search
Back to results

Randomized Trial Comparing Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Diabetes Mellitus (INC-DM)

Primary Purpose

Diabetes Mellitus, Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Mexico
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent System (ASES)
Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (OSES)
Sponsored by
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetes Mellitus focused on measuring Diabetes Mellitus, Albuminus, Orsiro, Percutaneous coronary intervention

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women over 18 years of age.
  • Provide informed consent and agree to follow up as stipulated in the protocol.
  • Diabetes mellitus. Whether it is DM 1 or 2 previously diagnosed or newly diagnosed by:

    • Fasting glucose> 126 mg / dl (for study terms, fasting will be defined as the absence of caloric intake for> 8 hours)
    • Tolerance curve to glucose (75 grams of glucose orally) with a glycemia at 2 hours> 200 mg / dl or,
    • HbA1C> 6.5%.
  • Coronary artery disease including chronic coronary syndrome, silent ischemia, or non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary ischemic syndrome.
  • Presence of 1 or more de novo coronary lesions in native coronary arteries with a site of maximum stenosis> 50% that may be amenable to stenting; without limitation in the number of lesions or vessels affected.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiogenic shock.
  • Allergy to acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, prasugrel, heparin, sirolimus or contrast medium, which cannot be adequately premedicated.
  • Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction candidate for primary or urgent coronary angioplasty.
  • Left main coronary artery disease.
  • In-stent restenosis.
  • Lesions in venous or arterial grafts.
  • Surgery (cardiac or non-cardiac) planned within 6 months of PCI, unless dual antiplatelet therapy can be continued in the periprocedural period.
  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • Life expectancy <1 year

Sites / Locations

  • Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio ChávezRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent System (ASES)

Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (OSES)

Arm Description

The Abluminus sirolimus eluting stent manufactured by Envision and distributed by Concept Medical.

The Orsiro sirolimus eluting stent manufactured by Biotronik.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Rate of Target Lesion Failure (TLF)
To compare the rate of target lesion failure (composed of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction related to the treated vessel or ischemia driven target lesion revascularization)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Cardiovascular Death
Cardiovascular death is defined as death resulting from cardiovascular causes. The following categories may be collected: Death caused by acute MI Death caused by sudden cardiac, including unwitnessed, death Death resulting from heart failure Death caused by stroke Death caused by cardiovascular procedures Death resulting from cardiovascular hemorrhage Death resulting from other cardiovascular cause Any MI not clearly attributable to a non-target vessel will be considered as target-vessel MI. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) related MI is termed type 4a MI. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) related MI is termed type 5 MI. Revascularization is clinically driven if the target lesion diameter stenosis is > 50% by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and the subject has clinical or functional ischemia which cannot be explained by another native coronary or bypass graft lesion.
Myocardial Infarction (MI)
Compare the myocardial infarction related to the treated vessel between both groups. (according to the 4th international definition of myocardial infarction) detection of an increase or decrease in cardiac troponin values with at least 1 of the values above the upper reference limit of the 99th percentile and at least 1 of the following conditions : Symptoms of acute myocardial ischemia. New ischemic changes in the electrocardiogram. Appearance of pathological Q waves. Imaging evidence of loss of viable myocardium or new regional abnormalities in myocardial wall mobility following a pattern compatible with ischemic etiology. Identification of a coronary thrombus by angiography with intracoronary imaging or by autopsy Any MI that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the revascularized one will be considered as MI related to the treated vessel.
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Revascularization is clinically driven if the target lesion diameter stenosis is > 50% by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and the subject has clinical or functional ischemia which cannot be explained by another native coronary or bypass graft lesion.
Target vessel revascularization (TVR)
TVR is a repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion.
Target vessel failure (TVF)
To compare the rate of target vessel failure (composed of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction related to the treated vessel or ischemia driven target vessel revascularization)
Death caused by other cardiovascular causes.
Compare death from any cause between the two groups. The following categories will be collected: Malignancy. Pulmonary causes. Infection. Gastrointestinal causes. Accident / trauma. Caused by failure of another non-cardiovascular organ. Other non-cardiovascular causes. Death that cannot be attributed to any of the aforementioned categories due to lack of information will be considered cardiovascular in terms of study outcomes.
Rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR)
Compare the rate of stent edge restenosis between both groups. Stenosis> 50% of the diameter and one or more of the following: symptoms suggestive of ischemia, electrocardiographic changes suggestive of ischemia, significant pressure gradient across the lesion; or a> 70% reduction in luminal area, even in the absence of data suggestive of ischemia. The categories will be collected according to the Waksman In-Stent Restenosis Classification: Type I: mechanical IA Underexpansion IIA Stent fracture Type II: Biologic IIA Intimal hyperplasia IIB Neoatherosclerosis, noncalcified IIC Neoatherosclerosis, calcified Type III: Mixed pattern: Combined mechanical and biologic etiology Type IV: Chronic total occlusion Type V: >2 layers of stent
Rate of stent thrombosis (ST)
Compare the rate of stent thrombosis between both groups, According to the definition of the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) -2: Definitive thrombosis. Probable thrombosis. Silent occlusion. Temporality: acute (0-24 hours), subacute (> 24 hours to 30 days), late (> 30 days to 1 year) and very late (> 1 year).
Major bleeding
Compare the incidence of bleeding complications according to The Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2 (BARC-2) scale: 3 or greater.
Rate of Cerebrovascular Event
Compare the rate of cerebrovascular event between both groups according to Neuro-ARC stroke/ Transient ischemic attack (TIA) criteria.
Contrast Nephropathy
Creatinine increase >0.5 mg / dl or >25% over baseline at 48 hours after the procedure.
Technical Success
Technical success is defined as the ability to cross the occluded segment with both a wire and a balloon, and successfully open the artery; the restoration of antegrade Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow 2 or 3 and a <30% residual stenosis.

Full Information

First Posted
December 3, 2020
Last Updated
October 14, 2022
Sponsor
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04660240
Brief Title
Randomized Trial Comparing Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Diabetes Mellitus
Acronym
INC-DM
Official Title
Randomized Trial Investigating Clinical Outcomes of Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Diabetes Mellitus
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
October 1, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Randomized, controlled, blind, single-center and non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months in patients with diabetes mellitus who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with an Orsiro stent vs. Abluminus stent.
Detailed Description
Worldwide, and especially in Mexico, there is a high incidence of diabetes mellitus (DM), which in turn, confers a higher cardiovascular risk in this population. Diabetic patients undergoing PCI have worse outcomes than non-diabetics regardless of the degree of complexity of their coronary anatomy. Although the 30-day in-hospital outcomes have been similar between diabetic and non-diabetic patients, DM has been invariably associated with greater stent failure with target vessel revascularization (TVR), major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and mortality in the long-term follow-up, even with the use of drug-eluting stents. In relation to the above, two of the sirolimus-eluting stents (SES): the Abluminus and the Orsiro, have been considered as promising options in patients with DM. The Abluminus stent has been designed for diabetic patients in order to reduce cardiovascular events. Said stent consists of a cobalt-chromium platform covered with a layer of biodegradable polymer and mounted on a balloon, both sirolimus-releasing. The Rate of target lesion failure (TLF) reported to date in diabetic patients is 3.8%. On the other hand, the Orsiro stent, a cobalt-chromium platform with ultrathin struts, has had favorable results in different clinical settings and patients with different characteristics]; specifically in a subgroup analysis in DM, a TLF rate of 3.5% was reported

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetes Mellitus, Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome
Keywords
Diabetes Mellitus, Albuminus, Orsiro, Percutaneous coronary intervention

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in de novo lesions are going to be randomized to two groups. One will have percutaneous coronary intervention with Abluminus sirolimus eluting stent implantation, and the other will have percutaneous coronary intervention with Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting stent implantation. The implantation of both stents will be guided by angiography only. In a subgroup of both arms (100 patients per group) the implantation will be also guided by intravascular ultrasound.
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
860 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent System (ASES)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The Abluminus sirolimus eluting stent manufactured by Envision and distributed by Concept Medical.
Arm Title
Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (OSES)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The Orsiro sirolimus eluting stent manufactured by Biotronik.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Abluminus Sirolimus Eluting Stent System (ASES)
Intervention Description
The procedure will be conducted in accordance with the CE mark instructions for use for the ASES. The need or not for postdilation in any segment of the stent will be at the discretion of the operator, seeking its adequate expansion and apposition. To consider PCI to be successful, residual stenosis must be less than or equal to 30% by angiography at the end of the procedure, including the absence of coronary dissection that compromises distal flow or a hemodynamically significant pressure gradient across the lesion.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Orsiro Sirolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (OSES)
Intervention Description
The procedure will be conducted in accordance with the CE mark instructions for use for the OSES. The need or not for postdilation in any segment of the stent will be at the discretion of the operator, seeking its adequate expansion and apposition. To consider PCI to be successful, residual stenosis must be less than or equal to 30% by angiography at the end of the procedure, including the absence of coronary dissection that compromises distal flow or a hemodynamically significant pressure gradient across the lesion.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of Target Lesion Failure (TLF)
Description
To compare the rate of target lesion failure (composed of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction related to the treated vessel or ischemia driven target lesion revascularization)
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cardiovascular Death
Description
Cardiovascular death is defined as death resulting from cardiovascular causes. The following categories may be collected: Death caused by acute MI Death caused by sudden cardiac, including unwitnessed, death Death resulting from heart failure Death caused by stroke Death caused by cardiovascular procedures Death resulting from cardiovascular hemorrhage Death resulting from other cardiovascular cause Any MI not clearly attributable to a non-target vessel will be considered as target-vessel MI. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) related MI is termed type 4a MI. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) related MI is termed type 5 MI. Revascularization is clinically driven if the target lesion diameter stenosis is > 50% by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and the subject has clinical or functional ischemia which cannot be explained by another native coronary or bypass graft lesion.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Myocardial Infarction (MI)
Description
Compare the myocardial infarction related to the treated vessel between both groups. (according to the 4th international definition of myocardial infarction) detection of an increase or decrease in cardiac troponin values with at least 1 of the values above the upper reference limit of the 99th percentile and at least 1 of the following conditions : Symptoms of acute myocardial ischemia. New ischemic changes in the electrocardiogram. Appearance of pathological Q waves. Imaging evidence of loss of viable myocardium or new regional abnormalities in myocardial wall mobility following a pattern compatible with ischemic etiology. Identification of a coronary thrombus by angiography with intracoronary imaging or by autopsy Any MI that cannot be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the revascularized one will be considered as MI related to the treated vessel.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Description
Revascularization is clinically driven if the target lesion diameter stenosis is > 50% by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and the subject has clinical or functional ischemia which cannot be explained by another native coronary or bypass graft lesion.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Target vessel revascularization (TVR)
Description
TVR is a repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Target vessel failure (TVF)
Description
To compare the rate of target vessel failure (composed of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction related to the treated vessel or ischemia driven target vessel revascularization)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Death caused by other cardiovascular causes.
Description
Compare death from any cause between the two groups. The following categories will be collected: Malignancy. Pulmonary causes. Infection. Gastrointestinal causes. Accident / trauma. Caused by failure of another non-cardiovascular organ. Other non-cardiovascular causes. Death that cannot be attributed to any of the aforementioned categories due to lack of information will be considered cardiovascular in terms of study outcomes.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR)
Description
Compare the rate of stent edge restenosis between both groups. Stenosis> 50% of the diameter and one or more of the following: symptoms suggestive of ischemia, electrocardiographic changes suggestive of ischemia, significant pressure gradient across the lesion; or a> 70% reduction in luminal area, even in the absence of data suggestive of ischemia. The categories will be collected according to the Waksman In-Stent Restenosis Classification: Type I: mechanical IA Underexpansion IIA Stent fracture Type II: Biologic IIA Intimal hyperplasia IIB Neoatherosclerosis, noncalcified IIC Neoatherosclerosis, calcified Type III: Mixed pattern: Combined mechanical and biologic etiology Type IV: Chronic total occlusion Type V: >2 layers of stent
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Rate of stent thrombosis (ST)
Description
Compare the rate of stent thrombosis between both groups, According to the definition of the Academic Research Consortium (ARC) -2: Definitive thrombosis. Probable thrombosis. Silent occlusion. Temporality: acute (0-24 hours), subacute (> 24 hours to 30 days), late (> 30 days to 1 year) and very late (> 1 year).
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Major bleeding
Description
Compare the incidence of bleeding complications according to The Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2 (BARC-2) scale: 3 or greater.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Rate of Cerebrovascular Event
Description
Compare the rate of cerebrovascular event between both groups according to Neuro-ARC stroke/ Transient ischemic attack (TIA) criteria.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Contrast Nephropathy
Description
Creatinine increase >0.5 mg / dl or >25% over baseline at 48 hours after the procedure.
Time Frame
48 hours
Title
Technical Success
Description
Technical success is defined as the ability to cross the occluded segment with both a wire and a balloon, and successfully open the artery; the restoration of antegrade Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow 2 or 3 and a <30% residual stenosis.
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Men and women over 18 years of age. Provide informed consent and agree to follow up as stipulated in the protocol. Diabetes mellitus. Whether it is DM 1 or 2 previously diagnosed or newly diagnosed by: Fasting glucose> 126 mg / dl (for study terms, fasting will be defined as the absence of caloric intake for> 8 hours) Tolerance curve to glucose (75 grams of glucose orally) with a glycemia at 2 hours> 200 mg / dl or, HbA1C> 6.5%. Coronary artery disease including chronic coronary syndrome, silent ischemia, or non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary ischemic syndrome. Presence of 1 or more de novo coronary lesions in native coronary arteries with a site of maximum stenosis> 50% that may be amenable to stenting; without limitation in the number of lesions or vessels affected. Exclusion Criteria: Cardiogenic shock. Allergy to acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, ticagrelor, prasugrel, heparin, sirolimus or contrast medium, which cannot be adequately premedicated. Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction candidate for primary or urgent coronary angioplasty. Left main coronary artery disease. In-stent restenosis. Lesions in venous or arterial grafts. Surgery (cardiac or non-cardiac) planned within 6 months of PCI, unless dual antiplatelet therapy can be continued in the periprocedural period. Inability to provide informed consent. Life expectancy <1 year
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Alejandra D Portillo Romero, MD
Phone
+52 55 5573 2911
Ext
21217
Email
aleportilloromero@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Guering Eid Lidt, MD
Phone
55 5573 2911
Ext
21217
Email
guering@yahoo.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guering Eid Lidt, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julio I Farjat Pasos, MD MSc
Organizational Affiliation
Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Walter O Magaña Ornelas, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alejandra D Portillo Romero, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
José A Ayón Martínez, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez
City
Mexico City
State/Province
Tlalpan
ZIP/Postal Code
14080
Country
Mexico
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alejandra D Portillo Romero, MD
Phone
+52 55 5573 2911
Ext
21217
Email
aleportilloromero@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guering Edit Lid, MD
Phone
+52 55 5573 2911
Ext
21217
Email
guering@yahoo.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guering Eid Lidt, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julio I Farjat Pasos, MD MSc
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Walter O Magaña Ornelas, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alejandra D Portillo Romero, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
José A Ayón Martinez, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maria E Soto López, MD PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Iran Diaz Santillán, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gustavo Salinas Arteaga, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Oscar Preciado, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jorge Gaspar, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Randomized Trial Comparing Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Diabetes Mellitus

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs