search
Back to results

Early Detection of Barrett's Esophagus in Participants With Reflux Symptoms in Primary Care (ELECTRONIC)

Primary Purpose

Barrett Esophagus, Esophageal Cancer

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Breath test (eNose) followed by uTNE.
Sponsored by
Radboud University Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Barrett Esophagus focused on measuring Barrett Esophagus, Esophageal Cancer, Primary care, General practice, Screening

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 50 to 75 years;
  • Recorded diagnosis of reflux symptoms >90 days OR
  • Recorded prescriptions for acid suppressant therapy for this indication for at least 1 year in the past 5 years
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Upper endoscopy in the previous 5 years;
  • A current or previous diagnosis and/or treatment of any type of malignancy (not including basal-cell skin cancer (BCC) and squamous-cell skin cancer (SCC)) within the last five years;
  • Already known with a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus or gastro-esophageal cancer;
  • Any argument provided by a patient's own general practitioner not to include the patient;
  • Comorbidities precluding transnasal endoscopy (e.g. inability to discontinue oral anticoagulants, history of recurrent epistaxis, allergy to lidocaine derivatives).

Sites / Locations

  • Radboud University Medical CenterRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Breath test (eNose) followed by uTNE.

Arm Description

All participants will receive the breath test with the eNose in the general practice, followed by the uTNE in the hospital.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE
PPV of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE with the diagnosis made by transnasal endoscopy and upper endoscopy as the reference standard in primary care.
Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE
NPV of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE with the diagnosis made by transnasal endoscopy and upper endoscopy as the reference standard in primary care.
Sensitivity of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE
Sensitivity of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE with the diagnosis made by transnasal endoscopy and upper endoscopy as the reference standard in primary care.
Specificity of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE
Specificity of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE with the diagnosis made by transnasal endoscopy and upper endoscopy as the reference standard in primary care.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Patient acceptability (discomfort and overall experience) of the eNose measured on a NPRS.
Patient acceptability consists of two questions regarding discomfort and overall experience of the eNose. Discomfort is measured on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with 0 being 'none' and 10 being 'severe'. Overall experience is measured on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with 0 being 'the worst experience', 5 being 'neither pleasant nor unpleasant' and 10 being 'the best experience'.
Patient acceptability (discomfort and overall experience) of uTNE measured on a NPRS.
Patient acceptability consists of two questions regarding discomfort and overall experience of uTNE. Discomfort is measured on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with 0 being 'none' and 10 being 'severe'. Overall experience is measured on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with 0 being 'the worst experience', 5 being 'neither pleasant nor unpleasant' and 10 being 'the best experience'.
Patient acceptability (discomfort and overall experience) of conventional endoscopy (if applicable) measured on a NPRS.
Patient acceptability consists of two questions regarding discomfort and overall experience of conventional endoscopy. Discomfort is measured on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with 0 being 'none' and 10 being 'severe'. Overall experience is measured on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with 0 being 'the worst experience', 5 being 'neither pleasant nor unpleasant' and 10 being 'the best experience'.
Willingness to undergo repeat eNose procedure
Willingness to undergo repeat procedure consists of one question with answer options 'Yes' and 'No'.
Willingness to undergo repeat uTNE procedure
Willingness to undergo repeat procedure consists of one question with answer options 'Yes' and 'No'.
Willingness to undergo repeat conventional endoscopy
Willingness to undergo repeat procedure consists of one question with answer options 'Yes' and 'No'.
Cancer worry (CWS-8)
The Cancer Worry Scale (CWS-8) is used to measure cancer worry. Scores are ranging from 8 to 32, and higher scores indicate more cancer worry.
Anxiety (STAI-6)
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6) is used to measure anxiety. Scores are ranging from 6 to 24, and higher scores indicate more anxiety.
Impact of event (IES-15)
The Impact of Event Scale (IES-15) is used to measure impact of event. Scores are ranging from 0 to 75, and higher scores indicate more impact of event.
Rate of successful evaluation by uTNE
The rate of successful intubation and complete evaluation will be measured.
Rate of successful evaluation by breath test (eNose)
The rate of successful intubation and complete evaluation will be measured.
Safety of uTNE based on reported Adverse Events.
The safety will be measured based on reported Adverse Events.
Safety of eNose based on reported Adverse Events.
The safety will be measured based on reported Adverse Events.

Full Information

First Posted
November 30, 2020
Last Updated
December 16, 2022
Sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Collaborators
Dutch Digestive Diseases Foundation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04656392
Brief Title
Early Detection of Barrett's Esophagus in Participants With Reflux Symptoms in Primary Care
Acronym
ELECTRONIC
Official Title
Early Detection of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Cancer: Accuracy and Acceptability of a Novel Screening Strategy in Primary Care
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
April 20, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 29, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Radboud University Medical Center
Collaborators
Dutch Digestive Diseases Foundation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
In the Netherlands, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is increasing. In addition, EAC has a dismal prognosis. Therefore, screening for Barrett's Esophagus (BE) has stimulated interest. Although BE is a known precursor of EAC, a minority of patients with EAC are known with a previous diagnosis of BE. A non-invasive screening tool, such as breath testing, could select patients at risk for BE, after which unsedated transnasal endoscopy (uTNE) can confirm or exclude the diagnosis. The objective is to determine the accuracy and acceptability of a non-invasive screening strategy i.e. breath testing followed by uTNE for BE and EAC.
Detailed Description
The ongoing increasing incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in the Netherlands during the last few decades and the still dismal prognosis has stimulated interest in screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE). Although BE is a known precursor of EAC, a minority of patients with EAC (<10%) are known with a previous diagnosis of BE, and hence, most cases of BE are undiagnosed. Screening programs to detect BE followed by endoscopic surveillance and treatment of dysplasia or early neoplasia seem able to reduce the incidence of EAC and improve survival. A non-invasive screening tool, such as breath testing, could select patients at risk for BE, after which unsedated transnasal endoscopy (uTNE) can confirm or exclude the diagnosis. uTNE offers the possibility of a more acceptable and accurate endoscopic assessment of the esophagus with almost neglectable risks and lower costs compared to conventional endoscopy. The objective is to determine the accuracy and acceptability of a non-invasive screening strategy i.e. breath testing followed by uTNE for BE and EAC.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Barrett Esophagus, Esophageal Cancer
Keywords
Barrett Esophagus, Esophageal Cancer, Primary care, General practice, Screening

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
The study design is a multi-site prospective cohort study in eight general practices. All participants will receive the breath test with the eNose in the general practice, followed by the uTNE in the hospital.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
450 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Breath test (eNose) followed by uTNE.
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
All participants will receive the breath test with the eNose in the general practice, followed by the uTNE in the hospital.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Breath test (eNose) followed by uTNE.
Intervention Description
All participants will receive the breath test with the eNose in the general practice, followed by the uTNE in the hospital.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE
Description
PPV of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE with the diagnosis made by transnasal endoscopy and upper endoscopy as the reference standard in primary care.
Time Frame
16 weeks after breath test (eNose)
Title
Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE
Description
NPV of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE with the diagnosis made by transnasal endoscopy and upper endoscopy as the reference standard in primary care.
Time Frame
16 weeks after breath test (eNose)
Title
Sensitivity of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE
Description
Sensitivity of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE with the diagnosis made by transnasal endoscopy and upper endoscopy as the reference standard in primary care.
Time Frame
16 weeks after breath test (eNose)
Title
Specificity of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE
Description
Specificity of the eNose for detecting confirmed BE with the diagnosis made by transnasal endoscopy and upper endoscopy as the reference standard in primary care.
Time Frame
16 weeks after breath test (eNose)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient acceptability (discomfort and overall experience) of the eNose measured on a NPRS.
Description
Patient acceptability consists of two questions regarding discomfort and overall experience of the eNose. Discomfort is measured on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with 0 being 'none' and 10 being 'severe'. Overall experience is measured on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with 0 being 'the worst experience', 5 being 'neither pleasant nor unpleasant' and 10 being 'the best experience'.
Time Frame
Directly after breath test (eNose)
Title
Patient acceptability (discomfort and overall experience) of uTNE measured on a NPRS.
Description
Patient acceptability consists of two questions regarding discomfort and overall experience of uTNE. Discomfort is measured on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with 0 being 'none' and 10 being 'severe'. Overall experience is measured on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with 0 being 'the worst experience', 5 being 'neither pleasant nor unpleasant' and 10 being 'the best experience'.
Time Frame
Directly after uTNE
Title
Patient acceptability (discomfort and overall experience) of conventional endoscopy (if applicable) measured on a NPRS.
Description
Patient acceptability consists of two questions regarding discomfort and overall experience of conventional endoscopy. Discomfort is measured on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with 0 being 'none' and 10 being 'severe'. Overall experience is measured on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) with 0 being 'the worst experience', 5 being 'neither pleasant nor unpleasant' and 10 being 'the best experience'.
Time Frame
Directly after conventional endoscopy
Title
Willingness to undergo repeat eNose procedure
Description
Willingness to undergo repeat procedure consists of one question with answer options 'Yes' and 'No'.
Time Frame
Directly after breath test (eNose)
Title
Willingness to undergo repeat uTNE procedure
Description
Willingness to undergo repeat procedure consists of one question with answer options 'Yes' and 'No'.
Time Frame
Directly after uTNE
Title
Willingness to undergo repeat conventional endoscopy
Description
Willingness to undergo repeat procedure consists of one question with answer options 'Yes' and 'No'.
Time Frame
Directly after conventional endoscopy
Title
Cancer worry (CWS-8)
Description
The Cancer Worry Scale (CWS-8) is used to measure cancer worry. Scores are ranging from 8 to 32, and higher scores indicate more cancer worry.
Time Frame
At baseline, 7 days after eNose, 7 days after uTNE, 7 days after conventional endoscopy (if applicable), 30 days after eNose, 30 days after uTNE, 30 days after conventional endoscopy (if applicable), 90 days after last study procedure.
Title
Anxiety (STAI-6)
Description
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6) is used to measure anxiety. Scores are ranging from 6 to 24, and higher scores indicate more anxiety.
Time Frame
At baseline, 7 days after eNose, 7 days after uTNE, 7 days after conventional endoscopy (if applicable), 30 days after eNose, 30 days after uTNE, 30 days after conventional endoscopy (if applicable), 90 days after last study procedure.
Title
Impact of event (IES-15)
Description
The Impact of Event Scale (IES-15) is used to measure impact of event. Scores are ranging from 0 to 75, and higher scores indicate more impact of event.
Time Frame
7 days after eNose, 7 days after uTNE, 7 days after conventional endoscopy (if applicable), 30 days after eNose, 30 days after uTNE, 30 days after conventional endoscopy (if applicable), 90 days after last study procedure.
Title
Rate of successful evaluation by uTNE
Description
The rate of successful intubation and complete evaluation will be measured.
Time Frame
1 week after the last participant undergoes uTNE.
Title
Rate of successful evaluation by breath test (eNose)
Description
The rate of successful intubation and complete evaluation will be measured.
Time Frame
1 week after the last participant undergoes breath test (eNose).
Title
Safety of uTNE based on reported Adverse Events.
Description
The safety will be measured based on reported Adverse Events.
Time Frame
1 week after the last participant undergoes uTNE.
Title
Safety of eNose based on reported Adverse Events.
Description
The safety will be measured based on reported Adverse Events.
Time Frame
1 week after the last participant undergoes breath test (eNose).

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient aged 50 to 75 years; Recorded diagnosis of reflux symptoms >90 days OR Recorded prescriptions for acid suppressant therapy for this indication for at least 1 year in the past 5 years Written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Upper endoscopy in the previous 5 years; A current or previous diagnosis and/or treatment of any type of malignancy (not including basal-cell skin cancer (BCC) and squamous-cell skin cancer (SCC)) within the last five years; Already known with a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus or gastro-esophageal cancer; Any argument provided by a patient's own general practitioner not to include the patient; Comorbidities precluding transnasal endoscopy (e.g. inability to discontinue oral anticoagulants, history of recurrent epistaxis, allergy to lidocaine derivatives).
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lotte J. Huibertse
Phone
0650155752
Ext
+31
Email
Lotte.Huibertse@radboudumc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Yonne Peters, Drs.
Phone
0615956464
Ext
+31
Email
Y.Peters@radboudumc.nl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter D. Siersema, Prof. dr.
Organizational Affiliation
Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Radboud University Medical Center
City
Nijmegen
State/Province
Gelderland
ZIP/Postal Code
6525 GA
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lotte J. Huibertse
Phone
0650155752
Ext
+31
Email
Lotte.Huibertse@radboudumc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yonne Peters, Drs.
Phone
0615956464
Ext
+31
Email
Y.Peters@radboudumc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter D. Siersema, Prof. dr.

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Early Detection of Barrett's Esophagus in Participants With Reflux Symptoms in Primary Care

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs