search
Back to results

FES Assisted Cycling in Children With CP (CP FES Cycling)

Primary Purpose

Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
FES
Cycling
Sponsored by
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia focused on measuring Cerebral Palsy, Functional electrical stimulation, Cycling

Eligibility Criteria

10 Years - 18 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Spastic CP (di-, tetra-, or triplegic)
  • Level II, III or IV GMFCS classification
  • Sufficient covering of the femoral head in the acetabulum (migration % < 40)
  • Adequate range of motion of the hips, knees and ankles to allow pedaling
  • Visual, perceptual, cognitive, and communication skills to follow multiple step commands for attending to exercise and data collection
  • Seizure-free or well controlled seizures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Athetoid, ataxic, or hemiplegic CP
  • Significant scoliosis (primary curve > 40°)
  • Spinal fusions extending into the pelvis
  • Severe tactile hypersensitivity
  • Joint instability or dislocation in LE
  • LE surgery or fractures in the past year
  • Botox injections to LE in the past 6 months
  • Severe spasticity in LE (Mod Ashworth 4)
  • LE joint pain during cycling
  • Hx of pulmonary disease limiting exercise tolerance or Hx of cardiac disease
  • Severely limited ROM / contractures that prevent the subject from being able to be safely positioned on the cycle
  • Pregnancy

Sites / Locations

  • Shriners Hospitals fof Children, Philadelphia

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

FES + Cycling

Cycling only

Control

Arm Description

Functional electrical stimulation cycling group

Volitional cycling group (no electrical stimulation)

control group

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in cycling Ability
Change in cycling cadence from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up will be assessed.
Change in Energy Expenditure
Energy expenditure is a measure of cardiovascular fitness. Change in energy expenditure from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up will be assessed.
Change in Gait speed
Gait speed will be measured using a GAITRite Portable Walkway System (CIR Systems Inc; Havertown, PA). We will measure the change in gait speed from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Change in Spatiotemporal gait parameter
Step length will be measured using a GAITRite Portable Walkway System (CIR Systems Inc; Havertown, PA). We will measure the change in step length from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Change in Muscle Strength
Isometric maximum voluntary exertion testing of hip extensors & flexors, knee extensors & flexors, and ankle plantarflexors. We will measure the change in isometric maximum voluntary exertion from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Change in Walking Distance
6 minute walk test (6MWT) measures walking distance. Walking distance (in a fixed period of time) is an indicator of endurance. We will measure the change in walking distance from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Change in Timed Up-And-Go
Timed Up-And-Go (TUG) is a measure of functional mobility and will allow for assessing the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics. We will measure the change in TUG test from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Change in Pedometer measurement
Pedometer measurements to allow an unbiased report of the subject's activity level at home and in the community. We will measure the change in pedometer measurements from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Change in Electromyography
Muscle activation timing measured with electromyography (EMG) during analysis allows for mechanistic study of anticipated improvements in motor control as well as comparison to typical norms. We will measure the change in EMG from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Change in Self-Assessment
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a 10 point scale to rate one's own level of performance and satisfaction with performance. 1 mean poor performance low satisfaction and 10 means very good performance high satisfaction. We will measure the change in COPM scores from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Change in Health related Quality of Life
The KINDL questionnaire is administered to measure changes in health-related quality of life. The questionnaire is completed by the adolescent and a caregiver. The KINDL standard scale and "Disease Module" is administered. The standard scale contains 24 items comprised of Physical, Emotional, Self-Esteem, Family, Friends and School sub-scales. The 6-item "Disease Module" that measures the child's and caregiver's perceptions about CP. Scores for each item ranges from 1-5. The total score is the sum of all item scores, transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. We will measure the change in KINDL scores from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Change in Self-Perception
Self-Perception (Piers-Harris-2) survey measures physical and emotional well-being and self-esteem and will allow assessment of the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training. We will measure the change in Piers-Harris scores from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
May 15, 2015
Last Updated
December 24, 2020
Sponsor
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Collaborators
Shriners Hospitals for Children
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04688424
Brief Title
FES Assisted Cycling in Children With CP
Acronym
CP FES Cycling
Official Title
Functional Electrical Stimulation Assisted Cycling to Improve Fitness and Strength in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 30, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
Collaborators
Shriners Hospitals for Children

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This project proposes to assess if Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) assisted cycling can improve the cycling ability, muscle strength, cardiovascular health, quality of life, self perception and functional mobility of adolescents with CP better than a volitional cycling program or a non-intervention control group.
Detailed Description
Aim 1: To compare the effects of 8-weeks of FES-assisted cycling training on improving cardiorespiratory fitness, walking function, self-motivated exercise/recreation, self-perception and functional mobility and quality of life of adolescents with spastic CP with marginal walking ability (Gross Motor Function Classification System Levels II - IV) vs. 8-weeks of volitional cycling training and a non-intervention control group. Aim 2: To compare the effects of 8-weeks FES-assisted cycling training on changes in cycling ability of adolescents with spastic CP with marginal walking ability vs. 8-weeks of volitional cycling training and a nonintervention control group. Aim 3: To elucidate the mechanisms for potential improvements in cycling ability after 8-weeks of FES-assisted or volitional cycling training of adolescents with spastic CP and marginal walking ability.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia
Keywords
Cerebral Palsy, Functional electrical stimulation, Cycling

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
39 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
FES + Cycling
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Functional electrical stimulation cycling group
Arm Title
Cycling only
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Volitional cycling group (no electrical stimulation)
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
control group
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
FES
Intervention Description
FES will be applied via surface electrodes placed over bilateral quadriceps muscles. FES-stimulation will be ramped from sensory level (the level at which the individual feels a cutaneous sensation from the stimulation) to the maximum-tolerated level using a closed loop system controlled by computer software Subjects will exercise at home, three times per week, with FES on for 8 weeks with a goal of attaining 30 minutes of continuous cycling per session. If the individuals are unable to cycle for 30 continuous minutes, rest breaks will be provided with a goal of cycling for a total of 30 minutes. The length of each session will be approximately 45 minutes, with 15 minutes of set-up and 30 minutes of cycling.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Cycling
Intervention Description
Subjects will exercise at home, three times per week, without FES for 8 weeks with a goal of attaining 30 minutes of continuous cycling per session. If the individuals are unable to cycle for 30 continuous minutes, rest breaks will be provided with a goal of cycling for a total of 30 minutes. The length of each session will be approximately 45 minutes, with 15 minutes of set-up and 30 minutes of cycling.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in cycling Ability
Description
Change in cycling cadence from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up will be assessed.
Time Frame
Outcome assessed: Pre Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), Post Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
Title
Change in Energy Expenditure
Description
Energy expenditure is a measure of cardiovascular fitness. Change in energy expenditure from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up will be assessed.
Time Frame
Outcome assessed: Pre Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), Post Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
Title
Change in Gait speed
Description
Gait speed will be measured using a GAITRite Portable Walkway System (CIR Systems Inc; Havertown, PA). We will measure the change in gait speed from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Time Frame
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
Title
Change in Spatiotemporal gait parameter
Description
Step length will be measured using a GAITRite Portable Walkway System (CIR Systems Inc; Havertown, PA). We will measure the change in step length from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Time Frame
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
Title
Change in Muscle Strength
Description
Isometric maximum voluntary exertion testing of hip extensors & flexors, knee extensors & flexors, and ankle plantarflexors. We will measure the change in isometric maximum voluntary exertion from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Time Frame
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
Title
Change in Walking Distance
Description
6 minute walk test (6MWT) measures walking distance. Walking distance (in a fixed period of time) is an indicator of endurance. We will measure the change in walking distance from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Time Frame
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
Title
Change in Timed Up-And-Go
Description
Timed Up-And-Go (TUG) is a measure of functional mobility and will allow for assessing the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics. We will measure the change in TUG test from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Time Frame
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
Title
Change in Pedometer measurement
Description
Pedometer measurements to allow an unbiased report of the subject's activity level at home and in the community. We will measure the change in pedometer measurements from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Time Frame
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
Title
Change in Electromyography
Description
Muscle activation timing measured with electromyography (EMG) during analysis allows for mechanistic study of anticipated improvements in motor control as well as comparison to typical norms. We will measure the change in EMG from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Time Frame
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
Title
Change in Self-Assessment
Description
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a 10 point scale to rate one's own level of performance and satisfaction with performance. 1 mean poor performance low satisfaction and 10 means very good performance high satisfaction. We will measure the change in COPM scores from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Time Frame
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
Title
Change in Health related Quality of Life
Description
The KINDL questionnaire is administered to measure changes in health-related quality of life. The questionnaire is completed by the adolescent and a caregiver. The KINDL standard scale and "Disease Module" is administered. The standard scale contains 24 items comprised of Physical, Emotional, Self-Esteem, Family, Friends and School sub-scales. The 6-item "Disease Module" that measures the child's and caregiver's perceptions about CP. Scores for each item ranges from 1-5. The total score is the sum of all item scores, transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores indicate better quality of life. We will measure the change in KINDL scores from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Time Frame
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)
Title
Change in Self-Perception
Description
Self-Perception (Piers-Harris-2) survey measures physical and emotional well-being and self-esteem and will allow assessment of the impact of anticipated improvements in motor control and gait biomechanics from training. We will measure the change in Piers-Harris scores from pre-training to post-training and at follow-up.
Time Frame
Outcome assessed: Before Training (week 0), Mid Training (week 4), After Training (week 8), Follow-Up (week 16)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
10 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Spastic CP (di-, tetra-, or triplegic) Level II, III or IV GMFCS classification Sufficient covering of the femoral head in the acetabulum (migration % < 40) Adequate range of motion of the hips, knees and ankles to allow pedaling Visual, perceptual, cognitive, and communication skills to follow multiple step commands for attending to exercise and data collection Seizure-free or well controlled seizures Exclusion Criteria: Athetoid, ataxic, or hemiplegic CP Significant scoliosis (primary curve > 40°) Spinal fusions extending into the pelvis Severe tactile hypersensitivity Joint instability or dislocation in LE LE surgery or fractures in the past year Botox injections to LE in the past 6 months Severe spasticity in LE (Mod Ashworth 4) LE joint pain during cycling Hx of pulmonary disease limiting exercise tolerance or Hx of cardiac disease Severely limited ROM / contractures that prevent the subject from being able to be safely positioned on the cycle Pregnancy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Samuel Lee, PT, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Physical Therapy Department, University of Delaware
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Shriners Hospitals fof Children, Philadelphia
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19140
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The proposed experiments will generate data for publications in high quality peer reviewed journals. We will also present our findings at national meetings of neurorehabilitation scientists and clinicians and neuroscience and motor control meetings. To have the most impact, it is important that we present our findings to both clinicians and scientists, therefore, in addition to these standard approaches, we will seek out regular opportunities to present both the rationale and results of our work to local and regional clinicians as well as local and regional stroke support groups.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Following publication of primary results.
Links:
URL
https://sites.udel.edu/pt/research/samuel-lee-pt-mpt-phd/
Description
Dr. Lee's research studies

Learn more about this trial

FES Assisted Cycling in Children With CP

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs