citation
Bhadauria EA, Gurudut P. Comparative effectiveness of lumbar stabilization, dynamic strengthening, and Pilates on chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial. J Exerc Rehabil. 2017 Aug 29;13(4):477-485. doi: 10.12965/jer.1734972.486. eCollection 2017 Aug.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26180363
Citation
Cho I, Jeon C, Lee S, Lee D, Hwangbo G. Effects of lumbar stabilization exercise on functional disability and lumbar lordosis angle in patients with chronic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jun;27(6):1983-5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.1983. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29067082
Citation
Akhtar MW, Karimi H, Gilani SA. Effectiveness of core stabilization exercises and routine exercise therapy in management of pain in chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Jul-Aug;33(4):1002-1006. doi: 10.12669/pjms.334.12664.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23411647
Citation
Inani SB, Selkar SP. Effect of core stabilization exercises versus conventional exercises on pain and functional status in patients with non-specific low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-0348.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8554479
Citation
Ito T, Shirado O, Suzuki H, Takahashi M, Kaneda K, Strax TE. Lumbar trunk muscle endurance testing: an inexpensive alternative to a machine for evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Jan;77(1):75-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90224-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22588748
Citation
Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8725925
Citation
Saur PM, Ensink FB, Frese K, Seeger D, Hildebrandt J. Lumbar range of motion: reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Jun 1;21(11):1332-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199606010-00011.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16805041
Citation
Williamson E. Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Aust J Physiother. 2006;52(2):149. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(06)70052-6. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21597108
Citation
Jensen LD, Maribo T, Schiottz-Christensen B, Madsen FH, Gonge B, Christensen M, Frost P. Counselling low-back-pain patients in secondary healthcare: a randomised trial addressing experienced workplace barriers and physical activity. Occup Environ Med. 2012 Jan;69(1):21-8. doi: 10.1136/oem.2010.064055. Epub 2011 May 19.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Non Pain Contingent Spine Rehabilitation Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs