search
Back to results

Superior vs Temporal Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure Suspects (PACS)

Primary Purpose

Primary Angle Glaucoma Closure Suspect

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Yag Laser peripheral Iridotomy
Sponsored by
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Primary Angle Glaucoma Closure Suspect

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

* clinical evidence of bilateral occludable angles (PACS) defined as:

  • Peripheral anterior synechia (PAS) absent and trabecular meshwork not visible in ≥6 clock hours under non-indentation gonioscopy, Along with,
  • absence of PAC or PACG, in both eyes.
  • macular and optic nerve OCT within the 95% range of the normative database for patients to be included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • evidence of unilateral PACS,
  • a history suggestive of an acute angle closure attack (based on symptoms) documented intraocular pressure over 30 mmHg,
  • or any sign of Angle Closure Glaucoma (manifest glaucomatous neuropathy detected by OCT).
  • Patients with previous ocular surgeries will also be excluded.

Sites / Locations

  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Superior LPI placement

Temporal LPI placement

Arm Description

Each participant will be randomized to receive an LPI placement superiorly in one eye.

Each participant will be randomized to receive an LPI placement temporally in one eye.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Dysphotopsias noted from baseline visit before procedure till 3 months after procedure
We will inquire if patients experienced any of the following before and/or after the iridotomy: halo, lines, crescent, ghost image, glare, spots, shadows, blurring, or other unlisted visual disturbances. This will be part of the questionnaire completed before the procedure, at 2 weeks, and at 3 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Pain during the baseline visit procedure and recollection of pain till 3 months after procedure
The pain during the procedure and recollection of pain in follow up study visits; (no pain is expected once the procedure is completed) is a secondary outcome, as part of the questionnaire, graded by a standardized pain scale grading the pain from 0 to 10, being 0 no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain). This will be assessed immediately after the procedure, at 2 weeks and at 3 months after their laser peripheral iridotomy has been performed as is the current standard of care.

Full Information

First Posted
October 16, 2020
Last Updated
April 10, 2023
Sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04741919
Brief Title
Superior vs Temporal Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure Suspects (PACS)
Official Title
Randomized Prospective Study of Superior Versus Temporal Laser Peripheral Iridotomy (LPI) in Primary Angle Closure Suspects (PACS)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
November 25, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Basic Study Design: Prospective, randomized, single-center, single-blinded study to compare dysphotopsias and pain recollection immediately 2 weeks, and 3 months after LPI in PACS patients who have a clear indication for bilateral LPI. Our null hypothesis is that there is no difference in dysphotopsia or pain levels by LPI position. Our alternate hypothesis is that there are more dysphotopsias superiorly and more pain temporally.
Detailed Description
The study objective is to describe the difference in the incidence of dysphotopsias and sensation of pain both immediately, 2 weeks and 3 months after superior or temporal LPI. The main primary outcome variable will be the presence of dysphotopsias and the recollection of pain graded by a standardized pain scale. Stratified Block Randomization: 200 patients will be recruited from participating centre. For each patient, the order of the eye to be treated as well as the position of the LPI superior or temporal will be randomized. Methods: Subjects: Patients included in the study will be patients referred for a glaucoma evaluation or in follow up at Sunnybrook Science Center who are diagnosed as PACS and have therefore an indication for bilateral LPIs. Interventions: All patients eligible will be examined by the principal investigator, including a slit lamp assessment of the anterior segment, gonioscopy of the angle and stereoscopic optic nerve examination with a 78 Diopters lens. Intraocular pressure (IOP) will be measured with applanation tonometry. Patients will be assessed with a macular and optic nerve OCT to rule out glaucoma. Only bilateral PACS patients will be included. One randomly selected eye will receive superior LPI while contralateral eye temporal LPI. At the 2 week and 3 month follow up visits patients will be asked about dysphotopsias in one or both eyes and their recollection of pain will be graded. Other distractors will be included in the questionnaire such as increased tearing sensation. Laser peripheral iridotomy will be performed using neo-dynium:yttrium:aluminium-garnet laser after pretreatment with 2% pilocarpine and brimonidine 0.15%. Superior LPIs will be placed between the 11- and 1-o'clock positions such that they were covered completely by the upper eyelid; nasal/temporal LPIs will be placed between the 2- and 4-o'clock positions or the 8- and 10-o'clock positions such that they were completely clear of the lid margin. Preference will be given to iris crypts, avoiding iris vessels when possible. Laser peripheral iridotomies will be performed in both eyes during the same visit and will be confirmed to be patent after the procedure. Intraoperative data collected will include initial per-shot laser energy in milli joules, number of laser shots, and total laser energy in millijoules. All the patients will be treated with fluorometholone 0.1% eye drops QID for 5 days after surgery. Data Collection: Laser treatment specifications will be noted for the amount in LPI positioning, number of applications, and amount of energy used. Other relevant patient information will also be noted such as best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refractive error, IOP and presence of lens opacities along with the patients gender, age and ethnicity. These patients will be scheduled for follow up examination and IOP measurement at 2 weeks and 3 months after LPI procedure. On follow up a questionnaire will be given to patients assessing pain recollection and presence of dysphotopsias. Lid coverage of the LPI will also be noted. Sample size and Justification: The target sample size of 200 participants was selected to provide 80% power on an estimated incidence of 10.7% incidence of dysphotopsias after superior LPI versus 2.4% after temporal LPI with a 2-sided error at α = .05. This was based on the study published by Vera et al,.2014. The sample size allows for a 15% loss to follow-up and a 10% crossover between randomization groups. Data Analysis: Group differences in baseline variables will be evaluated using Student t test for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. P values of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Recruitment: Patients will be identified on initial or follow up visits at Sunnybrook Health Center. The ophthalmologists will identify potential subjects and the study coordinator will explain the nature of the study and invite them to participate. An Information and Consent Form will be signed by the patient previous to the enrollment in the study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Primary Angle Glaucoma Closure Suspect

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Each participant will be randomized to a specific LPI placement (superior or temporal) for one eye, and will be given the other alternative placement for the second eye. This is paired-eye comparative clinical trial.
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Superior LPI placement
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Each participant will be randomized to receive an LPI placement superiorly in one eye.
Arm Title
Temporal LPI placement
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Each participant will be randomized to receive an LPI placement temporally in one eye.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Yag Laser peripheral Iridotomy
Intervention Description
Laser peripheral iridotomy will be performed using neo-dynium:yttrium:aluminium-garnet laser after pretreatment with 2% pilocarpine and brimonidine 0.15%. Superior LPIs will be placed between the 11- and 1-o'clock positions such that they were covered completely by the upper eyelid; nasal/temporal LPIs will be placed between the 2- and 4-o'clock positions or the 8- and 10-o'clock positions such that they were completely clear of the lid margin. Preference will be given to iris crypts, avoiding iris vessels when possible. Laser peripheral iridotomies will be performed in both eyes during the same visit and will be confirmed to be patent after the procedure. Intraoperative data collected will include initial per-shot laser energy in milli joules, number of laser shots, and total laser energy in millijoules. All the patients will be treated with flurometholone 0.1% eye drops QID for 5 days after surgery.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Dysphotopsias noted from baseline visit before procedure till 3 months after procedure
Description
We will inquire if patients experienced any of the following before and/or after the iridotomy: halo, lines, crescent, ghost image, glare, spots, shadows, blurring, or other unlisted visual disturbances. This will be part of the questionnaire completed before the procedure, at 2 weeks, and at 3 months.
Time Frame
3 months from baseline visit
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain during the baseline visit procedure and recollection of pain till 3 months after procedure
Description
The pain during the procedure and recollection of pain in follow up study visits; (no pain is expected once the procedure is completed) is a secondary outcome, as part of the questionnaire, graded by a standardized pain scale grading the pain from 0 to 10, being 0 no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain). This will be assessed immediately after the procedure, at 2 weeks and at 3 months after their laser peripheral iridotomy has been performed as is the current standard of care.
Time Frame
3 months from baseline visit

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: * clinical evidence of bilateral occludable angles (PACS) defined as: Peripheral anterior synechia (PAS) absent and trabecular meshwork not visible in ≥6 clock hours under non-indentation gonioscopy, Along with, absence of PAC or PACG, in both eyes. macular and optic nerve OCT within the 95% range of the normative database for patients to be included in this study. Exclusion Criteria: evidence of unilateral PACS, a history suggestive of an acute angle closure attack (based on symptoms) documented intraocular pressure over 30 mmHg, or any sign of Angle Closure Glaucoma (manifest glaucomatous neuropathy detected by OCT). Patients with previous ocular surgeries will also be excluded.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Catherine Birt, MD, FRCSC
Phone
416-480-5882
Email
catherine.birt@sunnybrook.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Cindy Rutz
Phone
416-480-5091
Email
cindy.rutz@sunnybrook.ca
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Catherine Birt, MD, FRCSC
Organizational Affiliation
Sunnybrook
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N 3M5
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Catherine Birt, MD, FRCSC
Phone
416-480-5882
Email
catherine.birt@sunnybrook.ca

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Superior vs Temporal Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Primary Angle Closure Suspects (PACS)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs