Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial dIrect Current stiMulation (tDCS) in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) (STIM-PSP) (STIM-PSP)
Primary Purpose
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Motor and Cognitive Symptoms
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS)
Sham Condition
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy focused on measuring Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of PSP according with Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria (Hoglinger et al., 2017);
- Age > 40 and < 89 years;
- Presence of a caregiver supportive the patient for all study procedure;
- Ability to walk for at least 5 steps either independently or with a minimum support (another patients holding patient's arm or with a walker)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of electrical stimulators (for example, pacemaker, Deep Brain Stimulation, DBS)
- Difficult in understanding Italian language
- Presence of severe sensory deficits (for example, visual or hearing impairments)
- Education level <5 years
- History of drug abuse
- History of severe psychiatric disorders
- History of transient ischemic attacks
- Cortical or sub-cortical vascular lesions
- Seizures or severe heart problems and previous neurosurgical operations
- Absence of subjective cognitive deficits
- MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) score <20
- Left-handedness
Sites / Locations
- Centro per le Malattie Neurodegenerative (CEMAND) Dipartimento di Medicina e chirurgia, Sezione Neuroscienze, Università di Salerno
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
Real tDCS group
Sham group
Arm Description
Participants receive anodal tDCS on the left dlPFC for 5 days/week for 2 weeks
Participants receive sham stimulation on the left dlPFC for 5 days/week for 2 weeks
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in verbal fluency task
fluency in verbal names
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change from baseline to 3-month follow in motor symptoms as assessed with sensor recordings (OPAL system)
movements recorded with digital sensors (gait and other tasks)
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in cognitive symptoms as assessed with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
Cognitive status assessed with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The cut off is 15,5. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum is 30. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in caregiver distress as assessed with Neuropshychiatric Inventory (NPI)
depression symptoms, apathy, neuropsychiatric symptoms assessed with Neuropshychiatric Inventory (NPI) . The minimum value of distress is 0 and the maximum is 5. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in executive function as assessed with Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)
Executive function assessed with Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). The cut off is 13,4. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum is 18. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in attention as assessed with Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)
Attention assessed with Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). The cut off is 13,4. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum is 18. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in caregiver distress as assessed with Zarit Carer Burden Burden Interview (ZBI)
Caregiver distress assessed with Zarit Carer Burden Burden Interview (ZBI). The minimum value is 0 and the maximum is 88. The cut off is 46. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04655079
First Posted
November 27, 2020
Last Updated
August 1, 2023
Sponsor
University of Salerno
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04655079
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial dIrect Current stiMulation (tDCS) in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) (STIM-PSP)
Acronym
STIM-PSP
Official Title
Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial dIrect Current stiMulation (tDCS) on Motor and Cognitive Symptoms in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) (STIM-PSP)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 11, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 11, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Salerno
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial that aim to verify the safety and the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive and motor symptoms in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC).
Detailed Description
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) is a rapidly progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by deposition of tau and motor, cognitive and behavioral symptoms. Since no effective treatment is available, non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as tDCS, could be a valid complementary therapeutic approach. The tDCS modulates the spontaneous activity of the neural network by applying a direct current flow on the cortical brain areas (anodic or cathodic stimulation). Despite its efficacy in psychiatric disorders, the therapeutic use of tDCS in neurodegenerative diseases requires more systematic studies. The aim of this study is to verify the safety and efficacy of tDCS in PSP on motor, cognitive and behavioral symptoms.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Motor and Cognitive Symptoms
Keywords
Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Participants will be recruited and randomized in two parallel group: group 1 will receive anodal left dlPFC tDCS (real tDCS) and group 2 will receive sham stimulation for 5 days/week for 2 consecutive weeks, in a 2:1 ratio, respectively. Each participant will undergo a clinical evaluation at baseline (T0), immediately after 2 weeks of either real or sham tDCS (T1), at 45-day (T2) and at 3-month follow up (T3) from baseline. PSP phenotypes will be uniformly distributed between treatment arms (ie, =Richardson's syndrome versus non-Richardson's syndrome=1:1).
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Randomization, monitoring and data management will be performed locally. Randomization will be performed using an online list randomizer (random.org). The study coordinator will generate the random allocation sequence before enrollment. Then, one sub-investigator will perform clinical evaluations and another one will administer the treatment.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
24 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Real tDCS group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants receive anodal tDCS on the left dlPFC for 5 days/week for 2 weeks
Arm Title
Sham group
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Participants receive sham stimulation on the left dlPFC for 5 days/week for 2 weeks
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Active tDCS
Intervention Description
tDCS is delivered by a battery-driven constant current stimulator thought a pair of saline soaked surface sponge electrodes. The active electrode (anode) is placed on the scalp over the left dlPFC (F3) according to the 10 to 20 international electroencephalogram coordinates) and the cathode is placed over the right deltoid muscle. During real stimulation a constant current of 2mA (milli Ampere) is applied for 20 minutes.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham Condition
Intervention Description
For the sham condition the electrode placement is the same of active tDCS but the electric current is ramped down 5 seconds after the beginning of the stimulation.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in verbal fluency task
Description
fluency in verbal names
Time Frame
Baseline (T0); At 3-month (T3)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from baseline to 3-month follow in motor symptoms as assessed with sensor recordings (OPAL system)
Description
movements recorded with digital sensors (gait and other tasks)
Time Frame
Baseline (T0); At 3-month (T3)
Title
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in cognitive symptoms as assessed with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
Description
Cognitive status assessed with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA). The cut off is 15,5. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum is 30. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0); At 3-month (T3)
Title
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in caregiver distress as assessed with Neuropshychiatric Inventory (NPI)
Description
depression symptoms, apathy, neuropsychiatric symptoms assessed with Neuropshychiatric Inventory (NPI) . The minimum value of distress is 0 and the maximum is 5. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0); At 3-month (T3)
Title
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in executive function as assessed with Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)
Description
Executive function assessed with Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). The cut off is 13,4. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum is 18. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0); At 3-month (T3)
Title
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in attention as assessed with Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)
Description
Attention assessed with Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB). The cut off is 13,4. The minimum value is 0 and the maximum is 18. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0); At 3-month (T3)
Title
Change from baseline to 3-month follow up in caregiver distress as assessed with Zarit Carer Burden Burden Interview (ZBI)
Description
Caregiver distress assessed with Zarit Carer Burden Burden Interview (ZBI). The minimum value is 0 and the maximum is 88. The cut off is 46. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0); At 3-month (T3)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
89 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis of PSP according with Movement Disorder Society (MDS) criteria (Hoglinger et al., 2017);
Age > 40 and < 89 years;
Presence of a caregiver supportive the patient for all study procedure;
Ability to walk for at least 5 steps either independently or with a minimum support (another patients holding patient's arm or with a walker)
Exclusion Criteria:
Presence of electrical stimulators (for example, pacemaker, Deep Brain Stimulation, DBS)
Difficult in understanding Italian language
Presence of severe sensory deficits (for example, visual or hearing impairments)
Education level <5 years
History of drug abuse
History of severe psychiatric disorders
History of transient ischemic attacks
Cortical or sub-cortical vascular lesions
Seizures or severe heart problems and previous neurosurgical operations
Absence of subjective cognitive deficits
MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) score <20
Left-handedness
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Centro per le Malattie Neurodegenerative (CEMAND) Dipartimento di Medicina e chirurgia, Sezione Neuroscienze, Università di Salerno
City
Salerno
Country
Italy
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial dIrect Current stiMulation (tDCS) in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) (STIM-PSP)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs