search
Back to results

Clinical Trial With Artiflex Presbyopic

Primary Purpose

Presbyopia, Ametropia, Refractive Errors

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Artiflex Presbyopic implantation
Sponsored by
Ophtec BV
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Presbyopia focused on measuring Artiflex, iris-fixated, phakic intraocular lens, PIOL, Ophtec

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presbyopic adult
  • Potential for binocular vision
  • Subject wishes to be spectacle independent for near and far vision
  • Refractive error that can be corrected with correction at PIOL plane from +2.0 to -15.0 D
  • Subject requiring a presbyopic correction
  • A distance corrected near visual acuity of 20/60 or worse (0.48 LogMAR or higher)
  • Stable refraction (±0.75 D), as expressed by manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) for a minimum of 12 months prior to surgery, verified by consecutive refractions and/or medical records or prescription history
  • Expected best-corrected visual acuity of 0.2 logMAR (0.63 Snellen decimal) or better after lens implantation
  • Current contact lens wearer should demonstrate stable refraction (± 0.5 D), expressed as subjective refraction spherical equivalent, on two consecutive examination dates performed at least 7 days apart. Before the first refraction, the contact lens wearer should not have worn lenses for at least 2 weeks in case of rigid and toric contact lenses, or 3 days for spherical soft contact lenses.
  • Any subject, who is expected to have a residual postoperative cylindrical refractive error of below 0.75 D
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • Availability, willingness and sufficient cognitive awareness and physical ability to comply with examination procedures throughout the entire duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

Pre-existing pathology or physiology which may be aggravated by the implant or where the implant may interfere with the possibility of examining or treating the disease:

  • Preoperative ocular or systemic condition or medication use that would be expected to present an undue risk to the subject, that can predispose for future complications or confound the outcome(s) of the study. E.g. the systemic use of alpha-1a adrenergic receptor antagonists was suggested to increase the occurrence of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome, alter iris morphology - or more specifically reduce iris thickness at the site of potential IOL enclavation - and increase postoperative endothelial cell loss.
  • Previous ocular surgery which might affect the outcome of the study
  • Concurrent participation or participation during the last 30 days in another drug or device investigation
  • Subjects with a distance corrected near visual acuity of better than 20/60 or 0.48 LogMAR.
  • Preoperative subjective astigmatism exceeding 1.0 D
  • Secondary surgical procedure planned during the first 6 months of the study (e.g. laser treatment to correct astigmatism)
  • Amblyopia
  • Preoperative anterior chamber depth measurement of below 3.0 mm from corneal endothelium to the anterior pole of the crystalline lens. This will result in a critical distance between PIOL and endothelium of 1.5 mm or more as simulated with anterior segment imaging.
  • White-to-white smaller than 10.5 mm
  • Subjects not meeting the age specific minimum preoperative endothelial cell density as defined below:

    31 to 35 years of age 2400 cells/mm2; 36 to 45 years of age 2200 cells/mm2; > 45 years of age 2000 cells/mm2

  • Corneas with high rates of polymegethism (a coefficient of variation over 0.40) and pleomorphism (the presence of less than 50% hexagonal cells).
  • Abnormal iris (e.g. convex, bulging or volcano shaped iris)
  • Crystalline lens rise of 600 µm or more
  • Abnormal cornea (keratoconus, opaque cornea, corneal scars, post corneal transplant, corneal dystrophy, or other)
  • Ocular surface conditions which might influence the quality of vision and affect the outcome of the study
  • Abnormal pupil (e.g. nonreactive, fixed)
  • Ectopic pupil
  • Pupil in photopic light conditions smaller than 2.6 mm
  • Pupil in scotopic light conditions greater than 7.0 mm
  • High preoperative intraocular pressure (>21 mm Hg)
  • Cataract of any grade
  • Glaucoma or family history of glaucoma
  • Diabetes or diabetic retinopathy
  • Acute or chronic inflammation
  • Chronic or recurrent uveitis or family history of the same condition
  • Retinal detachments or family history of retinal detachments
  • Corticosteroid responder
  • Pregnant or nursing
  • Aged under 18

Sites / Locations

  • Nune Eye Hospital SeoulRecruiting
  • GM st. Mary's Eye clinicRecruiting
  • Seoul ST. Mary's HospitalRecruiting
  • SU Yonsei Eye ClinicRecruiting
  • Nune Eye Hospital DaeguRecruiting
  • Maastricht UMC+Recruiting
  • ICQORecruiting
  • IMORecruiting
  • Instituto oftalmologico de madridRecruiting
  • Vision Diez
  • CIMORecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Artiflex Presbyopic

Arm Description

About 125 - 140 subjects will receive the Artiflex Presbyopic lens bilaterally and will be followed for a period of 3 years.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Improvement in monocular and binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA)
Percentage of eyes that achieve UNVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve UNVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Improvement in monocular and binocular corrected near visual acuity (CNVA)
Percentage of eyes that achieve CNVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve CNVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Improvement in monocular and binocular distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA)
Percentage of eyes that achieve DCNVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve DCNVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Improvement in monocular and binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA)
Percentage of eyes that achieve UIVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve UIVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Improvement in monocular and binocular distance corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA)
Percentage of eyes that achieve DCIVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve DCIVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Improvement in monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA)
Percentage of eyes that achieve UDVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve UDVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Improvement in monocular and binocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA)
Percentage of eyes that achieve CDVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve CDVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Defocus evaluation
Binocular defocus evaluation will be obtained by using the best-corrected distance refraction and then defocusing the image in 0.5 D increments from +1.5 to -5.0 D
Predictability of the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
The absolute difference between the actually obtained MRSE and the target MRSE
Predictability of the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
The percentage of eyes that achieves a MRSE of less than or equal to 0.5 D difference between the actual and target MRSE
Predictability of the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
The percentage of eyes that achieves a MRSE of less than or equal to 1.0 D difference between the actual and target MRSE
Stability of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Mean change in MRSE between visits as determined by a paired analysis
Stability of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
The percentage of eyes that achieves a change in MRSE of less than or equal to 0.5 D between two consecutive refraction measurements
Stability of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
The percentage of eyes that achieves a change in MRSE of less than or equal to 1.0 D between two consecutive refraction measurements
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Assessing the percentage of subjects who experience different visual disturbances, by means of questionnaire
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Assessing the occurrence of the different visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Assessing the severity of the different visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Assessing the bothersomeness of the different visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Assessing the time of onset of visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Satisfaction questionnaire
Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with the overall procedure Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with uncorrected near vision Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with uncorrected intermediate vision Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with uncorrected distance vision
Endothelial cell density
Comparison of the preoperative and postoperative endothelial cell density
Endothelial cell density
Endothelial cell loss over time
Endothelial cell density
Additionally, a comparison between the scientific literature reported naturally occurring endothelial cell loss over time (approx. 0.6% per year; Bourne et al., 1997) and the study observed cell loss will be performed
Adverse event (AEs) / complication rates
Cumulative numbers of adverse events, e.g. cystoid macular edema (CME), hypopyon, endophthalmitis, lens dislocation, pupillary block, retinal detachment, necessary secondary surgical interventions Cumulative numbers of adverse events persistently present, e.g. corneal stroma edema, cystoid macular edema, iritis, raised intraocular pressure (IOP) requiring treatment, lens deposits The occurrence of adverse events will be compared to and should not exceed the reference safety and performance endpoint (SPE) rates as defined by ISO 11979-7:2018, Annex E, table E.1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
October 30, 2020
Last Updated
January 5, 2023
Sponsor
Ophtec BV
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04632784
Brief Title
Clinical Trial With Artiflex Presbyopic
Official Title
Prospective Multicentre Clinical Trial With the Artiflex Presbyopic, an Iris-fixated Multifocal Intraocular Lens for the Correction of Presbyopia in Phakic Eyes
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 12, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Ophtec BV

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the multifocal Artiflex Presbyopic intraocular lens.
Detailed Description
The study is a prospective, open-label, single-arm, and multicentre clinical investigation with three years of follow-up. Artiflex Presbyopic is a phakic intraocular lens to be implanted in the anterior chamber, intended for adult subjects and indicated for the optical correction of presbyopia and spherical error requiring a correction. The results of this study will be used for CE-approval and registration as well as marketing purposes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Presbyopia, Ametropia, Refractive Errors, Myopia, Hyperopia
Keywords
Artiflex, iris-fixated, phakic intraocular lens, PIOL, Ophtec

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
140 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Artiflex Presbyopic
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
About 125 - 140 subjects will receive the Artiflex Presbyopic lens bilaterally and will be followed for a period of 3 years.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Artiflex Presbyopic implantation
Intervention Description
Implantation of iris-fixated multifocal Artiflex Presbyopic IOL
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Improvement in monocular and binocular uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA)
Description
Percentage of eyes that achieve UNVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve UNVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Improvement in monocular and binocular corrected near visual acuity (CNVA)
Description
Percentage of eyes that achieve CNVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve CNVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Improvement in monocular and binocular distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA)
Description
Percentage of eyes that achieve DCNVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve DCNVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Improvement in monocular and binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA)
Description
Percentage of eyes that achieve UIVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve UIVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Improvement in monocular and binocular distance corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA)
Description
Percentage of eyes that achieve DCIVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve DCIVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Improvement in monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA)
Description
Percentage of eyes that achieve UDVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve UDVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Improvement in monocular and binocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA)
Description
Percentage of eyes that achieve CDVA of 0.3 logMAR or better Percentage of eyes that achieve CDVA of 0.0 logMAR or better
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Defocus evaluation
Description
Binocular defocus evaluation will be obtained by using the best-corrected distance refraction and then defocusing the image in 0.5 D increments from +1.5 to -5.0 D
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Predictability of the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Description
The absolute difference between the actually obtained MRSE and the target MRSE
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Predictability of the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Description
The percentage of eyes that achieves a MRSE of less than or equal to 0.5 D difference between the actual and target MRSE
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Predictability of the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Description
The percentage of eyes that achieves a MRSE of less than or equal to 1.0 D difference between the actual and target MRSE
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Stability of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Description
Mean change in MRSE between visits as determined by a paired analysis
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Stability of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Description
The percentage of eyes that achieves a change in MRSE of less than or equal to 0.5 D between two consecutive refraction measurements
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Stability of manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE)
Description
The percentage of eyes that achieves a change in MRSE of less than or equal to 1.0 D between two consecutive refraction measurements
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Description
Assessing the percentage of subjects who experience different visual disturbances, by means of questionnaire
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Description
Assessing the occurrence of the different visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Description
Assessing the severity of the different visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Description
Assessing the bothersomeness of the different visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Evaluation of visual disturbances using a validated questionnaire
Description
Assessing the time of onset of visual disturbances by means of questionnaire
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Satisfaction questionnaire
Description
Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with the overall procedure Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with uncorrected near vision Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with uncorrected intermediate vision Percentage of subjects that is satisfied with uncorrected distance vision
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Endothelial cell density
Description
Comparison of the preoperative and postoperative endothelial cell density
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Endothelial cell density
Description
Endothelial cell loss over time
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Endothelial cell density
Description
Additionally, a comparison between the scientific literature reported naturally occurring endothelial cell loss over time (approx. 0.6% per year; Bourne et al., 1997) and the study observed cell loss will be performed
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Adverse event (AEs) / complication rates
Description
Cumulative numbers of adverse events, e.g. cystoid macular edema (CME), hypopyon, endophthalmitis, lens dislocation, pupillary block, retinal detachment, necessary secondary surgical interventions Cumulative numbers of adverse events persistently present, e.g. corneal stroma edema, cystoid macular edema, iritis, raised intraocular pressure (IOP) requiring treatment, lens deposits The occurrence of adverse events will be compared to and should not exceed the reference safety and performance endpoint (SPE) rates as defined by ISO 11979-7:2018, Annex E, table E.1
Time Frame
3 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Presbyopic adult Potential for binocular vision Subject wishes to be spectacle independent for near and far vision Refractive error that can be corrected with correction at PIOL plane from +2.0 to -15.0 D Subject requiring a presbyopic correction Patients with reading glasses of minimum +1D Stable refraction (±0.75 D), as expressed by manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE) for a minimum of 12 months prior to surgery, verified by consecutive refractions and/or medical records or prescription history Expected best-corrected visual acuity of 0.2 logMAR (0.63 Snellen decimal) or better after lens implantation Current contact lens wearer should demonstrate stable refraction (± 0.5 D), expressed as subjective refraction spherical equivalent, on two consecutive examination dates performed at least 7 days apart. Before the first refraction, the contact lens wearer should not have worn lenses for at least 2 weeks in case of rigid and toric contact lenses, or 3 days for spherical soft contact lenses. Any subject, who is expected to have a residual postoperative cylindrical refractive error of below 0.75 D Ability to give informed consent Availability, willingness and sufficient cognitive awareness and physical ability to comply with examination procedures throughout the entire duration of the study Exclusion Criteria: Pre-existing pathology or physiology which may be aggravated by the implant or where the implant may interfere with the possibility of examining or treating disease: • Preoperative ocular or systemic condition or medication use that would be expected to present undue risk to the subject, that can predispose for future complications or confound the outcome(s) of the study. E.g. the systemic use of alpha-1a adrenergic receptor antagonists was suggested to increase the occurrence of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome, alter iris morphology - or more specifically reduce iris thickness at the site of potential IOL enclavation - and increase postoperative endothelial cell loss. Previous ocular surgery which might affect the outcome of the study Concurrent participation or participation during the last 30 days in another drug or device investigation Secondary surgical procedure planned during the first 6 months of the study (e.g. laser treatment to correct astigmatism) Amblyopia Preoperative anterior chamber depth measurement of below 3.0 mm for subjects < 40 years old and 2.8 mm for subjects > 40 years old. Anterior chamber depth is being measured from corneal endothelium to the anterior pole of the crystalline lens. This will result in a critical distance between PIOL and endothelium of 1.5 mm or more as simulated with anterior segment imaging. White-to-white smaller than 10.5 mm Subjects not meeting the age specific minimum preoperative endothelial cell density as defined below: 31 to 35 years of age 2400 cells/mm2; 36 to 45 years of age 2200 cells/mm2; > 45 years of age 2000 cells/mm2 Corneas with high rates of polymegethism (a coefficient of variation over 0.40) and pleomorphism (the presence of less than 50% hexagonal cells). Abnormal iris (e.g. convex, bulging or volcano shaped iris) Crystalline lens rise of 600 μm or more Abnormal cornea (keratoconus, opaque cornea, corneal scars, post corneal transplant, corneal dystrophy, or other) Ocular surface conditions which might influence the quality of vision and affect the outcome of the study Abnormal pupil (e.g. nonreactive, fixed) Ectopic pupil Pupil in photopic light conditions smaller than 2.6 mm Pupil in scotopic light conditions greater than 7.0 mm High preoperative intraocular pressure (>21 mm Hg) Cataract of any grade Glaucoma or family history of glaucoma (dependent on the evaluation of physician) Diabetes or diabetic retinopathy Acute or chronic inflammation Chronic or recurrent uveitis or family history of the same condition Retinal detachments or family history of retinal detachments Corticosteroid responder Pregnant or nursing Aged under 18
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Erwin Bouwman, MSc
Phone
+31 (0)6 83246222
Email
study@ophtec.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Daniel Afsharzadeh, PhD
Phone
+31687226609
Email
study@ophtec.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
J. Guell, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Instituto de Microcirugía Ocular, Barcelona, Spain
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Nune Eye Hospital Seoul
City
Seul
State/Province
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jake Shon
Phone
+82-2-508-0522
Facility Name
GM st. Mary's Eye clinic
City
Busan
Country
Korea, Republic of
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jake Shon
Phone
+82-2-508-0522
Facility Name
Seoul ST. Mary's Hospital
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jake Shon
Phone
+82-2-508-0522
Facility Name
SU Yonsei Eye Clinic
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jake Shon
Phone
+82-2-508-0522
Facility Name
Nune Eye Hospital Daegu
City
Seul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jake shon
Phone
+82-10-6677-9465
Facility Name
Maastricht UMC+
City
Maastricht
State/Province
Limburg
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rudy Nuijts, Dr.
Phone
043-387 67 00
Facility Name
ICQO
City
Bilbao
State/Province
Biscay
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Juan de la Colina, Dr.
Phone
+34944 733 545
Facility Name
IMO
City
Barcelona
State/Province
Catalonia
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jose luis Guell, Dr
Phone
+34 936 42 46 62
Facility Name
Instituto oftalmologico de madrid
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mariano Royo, Dr.
Phone
91 564 99 43
Facility Name
Vision Diez
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel Casado, Dr.
Phone
+34 915 59 59 59
Facility Name
CIMO
City
Seville
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julian Cezon, Dr
Phone
+34 954 23 03 03

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Clinical Trial With Artiflex Presbyopic

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs