search
Back to results

Evaluation of Tricuspid Valve Percutaneous Repair System in the Treatment of Severe Secondary Tricuspid Disorders (TRI-FR)

Primary Purpose

Tricuspid Regurgitation

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tricuspid valve
Best medical treatment
Sponsored by
Rennes University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tricuspid Regurgitation focused on measuring secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation, least severe Tricuspid Regurgitation, symptomatic patients

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

Pre-Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Symptomatic secondary (at least) severe TR (Carpentier Type IIIB (restrictive) and / or I (tricuspid annulus dilation)) stable for at least 30 days
  3. NYHA functional class II to IV without cirrhosis and/or ascites
  4. Signs of heart failure in the previous 12-months with or without having been hospitalized
  5. Stable optimized medical and/or interventional treatment
  6. Ineligible for corrective action on the valve by surgical approach after a specialized multidisciplinary consultation ("heart team") including at least a cardio-thoracic surgeon, an interventional cardiologist, an imaging-cardiologist and an Anesthesiologist).
  7. Signature of an informed consent

    Definitive Inclusion Criteria:

  8. Central core-laboratory analysis : TR characterized before Implantation by at least one of the following criteria:

    • Regurgitation volume > 45 mL / beat
    • Surface of the regurgitant orifice > 40 mm²
    • Vena contracta> 7mm
    • Gap between leaflets ≤ 10 mm (at the presumed location of the clip)

Then after the TR severity grading; the Clinical eligibility Committee will valid the inclusion.

Non Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient treated with Mitraclip or other percutaneous approach on the mitral valve in the past 3-month
  2. Any prior tricuspid valve procedure that would interfere with placement of the Triclip device
  3. Tricuspid valve leaflet anatomy which may preclude clip implantation, proper clip positioning on the leaflets or sufficient reduction in TR. This may include:

    • Tricuspid valve anatomy not evaluable by TTE and TEE
    • Active endocarditis
    • Evidence of calcification in the grasping area
    • Evidence of stenosis (mean pressure gradient > 5 mmHg or surface area ≤1cm²
    • Presence of a severe coaptation defect (> 1cm) of the tricuspid leaflets
    • Severe leaflet defect(s) preventing proper device placement
    • Epstein anomaly - identified by having a normal annulus position while the valve leaflets are attached to the walls and septum of the right ventricle
  4. Myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery in the past 3-month
  5. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%
  6. Cardiac Resynchronization therapy for less than 3-month and patients having a TR that is clearly related to the right ventricular lead positioning
  7. Cardioversion for less than 6 weeks
  8. Life expectancy irrespective of the valvular heart disease <1 year (due to co-morbidities)
  9. Other scheduled cardiac surgery (including registration in cardiac transplant list)
  10. Coronary angioplasty in the preceding month
  11. Current infection requiring prescription of antibiotics
  12. End-stage renal failure (dialysis patient)
  13. Severe hepatic insufficiency (disruption of liver metabolism associated with coagulation disorders (factor V <50%))
  14. Stroke in the previous 3-month
  15. Uncontrolled pre- capillary pulmonary hypertension (right catheterization required) (systolic pulmonary pressure > 60 mmHg)
  16. Tricuspid prosthetic valve
  17. Pace maker lead or ICD lead that would prevent appropriate placement of the Triclips
  18. Nitinol allergy
  19. Contraindication, allergy or hypersensibility to dual anti-platelet and anticoagulant therapy
  20. Ongoing infection requiring antibiotic therapy
  21. Evidence of intra vascular or intra cardiac thrombus
  22. Patient who are included in another research protocol
  23. Protected person (adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship or supervision), person deprived of their liberty, pregnant woman, lactating woman and minor)
  24. Absence of coverage by a social security scheme

Sites / Locations

  • Service de Cardiologie AZ Sint-Jan
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
  • CHU Liège
  • CHU Amiens
  • CHU Angers
  • CHU Bordeaux - Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque
  • Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
  • CHU Lille
  • Hôpital Privé Le Bois
  • Hospices Civils de Lyon Groupement Hospitalier EST
  • APHM - Hôpital La Timone
  • Hôpital de Saint-Joseph
  • Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud Hôpital Jacques Cartier
  • Clinique du Millénaire
  • CHU Nantes - Hôtel Dieu et Hôpital Nord Laennec
  • Hôpital Bichat
  • Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
  • Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
  • CHU Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou
  • Centre Cardiologique du Nord
  • CHU La Réunion
  • CHU Saint-Etienne
  • CHU Toulouse - Hôpital Rangueil
  • Clinique Pasteur
  • CHU Tours - Hôpital Trousseau
  • Médipôle Lyon-Villeurbanne

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

Tricuspid valve

Best medical treatment

Arm Description

tricuspid valve percutaneous repair strategy with clip for the tricuspid valve

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Milton Packer clinical composite score
Milton Packer clinical composite score classifies each patient into 1 of 3 categories (improved, worsened, unchanged), and is determined aggregating evaluation functional using NYHA class, quality of life score using patient global assessment and number of major cardio-vascular events

Secondary Outcome Measures

number of participants with all-cause mortality
number of participants with tricuspid valve surgery
rate of heart failure hospitalizations
assessment of quality of life improvement
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score (KCCQ) The responses are categorized under 3 subscales (symptom burden, physical limitation and quality of life) with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The total KCCQ score represents the mean of the three subscale scores.
quality of life score
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) The responses are categorized under 3 subscales (symptom burden, physical limitation and quality of life) with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The total KCCQ score represents the mean of the three subscale scores.
quality of life score
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF)
quality of life score
EQ5D-5L The EQ-5D-5L consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system : 5 dimensions : mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. 5 levels : no problems,slight problems, moderate, problems and extreme. Each level corresponds to 1 digit number. The digits for the 5 dimensions are combined into a 5-digit number. The EQ VAS : on a vertical visual analogue scale, 100 'The best health you can imagine' 0 'The worst health you can imagine'.
quality of life score
Patient global assessment (PGA)
functional evaluation
NYHA functional class
severity of the Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR)
TR grade
walking distance
6-minute walk test
echocardiography parameters
right heart function
echocardiography parameters
right heart cavities sizes
echocardiography parameters
degree of tricuspid regurgitation
echocardiography parameters
stenosis
biological parameters
parameters renal : creatinine, clearance, AST
biological parameters
hepatic function
biological parameters
NT-proBNP
overall survival
number of cardiovascular death
number of major cardiovascular events
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio expressed as cost per QALY

Full Information

First Posted
November 10, 2020
Last Updated
May 2, 2023
Sponsor
Rennes University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04646811
Brief Title
Evaluation of Tricuspid Valve Percutaneous Repair System in the Treatment of Severe Secondary Tricuspid Disorders
Acronym
TRI-FR
Official Title
TRI-FR : Multicentric Randomized Evaluation of Tricuspid Valve Percutaneous Repair System (Clip for the Tricuspid Valve) in the Treatment of Severe Secondary Tricuspid Disorders
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
February 10, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Rennes University Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a long-overdue valvular pathology. Its prevalence is significant and increasing with the aging of the population. It is often a consequence of chronic left cardiac pathologies or atrial fibrillation. Surgical treatment is recommended in severe symptomatic TR or when the tricuspid annulus is dilated with TR identified prior to scheduled left heart valve surgery. TR are mainly secondary (complicating left heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, atrial fibrillation and atrial dilatation) and pose a difficult problem related to the prognosis. The risk of death or hospitalization is high under medical treatment. Nevertheless, the surgical results are disappointing with significant morbidity and mortality, which are increased by associated comorbidities that are frequent in these sorts of patients. The benefit-risk assessment of surgery is limited by multiple confounders. This justifies the evaluation of alternative methods aimed at correcting TR with less interventional risk. The Clip for the tricuspid valve has been evaluated in the TRILUMINATE trial (inclusion of 85 patients with moderate-to-severe symptomatic TR with a 6-month follow-up). The Triclip system appears to be safe and effective at reducing tricuspid regurgitation by at least one grade. This reduction could translate to significant clinical improvement at 6 months post-procedure. It justified the European Conformity (CE) mark obtention. A very similar system for the mitral valve (Mitraclip) was previously tested in the randomized EVEREST II study against conventional surgery. The results of the EVEREST II trial justified the recourse to percutaneous edge-to edge mitral repair in patients with primary mitral regurgitation when the patient is contraindicated to conventional surgery. The Mitra-FR study made it possible to study the role of Mitraclip for treating patient suffering from a secondary mitral insufficiency. It leads to the implementation of this technique in selected patients. For secondary TR, several series underscored its prevalence and its clinical consequences. TR treatment justifies the proposal for a randomized study. As a matter of fact, evidence for treating are seriously lacking. Surgical surveys report hospital mortality ~ 8.8%. It, therefore, seems necessary to conduct a study as robust as possible to evaluate the contribution of clip for the tricuspid valve (as an innovative percutaneous technique) compared to conventional pharmacological treatment in patients who are unsuitable for a surgical isolated correction of the TR and who has suitable anatomy for clip for the tricuspid valve. It will be necessary to demonstrate clinical, functional (quality of life), echocardiographic and biological benefit of the percutaneous treatment vs optimized medical treatment alone.
Detailed Description
The principal objective is to demonstrate, over a period of 12-month after randomization, that, on the Packer composite clinical endpoint (CCS) (combining NYHA class, patient global assessment (PGA) and major cardio-vascular events), the tricuspid valve percutaneous repair strategy with clip for the tricuspid valve is superior to best (optimized) medical treatment (BMT) in symptomatic patients with at least severe secondary TR. The Packer clinical composite score is eventually a three-level ordered categorical endpoint, each randomized patient being classifying as improved, unchanged, or worsen, depending on the clinical response over the follow-up period and at 12 months.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tricuspid Regurgitation
Keywords
secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation, least severe Tricuspid Regurgitation, symptomatic patients

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
300 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tricuspid valve
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
tricuspid valve percutaneous repair strategy with clip for the tricuspid valve
Arm Title
Best medical treatment
Arm Type
Other
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Tricuspid valve
Intervention Description
Clip for the tricuspid valve implantation on top of best medical therapy
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Best medical treatment
Intervention Description
Best medical therapy alone
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Milton Packer clinical composite score
Description
Milton Packer clinical composite score classifies each patient into 1 of 3 categories (improved, worsened, unchanged), and is determined aggregating evaluation functional using NYHA class, quality of life score using patient global assessment and number of major cardio-vascular events
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
number of participants with all-cause mortality
Time Frame
12 months
Title
number of participants with tricuspid valve surgery
Time Frame
12 months
Title
rate of heart failure hospitalizations
Time Frame
12 months
Title
assessment of quality of life improvement
Description
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score (KCCQ) The responses are categorized under 3 subscales (symptom burden, physical limitation and quality of life) with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The total KCCQ score represents the mean of the three subscale scores.
Time Frame
0 and 12 months
Title
quality of life score
Description
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) The responses are categorized under 3 subscales (symptom burden, physical limitation and quality of life) with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The total KCCQ score represents the mean of the three subscale scores.
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
quality of life score
Description
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure (MLHF)
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
quality of life score
Description
EQ5D-5L The EQ-5D-5L consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system : 5 dimensions : mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. 5 levels : no problems,slight problems, moderate, problems and extreme. Each level corresponds to 1 digit number. The digits for the 5 dimensions are combined into a 5-digit number. The EQ VAS : on a vertical visual analogue scale, 100 'The best health you can imagine' 0 'The worst health you can imagine'.
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
quality of life score
Description
Patient global assessment (PGA)
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
functional evaluation
Description
NYHA functional class
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
severity of the Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR)
Description
TR grade
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
walking distance
Description
6-minute walk test
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
echocardiography parameters
Description
right heart function
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
echocardiography parameters
Description
right heart cavities sizes
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
echocardiography parameters
Description
degree of tricuspid regurgitation
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
echocardiography parameters
Description
stenosis
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
biological parameters
Description
parameters renal : creatinine, clearance, AST
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
biological parameters
Description
hepatic function
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
biological parameters
Description
NT-proBNP
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
overall survival
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
number of cardiovascular death
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
number of major cardiovascular events
Time Frame
6 and 12 months
Title
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio expressed as cost per QALY
Time Frame
12 and 24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Pre-Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years Symptomatic secondary (at least) severe TR (Carpentier Type IIIB (restrictive) and / or I (tricuspid annulus dilation)) stable for at least 30 days NYHA functional class II to IV without cirrhosis and/or ascites Signs of heart failure in the previous 12-months with or without having been hospitalized Stable optimized medical and/or interventional treatment Ineligible for corrective action on the valve by surgical approach after a specialized multidisciplinary consultation ("heart team") including at least a cardio-thoracic surgeon, an interventional cardiologist, an imaging-cardiologist and an Anesthesiologist). Signature of an informed consent Definitive Inclusion Criteria: Central core-laboratory analysis : TR characterized before Implantation by at least one of the following criteria: Regurgitation volume > 45 mL / beat Surface of the regurgitant orifice > 40 mm² Vena contracta> 7mm Gap between leaflets ≤ 10 mm (at the presumed location of the clip) Then after the TR severity grading; the Clinical eligibility Committee will valid the inclusion. Non Inclusion Criteria: Patient treated with Mitraclip or other percutaneous approach on the mitral valve in the past 3-month Any prior tricuspid valve procedure that would interfere with placement of the Triclip device Tricuspid valve leaflet anatomy which may preclude clip implantation, proper clip positioning on the leaflets or sufficient reduction in TR. This may include: Tricuspid valve anatomy not evaluable by TTE and TEE Active endocarditis Evidence of calcification in the grasping area Evidence of stenosis (mean pressure gradient > 5 mmHg or surface area ≤1cm² Presence of a severe coaptation defect (> 1cm) of the tricuspid leaflets Severe leaflet defect(s) preventing proper device placement Epstein anomaly - identified by having a normal annulus position while the valve leaflets are attached to the walls and septum of the right ventricle Myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery in the past 3-month Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% Cardiac Resynchronization therapy for less than 3-month and patients having a TR that is clearly related to the right ventricular lead positioning Cardioversion for less than 6 weeks Life expectancy irrespective of the valvular heart disease <1 year (due to co-morbidities) Other scheduled cardiac surgery (including registration in cardiac transplant list) Coronary angioplasty in the preceding month Current infection requiring prescription of antibiotics End-stage renal failure (dialysis patient) Severe hepatic insufficiency (disruption of liver metabolism associated with coagulation disorders (factor V <50%)) Stroke in the previous 3-month Uncontrolled pre- capillary pulmonary hypertension (right catheterization required) (systolic pulmonary pressure > 60 mmHg) Tricuspid prosthetic valve Pace maker lead or ICD lead that would prevent appropriate placement of the Triclips Nitinol allergy Contraindication, allergy or hypersensibility to dual anti-platelet and anticoagulant therapy Ongoing infection requiring antibiotic therapy Evidence of intra vascular or intra cardiac thrombus Patient who are included in another research protocol Protected person (adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship or supervision), person deprived of their liberty, pregnant woman, lactating woman and minor) Absence of coverage by a social security scheme
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Donal Erwan
Organizational Affiliation
CHU Rennes
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Service de Cardiologie AZ Sint-Jan
City
Brugge
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
City
Bruxelles
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
CHU Liège
City
Liège
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
CHU Amiens
City
Amiens
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Angers
City
Angers
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Bordeaux - Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque
City
Bordeaux
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
City
Le Plessis-Robinson
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Lille
City
Lille
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Privé Le Bois
City
Lille
Country
France
Facility Name
Hospices Civils de Lyon Groupement Hospitalier EST
City
Lyon
Country
France
Facility Name
APHM - Hôpital La Timone
City
Marseille
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital de Saint-Joseph
City
Marseille
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud Hôpital Jacques Cartier
City
Massy
Country
France
Facility Name
Clinique du Millénaire
City
Montpellier
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Nantes - Hôtel Dieu et Hôpital Nord Laennec
City
Nantes
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Bichat
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou
City
Rennes
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Cardiologique du Nord
City
Saint-Denis
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU La Réunion
City
Saint-Denis
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Saint-Etienne
City
Saint-Étienne
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Toulouse - Hôpital Rangueil
City
Toulouse
Country
France
Facility Name
Clinique Pasteur
City
Toulouse
Country
France
Facility Name
CHU Tours - Hôpital Trousseau
City
Tours
Country
France
Facility Name
Médipôle Lyon-Villeurbanne
City
Villeurbanne
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33478647
Citation
Donal E, Leurent G, Iung B. Are We Right to Believe in the Value of Transcatheter Treatment of Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jan 26;77(3):240-242. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.037. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Tricuspid Valve Percutaneous Repair System in the Treatment of Severe Secondary Tricuspid Disorders

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs