search
Back to results

Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: A Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Effect of Sending Invitation Letters to Nonadherent Women (IMPACTGP)

Primary Purpose

Cervical Cancer

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Invitation letter + GP reminder
Invitation letter
Sponsored by
Nantes University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Cervical Cancer focused on measuring Cervical cancer screening, General Practitioner, Organized screening

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria for GPs:

- All GPs practicing in the Loire-Atlantique region (Western France) will be included.

Inclusion criteria for patients :

  • women aged 40 to 65 years,
  • being on the patient list of the GPs participating in the study,
  • living in the Loire-Atlantique region (Western France),
  • being affiliated to the National Health Insurance.

Exclusion Criteria for GPs:

- GPs who could refuse to participate by contacting the research team.

Inclusion criteria for patients :

  • Refusal to participate to the study
  • Female patients who underwent total hysterectomy and those who received a pathological result of a previous pap smear (asc-us or CIN) are not eligible to participate in the CC screening and therefore excluded from the study.
  • Women not registered with a GP located in Loire-Atlantique will not be included.

Sites / Locations

  • University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Invitation letter + GP reminder (Arm 1)

Invitation letter (Arm 2)

Usual care (Arm 3)

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of women aged 40-65 who performed a screening test (HPV test or PAP smear) over the last 3 years, 6 months after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Description of the types of screening tests carried out in first intention
Proportion of cytological tests performed among all screening tests
Description of the types of screening tests carried out in first intention
Proportion of HPV tests performed among all screening tests
Description of the results of screening tests carried out in first intention
Proportion of abnormal test results (cytology, HPV) among all screening tests performed
Description of the types of tests performed for follow-up of lesions detected
Proportion of "reflex" tests performed (number of cervical smears after a positive HPV result) among abnormal test results
Description of the types of tests performed to follow lesions detected by screening
Proportion of biopsies and conizations performed among abnormal screening test results
Description the results of the tests performed to follow lesions detected by screening
Proportion of high-grade lesions detected (second, a third-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, including in situ carcinomas and cancers) among the abnormal screening tests
Description of the treatments undergone by the women following abnormal screening tests
Percentages of treatments performed (conization, laser, hysterectomy) among the abnormal screening tests
Description of the factors associated with lower participation in screening
Participation rate according to age (over 50), income (women with low incomes qualifying for basic health coverage) and comorbidities.
Description of the healthcare trajectory of women undergoing a screening test
Proportion of women who resort to a GP, a midwife or a gynaecologist to undergo their screening test

Full Information

First Posted
November 27, 2020
Last Updated
February 2, 2023
Sponsor
Nantes University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04689178
Brief Title
Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: A Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Effect of Sending Invitation Letters to Nonadherent Women
Acronym
IMPACTGP
Official Title
Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: A Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Effect of Sending Invitation Letters to Nonadherent Women Combined With Sending Their General Practitioners a List of Their Nonadherent Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
January 8, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 2, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Nantes University Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Context: In France, cervical cancer (CC) screening was opportunistic until recently. The target population includes women aged 25 to 65 years. About 66% of women aged 25-40 years have performed a screening test over the last three years but this figure decreases to 55% in women over 40. The third "Cancer Plan" proposed by the French National Institute for Cancer recommends to achieve an 80% participation in eligible women. Improving women compliance to CC screening is a major challenge to decrease cancer incidence and mortality. To improve patient adherence, a CC screening organization will be launched in 2020 at a national scale in France. Women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation letter from the local public health association in charge of cancer screening organization. The invitation letter will remind women that they should consult a healthcare professional (a general practitioner (GP), a gynecologist or a midwife) to perform a screening test. Providing GPs with a list of their non-adherent patients could also improve women compliance to CC screening recommendations. The study objective is to assess whether sending both an invitation letter to non-adherent women and a list of their non-adherent patients to GPs ("invitation letter + GP reminder" group) could increase the proportion of women who perform a screening test, compared to only sending an invitation letter to non-adherent women ("invitation letter" group) or not sending any invitation ("usual care" group).
Detailed Description
Design, Setting and Participants: The investigators will conduct a 3-arm, cluster-randomized, controlled trial in the Loire-Atlantique region, in France. The study will include a total of 1,500 GPs and about 100,000 women. The randomization will be based on GP practices to avoid a contamination bias resulting from shared tracking mechanisms and communication between GPs within a given practice. Thus, several GPs working in the same practice will be assigned to the same study arm. Women on the patient list of a given GP will be assigned to the arm of this GP. Intervention: After a cluster randomization according to the practice, the GPs and their female patients will be included in one of the following 3 arms: "Invitation letter + GP reminder" (Arm 1): 40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test, AND GPs will receive the list of their 40-65 year-old patients who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years; "Invitation letter" (Arm 2): 40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test. GPs will NOT receive any list of their non-adherent patients. "Usual care" (arm 3): 40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will NOT receive any invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test. GPs will NOT receive any list of their non-adherent patients. Expected Results The investigators expect an increase in the proportion of women who perform a screening test in the intervention arm (arm 1), compared to arms 2 and 3. Previous studies have suggested that the proportion of women adherent to CC screening could be increased by 25% in arm 1 compared to arm 3, whereas the participation could be increased by 15% in arm 2 compared to arm 3. Considering that the proportion of adherent women in arm 3 should be of about 55%, the absolute increase in participation could reach 11% in arm 1, and 6.6% in arm 2. A higher adherence to CC screening could improve the detection of pathological lesions by 5% for pathological pap smears and by 10% for positive HPV tests.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cervical Cancer
Keywords
Cervical cancer screening, General Practitioner, Organized screening

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
195000 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Invitation letter + GP reminder (Arm 1)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Invitation letter (Arm 2)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Usual care (Arm 3)
Arm Type
No Intervention
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Invitation letter + GP reminder
Intervention Description
40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test, AND GPs will receive the list of their 40-65 year-old patients who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Invitation letter
Intervention Description
40-65 year-old women who did not perform a PAP test over the last 3 years will receive an invitation to consult a health professional to perform a screening test. GPs will NOT receive any list of their non-adherent patients.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of women aged 40-65 who performed a screening test (HPV test or PAP smear) over the last 3 years, 6 months after the intervention
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Description of the types of screening tests carried out in first intention
Description
Proportion of cytological tests performed among all screening tests
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Description of the types of screening tests carried out in first intention
Description
Proportion of HPV tests performed among all screening tests
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Description of the results of screening tests carried out in first intention
Description
Proportion of abnormal test results (cytology, HPV) among all screening tests performed
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Description of the types of tests performed for follow-up of lesions detected
Description
Proportion of "reflex" tests performed (number of cervical smears after a positive HPV result) among abnormal test results
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Description of the types of tests performed to follow lesions detected by screening
Description
Proportion of biopsies and conizations performed among abnormal screening test results
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Description the results of the tests performed to follow lesions detected by screening
Description
Proportion of high-grade lesions detected (second, a third-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, including in situ carcinomas and cancers) among the abnormal screening tests
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Description of the treatments undergone by the women following abnormal screening tests
Description
Percentages of treatments performed (conization, laser, hysterectomy) among the abnormal screening tests
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Description of the factors associated with lower participation in screening
Description
Participation rate according to age (over 50), income (women with low incomes qualifying for basic health coverage) and comorbidities.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Description of the healthcare trajectory of women undergoing a screening test
Description
Proportion of women who resort to a GP, a midwife or a gynaecologist to undergo their screening test
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria for GPs: - All GPs practicing in the Loire-Atlantique region (Western France) will be included. Inclusion criteria for patients : women aged 40 to 65 years, being on the patient list of the GPs participating in the study, living in the Loire-Atlantique region (Western France), being affiliated to the National Health Insurance. Exclusion Criteria for GPs: - GPs who could refuse to participate by contacting the research team. Inclusion criteria for patients : Refusal to participate to the study Female patients who underwent total hysterectomy and those who received a pathological result of a previous pap smear (asc-us or CIN) are not eligible to participate in the CC screening and therefore excluded from the study. Women not registered with a GP located in Loire-Atlantique will not be included.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Cedric RAT, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Nantes University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne-Sophie BANASZUK, Doctor
Organizational Affiliation
Centre de coordination des dépistages des cancers (CRCDC)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Nantes
ZIP/Postal Code
44000
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: A Randomised Controlled Trial Assessing the Effect of Sending Invitation Letters to Nonadherent Women

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs