Two-unit Cantilever Implant Prostheses Made of Monolithic Zirconia or PFM (Cantilever)
Primary Purpose
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Missing Teeth
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Switzerland
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Monolithic zirconia screw retained implant-supported cantilever reconstruction supported by titanium base abutments, in a full digital workflow (ZR-TiB)
porcelain fused-to metal screw retained implant-supported cantilever reconstruction supported by a gold-abutment, in a conventional workflow (PFM-GA)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Jaw, Edentulous, Partially focused on measuring Dental Implants, Cantilever, Titanium base, Dental abutment, Fixed dental prosthesis, Monolithic zirconia, Porcelain fused to metal
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Minimal age of 22 years old.
- No general medical condition which represents a contraindication to implant treatment
- Good oral hygiene (PII ≤ 20%), and healthy periodontal tissues (BOP≤ 20%)
- Two adjacent-teeth gap in posterior maxilla or mandible arch (first premolar, second premolar, first molar, second molar) with an osseointegrated regular or wide-diameter bone-level implant in a prosthetically correct position to allow occlusal screw-retention. Free-end edentulous gaps can also be included
- Presence of antagonist occlusal units
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe bruxism or clenching habits
- Patients with inadequate oral hygiene or persistent intraoral infection
- Women who are pregnant or breast feeding at the day of inclusion
- Smokers exceeding 15 cigarettes / day, or equivalent; patients chewing tobacco
- Unable or unwilling to cooperate for the trial period
- Estimated cantilever crown mesial-distal length > 10 mm
- Estimated implant crown height (from implant platform to occlusal contact points) > 15 mm
Sites / Locations
- University of GenevaRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
ZR-TiB
PFM-GA
Arm Description
Monolithic zirconia screw retained implant-supported cantilever reconstruction supported by titanium base abutments, in a full digital workflow (ZR)
Porcelain fused-to metal screw retained implant-supported cantilever reconstruction supported by a gold-abutment, in a conventional workflow (PFM)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Technical complication rate
assessed by USPHS-criteria
Secondary Outcome Measures
Survival rate
Biological parameters
assessed by clinical examination by measuring with a periodontal probe: bleeding on probing (yes/no per site), pocket probing depth (mm), width of keratinized mucosa (mm), assessed by evaluation of standardized x-rays: marginal bone level changes (mm)
Wear rate of restoration and antagonist
assessed by a volumetric analysis software
Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs)
assessed through questionnaires: Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) to evaluate oral health-related quality of life [0-4 for each of the 14 questions, where 4 represents the worst outcome]; Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to evaluate patient experience with the impression procedure [0-10, where 10 represents the best outcome]
Cost-efficiency
assessed by measuring time and counting costs of materials between the two workflows procedures (digital vs. analogue)
Accuracy of fabrication
measured in terms of occlusal adjustment needed between the two fabrication procedures (digital vs. analogue workflow)
Operator Reported Outcomes Measures
assessed through Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to evaluate operator experience with the impression procedure and with the adjustment of the restoration [0-10, where 10 represents the best outcome]
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04713800
First Posted
January 12, 2021
Last Updated
November 21, 2022
Sponsor
University of Geneva, Switzerland
Collaborators
ITI Foundation
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04713800
Brief Title
Two-unit Cantilever Implant Prostheses Made of Monolithic Zirconia or PFM
Acronym
Cantilever
Official Title
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Two-unit Cantilever Implant Prostheses Made of Monolithic Zirconia on Titanium Base Abutments or Porcelain-fused to Metal on Gold Abutments
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
July 28, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 2027 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 2027 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Geneva, Switzerland
Collaborators
ITI Foundation
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of is to compare the survival rate and technical outcomes of cantilever implant-supported fixed denture prosthetics (cFDPs) made either out of monolithic zirconia bonded to a titanium base in a digital workflow, or porcelain fused-to metal using a gold abutment in a conventional workflow. In addition, biological outcomes, wear patterns, PROMs and time efficiency will be recorded. The null hypothesis is: the reconstruction type does not influence the survival rate and technical outcomes of 2-unit implant-supported cFDP.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Missing Teeth
Keywords
Dental Implants, Cantilever, Titanium base, Dental abutment, Fixed dental prosthesis, Monolithic zirconia, Porcelain fused to metal
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
38 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
ZR-TiB
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Monolithic zirconia screw retained implant-supported cantilever reconstruction supported by titanium base abutments, in a full digital workflow (ZR)
Arm Title
PFM-GA
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Porcelain fused-to metal screw retained implant-supported cantilever reconstruction supported by a gold-abutment, in a conventional workflow (PFM)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Monolithic zirconia screw retained implant-supported cantilever reconstruction supported by titanium base abutments, in a full digital workflow (ZR-TiB)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Straumann® Variobase® for crown
Intervention Description
In group ZR-TiB the implant impressions will be taken using an intra-oral scanner and the respective scanbody. The restorations will be manufactured by means of CAD/CAM procedures using monolithic zirconia. For sufficient aesthetics, the zirconia restorations can be manually veneered with veneering ceramic only at the buccal surface, while the occlusal surface will remain monolithic and will be high-gloss polished. The zirconia restorations will be extra-orally cemented onto titanium base abutments (Straumann® Variobase® for crown, Straumann AG), correctly polished and delivered to the patient, by screw-retention onto the implant.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
porcelain fused-to metal screw retained implant-supported cantilever reconstruction supported by a gold-abutment, in a conventional workflow (PFM-GA)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Straumann® Gold abutment for crown
Intervention Description
In group PFM-GA implant impression will be taken using a polyvinyl siloxane or polyether impression material in a conventional manner with the use of stock trays and corresponding impression copings. The framework will be manufactured by the lost wax-technique using a gold-abutment (Straumann® Gold abutment for crown, Straumann AG) and a gold-alloy. All metal frameworks will be manually veneered with veneering ceramic, polished and glazed, and delivered to the patient, by screw-retention onto the implant.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Technical complication rate
Description
assessed by USPHS-criteria
Time Frame
5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Survival rate
Time Frame
1, 3, 5 years
Title
Biological parameters
Description
assessed by clinical examination by measuring with a periodontal probe: bleeding on probing (yes/no per site), pocket probing depth (mm), width of keratinized mucosa (mm), assessed by evaluation of standardized x-rays: marginal bone level changes (mm)
Time Frame
1, 3, 5 years
Title
Wear rate of restoration and antagonist
Description
assessed by a volumetric analysis software
Time Frame
1, 3, 5 years
Title
Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs)
Description
assessed through questionnaires: Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) to evaluate oral health-related quality of life [0-4 for each of the 14 questions, where 4 represents the worst outcome]; Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to evaluate patient experience with the impression procedure [0-10, where 10 represents the best outcome]
Time Frame
1, 3, 5 years
Title
Cost-efficiency
Description
assessed by measuring time and counting costs of materials between the two workflows procedures (digital vs. analogue)
Time Frame
single-point measure at baseline
Title
Accuracy of fabrication
Description
measured in terms of occlusal adjustment needed between the two fabrication procedures (digital vs. analogue workflow)
Time Frame
single-point measure at baseline
Title
Operator Reported Outcomes Measures
Description
assessed through Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) to evaluate operator experience with the impression procedure and with the adjustment of the restoration [0-10, where 10 represents the best outcome]
Time Frame
single-point measure at baseline
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
22 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Minimal age of 22 years old.
No general medical condition which represents a contraindication to implant treatment
Good oral hygiene (PII ≤ 20%), and healthy periodontal tissues (BOP≤ 20%)
Two adjacent-teeth gap in posterior maxilla or mandible arch (first premolar, second premolar, first molar, second molar) with an osseointegrated regular or wide-diameter bone-level implant in a prosthetically correct position to allow occlusal screw-retention. Free-end edentulous gaps can also be included
Presence of antagonist occlusal units
Exclusion Criteria:
Severe bruxism or clenching habits
Patients with inadequate oral hygiene or persistent intraoral infection
Women who are pregnant or breast feeding at the day of inclusion
Smokers exceeding 15 cigarettes / day, or equivalent; patients chewing tobacco
Unable or unwilling to cooperate for the trial period
Estimated cantilever crown mesial-distal length > 10 mm
Estimated implant crown height (from implant platform to occlusal contact points) > 15 mm
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
João Pitta, Dr
Phone
+41223794088
Email
joao.pitta@unige.ch
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
João Pitta, Dr
Organizational Affiliation
University of Geneva
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Irena Sailer, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
University of Geneva
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Geneva
City
Geneva
ZIP/Postal Code
1211
Country
Switzerland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
João Pitta, Dr
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Two-unit Cantilever Implant Prostheses Made of Monolithic Zirconia or PFM
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs