search
Back to results

Evaluation of the Use of the Atalante Exoskeleton in Patients Presenting an Hemiplegia Due to Cerebrovascular Accident (INSPIRE)

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Stroke, Acute, Stroke, Subacute

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Use of the Atalante exoskeleton
Sponsored by
Wandercraft
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Stroke focused on measuring Robotics, Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Powered exoskeleton, Walking, Exercises, Ambulation, Stroke, Acute stroke, Subacute stroke, Chronic stroke

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with hemiplegia due to cerebrovascular accident, occurred two weeks ago or more, follow up in a rehabilitation center or in a hospital (inpatient or outpatient),
  • Patient presenting a FAC score of 0, 1, 2 or 3,
  • Patient whose etiological evaluation of the stroke has been complete,
  • Adult patient ≥18 years old,
  • Patient able to read and write in at least one of the languages of the country and who have signed an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with severe spasticity of adductor muscles, hamstring, quadriceps and triceps surae. Severe spasticity is defined by a score greater than 3 on the modified Ashworth scale,
  • Pregnant women
  • Individuals with history of osteoporotic fracture and pathology or treatment causing secondary osteoporosis,
  • Pressure Ulcer of Grade I or higher according to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) International Pressure Ulcer Classification System- European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP), in areas of contact with the Atalante system,
  • Severe aphasia limiting ability to express needs or to fulfil questionnaires, at the discretion of the physician.
  • Patient with a cardiac or respiratory contraindication to physical exertion,
  • Patient with a score below 18 on the Mini Mental State test,
  • Patient unable to deliver his/her consent,
  • Patient under legal protection,
  • Patient participating at the same time in another study,
  • Patients with morphological contraindications to the use of the Atalante exoskeleton.

Sites / Locations

  • Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc
  • Centre Jacques Calvé - Fondation Hopale
  • Centre de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation
  • Centre mutualiste de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de Kerpape
  • Hôpital La Musse, La Renaissance Sanitaire
  • Rehazenter

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Other

Arm Label

Hemiplegia due to Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The primary objective is to evaluate the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events.
The primary endpoint is measured through reported Adverse Events (AEs) including adverse events (AEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), serious adverse device effects (SADEs), adverse procedure effects (APE), and new findings (NFs).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Evaluate the patient's ability to walk without the Atalante exoskeleton
Evaluation of the walk performance with the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) at baseline and session 6 (from 0 to 5, 0 being "patient cannot walk" and 5 "patient can walk independently anywhere")
Evaluate the patient's gait speed without the Atalante exoskeleton
Evaluation of the gait speed measured without the Atalante exoskeleton in 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) at baseline and session 6
Evaluate the patient's endurance without the Atalante exoskeleton
Evaluation of the covered distance without the Atalante exoskeleton measured in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at baseline and session 6
Evaluate the patient's static and dynamic balance without the Atalante exoskeleton
Evaluation of static and dynamic balance without the Atalante exoskeleton measured with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) at baseline and session 6 (0-20 on the BBS represents balance impairment; 21-40 on the BBS represents acceptable balance; 41-56 on the BBS represents good balance)
Evaluate the patient's spasticity
Evaluation of the spasticity of the adductor muscles, hamstrings, quadriceps, and triceps surae measured with Modified Ashworth Scale at baseline and session 6 0 No increase in muscle tone Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM) when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension
Evaluate the patient's pain
Evaluation of the pain measured before and after sessions 1 to 5 using the Visual Analogical Scale-Pain. The patient is asked to make pain ratings between "No Pain" and "Maximum pain imaginable", , with "No pain" corresponding on 0 on the caregiver side and and "Maximum pain imaginable" to 10 on caregiver side.
Evaluate the patient's capability to stop the exoskeleton on time using the remote
Evaluation of the patient's capability to stop the exoskeleton, on time using the remote at session 5
Evaluate the patient's satisfaction and perceptions upon completion of a locomotor training program with the Atalante exoskeleton
Evaluation of the satisfaction et perceptions via a questionnaire specific to the use of robotics exoskeleton at session 6. Questions are answered on a 7-level Likert scale.
Evaluate the use of the Atalante exoskeleton
Collection of data relating to the patient's walking parameters and level of assistance with the Atalante exoskeleton during sessions 1 to 5
Evaluate the patient's skin condition to monitore the pressure points the patient may have with the contact of the exoskeleton.
The operator will perform a visual monitoring of the patient's skin to identify potential cutaneous morbidity at pressure points the patient may have with the exoskeleton before and after sessions 1 to 5.
Evaluate the patient's level of anxiety and depression
Assessment of patient anxiety and depression by means of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale at baseline and one week after the 5th session

Full Information

First Posted
December 28, 2020
Last Updated
April 26, 2022
Sponsor
Wandercraft
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04694001
Brief Title
Evaluation of the Use of the Atalante Exoskeleton in Patients Presenting an Hemiplegia Due to Cerebrovascular Accident
Acronym
INSPIRE
Official Title
Evaluation of the Use of the Atalante Exoskeleton in Patients Presenting an Hemiplegia Due to Cerebrovascular Accident
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 12, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 28, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 28, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Wandercraft

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The INSPIRE study is interventional, European, prospective, open, multicentric, each patient being his/her own control. It is conducted to assess the safety and performance of the Atalante exoskeleton system in patients presenting an hemiplegia due to cerebrovascular accident. The primary endpoint is defined by the reported adverse events. The study will include 40 patients and takes place in six rehabilitation centers (4 in France, 1 in Luxembourg, 1 in Belgium).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Stroke, Acute, Stroke, Subacute, Chronic Stroke
Keywords
Robotics, Rehabilitation, Physiotherapy, Powered exoskeleton, Walking, Exercises, Ambulation, Stroke, Acute stroke, Subacute stroke, Chronic stroke

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
40 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Hemiplegia due to Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA)
Arm Type
Other
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Use of the Atalante exoskeleton
Intervention Description
A session includes stand-up, walks, exercises with or without the assistance of the exoskeleton, rotation, side and back step, squat and sitting.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The primary objective is to evaluate the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events.
Description
The primary endpoint is measured through reported Adverse Events (AEs) including adverse events (AEs), adverse device effects (ADEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), serious adverse device effects (SADEs), adverse procedure effects (APE), and new findings (NFs).
Time Frame
Throughout study completion, an average of 6 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Evaluate the patient's ability to walk without the Atalante exoskeleton
Description
Evaluation of the walk performance with the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) at baseline and session 6 (from 0 to 5, 0 being "patient cannot walk" and 5 "patient can walk independently anywhere")
Time Frame
At study start, day 1 and at study completion, up to 6 days
Title
Evaluate the patient's gait speed without the Atalante exoskeleton
Description
Evaluation of the gait speed measured without the Atalante exoskeleton in 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT) at baseline and session 6
Time Frame
At study start, day 1 and at study completion, up to 6 days
Title
Evaluate the patient's endurance without the Atalante exoskeleton
Description
Evaluation of the covered distance without the Atalante exoskeleton measured in 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) at baseline and session 6
Time Frame
At study start, day 1 and at study completion, up to 6 days
Title
Evaluate the patient's static and dynamic balance without the Atalante exoskeleton
Description
Evaluation of static and dynamic balance without the Atalante exoskeleton measured with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) at baseline and session 6 (0-20 on the BBS represents balance impairment; 21-40 on the BBS represents acceptable balance; 41-56 on the BBS represents good balance)
Time Frame
At study start, day 1 and at study completion, up to 6 days
Title
Evaluate the patient's spasticity
Description
Evaluation of the spasticity of the adductor muscles, hamstrings, quadriceps, and triceps surae measured with Modified Ashworth Scale at baseline and session 6 0 No increase in muscle tone Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM) when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension 1+ Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension
Time Frame
At study start, day 1 and at study completion, up to 6 days
Title
Evaluate the patient's pain
Description
Evaluation of the pain measured before and after sessions 1 to 5 using the Visual Analogical Scale-Pain. The patient is asked to make pain ratings between "No Pain" and "Maximum pain imaginable", , with "No pain" corresponding on 0 on the caregiver side and and "Maximum pain imaginable" to 10 on caregiver side.
Time Frame
At study start, day 2 and at study completion, up to 6 days
Title
Evaluate the patient's capability to stop the exoskeleton on time using the remote
Description
Evaluation of the patient's capability to stop the exoskeleton, on time using the remote at session 5
Time Frame
At study mid term, up to 5 days
Title
Evaluate the patient's satisfaction and perceptions upon completion of a locomotor training program with the Atalante exoskeleton
Description
Evaluation of the satisfaction et perceptions via a questionnaire specific to the use of robotics exoskeleton at session 6. Questions are answered on a 7-level Likert scale.
Time Frame
At study completion, up to 6 days
Title
Evaluate the use of the Atalante exoskeleton
Description
Collection of data relating to the patient's walking parameters and level of assistance with the Atalante exoskeleton during sessions 1 to 5
Time Frame
At study start, day 2 and at study completion, up to 6 days
Title
Evaluate the patient's skin condition to monitore the pressure points the patient may have with the contact of the exoskeleton.
Description
The operator will perform a visual monitoring of the patient's skin to identify potential cutaneous morbidity at pressure points the patient may have with the exoskeleton before and after sessions 1 to 5.
Time Frame
At study start, day 2 and at study completion, up to 6 days
Title
Evaluate the patient's level of anxiety and depression
Description
Assessment of patient anxiety and depression by means of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale at baseline and one week after the 5th session
Time Frame
At study start, day 1 and at one week afetr the study completion, up to 12 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient with hemiplegia due to cerebrovascular accident, occurred two weeks ago or more, follow up in a rehabilitation center or in a hospital (inpatient or outpatient), Patient presenting a FAC score of 0, 1, 2 or 3, Patient whose etiological evaluation of the stroke has been complete, Adult patient ≥18 years old, Patient able to read and write in at least one of the languages of the country and who have signed an informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: Individuals with severe spasticity of adductor muscles, hamstring, quadriceps and triceps surae. Severe spasticity is defined by a score greater than 3 on the modified Ashworth scale, Pregnant women Individuals with history of osteoporotic fracture and pathology or treatment causing secondary osteoporosis, Pressure Ulcer of Grade I or higher according to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) International Pressure Ulcer Classification System- European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (EPUAP), in areas of contact with the Atalante system, Severe aphasia limiting ability to express needs or to fulfil questionnaires, at the discretion of the physician. Patient with a cardiac or respiratory contraindication to physical exertion, Patient with a score below 18 on the Mini Mental State test, Patient unable to deliver his/her consent, Patient under legal protection, Patient participating at the same time in another study, Patients with morphological contraindications to the use of the Atalante exoskeleton.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc
City
Bruxelles
ZIP/Postal Code
1200
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Centre Jacques Calvé - Fondation Hopale
City
Berck
ZIP/Postal Code
62600
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation
City
Pionsat
ZIP/Postal Code
63330
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre mutualiste de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de Kerpape
City
Ploemeur
ZIP/Postal Code
56270
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital La Musse, La Renaissance Sanitaire
City
Saint-Sébastien-de-Morsent
ZIP/Postal Code
20119
Country
France
Facility Name
Rehazenter
City
Luxembourg
ZIP/Postal Code
2674
Country
Luxembourg

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of the Use of the Atalante Exoskeleton in Patients Presenting an Hemiplegia Due to Cerebrovascular Accident

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs