search
Back to results

ILM Peeling Versus Inverted Flap Technique for Treatment of Macular Hole: Near Visual Acuity Outcomes

Primary Purpose

Macular Holes

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Czechia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with complete internal limiting membrane peeling and SF6 tamponade
25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with inverted flap technique and SF6 tamponade
Sponsored by
Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Macular Holes focused on measuring Idiopathic macular hole, Pars plana vitrectomy, Inverted flap, Internal limiting membrane peel, Salzburg reading desk, Microperimetry

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients over 18 years of age
  • With idiopathic full thickness macular hole verified on OCT (Gass stage 2-4)
  • Minimal macular hole size under 1000 um
  • Pseudophakic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of other ocular pathology influencing visual acuity (e.g. age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy etc.)
  • Unwilling to sign the informed consent form
  • Unable to come to the study visits
  • Health status not allowing participation in the study

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty hospital Kralovske VinohradyRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

ILM peel

Inverted flap

Arm Description

Patients who will undergo 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with complete internal limiting membrane peeling and SF6 tamponade.

Patients who will undergo 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with inverted flap technique and SF6 tamponade.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Near best corrected visual acuity on Salzburg reading desk
Near best corrected visual acuity defined as the smallest text size where reading speed is over 80 wpm or word miss rate is 1 or lower as per Salzburg reading desk exam.
Microperimetry - macular integrity
Change from baseline macular integrity score from MAIA Confocal Microperimeter Expert exam 4-2 of the study eye at month 6.
Microperimetry - avarage threshold
Change from baseline avarage threshold score from MAIA Confocal Microperimeter Expert exam 4-2 of the study eye.exam 4-2 of the study eye at month 6.
Microperimetry - fixation stability
Change from baseline fixation stability P1 and P2 from MAIA Confocal Microperimeter Expert exam 4-2 of the study eye at month 6.
Macular hole closure rate
Macular hole closure rate defined as a flattened and reattached hole rim along the whole circumference of macular hole on the OCT examination of the macular region of the study eye.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Distance best corrected visual acuity
Change from baseline distance best corrected visual acuity examined on ETDRS tables and recorded in logMAR at month 6.
Occurrence of perioperative complications
Occurrence of perioperative complications such as retinal breaks, etc. will be recorded.
Occurrence of postoperative complications
Occurrence of postoperative complications such as intraocular haemorrhage, retinal detachment etc. will be recorded.

Full Information

First Posted
January 2, 2021
Last Updated
August 7, 2022
Sponsor
Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
Collaborators
Charles University, Czech Republic
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04698226
Brief Title
ILM Peeling Versus Inverted Flap Technique for Treatment of Macular Hole: Near Visual Acuity Outcomes
Official Title
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Versus Inverted Flap Technique for Treatment of Idiopathic Full-thickness Macular Hole: a Comparative Study of Near Visual Acuity Outcomes Using Salzburg Reading Desk.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
January 5, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
Collaborators
Charles University, Czech Republic

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A prospective randomised study comparing the near visual acuity outcomes using Salzburg Reading Desk in pseudophakic patients with idiopathic full-thickness macular hole treated with pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted flap technique. The aim of the study is confirm or disprove the hypothesis, that the near visual acuity results of pars plana vitrectomy with inverted flap technique for idiopathic macular hole are not inferior to pars plana vitrectomy with complete internal limiting membrane peeling technique. Patients will be followed for 6 months after the operation and near best corrected visual acuity testing on Salzburg reading desk, distance best corrected visual acuity on ETDRS tables and microperimetry will be performed and compared between both groups. Also the macular hole closure rate and complication rate will be compared between both groups.
Detailed Description
Idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (MH) is an anatomic defect of the macula caused by the traction of the vitreous. Interruption of all neural retinal layers from the internal limiting membrane (ILM) to the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) is present. Although other therapeutic approaches like pneumatic or enzymatic vitreolysis may lead to MH closure, pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) remains a gold standard for the treatment of full-thickness MH. Combination of PPV with full ILM peeling showed excellent results in small to medium MH, however the success rates dropped significantly with the increasing size of MH. PPV with inverted flap technique was introduced to address this issue and showed great results in MH of all diameters. In inverted flap technique, ILM is peeled around the MH and small piece of it is placed over the MH. It is speculated, that it serves as a scaffolding for gliosis allowing it to close large MHs. Besides gliosis, the ILM flap seals the MH by secluding communication between the vitreous and subretinal space, creating a closed compartment enabling the RPE to pump out fluid effectively. However, it is not known whether the ILM left in the macular hole might not hinder the healing process and full closure of macular hole. The aim of this study is to perform a detailed assessment of the state of the macula and near best corrected visual acuity and to compare the results of complete ILM peeling and ILM flap technique. This is a prospective randomised study comparing the near visual acuity outcomes using Salzburg Reading Desk in pseudophakic patients with idiopathic full-thickness MH treated with PPV with ILM peeling versus inverted flap technique. Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ration to undergo 25-gauge PPV with complete ILM peeling or with circular inverted flap technique with sulphur hexafluoride as a tamponade and recommendation to maintain reading position for 3 days. At baseline visit (D1) one day prior to the operation, patients undergo distance best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) exam using ETDRS charts, intraocular pressure (IOP) measuring using the non-contact tonometry, anterior segment slit-lamp examination, fundus biomicroscopy, microperimetry and optical coherence tomography (OCT). At month 3 (M3) and month 6 (M6) visits, patients undergo distance BCVA exam using ETDRS charts, near BCVA exam using the Salzburg reading desk (SRD Vision, NY, USA), IOP measuring using the non-contact tonometry, anterior segment slit-lamp examination, fundus biomicroscopy, microperimetry, and OCT. The closure of macular hole and post-operational complications are assessed. Distance BCVA is performed using ETDRS charts and recorded in logMAR. Microperimetry is performed using the MAIA Confocal Microperimeter (CenterVue S.p.A, Padova, Italy). Expert exam 4-2 of the study eye is performed two times and the average of macular integrity score, average threshold score and fixation stability P1 and P2 are recorded. OCT is performed using the Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). Macula of the study eye is scanned in 512 horizontal scans in the angle of 20x20 degrees with the spacing of 11 um in High Speed mode with noise reduction set to ART=5. The minimum and basal macular hole diameter is recorded, and the staging of the macular hole is performed using both the Gass and International Vitreomacular Traction Study Classification System. Presence or absence of epiretinal membrane is recorded. Near BCVA is performed using the Salzburg reading desk. The best near correction is determined first using the Jaeger Reading Eye Charts. Examination on Salzburg reading desk is performed afterwards in Czech with the reading distance set to 40 cm with contrast and luminance set to 100%. Progressively smaller text is presented to the patient until his reading speed falls under 80 words per minute (wpm) or until his word miss rate is higher than 1. At this point, patient is presented with 5 different sentences with the same text size. Test is ended if the patient cannot exceed the reading speed of 80 wpm or if his word miss rate is higher than 1 3 or more times for the same text size. The smallest text size where reading speed is over 80 wpm or word miss rate is 1 or lower is recorded in logMAR as near BCVA.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Macular Holes
Keywords
Idiopathic macular hole, Pars plana vitrectomy, Inverted flap, Internal limiting membrane peel, Salzburg reading desk, Microperimetry

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
ILM peel
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients who will undergo 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with complete internal limiting membrane peeling and SF6 tamponade.
Arm Title
Inverted flap
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients who will undergo 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with inverted flap technique and SF6 tamponade.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with complete internal limiting membrane peeling and SF6 tamponade
Intervention Description
Standard 3 port 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with complete internal limiting membrane peeling around the macular hole after brilliant blue dye staining and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) tamponade
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with inverted flap technique and SF6 tamponade
Intervention Description
Standard 3 port 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with inverted flap technique after brilliant blue dye staining and SF6 tamponade. "Flower petal" type of inverted flap will be performed - multiple small ILM flaps will be created around the macular hole and placed over the macular hole.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Near best corrected visual acuity on Salzburg reading desk
Description
Near best corrected visual acuity defined as the smallest text size where reading speed is over 80 wpm or word miss rate is 1 or lower as per Salzburg reading desk exam.
Time Frame
Month 6
Title
Microperimetry - macular integrity
Description
Change from baseline macular integrity score from MAIA Confocal Microperimeter Expert exam 4-2 of the study eye at month 6.
Time Frame
Baseline and month 6
Title
Microperimetry - avarage threshold
Description
Change from baseline avarage threshold score from MAIA Confocal Microperimeter Expert exam 4-2 of the study eye.exam 4-2 of the study eye at month 6.
Time Frame
Baseline and month 6
Title
Microperimetry - fixation stability
Description
Change from baseline fixation stability P1 and P2 from MAIA Confocal Microperimeter Expert exam 4-2 of the study eye at month 6.
Time Frame
Baseline and month 6
Title
Macular hole closure rate
Description
Macular hole closure rate defined as a flattened and reattached hole rim along the whole circumference of macular hole on the OCT examination of the macular region of the study eye.
Time Frame
Month 6
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Distance best corrected visual acuity
Description
Change from baseline distance best corrected visual acuity examined on ETDRS tables and recorded in logMAR at month 6.
Time Frame
Baseline and month 6
Title
Occurrence of perioperative complications
Description
Occurrence of perioperative complications such as retinal breaks, etc. will be recorded.
Time Frame
Month 3
Title
Occurrence of postoperative complications
Description
Occurrence of postoperative complications such as intraocular haemorrhage, retinal detachment etc. will be recorded.
Time Frame
Month 6

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients over 18 years of age With idiopathic full thickness macular hole verified on OCT (Gass stage 2-4) Minimal macular hole size under 1000 um Pseudophakic Exclusion Criteria: Presence of other ocular pathology influencing visual acuity (e.g. age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy etc.) Unwilling to sign the informed consent form Unable to come to the study visits Health status not allowing participation in the study
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Martin Pencak, M.D.
Phone
+420 267 16 3637
Email
pencak@volny.cz
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Miroslav Veith, M.D.
Phone
+420 267 16 3637
Email
mveith@email.cz
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Martin Pencak, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty hospital Kralovske Vinohrady
City
Prague
ZIP/Postal Code
100 34
Country
Czechia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Martin Pencak, M.D.
Phone
+420 267 16 3637
Email
pencak@volny.cz

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

ILM Peeling Versus Inverted Flap Technique for Treatment of Macular Hole: Near Visual Acuity Outcomes

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs