To evaluate the evolution of weight
Weight measured in kilograms
To evaluate the evolution of weight
Weight measured in kilograms
To evaluate the evolution of weight
Weight measured in kilograms
To evaluate the presence of any physical pain
Actual physical pain (yes/no), precision of the localisation and intensity by Visual Analog Score (from 0 to 10)
To evaluate the presence of any physical pain
Actual physical pain (yes/no), precision of the localisation and intensity by Visual Analog Score (from 0 to 10)
To evaluate the presence of any physical pain
Actual physical pain (yes/no), precision of the localisation and intensity by Visual Analog Score (from 0 to 10)
To evaluate the presence of constipation
Any constipation (yes/no) and precision of number of bowel movements per week
To evaluate the presence of constipation
Any constipation (yes/no) and precision of number of bowel movements per week
To evaluate the presence of constipation
Any constipation (yes/no) and precision of number of bowel movements per week
To evaluate the evolution of nature of patient's eating disorder symptoms
EDDS : Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale. Self-reported questionnaire for diagnosis of eating disorders.
To evaluate the evolution of nature of patient's eating disorder symptoms
EDDS : Eating Disorder Diagnostic Scale. Self-reported questionnaire for diagnosis of eating disorders.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of patient's eating disorder symptoms
EDI-2: Eating Disorders Inventory. The EDI-2 total score ranges from 91 to 546. Higher score means a worse outcome.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of patient's eating disorder symptoms
EDI-2: Eating Disorders Inventory. The EDI-2 total score ranges from 91 to 546. Higher score means a worse outcome.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of concerns about body image
BSQ: Body shape questionnaire. The BSQ score ranges from 34 to 204. Higher score means a worse outcome.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of concerns about body image
BSQ: Body shape questionnaire. The BSQ score ranges from 34 to 204. Higher score means a worse outcome.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of alexithymia
BVAQ-B: Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire Form B. The BVAQ-B score ranges from 20 to 100. Higher score means a worse outcome.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of alexithymia
BVAQ-B: Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire Form B. The BVAQ-B score ranges from 20 to 100. Higher score means a worse outcome.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of self-esteem
RSE: Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale. The RSE score ranges from 10 to 40. Higher score means a worse outcome.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of self-esteem
RSE: Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale. The RSE score ranges from 10 to 40. Higher score means a worse outcome.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of anxiety
STAI-Y: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Form Y. The STAI-Y score ranges from 20 to 80. Higher score mean a worse outcome.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of anxiety
STAI-Y: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Form Y. The STAI-Y score ranges from 20 to 80. Higher score mean a worse outcome.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of anxiety
STAI-Y: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Form Y. The STAI-Y score ranges from 20 to 80. Higher score means a worse outcome.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of depressive experiences
DEQ: Depressive Experiences Questionnaire - Adolescent Version. The Depressive Experiences Questionnaire (DEQ) is a 66 item questionnaire where participants rate themselves on life experiences and personality characteristics frequently associated with depression. Participants are asked to rate each item on a seven-point Likert-type scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7). Analysis of results produces 3 factors: Dependency, Self-criticism, and Efficacy.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of depressive experiences
DEQ: Depressive Experiences Questionnaire - Adolescent Version. The Depressive Experiences Questionnaire (DEQ) is a 66 item questionnaire where participants rate themselves on life experiences and personality characteristics frequently associated with depression. Participants are asked to rate each item on a seven-point Likert-type scale ranging from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (7). Analysis of results produces 3 factors: Dependency, Self-criticism, and Efficacy.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of depression
HAD-depression: Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale-depression. The HAD-depession score ranges from 0 to 21. Higher score means a worse outcome.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of depression
HAD-depression: Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale-depression. The HAD-depession score ranges from 0 to 21. Higher score means a worse outcome.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of depression
HAD-depression: Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale-depression. The HAD-depession score ranges from 0 to 21. Higher score means a worse outcome.
To evaluate the evolution of nature and seriousness of self-injury
OSI: Ottawa Self-injury Questionnaire. OSI (Ottawa Self-Injury) to measure occurrence, frequency, level of motivation to stop, types and functions and potential addictive features of self-injury
To evaluate the evolution of nature and seriousness of self-injury
OSI: Ottawa Self-injury Questionnaire. OSI (Ottawa Self-Injury) to measure occurrence, frequency, level of motivation to stop, types and functions and potential addictive features of self-injury
To evaluate the evolution of quality of life
ED-QOL: Eating Disorders Quality of Life Scale. The EDQOL has 25 items that contribute to four subscales (Psychological, Physical/Cognitive, Work/School, and Financial), which combined produce an overall quality of life score. Each item is coded on a five-point scale and asks the participant to rate the extent to which they perceive their eating disorder to affect their quality of life in different domains. Higher scores indicate lower quality of life.
To evaluate the evolution of quality of life
ED-QOL: Eating Disorders Quality of Life Scale. The EDQOL has 25 items that contribute to four subscales (Psychological, Physical/Cognitive, Work/School, and Financial), which combined produce an overall quality of life score. Each item is coded on a five-point scale and asks the participant to rate the extent to which they perceive their eating disorder to affect their quality of life in different domains. Higher scores indicate lower quality of life.
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of physical activity dependence
EDS-R: Exercise-Dependence Scale-Revised, The EDS-R score ranges from 21 to 126. Higher score means worse outcome
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of physical activity dependence
EDS-R: Exercise-Dependence Scale-Revised, The EDS-R score ranges from 21 to 126. Higher score means worse outcome
To evaluate the evolution of seriousness of physical activity dependence
EDS-R: Exercise-Dependence Scale-Revised, The EDS-R score ranges from 21 to 126. Higher score means worse outcome
To evaluate the evolution of somatic dysfonctions (for Arm 1)
SOAP note form. This is a standardized tool to evaluate somatic dysfunctions (sensitivity, mobility, texture, asymmetry) and severity (from 0 to 3) for each body region
To evaluate the evolution of somatic dysfonctions (for Arm 1)
SOAP note form. This is a standardized tool to evaluate somatic dysfunctions (sensitivity, mobility, texture, asymmetry) and severity (from 0 to 3) for each body region