search
Back to results

Needlescopic Inversion and Snaring of Hernia in Girls

Primary Purpose

Inguinal Hernia, Polyps, Fallopian Tube Injury

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Egypt
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Inversion and snaring
Sponsored by
Al-Azhar University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Inguinal Hernia

Eligibility Criteria

6 Months - 10 Years (Child)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral congenital inguinal hernia Unilateral congenital inguinal hernia Hernia defect siameter less than 1.5 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent hernia age less than 6 Month Contraindication to laparoscopy

Sites / Locations

  • Rafik Sahalaby
  • Rafik Shalaby

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Inversion and Snaring

Arm Description

needlescopic inversion, snaring, and excision of the hernia sac using two Suture Grasper Sevice of Mediflex Company and a home made snare

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Recurrence of Hernia
All patients were examined clinical and by U/S for detection of the recurrence

Secondary Outcome Measures

Operative time
The operative time will be measured by minutes from the start of skin incision to the end of operation

Full Information

First Posted
May 15, 2020
Last Updated
November 11, 2020
Sponsor
Al-Azhar University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04628455
Brief Title
Needlescopic Inversion and Snaring of Hernia in Girls
Official Title
Needlescopic Inversion and Snaring for Inguinal Hernia in Girls Using 1.6-mm Instruments
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Al-Azhar University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Two Millimetres needlescopic instruments induce minimal damage to the abdominal wall and have excellent cosmetic results. However, these instruments are fragile and expensive with short weak jaws. The aim of this study is to present a novel needlescopic approach using 1.6-mm Suture Grasper Device [SGD], modified polypectomy snare and a home-made Snare (HMS) for the treatment of congenital inguinal hernias [CIH] in girls. Over a period of one year from March 2018 to March 2019 a prospective study was conducted in three tertiary centres on 53 girls presented with CIH. Preoperative inguinoscrotal U/S was done for all patients to confirm the diagnosis and to measure the diameter of internal inguinal ring [IIR]. All patients were repaired using needlescopic inversion and snaring of the hernia sac using 2-SGDs and a snare. Follow up period ranged from 12 to 24 (Median 16.5) months. Fifty-three girls with 74 hernias were included in this study. Their mean age was 37.8 months. Internal inguinal ring diameter (IIR) ranged between 8-15 mm with a mean of 11.8±2.8mm. Mean operative time was 15.5 minutes in bilateral and 11.4 minutes in unilateral cases. Mean operative time for inversion, snaring, and sac extraction was 4.2±1.3 minutes. All cases were completed successfully without conversion and without complications. Follow up period ranged from 12 to 24 (Median 16.5) months with non-visible scar and no recurrence among the studied patients. Needlescopic inversion and snaring of inguinal hernia using 1.6mm instruments is a safe, rapid and feasible method for CIH repair in girls with invisible scar and no short-term recurrence.
Detailed Description
Operative details: Patient lies in supine position at upper part of OR table towards right edge. Operating table is tilted to opposite side of hernia with 30-degree Trendelenburg position. Operator stands on patient's right side during either uni-or bi-lateral hernia. Camera man stands at table head and monitor facing patient's feet. Vertical trans umbilical 5-mm incision [Point A] was made and 5-mm trocar passed under vision using open technique. Pneumoperitoneum is then established with CO2 flow of 1.5-2.5 L/min keeping intraabdominal pressure between 8-12 mmHg according to patients' age and weight. Early in our experience, a two-mm incision is done at a point located midway between umbilicus and symphysis pubis [point B] for 2-mm port passed under direct vision and a tiny 11-blade scalpel puncture was done at the corresponding Mac-Burney's [Point C] for SGD. Abdomen was then explored to confirm the diagnosis and detect contralateral or other hernias if present. One SGD was introduced through point B (SGD-B) and another one through point C (SGD-C). Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac by gradual sustained alternating traction on the round ligament. Each SGD hands to the other one till complete inversion occurs, this is known by the hernial sac hanging from internal ring without retracting-back inside the inguinal canal. Occasionally, investigators had to fix the sac to the anterior abdominal wall by a suture [Prolne 2/0 on a half circle 20-mm needle] placed percutaneously lateral to the corresponding Mac-Berney's point to prevent its retraction. Then, the MPS was introduced via the trocar at point B and opened inside the abdomen and SGD-C passed inside the loop of MPS and re-catches the hernial sac, which is then twisted around its neck several times. MPS was closed tightly at the proper neck and coagulation diathermy current is applied to it leading to separation of the hernia sac. Detached sac (grasped by SGD-C) was then pushed antegradely out through the umbilical port. In some cases, the Fallopian's tube was closely related to the round ligament and investigators had to divide the round ligament with the long microdiathermy needle introduced directly via point B before hernia sac snaring to avoid its injury during the application of MPS. Deflation of the abdomen is done, and umbilical fascial incision is closed using 2/0 or 3/0 Polygalctin suture and umbilical skin layers were closed using 4/0 Polygalctin suture. Later in the study, we were able to innovate a HMS by using the guide wire of central venous catheter looped through VAC and connected to a regular diathermy probe and investigators modified our technique. An11-blade scalpel puncture is done at point-B through which VAC is introduced directly instead of 2-mm trocar. This VAC is used for the insertion of HMS and SGD-B. Then, complete inversion of the sac was done using 2 SGDs as previously described. Followed by introduction of HMS through #14-G VAC at point-B and the procedure completed as before. Postoperative Management: Patients received antibiotics and analgesics according to hospital protocols. Oral fluids started 2 hours post operatively and diet was advanced gradually as tolerated. Patients were discharged the same post-operative day. Follow up period ranged from 12 to 24 (Median 16.5) months. with for recurrence and cosmetic results. Discussion: In the last 2 decades, pediatric inguinal hernia repair witnessed a huge evolution with laparoscopic approaches attracting more and more pediatric surgeons and laparoscopic hernia repair became well-established and popular technique with comparable recurrence rates and operative time. Moreover, laparoscopy allows diagnosis of contralateral and other coexisting hernia with a chance for simultaneous repair. Early in the laparoscopic era, its drawbacks were long learning curve, need for smaller instruments for younger kids, higher recurrence rates, and to somewhat smaller but visible scars compared to conventional open hernia repair. With time, regular use of laparoscopy, fine instruments, introduction of newer concepts and techniques for tailoring which laparoscopic technique fits for each patient the results came to be similar or even better than that of conventional repair. Laparoscopy for female inguinal hernia repair was first introduced in 1997 by El Gohary. He described hernial sac inversion and ligation in girls using 5-mm instruments and endo loop with excellent results. During the evolution of laparoscopic repair of hernia, results improved very much by cautery of the IIR enhancing peritoneal fibrosis hence reducing recurrence rates compared to simple peritoneal closure. Snaring is routinely used for colonic polypectomy with excision of polyps at its proper neck using coagulation current without colonic wall perforation. In this study it is proposed that inversion and snaring of the hernia sac results in a herniotomy with narrow raw area at its neck of the hernia sac combining the benefits of both peritoneal disconnection and thermal injury to prevent recurrence. Recently there is a report of early results of inversion, and snaring of hernial sac using 3-mm instruments and commercial polypectomy snare in girls with encouraging results and no recurrence. On application of monopolar diathermy current to the snare itself, the hernial sac will shrink with almost closure of internal ring. No recurrence was reported with no perioperative complications except for lymphocele developed at the level of labium major 2 weeks postoperatively that completely resolved after 6 months. Commercially available polypectomy snare length is 230-cm which imposed discomfort and difficulty using it for hernial sac snaring. So, investigators opted to shorten it from 230-cm to 50 cm to facilitate its usage. The biomedical engineering department was contacted and succeeded to shorten it to the required length. In this study, in the first 2 months investigator used this modified snare successfully but it is still not fully satisfied as it adds extra cost [needs 2-mm trocar for insertion], needs technical assistance for shortening and re-sterilization. Investigator came into another innovation by developing a home-made snare (HMS) made of central venous catheter guide wire looped through VAC and connected to a regular diathermy probe. Each wire can be cut to make 2-3 snares. It is shorter, easy to use, cheaper and avoided the use of expensive trocar 2-mm. This HMS was then applied for all upcoming cases after that. It is well known that, one of the most annoying factors lead to delayed acceptance of laparoscopic repair for CIH among pediatric surgeons is visible scars even though they are smaller compared to the hidden skin crease scar of the open repair which ultimately resulted in development of needlescopic repair. Chock et al. reported that despite good cosmetic results, 2-mm instruments are expensive, delicate, flexible, and with short and weak jaws limiting their use on a wide scale. Others reported that needlescopic instruments can be used only by expert surgeons as it can be bended easily and its small jaws limit the power of grasping the tissue with unsuitability for ideal retraction and tissue handling. In contrary, SGD used for port closure is only 1.6 mm in diameter with adequate length, strong shaft, ergonomic handle, cheap, wide jaw and offers a very good tissue grip. According to the results of this study, needlescopic inversion, snaring and complete excision of the hernia is a progress of minilaparoscopic surgery where two MSDs [1.6-mm diameter] were used instead of 2-3-mm instruments for the treatment of CIH in girls. It avoids the disadvantages of 2-mm instruments.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Inguinal Hernia, Polyps, Fallopian Tube Injury, Round Ligament; Anomaly

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac by gradual sustained alternating traction on the round ligament. Each SGD hands to the other one till complete inversion occurs, this is known by the hernial sac hanging from internal ring without retracting-back inside the inguinal canal. . SGD-C passed inside the loop of MPS and re-catches the hernial sac, which is then twisted around its neck several times. MPS is closed tightly at the proper neck and coagulation diathermy current is applied.Detached sac was then pushed antigradely out through the umbilical port.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
53 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Inversion and Snaring
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
needlescopic inversion, snaring, and excision of the hernia sac using two Suture Grasper Sevice of Mediflex Company and a home made snare
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Inversion and snaring
Intervention Description
Vertical umbilical 5-mm incision was made for 5-mm trocar. Pneumoperitoneum is then established with CO2 flow of 1.5-2.5 L/min keeping intraabdominal pressure between 8-12 mmHg. A two-mm incision was done at a point B [midway between umbilicus and symphysis pubis] for 2-mm port passed under direct vision and a tiny 11-blade scalpel puncture is done at the corresponding Mac-Burney's [Point C] for SGD. Both SGDs were used to invert the hernia sac by gradual sustained alternating traction on the round ligament. Each SGD hands to the other one till complete inversion occurs, this is known by the hernial sac hanging from internal ring without retracting-back inside the inguinal canal. Then, the MPS is introduced via 2-mm trocar at point. SGD-C passed inside the loop of MPS and re-catches the hernial sac, which is then twisted around its neck several times. MPS was closed at the neck and diathermy current is applied. Detached sac was then pushed antigradely out through the umbilical port.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recurrence of Hernia
Description
All patients were examined clinical and by U/S for detection of the recurrence
Time Frame
every month up to one year postoperative
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Operative time
Description
The operative time will be measured by minutes from the start of skin incision to the end of operation
Time Frame
every minute up to 2 hours (the end of the surgery)

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Gender Based
Yes
Gender Eligibility Description
Bilateral inguinal hernia, Unilateral inguinal hernia
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Months
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
10 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Bilateral congenital inguinal hernia Unilateral congenital inguinal hernia Hernia defect siameter less than 1.5 mm Exclusion Criteria: Recurrent hernia age less than 6 Month Contraindication to laparoscopy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rafik Y Shalaby, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Al-Azhar University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rafik Sahalaby
City
Cairo
Country
Egypt
Facility Name
Rafik Shalaby
City
Cairo
Country
Egypt

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25106720
Citation
McClain L, Streck C, Lesher A, Cina R, Hebra A. Laparoscopic needle-assisted inguinal hernia repair in 495 children. Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):781-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3739-8. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9802799
Citation
Schier F. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in girls. J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Oct;33(10):1495-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90483-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32216722
Citation
Wang K, Cai J, Lu YC, Li XW, Zhai GM, He WB, Guo XS, Wu GQ. A Faster and Simpler Operation Method for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Jun;30(6):706-711. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0598. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31292721
Citation
Kantor N, Travis N, Wayne C, Nasr A. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in children: which is the true gold-standard? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2019 Sep;35(9):1013-1026. doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04521-1. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29166678
Citation
Chan IH, Tam PK. Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Infants and Children: State-of-the-Art Technique. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Dec;27(6):465-471. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608685. Epub 2017 Nov 22. No abstract available.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28025693
Citation
Gause CD, Casamassima MGS, Yang J, Hsiung G, Rhee D, Salazar JH, Papandria D, Pryor HI 2nd, Stewart D, Lukish J, Colombani P, Chandler NM, Johnson E, Abdullah F. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair in children </=3: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 Mar;33(3):367-376. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-4029-4. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29021976
Citation
Barroso C, Etlinger P, Alves AL, Osorio A, Carvalho JL, Lamas-Pinheiro R, Correia-Pinto J. Learning Curves for Laparoscopic Repair of Inguinal Hernia and Communicating Hydrocele in Children. Front Pediatr. 2017 Sep 27;5:207. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00207. eCollection 2017.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17362194
Citation
Zallen G, Glick PL. Laparoscopic inversion and ligation inguinal hernia repair in girls. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 Feb;17(1):143-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2006.0553.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20367121
Citation
Guner YS, Emami CN, Chokshi NK, Wang K, Shin CE. Inversion herniotomy: a laparoscopic technique for female inguinal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010 Jun;20(5):481-4. doi: 10.1089/lap.2009.0169.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25941750
Citation
Xi HW, Duan WQ, Cui QQ, You ZH, Zhao Z, Zhang P. Transumbilical Single-Site Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Inversion and Ligation in Girls. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Jun;25(6):522-5. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0383. Epub 2015 May 5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24625350
Citation
Ostlie DJ, Ponsky TA. Technical options of the laparoscopic pediatric inguinal hernia repair. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Mar;24(3):194-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0081.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20620347
Citation
Lipskar AM, Soffer SZ, Glick RD, Rosen NG, Levitt MA, Hong AR. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia inversion and ligation in female children: a review of 173 consecutive cases at a single institution. J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jun;45(6):1370-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.113.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29980220
Citation
Chen YN, Chang LC, Chang CY, Chen PJ, Chen CY, Tseng CH, Chiu HM. Comparison of cold and hot snaring polypectomy for small colorectal polyps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Jul 6;19(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2743-z.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22989037
Citation
Blatnik JA, Harth KC, Krpata DM, Kelly KB, Schomisch SJ, Ponsky TA. Stitch versus scar--evaluation of laparoscopic pediatric inguinal hernia repair: a pilot study in a rabbit model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012 Oct;22(8):848-51. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0137. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31129795
Citation
Shalaby R, Elsaied A, Shehata S, Shehata S, Hamed A, Alsamahy O, Ashour Y, Elsayaad I, Shahin M. Needlescopic assisted internal ring suturing; a novel application of low-cost home-made instruments for pediatric inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1279-1289. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01982-0. Epub 2019 May 25.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28358588
Citation
Novotny NM, Puentes MC, Leopold R, Ortega M, Godoy-Lenz J. The Burnia: Laparoscopic Sutureless Inguinal Hernia Repair in Girls. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Apr;27(4):430-433. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0234. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29501237
Citation
St-Louis E, Chabot A, Stagg H, Baird R. Experience with peritoneal thermal injury during subcutaneous endoscopically assisted ligation for pediatric inguinal hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2018 May;53(5):968-972. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.024. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12811662
Citation
Chock A, Seslar S, Stoopen E, Tristan A, Hashish H, Gonzalez JJ, Franklin ME Jr. Needlescopic appendectomy. Surg Endosc. 2003 Sep;17(9):1451-3. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8732-y. Epub 2003 Jun 19.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22223115
Citation
Wada H, Kimura T, Kawabe A, Sato M, Miyaki Y, Tochikubo J, Inamori K, Shiiya N. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair using needlescopic instruments: a 15-year, single-center experience in 317 patients. Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):1898-902. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2122-2. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
9880727
Citation
Schier F. Laparoscopic appendectomy with 1.7-mm instruments. Pediatr Surg Int. 1998 Nov;14(1-2):142-3. doi: 10.1007/s003830050465.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30827487
Citation
Shalaby R, Abdalrazek M, Hamed A, Elhady S, Ibrahim R, Shahin M, Helal A, Elsaied A, Mohamad S, Mahfouz M, Elsherbeny M, El-Lithy MM. Novel application of the sewing machine principle; a new simplified intracorporeal suturing technique for pediatric inguinal hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Jul;54(7):1505-1509. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.01.054. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Needlescopic Inversion and Snaring of Hernia in Girls

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs