search
Back to results

The Benefits of Vitamin B Combination as Add on Therapy in the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Patient

Primary Purpose

Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Indonesia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Standard therapy
Vitamin B combination
Sponsored by
Duta Wacana Christian University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy focused on measuring Vitamin B combination, B vitamins, Standard therapy, Diabetic neuropathy, Neuropathy

Eligibility Criteria

19 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female
  • Adult age (>18 years old)
  • Diagnosed as painful diabetic neuropathy based on validated Diabetic Neuropathy Symptoms (DNS) and Diabetic Neuropathy Examination (DNE)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with significant renal and liver problem
  • Subjects with known hypersensitivity to vitamin B combination
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding patients
  • Patients that enrolled any clinical trial within a month
  • Not competent enough in giving approval and answering questionnaires

Sites / Locations

  • Bethesda Hospital YogyakartaRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Experimental Group

Control Group

Arm Description

Receive standard therapy consists of gabapentin, pregabalin, or amitriptyline and vitamin B combination (B1 100 mg, B2 200 mg and B12 200 mcg) tablet once daily (experimental group).

Receive standard therapy consists of gabapentin, pregabalin, or amitriptyline.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Improvement in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at week 4
Change in pain impact on daily life as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from its baseline value. Visual analogue scale is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal or vertical line, usually 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme. The scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100). The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Improvement in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at week 8
Change in pain impact on daily life as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from its baseline and week 4 value. Visual analogue scale is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal or vertical line, usually 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme. The scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100). The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Improvement in Numeric Pain Scale at week 4
Change in pain impact on daily life as measured by Numeric Pain Scale from its baseline value. Numeric pain scale is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain. Higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
Improvement in Numeric Pain Scale at week 8
Change in pain impact on daily life as measured by Numeric Pain Scale from its baseline and week 4 value. Numeric pain scale is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain. Higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
Improvement in Brief Pain inventory at week 4
Change in pain impact on daily life as measured by Brief Pain Inventory from its baseline value. The Brief Pain Inventory evaluates a patient's pain experience through a number of different scales. There are line drawings of the front and back of a human body on which patients mark the location of their pain. Patients are asked to list the treatments or medications that they are using and how much relief they have provided in the past 24 hours. In addition, patients fill out 11 different numeric rating scale that ask about pain intensity (ranging from 0 to 10) and the effect of the pain on their ability to function during various activities of daily living. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Improvement in Brief Pain inventory at week 8
Change in physician global assessment from its baseline value. The Brief Pain Inventory evaluates a patient's pain experience through a number of different scales. There are line drawings of the front and back of a human body on which patients mark the location of their pain. Patients are asked to list the treatments or medications that they are using and how much relief they have provided in the past 24 hours. In addition, patients fill out 11 different numeric rating scale that ask about pain intensity (ranging from 0 to 10) and the effect of the pain on their ability to function during various activities of daily living. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
December 19, 2020
Last Updated
December 27, 2020
Sponsor
Duta Wacana Christian University
Collaborators
PT SOHO Global Health Tbk
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04689971
Brief Title
The Benefits of Vitamin B Combination as Add on Therapy in the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Patient
Official Title
The Benefits of Vitamin B Combination as Add on Therapy in the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Patient: Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
November 3, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 2021 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Duta Wacana Christian University
Collaborators
PT SOHO Global Health Tbk

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Large population-based study has shown that the prevalence of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) is around 21%, and painful symptoms are more prevalent in patients with type 2 diabetes, females, and Asians. PDN is characterized by symmetrical lower limb paresthesiae, dysesthesiae, lancinating pains and allodynia, with nocturnal exacerbation. PDN cause sleep disturbance and reduce quality of life. The international guidelines advocate a range of therapies for symptom relief. The therapeutic efficacy for all recommended medications is at best around 50% pain relief and is limited due to unwanted side effects. Apart from peripheral and central alterations, metabolic alterations such as increased glycemic influx, and elevated plasma methylglyoxal levels have been implicated in the pathogenesis of PDN. Several treatment options for PN are available, including pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and alternative options. Patients suffering from severe and disabling symptoms (e.g. NeP) may require guideline treatments like pregabalin, duloxetine, or gabapentin initially until the symptoms are under control. These medications can symptomatically relieve NeP; however, they do not address the underlying cause. Other options such as neurotropic B vitamins (B1, B6, and B12) do not only target the symptoms, but also improve nerve health and contribute to nerve regeneration. The B vitamins are commonly used for PN treatment in clinical practice worldwide, this treatment option is most suitable before the patient suffers from chronic NeP. However, co-treatment with neurotropic B vitamins is also appropriate in NeP patients, to ensure the restoration of nerve health.
Detailed Description
This was randomized clinical trial, active comparator, open label, controlled study from the period of November 2020 - November 2021 at Bethesda Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. There were 60 painful diabetic neuropathy patients who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each subject had been followed up from the first day of medication administration until 8 weeks after medication administration. Ethical approval number ((kosong)) was obtained from Health Research Ethics Committee, Bethesda Hospital Yogyakarta. The hypothesis of this study: a. Add on oral vitamin B combination (B1, B6, and B12) to standard treatment in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy is more effective in reducing pain and neuropathic symptoms in 8 weeks of treatment compared with standard treatment, b. Add on oral vitamin B combination (B1, B6, and B12) to standard treatment in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy is as safe as standard treatment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
Keywords
Vitamin B combination, B vitamins, Standard therapy, Diabetic neuropathy, Neuropathy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Eligible subjects were randomly allocated to receive any of the following regiments: standard therapy consists of pregabalin, gabapentine, or amitriptyline (control group) or standard therapy and vitamin B combination (vitamin B1 100 mg, B6 200 mg and B12 200 mcg) tablet once daily (experimental group).
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
Open label
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Experimental Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Receive standard therapy consists of gabapentin, pregabalin, or amitriptyline and vitamin B combination (B1 100 mg, B2 200 mg and B12 200 mcg) tablet once daily (experimental group).
Arm Title
Control Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Receive standard therapy consists of gabapentin, pregabalin, or amitriptyline.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Standard therapy
Intervention Description
Gabapentin, pregabalin, or amitriptyline
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vitamin B combination
Other Intervention Name(s)
Vitamin B complex
Intervention Description
Vitamin B combination (B1 100 mg, B2 200 mg and B12 200 mcg) tablet once daily
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Improvement in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at week 4
Description
Change in pain impact on daily life as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from its baseline value. Visual analogue scale is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal or vertical line, usually 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme. The scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100). The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Time Frame
4 weeks after treatment initiation
Title
Improvement in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at week 8
Description
Change in pain impact on daily life as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from its baseline and week 4 value. Visual analogue scale is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal or vertical line, usually 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme. The scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100). The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Time Frame
8 weeks after treatment initiation
Title
Improvement in Numeric Pain Scale at week 4
Description
Change in pain impact on daily life as measured by Numeric Pain Scale from its baseline value. Numeric pain scale is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain. Higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
Time Frame
4 weeks after treatment initiation
Title
Improvement in Numeric Pain Scale at week 8
Description
Change in pain impact on daily life as measured by Numeric Pain Scale from its baseline and week 4 value. Numeric pain scale is a segmented numeric version of the visual analog scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers) that best reflects the intensity of his/her pain. Higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
Time Frame
8 weeks after treatment initiation
Title
Improvement in Brief Pain inventory at week 4
Description
Change in pain impact on daily life as measured by Brief Pain Inventory from its baseline value. The Brief Pain Inventory evaluates a patient's pain experience through a number of different scales. There are line drawings of the front and back of a human body on which patients mark the location of their pain. Patients are asked to list the treatments or medications that they are using and how much relief they have provided in the past 24 hours. In addition, patients fill out 11 different numeric rating scale that ask about pain intensity (ranging from 0 to 10) and the effect of the pain on their ability to function during various activities of daily living. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Time Frame
4 weeks after treatment initiation
Title
Improvement in Brief Pain inventory at week 8
Description
Change in physician global assessment from its baseline value. The Brief Pain Inventory evaluates a patient's pain experience through a number of different scales. There are line drawings of the front and back of a human body on which patients mark the location of their pain. Patients are asked to list the treatments or medications that they are using and how much relief they have provided in the past 24 hours. In addition, patients fill out 11 different numeric rating scale that ask about pain intensity (ranging from 0 to 10) and the effect of the pain on their ability to function during various activities of daily living. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Time Frame
8 weeks after treatment initiation

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
19 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female Adult age (>18 years old) Diagnosed as painful diabetic neuropathy based on validated Diabetic Neuropathy Symptoms (DNS) and Diabetic Neuropathy Examination (DNE) Exclusion Criteria: Subjects with significant renal and liver problem Subjects with known hypersensitivity to vitamin B combination Pregnancy and breastfeeding patients Patients that enrolled any clinical trial within a month Not competent enough in giving approval and answering questionnaires
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Rizaldy T Pinzon, MD, MSc, PhD
Phone
+62 81294638229
Email
drpinzon17@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Vanessa Veronica, BM
Phone
+62 89605559529
Email
vanessaveronica73@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rizaldy Pinzon, MD, MSc, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Duta Wacana Christian University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Bethesda Hospital Yogyakarta
City
Yogyakarta
State/Province
Special Region Of Yogyakarta
ZIP/Postal Code
55224
Country
Indonesia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rizaldy T Pinzon, MD, MSc, PhD
Phone
+62 81294638229
Email
drpinzon17@gmail.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
15289425
Citation
Andres E, Loukili NH, Noel E, Kaltenbach G, Abdelgheni MB, Perrin AE, Noblet-Dick M, Maloisel F, Schlienger JL, Blickle JF. Vitamin B12 (cobalamin) deficiency in elderly patients. CMAJ. 2004 Aug 3;171(3):251-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031155.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17176168
Citation
Head KA. Peripheral neuropathy: pathogenic mechanisms and alternative therapies. Altern Med Rev. 2006 Dec;11(4):294-329.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26892473
Citation
Jayabalan B, Low LL. Vitamin B supplementation for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Singapore Med J. 2016 Feb;57(2):55-9. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016027.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16495296
Citation
Liu KW, Dai LK, Jean W. Metformin-related vitamin B12 deficiency. Age Ageing. 2006 Mar;35(2):200-1. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afj042.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24835269
Citation
Negrao L, Almeida P, Alcino S, Duro H, Liborio T, Melo Silva U, Figueira R, Goncalves S, Neto Parra L. Effect of the combination of uridine nucleotides, folic acid and vitamin B12 on the clinical expression of peripheral neuropathies. Pain Manag. 2014 May;4(3):191-6. doi: 10.2217/pmt.14.10. Epub 2014 May 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20045411
Citation
Okada K, Tanaka H, Temporin K, Okamoto M, Kuroda Y, Moritomo H, Murase T, Yoshikawa H. Methylcobalamin increases Erk1/2 and Akt activities through the methylation cycle and promotes nerve regeneration in a rat sciatic nerve injury model. Exp Neurol. 2010 Apr;222(2):191-203. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.12.017. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31624024
Citation
Selvarajah D, Kar D, Khunti K, Davies MJ, Scott AR, Walker J, Tesfaye S. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: advances in diagnosis and strategies for screening and early intervention. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Dec;7(12):938-948. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30081-6. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16008162
Citation
Sun Y, Lai MS, Lu CJ. Effectiveness of vitamin B12 on diabetic neuropathy: systematic review of clinical controlled trials. Acta Neurol Taiwan. 2005 Jun;14(2):48-54.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23970715
Citation
Tesfaye S, Boulton AJ, Dickenson AH. Mechanisms and management of diabetic painful distal symmetrical polyneuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep;36(9):2456-65. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1964.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17030830
Citation
Ting RZ, Szeto CC, Chan MH, Ma KK, Chow KM. Risk factors of vitamin B(12) deficiency in patients receiving metformin. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Oct 9;166(18):1975-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.18.1975.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

The Benefits of Vitamin B Combination as Add on Therapy in the Management of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Patient

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs