search
Back to results

The Modulatory Role of Communicated Treatment Rationale on Treatment Expectation Effects in Depression.

Primary Purpose

Condition: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Biological illness and treatment rationale
Psychological illness and treatment rationale
Active pharmacological placebo
Active psychological placebo
Sponsored by
Philipps University Marburg Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Condition: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) focused on measuring Placebo effect, Treatment rationale, Depression, Expectations

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of major depression according to the 'Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V' (SCID)
  • Age>17
  • Comorbidity is allowed if major depression is the dominant clinical problem
  • Concordant medication is allowed if kept constant for the four weeks before and until the end of the trial (with the exception of benzodiazepines and if not contraindicated together with Buscopan)
  • Fluency in German
  • Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe depression (BDI> 30) or suicidality
  • Psychosis
  • Significant neurological diseases
  • Other mental or physical disorder with substantial influence on disability
  • Benzodiazepine intake
  • Any intolerance against Buscopan and sucrose or any medical condition/treatment conflicting with Buscopan intake

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University MarburgRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

1. Congruent Rationale & Treatment: Biological/Pharmacol.

2. Incongruent Rationale & Treatment: Psychological/Pharmacol.

3. Congruent Rationale & Treatment: Psychological/Psychol.

4. Incongruent Rationale & Treatment: Biological/Psychol.

5. Natural course control

Arm Description

Participants receive a biological illness explanation and treatment rationale. During treatment they receive a placebo pill (Buscopan).

Participants receive a psychological illness explanation and treatment rationale. During treatment they receive a placebo pill (Buscopan).

Participants receive a psychological illness explanation and treatment rationale. During treatment they receive a placebo psychological treatment (emotional writing).

Participants receive a biological illness explanation and treatment rationale. During treatment they receive a placebo psychological treatment (emotional writing).

Participants receive no intervention and remain on the psychotherapy waiting list. Participants who are recruited externally and are not on a waiting list, will be offered the option to join the waiting list.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in depression severity scores after 4 weeks of treatment - 'Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale' (MADRS)
Expert rating to assess depression severity; 10 items; each item is rated on a 7-point scale (0-6); total scores range between 0-60 (higher scores indicate more severe depression)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in depressive symptom scores after 4 weeks of treatment- 'Beck Depression Inventory' (BDI-II)
Self-report questionnaire to assess subjective depression symptomatology; 21 items (each item response is scored 0-3); total scores range from 0 - 63 (higher scores indicate more depressiveness)
Change in subjective disability scores after 4 weeks of treatment - adaptation of 'Pain Disability Index' (PDI)
Self-report questionnaire to assess illness burden; 7 items; each item rated on a 0 (no disability)-10(maximum disability) standardized numerical analogue scale; total scores range from 0-70 (higher scores indicate more disability)
Change in 'Generic Assessment of Side-Effects' scores (GASE) after 4 weeks of treatment
Self-report questionnaire to assess experience of side effects; 36 items; each item describes a side-effect symptom which is rated on a 4-point scale from 0 (not present)-3 (strong experience); total scores range from 0-108 (higher scores indicate stronger experience of side effects)
Change in treatment expectations at the start of treatment - 'Treatment Expectation Questionnaire' (TEX-Q)
Self-report questionnaire to assess expectations about treatment outcomes; 15 items; each rated on a 0 (no expectation of improvement)- 10(most improvement imaginable) numeric scale; total scores range from 0-150 (higher scores indicate better treatment expectations)
Change in subjective stress scores after 4 weeks of treatment - 'Perceived Stress Scale' (PSS-10)
Self-report questionnaire to assess subjective stress experience; 10 items; each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 0(never) to 4(very often); total scores range between 0 and 40 (higher scores indicate more subjective stress)
Change in anxiety scores after 4 weeks of treatment - 'State-Trait-Anxiety- Depression-Inventory' (STADI)
Self-report questionnaire to assess state and trait anxiety and depression; 40 (20 state scale; 20 trait scale) items; each item is rated on a 4-point scale from 1(not at all) to 4(very much); total scores per scale range between 20 and 80 (higher scores indicate more anxiety)

Full Information

First Posted
January 6, 2021
Last Updated
December 9, 2021
Sponsor
Philipps University Marburg Medical Center
Collaborators
Psychotherapie-Ambulanz Marburg e.V.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04719663
Brief Title
The Modulatory Role of Communicated Treatment Rationale on Treatment Expectation Effects in Depression.
Official Title
The Modulatory Role of Communicated Treatment Rationale on Treatment Expectation Effects in Depression.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
April 13, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 30, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Philipps University Marburg Medical Center
Collaborators
Psychotherapie-Ambulanz Marburg e.V.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Placebo groups in clinical trials on depression show impressive improvements. Yet, there is little research on the mechanism underlying this effect. The aim of this study is to assess how patients' treatment expectations modulate the placebo treatment effects. We expect that patients' treatment expectation determines placebo responses and treatment outcomes, and that this expectation is influenced by the disorder explanations (information about the illness models) typically provided during the initial medical encounters that precede treatment. In the study we aim to manipulate depressed patients' expectations by providing two different clinician-delivered illness and treatment rationales (biological/ psychological). Patients will then receive placebo treatment (pharmacological/ psychological), that is either congruent or incongruent with the previously communicated treatment rationale. Hypotheses: Providing a treatment-congruent treatment rationale leads to a better outcome than providing treatment-incongruent rationales. Treatment-congruent explanations reduce the risk of side effect development, in particular in the medication arm. Inter-individual differences in the effect of provided treatment rationale are associated with pre-treatment experiences and expectations, depression severity and comorbid anxiety.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Condition: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Keywords
Placebo effect, Treatment rationale, Depression, Expectations

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Participants will be blinded to the congruency condition. Outcome assessors (diagnosticians) will be blinded to treatment allocation and the congruency condition (both at the pre-measurement and at the post-measurement). The clinicians (care providers) who deliver the illness explanation and treatment rationale will be blinded to the participants' treatment allocation up to the point at which the respective treatment is delivered. This means that the clinician provides the treatment rationale (biological / psychological) without knowledge of whether a congruent or incongruent treatment will be delivered afterwards. The staff members who deliver the treatment (care providers) will be different to the clinician who delivers the rationales. Thus the treatment will be delivered without knowledge of whether a congruent or incongruent illness explanation was given.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1. Congruent Rationale & Treatment: Biological/Pharmacol.
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants receive a biological illness explanation and treatment rationale. During treatment they receive a placebo pill (Buscopan).
Arm Title
2. Incongruent Rationale & Treatment: Psychological/Pharmacol.
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants receive a psychological illness explanation and treatment rationale. During treatment they receive a placebo pill (Buscopan).
Arm Title
3. Congruent Rationale & Treatment: Psychological/Psychol.
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants receive a psychological illness explanation and treatment rationale. During treatment they receive a placebo psychological treatment (emotional writing).
Arm Title
4. Incongruent Rationale & Treatment: Biological/Psychol.
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants receive a biological illness explanation and treatment rationale. During treatment they receive a placebo psychological treatment (emotional writing).
Arm Title
5. Natural course control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Participants receive no intervention and remain on the psychotherapy waiting list. Participants who are recruited externally and are not on a waiting list, will be offered the option to join the waiting list.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Biological illness and treatment rationale
Intervention Description
Depression is described as a brain disorder and the role of monoamine, brain structures, and brain functions are reported as central mechanisms of relevance for its etiology and treatment. Biological processes are illustrated using typical charts and visualizations. Psychological influences are mentioned, but only as a byproduct of the disorder.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Psychological illness and treatment rationale
Intervention Description
Depression is described as a psychological disorder resulting from emotion regulation deficits. The suppression of emotions receives a special role in explaining depression. The psychological processes are illustrated using charts and visualizations. Biological aspects are mentioned, but only as a byproduct of the disorder.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Active pharmacological placebo
Intervention Description
The active placebo pill does not have direct effects on the brain. Buscopan (butylscopolamine, 10 mg daily, 1 pill in the morning) does not cross the blood-brain barrier, yet induces some smaller side effects that resemble those of antidepressants (e.g., mouth dryness, fatigue, nausea). Treatment duration is 4 weeks. The rationale is briefly explained to participants as "stimulating the biological balance in humans with depression, using a well-tolerated drug similar to Buscopan, which is well-known from pain treatments.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Active psychological placebo
Intervention Description
"Emotional writing" consists of writing about emotional experiences (4 sessions, one per week, 30 minutes each). The study instructor will be present displaying standard psychotherapeutic attitudes but will not read the participant's notes. The rationale for this treatment is briefly explained as "improving the dealing" with emotions to achieve a psychological balance in humans with depression.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in depression severity scores after 4 weeks of treatment - 'Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale' (MADRS)
Description
Expert rating to assess depression severity; 10 items; each item is rated on a 7-point scale (0-6); total scores range between 0-60 (higher scores indicate more severe depression)
Time Frame
Baseline, post-treatment (4 weeks after start of treatment)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in depressive symptom scores after 4 weeks of treatment- 'Beck Depression Inventory' (BDI-II)
Description
Self-report questionnaire to assess subjective depression symptomatology; 21 items (each item response is scored 0-3); total scores range from 0 - 63 (higher scores indicate more depressiveness)
Time Frame
Baseline, post-treatment (4 weeks after start of treatment), and at follow-up (1 week later)
Title
Change in subjective disability scores after 4 weeks of treatment - adaptation of 'Pain Disability Index' (PDI)
Description
Self-report questionnaire to assess illness burden; 7 items; each item rated on a 0 (no disability)-10(maximum disability) standardized numerical analogue scale; total scores range from 0-70 (higher scores indicate more disability)
Time Frame
Pre-treatment (2-7 days after baseline), post-treatment (4 weeks after start of treatment), and at follow-up (1 week later)
Title
Change in 'Generic Assessment of Side-Effects' scores (GASE) after 4 weeks of treatment
Description
Self-report questionnaire to assess experience of side effects; 36 items; each item describes a side-effect symptom which is rated on a 4-point scale from 0 (not present)-3 (strong experience); total scores range from 0-108 (higher scores indicate stronger experience of side effects)
Time Frame
Pre-treatment (2-7 days after baseline), post-treatment (4 weeks after start of treatment), and at follow-up (1 week later)
Title
Change in treatment expectations at the start of treatment - 'Treatment Expectation Questionnaire' (TEX-Q)
Description
Self-report questionnaire to assess expectations about treatment outcomes; 15 items; each rated on a 0 (no expectation of improvement)- 10(most improvement imaginable) numeric scale; total scores range from 0-150 (higher scores indicate better treatment expectations)
Time Frame
Baseline, pre-treatment (2-7 days after baseline)
Title
Change in subjective stress scores after 4 weeks of treatment - 'Perceived Stress Scale' (PSS-10)
Description
Self-report questionnaire to assess subjective stress experience; 10 items; each item is rated on a 5-point scale from 0(never) to 4(very often); total scores range between 0 and 40 (higher scores indicate more subjective stress)
Time Frame
pre-treatment (2-7 days after baseline), post-treatment (4 weeks after start of treatment), and at follow-up (1 week later)
Title
Change in anxiety scores after 4 weeks of treatment - 'State-Trait-Anxiety- Depression-Inventory' (STADI)
Description
Self-report questionnaire to assess state and trait anxiety and depression; 40 (20 state scale; 20 trait scale) items; each item is rated on a 4-point scale from 1(not at all) to 4(very much); total scores per scale range between 20 and 80 (higher scores indicate more anxiety)
Time Frame
State scale: Baseline; pre-treatment (2-7 days after baseline), post-treatment (4 weeks after start of treatment) and at follow-up (1 week later); Trait scale only measured at baseline
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Treatment adherence
Description
Count of remaining pills per week; participation in weekly therapy sessions
Time Frame
Once per week (during the 4-week treatment period)
Title
Common biological stress markers
Description
Salivary Alpha-Amylase and cortisol levels
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Current treatment effects after 4 weeks of treatment
Description
Generic questions to assess perceived treatment effects; 3 items, each rated on a 0(no improvement) - 10(most improvement imaginable) numeric scale; total scores range from 0-30 (higher scores indicate better treatment expectations)
Time Frame
post-treatment (4 weeks after start of treatment)
Title
Current treatment effects at follow-up
Description
Generic questions to assess perceived treatment effects; 3 items, each rated on a 0(no improvement) - 10(most improvement imaginable) numeric analogue scale; total scores range from 0-30 (higher scores indicate better treatment expectations)
Time Frame
at follow-up (1 week after end of treatment)
Title
Change in generic expectations about antidepressants at the start of treatment
Description
Generic questions assess pre-existing expectations about antidepressants; 3 items; items are rated on a 0(no expectation of improvement) - 10(most improvement imaginable) numeric analogue scale; total scores range from 0-30 (higher scores indicate better antidepressant treatment expectations)
Time Frame
Baseline; pre-treatment (2-7 days after baseline)
Title
Change in generic expectations about psychotherapy at the start of treatment
Description
Generic questions to assess pre-existing expectations about psychotherapy; 3 items; items are rated on a 0(no expectation of improvement) - 10(most improvement imaginable) numeric analogue scale; total scores range from 0-30 (higher scores indicate better psychotherapy treatment expectations)
Time Frame
Baseline, pre-treatment (2-7 days after baseline)
Title
'Somatosensory Amplification Scale' (SSAS)
Description
Self-report questionnaire to assess amount of somatosensory amplification tendencies; 10 items; items are rated on a 5-point scale from 1(not at all true) - 5(extremely true); total scores range from 10-50 (higher scores indicate more somatosensory amplification)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
'Behavioral Inhibition/Behavioral Approach System' Scale (BIS/BAS)
Description
Self-report questionnaire to assess sensitivity to approach or avoidance goals; 24 items; each item is rated on a 4-point scale from 1(not at all true for me) to 4(very true for me)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Generic screening pre-experiences with antidepressants
Description
Generic questions to assess pre-existing experiences with antidepressants; 4 items; if experience with antidepressants is indicated in item 1, the following 3 items are rated on a 0(no improvement) - 10(most improvement imaginable) numeric analogue scale; total scores range from 0-30 (higher scores indicate better past experiences with antidepressants)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Generic screening pre-experiences with psychotherapy
Description
Generic questions to assess pre-existing experiences with psychotherapy; 4 items; if experience with psychotherapy is indicated in item 1, the following 3 items are rated on a 0 (no improvement)-10(most improvement imaginable) numeric analogue scale; total scores range from 0-30 (higher scores indicate better past experiences with psychotherapy)
Time Frame
Baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosis of major depression according to the 'Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V' (SCID) Age>17 Comorbidity is allowed if major depression is the dominant clinical problem Concordant medication is allowed if kept constant for the four weeks before and until the end of the trial (with the exception of benzodiazepines and if not contraindicated together with Buscopan) Fluency in German Informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Severe depression (BDI> 30) or suicidality Psychosis Significant neurological diseases Other mental or physical disorder with substantial influence on disability Benzodiazepine intake Any intolerance against Buscopan and sucrose or any medical condition/treatment conflicting with Buscopan intake
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Winfried Rief
Phone
+49 6421 28 23657
Email
rief@staff.uni-marburg.de
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Winfried Rief
Organizational Affiliation
Philipps University Marburg Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University Marburg
City
Marburg
ZIP/Postal Code
35032
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Winfried Rief, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

The Modulatory Role of Communicated Treatment Rationale on Treatment Expectation Effects in Depression.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs