search
Back to results

Subacute Effect of Pharyngeal Pharmacological Sensory Stimulation in Elderly Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia (FIS2018)

Primary Purpose

Oropharyngeal Dysphagia, Dysphagia, Swallowing Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Capsaicin 10microM (TRPV1 natural agonist)
Piperine 150microM (TRPV1 & TRPA1 natural agonist)
Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM (TRPA1 natural agonist)
Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (ASIC3 natural agonist)
Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (TRPV1 & ASIC3 natural agonists)
Placebo (Methyl benzoate, Propyl benzoate, Propylenglycol)
Sponsored by
Hospital de Mataró
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Oropharyngeal Dysphagia focused on measuring Oropharyngeal dysphagia, TRP agonists, Pharmacological stimulation, Sensory stimulation, Elderly

Eligibility Criteria

70 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • More than 70 years old.
  • Oropharyngeal dysphagia with impaired safety of swallow (penetration aspiration score higher or equal than 2).
  • Patients able to comply with the study protocol.
  • Signature or the written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous history of severe gastrointestinal diseases.
  • Epilepsy or previous convulsive crisis episodes.
  • Pacemaker or implanted defibrillator carriers.
  • Cardiopulmonary instability.
  • Oropharyngeal dysphagia of structural cause.
  • Previous history of head and neck surgery.
  • Neurodegenerative disease.
  • Advanced dementia (GDS higher than 5).
  • Gastroesophageal reflux.
  • Taking drugs with effects on dopamine.
  • Neoplasia or active infection.
  • Alcohol, tobacco or drugs dependence.
  • Participate or have participated in another interventionist clinical trial in the 4 weeks prior to inclusion.

Sites / Locations

  • Consorci Sanitari del Maresme (Hospital de Mataró)

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Capsaicin 10microM

Piperine 150microM

Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM

Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5)

Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5)

Placebo

Arm Description

10mL capsaicin 10microM solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).

10mL Piperine 150microM solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).

10mL Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).

10mL Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).

10mL Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).

10mL placebo solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in the score of the Penetration Aspiration Scale
Differences found in the videofluoroscopy Penetration Aspiration Scale (from 1 (safe swallow) to 8 (silent aspiration)) between treatments and vs. the placebo group.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Impaired safety of swallow
Videofluoroscopic signs of impaired safety of swallow (penetrations an aspirations)
Impaired efficacy
Videofluoroscopic signs of impaired efficacy of swallow (oral and pharyngeal residue)
Oropharyngeal swallow response (laryngeal vestibule closure time)
Laryngeal vestibule closure time (ms) in videofluoroscopy
Oropharyngeal swallow response (upper esophageal opening time)
Upper esophageal opening time (ms) in videofluoroscopy
Oropharyngeal swallow response (laryngeal vestibule opening time)
Laryngeal vestibule opening time (ms) in videofluoroscopy
Oropharyngeal swallow response (Bolus final velocity)
Bolus final velocity (m/s) in videofluoroscopy
Pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials
Latency and amplitude of N1, P1, N2 and P2 peaks of the Pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials.
Pharyngeal motor evoked potentials
Latency, amplitude, duration and area under de curve of the Pharyngeal motor evoked potentials.
Sensory threshold
Sensory threshold to pharyngeal electrical stimulation (mA)
Substance P
Concentration of substance P in saliva.
Palatability and comfort with the treatment.
Palatability and comfort with the treatment.

Full Information

First Posted
January 29, 2021
Last Updated
July 12, 2022
Sponsor
Hospital de Mataró
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04741620
Brief Title
Subacute Effect of Pharyngeal Pharmacological Sensory Stimulation in Elderly Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia
Acronym
FIS2018
Official Title
Subacute Effect of Pharmacological Sensory Stimulation of the Oropharynx by Agonists of TRP Receptors in Swallowing Neurophysiology in the Elderly With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 17, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 27, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 27, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital de Mataró

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Oropharyngeal sensory impairments are a potential target for treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in older patients. We previously found acute administration of TRP sensory stimulants improved VFS signs and swallow response. We hypothesized that sub-acute administration of TRP pharyngeal sensory stimulants, would improve cortical neuroplasticity and will lead into a faster and stronger swallow response, however desensitization of TRP receptors may occur. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to assess the biomechanical (Videofluoroscopy) and neurophysiological (pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials -PSEPs- and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs)) effect of 2 week treatment with TRP agonists in older patients with OD. Design: 150 older (>70yr) patients with OD will be included in a Randomized Control Trial assessing the effect of oral administration of either: a) capsaicin (TRPV1); b) piperine (TRPV1/TRPA1) c) cinnamaldehyde (TRPA1); d) citric acid (ASIC3); e) capsaicin+citric acid (TRPV1/ASIC3); and f) placebo (Control). Measurements: 1) VFS signs of safety and efficacy of swallow and timing and extent of swallow response; 2) Latency, amplitude and cortical representation of PSEP and MEP; 3) Substance P concentration in saliva by ELISA as a marker of peripheral stimulation. Results from this study might help to develop new and effective pharmacological treatments for older dysphagic patients, from compensation to recovery of swallow function.
Detailed Description
The project consists of a randomized, double-blind controlled interventional clinical trial (patient and analysis of results) with five treatment arms and a control group (placebo) involving a total of 150 elderly patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (25 patients per group). The recruitment of participants for the study will be carried out from the patients referred to the Dysphagia Unit of the Hospital de Mataró for the evaluation of swallowing disorders. The swallowing function of all candidates to be included in the study will be clinically evaluated using the volume-viscosity swallowing test (V-VST). Those patients with signs of impaired safety of swallowing during the examination (cough, decreased O2 saturation greater than 2% or voice change) will be candidates to participate in the study. They will be informed and in case of acceptance a saliva sample will be taken, and a videofluoroscopy (VFS) will be performed. If the patient presents impaired safety of swallow (Penetration aspiration scale higher or equal than 2), the patient will be definitively randomized to one of the branches of intervention and the rest of the explorations will proceed (sensory evoked potentials to pharyngeal electrical stimulation and pharyngeal motor evoked potentials to transcranial magnetic stimulation). After the treatment period a second evaluation of study procedures will be performed. The treatment will consist of administering 10mL solution of the study product, according to randomization, 3 times a day (before breakfast, lunch and dinner) for 14 consecutive days after inclusion in the study. Treatment selected according our previous studies (Alvarez-Berdugo et al. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017) are: Capsaicin 10microM, Piperine 150microM, Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM, citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5), Capsaicin 10microM + citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5). For the control group, placebo product will be administered, which will be the vehicle solution with a more neutral pH.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Oropharyngeal Dysphagia, Dysphagia, Swallowing Disorder
Keywords
Oropharyngeal dysphagia, TRP agonists, Pharmacological stimulation, Sensory stimulation, Elderly

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
150 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Capsaicin 10microM
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
10mL capsaicin 10microM solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).
Arm Title
Piperine 150microM
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
10mL Piperine 150microM solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).
Arm Title
Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
10mL Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).
Arm Title
Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
10mL Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).
Arm Title
Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
10mL Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
10mL placebo solution 3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).3 times/day during 14 consecutive days (2 weeks).
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Capsaicin 10microM (TRPV1 natural agonist)
Intervention Description
10 mL Capsaicin 10microM solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Piperine 150microM (TRPV1 & TRPA1 natural agonist)
Intervention Description
10 mL Piperine 150microM solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM (TRPA1 natural agonist)
Intervention Description
10 mL Cinnamaldehyde 756,6microM + zinc 70microM solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (ASIC3 natural agonist)
Intervention Description
10 mL Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) (TRPV1 & ASIC3 natural agonists)
Intervention Description
10 mL Capsaicin 10microM + Citric acid 457,5microM (pH=3,5) solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo (Methyl benzoate, Propyl benzoate, Propylenglycol)
Intervention Description
10 mL placebo solution 3 times per day (before each meal) during 14 consecutive days.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the score of the Penetration Aspiration Scale
Description
Differences found in the videofluoroscopy Penetration Aspiration Scale (from 1 (safe swallow) to 8 (silent aspiration)) between treatments and vs. the placebo group.
Time Frame
Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Impaired safety of swallow
Description
Videofluoroscopic signs of impaired safety of swallow (penetrations an aspirations)
Time Frame
Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Title
Impaired efficacy
Description
Videofluoroscopic signs of impaired efficacy of swallow (oral and pharyngeal residue)
Time Frame
Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Title
Oropharyngeal swallow response (laryngeal vestibule closure time)
Description
Laryngeal vestibule closure time (ms) in videofluoroscopy
Time Frame
Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Title
Oropharyngeal swallow response (upper esophageal opening time)
Description
Upper esophageal opening time (ms) in videofluoroscopy
Time Frame
Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Title
Oropharyngeal swallow response (laryngeal vestibule opening time)
Description
Laryngeal vestibule opening time (ms) in videofluoroscopy
Time Frame
Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Title
Oropharyngeal swallow response (Bolus final velocity)
Description
Bolus final velocity (m/s) in videofluoroscopy
Time Frame
Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Title
Pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials
Description
Latency and amplitude of N1, P1, N2 and P2 peaks of the Pharyngeal sensory evoked potentials.
Time Frame
Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Title
Pharyngeal motor evoked potentials
Description
Latency, amplitude, duration and area under de curve of the Pharyngeal motor evoked potentials.
Time Frame
Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Title
Sensory threshold
Description
Sensory threshold to pharyngeal electrical stimulation (mA)
Time Frame
Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Title
Substance P
Description
Concentration of substance P in saliva.
Time Frame
Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention
Title
Palatability and comfort with the treatment.
Description
Palatability and comfort with the treatment.
Time Frame
Baseline versus 2/3 days after the intervention

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: More than 70 years old. Oropharyngeal dysphagia with impaired safety of swallow (penetration aspiration score higher or equal than 2). Patients able to comply with the study protocol. Signature or the written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Previous history of severe gastrointestinal diseases. Epilepsy or previous convulsive crisis episodes. Pacemaker or implanted defibrillator carriers. Cardiopulmonary instability. Oropharyngeal dysphagia of structural cause. Previous history of head and neck surgery. Neurodegenerative disease. Advanced dementia (GDS higher than 5). Gastroesophageal reflux. Taking drugs with effects on dopamine. Neoplasia or active infection. Alcohol, tobacco or drugs dependence. Participate or have participated in another interventionist clinical trial in the 4 weeks prior to inclusion.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pere Clavé, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital de Mataró
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Consorci Sanitari del Maresme (Hospital de Mataró)
City
Mataró
State/Province
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08301
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Subacute Effect of Pharyngeal Pharmacological Sensory Stimulation in Elderly Patients With Oropharyngeal Dysphagia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs