Efficacy of Myofascial Pain Syndrome Treatment in Patients With Cancer in Palliative Care
Primary Purpose
Myofascial Pain Syndromes, Cancer
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
1% lidocaine injection in trigger points
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Myofascial Pain Syndromes focused on measuring Myofascial Pain Syndromes, Cancer Pain, Palliative care
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants that
- accomplish the Travel and Simons' diagnostic criteria for myofascial pain syndrome,
- have pain intensity on visual analog scale of 5 or more,
- have performance status on the Karnofsky Performance Status scale of 30 or more.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Use of high dose anticoagulants (RNI above the therapeutic range);
- Patients with hemorrhagic diathesis;
- Patients with moderate to severe dementia syndrome;
- Patients with diagnosis of acute confusional state during the follow-up;
- Occurrence of clinical complication or intervention that could compromise the reevaluation of pain in the following days (for example, undergoing a surgical procedure or nerve block) or death.
Sites / Locations
- Laís Araujo Dos Santos Vilar
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
1% lidocaine injection
Control Group
Arm Description
The intervention group will be submitted to the trigger point injection procedure with 1% lidocaine (the sum of all needled trigger points will have a maximum of 10 ml), in a single intervention
The control group will receive usual care, defined as the treatment for pain prescribed by their assistant doctors.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in pain intensity
Assessed by Visual Analogic Scale (0 to 10). This evaluation will be collected at baseline, after 72 hours and after 7 days in follow-up.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in pain threshold measurement
Assessed with a pressure gauge (Kg). This evaluation will be collected at baseline, after 72 hours and after 7 days in follow-up.
Change in number of analgesic drugs in use
Evaluation of the number of drugs in use, if there was an increase, reduction or maintenance of the number and doses of analgesic drugs comparing to the baseline.
Assessment of depression and anxiety simptoms
Assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale- scores ranged from 0 to 21 for anxiety and 0 to 21 for depression. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Assessment of quality of life
Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnarie Core 15 PAL
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04703803
First Posted
January 8, 2021
Last Updated
April 22, 2023
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04703803
Brief Title
Efficacy of Myofascial Pain Syndrome Treatment in Patients With Cancer in Palliative Care
Official Title
Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome With Lidocaine Injection in Patients With Cancer in Palliative Care: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 17, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 19, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 17, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Palliative Care is active holistic care offered to people who are in intense suffering related to their health, resulting from a serious life-threatening illness, with a focus on improving the quality of life. Among the symptoms that cause suffering, physical pain has a prominent role in terms of prevalence and impact on well-being, especially in the subgroup of patients with terminal cancer. Myofascial Pain Syndrome may be one of the components of pain in cancer patients in palliative care. However, the literature is scarce in defining the prevalence of this condition in this population, and there is no evidence of the benefit of needling treatment with 1% lidocaine in these patients until now. The objectives of this study are to determinate the prevalence of myofascial pain syndrome and to evaluate the effectiveness of myofascial pain treatment with 1% lidocaine injection in reducing pain in palliative cancer patients, comparing it with a control group in usual care.
Detailed Description
This is a clinical trial designed as a comparative, randomized, single-blinded intervention study. Patients will be recruited from wards and radiotherapy sector of the Ribeirão Preto Clinical Hospital - Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP). Initially, patients aged 50 years or older with cancer in palliative care will be evaluated to assess the prevalence of myofascial pain syndrome using Travel and Simons' diagnostic criteria and for the following variables: demographic characteristics, functional status (Palliative Performance Scale), pain intensity (visual analog scale and pain threshold measurement with a pressure gauge), prognostic score (Palliative Prognosis Score), depression and anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), quality of life (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 PAL) and analgesic drugs in use. The participants that (1) accomplish the Travel and Simons' diagnostic criteria for myofascial pain syndrome, (2) have performance status on the Karnofsky scale of 30 or more, and (3) have pain intensity on visual analog scale of 5 or more will be randomized for the clinical trial. The sample size calculation resulted in 15 participants for each group, totaling a sample composed of 30 patients. The intervention group will be submitted to the trigger point injection procedure with 1% lidocaine, and the control group will receive usual care, defined as the treatment for pain prescribed by their assistant doctors. Both groups will be reevaluated after 72 hours and 1 week after the procedure. In the analysis statistics, chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test) will be used to evaluate categorical variables. For the comparison between the groups at each moment (before and after intervention) will be used the linear mixed effects model. The significance level established was <0.05. SAS Statistical Software (version 9.3; SAS Institute, Inc. Cary , NC) will be used for the analysis.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Myofascial Pain Syndromes, Cancer
Keywords
Myofascial Pain Syndromes, Cancer Pain, Palliative care
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized, comparative, single-blinded interventional study
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
A member of the research team who doesn´t know whether the participant is in the intervention or control group will be responsible for the reassessment (after 72 hours and 1 week) to measure the outcomes
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
1% lidocaine injection
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The intervention group will be submitted to the trigger point injection procedure with 1% lidocaine (the sum of all needled trigger points will have a maximum of 10 ml), in a single intervention
Arm Title
Control Group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
The control group will receive usual care, defined as the treatment for pain prescribed by their assistant doctors.
Intervention Type
Combination Product
Intervention Name(s)
1% lidocaine injection in trigger points
Intervention Description
The trigger point injection procedure with 1% lidocaine will be e (the sum of all needled trigger points will have a maximum of 10 ml), in a single intervention
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in pain intensity
Description
Assessed by Visual Analogic Scale (0 to 10). This evaluation will be collected at baseline, after 72 hours and after 7 days in follow-up.
Time Frame
72 hours and 7 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in pain threshold measurement
Description
Assessed with a pressure gauge (Kg). This evaluation will be collected at baseline, after 72 hours and after 7 days in follow-up.
Time Frame
72 hours and 7 days
Title
Change in number of analgesic drugs in use
Description
Evaluation of the number of drugs in use, if there was an increase, reduction or maintenance of the number and doses of analgesic drugs comparing to the baseline.
Time Frame
72 hours and 7 days
Title
Assessment of depression and anxiety simptoms
Description
Assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale- scores ranged from 0 to 21 for anxiety and 0 to 21 for depression. Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Time Frame
7 days
Title
Assessment of quality of life
Description
Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnarie Core 15 PAL
Time Frame
7 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Participants that
accomplish the Travel and Simons' diagnostic criteria for myofascial pain syndrome,
have pain intensity on visual analog scale of 5 or more,
have performance status on the Karnofsky Performance Status scale of 30 or more.
Exclusion Criteria:
Use of high dose anticoagulants (RNI above the therapeutic range);
Patients with hemorrhagic diathesis;
Patients with moderate to severe dementia syndrome;
Patients with diagnosis of acute confusional state during the follow-up;
Occurrence of clinical complication or intervention that could compromise the reevaluation of pain in the following days (for example, undergoing a surgical procedure or nerve block) or death.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Laís Araujo Dos Santos Vilar
City
Ribeirão Preto
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
14048900
Country
Brazil
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IPD to be made available after the end of the study protocol
IPD Sharing Time Frame
After the publication of results of study
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Researchers after the review and approval of protocol by the principal investigator
Links:
URL
http://fmrp.usp.br
Description
Webpage of the Ribeirão Preto Medical School
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy of Myofascial Pain Syndrome Treatment in Patients With Cancer in Palliative Care
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs