Can we Use c-SIGHT for Spatial Neglect in Stroke Survivors' Homes? (c-SIGHT)
Primary Purpose
Stroke, Spatial Neglect, Inattention
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
c-SIGHT intervention
c-SIGHT attentional control
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring Stroke, Spatial Neglect, c-SIGHT, Feasibility Trial, Telerehabilition, Home-based therapy, Attention
Eligibility Criteria
Stroke survivors meeting all of the following criteria (and none of the exclusion criteria) at screening will be eligible to take part:.
- 18 years and older
- At least one-week post-stroke
- Stroke confirmed using clinical neuroimaging (head CT or MRI)
- Medically stable (as confirmed by the stroke service medical team responsible for the individual's stroke care)
- Capacity to give informed consent (as confirmed by the stroke service medical team responsible for the individual's stroke care and/or PI)
- Able to follow and execute a two-step command (e.g. "lift and balance this pen/pencil")
- Live within 70 miles of the University of East Anglia
- Signs of spatial neglect either via clinical assessment (e.g. star cancellation test; BIT) or observation
Exclusion criteria:
- History of other neurological conditions (e.g. dementia, brain tumour, Parkinson's disease, previous strokes)
- Bilateral impairment in arms (unable to move both arms)
- Taking part in a stroke rehabilitation research trial (which includes an intervention)
Carers must meet all the inclusion criteria to take part:
- 18 years and older
- Capacity to give informed consent
- Carer of stroke survivor in trial
- Live within 70 miles of the University of East Anglia
Sites / Locations
- Cambridge University HospitalRecruiting
- Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust
- Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation TrustRecruiting
- Norfolk Community Health and Care NHS TrustRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
c-SIGHT intervention
c-SIGHT attentional control
Arm Description
Grasp, lift and balance three wooden rods of different lengths.
Grasp and lift three wooden rods of different lengths from one end only (no attempt to balance rods).
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Recruitment rate
Rate of participants recruited into the trial amongst all participants screened
Exclusion rate
Rate of participants excluded from participating amongst all participants screened
Attrition rate
Rate of participants and data lost
Follow-up rate
Rate of participants included at follow-up
Time required to collect and analyze data
Time required for data collection and analysis will be computed per participant.
c-SIGHT compliance
Measured using short videos of participants carrying out first and final session of c-SIGHT. Following the participant's completion of the trial, videos will be reviewed by the research team to monitor whether participants and therapists deviated from instructions. Photo of set-up of first and last day of the training phase will also be checked to confirm set-up of equipment was correct and constant throughout the training phase.
Blinding and allocation success
Evaluated by the frequency of unblinding occurred among stroke survivors, carers and outcome assessors and clinical care team. Success of allocation method using minimisation will be evaluated by measuring homogeneity of the two groups on co-variates such as age, time since stroke, hemisphere damage and neglect severity.
Adherence to c-SIGHT protocol
The number of trials performed and length will be computed per session via a motion-tracking sensor.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Star cancellation test
The Star Cancellation Test is a paper and pencil test developed to detect the presence of unilateral spatial neglect (USN) in the near extra personal space in patients with stroke.The maximum score that can be achieved on the test is 54 points. A cutoff of < 51 indicates the presence of SN. A Laterality Index or Star Ratio will be calculated from the ratio of stars cancelled on the contralesional side of the page and the total number of stars cancelled. Scores between 0 and 0.46 indicate neglect in the left hemispace. Scores between 0.54 and 1 indicate neglect in the right hemispace.This will be completed by stroke survivors only.
Line bisection test
A paper and pencil task that measures spatial biases when marking middle horizontal lines (10 lines of 20 mm length). The deviation in mm from center (bisection error) is averaged and a bisection error > that 6 mm is considered evidence of spatial inattention. Completed by stroke survivors only.
Computerised Extrapersonal Neglect Test (CENT)
Computerised visual search cancellation test and a line bisection test that measure spatial neglect in extra personal space via television screens. Stimuli are presented out of reach (e.g., on participant's television), run on a laptop and performed using a wireless remote. A variety of variables are produced including: total cancelled targets, allocentric and egocentric neglect scores, number of intersections and re-cancellations, quality of search, total time, time asymmetry, asymmetry accuracy, asymmetry search speed and bisection error. Formulas adapted from Dalmaijer et al. (2015). This outcome is completed by stroke survivors only.
Completed by stroke survivors only.
Oxford Cognitive Screen
The Oxford Cognitive Screen is a short cognitive screening tool specifically designed for stroke survivors inclusive for patients with aphasia and neglect. OCS returns scores and a visual snapshot of a patient's cognitive profile, in a 'wheel of cognition', which at a glance demonstrates the specific cognitive domain impairments in Attention, Language, Praxis, Number and Memory. Completed by stroke survivors only.
Broken Hearts test
Paper-and-pencil standardized measure of spatial neglect (part of Oxford Cognitive Screen). Number of targets and distractors cancelled as well as ego and allocentric scores will be computed. Completed by stroke survivors only.
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
The SIS is a stroke-specific, self-report, health status measure. It was designed to assess multidimensional stroke outcomes, including strength, hand function Activities of Daily Living / Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL/IADL), mobility, communication, emotion, memory and thinking, and participation. An extra question on stroke recovery asks that the client rate on a scale from 0 - 100 how much the client feels that he/she has recovered from his/her stroke. Each item is rated using a 5-point Likert scale. Scoring will be computed for each domain and total according to scoring database: http://www.kumc.edu/school-of-medicine/population-health/research-and-community-engagement/stroke-impact-scale/instructions.html. Completed by stroke survivors only.
Spatial neglect visual analogue scale
A self-rating 10-point scale in which the participant will be asked to mark on a vertical line their (or their loved ones) perceived severity of spatial neglect. Completed by the stroke survivor and carer (if available) separately.
One item extended test
Observational test of contralesional limb awareness/personal neglect. Participants asked to point with unimpaired arm to six different parts of their body (e.g., ear, shoulder, elbow, side, leg, hand) and receive one of the following scores for each body part: 0 (no movement), 1 (search without reaching), 2 (reaching with hesitation and search), 3 (immediate reaching), with a total score ranging from 0 to 18. Completed by stroke survivors only.
Hand laterality task
Computerized task assessing body representation by testing perception of right vs. left hand images. Reaction times (ms) and errors (e.g., percentage) in identifying hands will be computed. Completed by stroke survivors only.
Body drawing task
Paper-and-pencil task requiring drawing of a person and self. Analysis will involve looking at symmetry of drawing and size/presence of different limbs. Completed by stroke survivors only.
1:1 semi-structured interview
Completed with the stroke survivor and carer (if available) separately. The interview, lasting approximately 15 minutes, will be transcribed and a thematic analysis will explore the usability of c-SIGHT and provide qualitative data about the therapy.
Modified Caregiver Strain Index
Questionnaire measuring financial, psychological, social, personal, physical caregiver strain. Carers indicate their agreement to statements from a choice three responses: 'Yes, on a regular basis' (2 points), 'Yes, sometimes' (1 point) and 'No' (0 points). Responses are summed and a higher score indicates greater strain. Completed by carer only (if available).
Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) carer version
The Catherine Bergego Scale is a standardized checklist to detect presence and degree of unilateral neglect during everyday life situations. The CBS uses a 4-point rating scale to report the frequency (e.g., Never, occasionally, frequently, always) of each statement occurring (e.g., "Forgets to groom/shave the left/right part of this/her face"). Responses are summed and the maximum score of 30 a total score of 30 indicates severe neglect. Completed by carer only (if available).
Rates of clinical brain scans obtained
Number of clinical scans obtained.
System Usability Scale
To assess usability of c-SIGHT. Participants are asked to score the following 10 items with one of five responses that range from Strongly Agree to Strongly disagree. The participant's scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100. Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking. Based on previous research, a SUS score above 68 would be considered above average and anything below 68 is below average. This scale will be completed by the stroke survivor and carer (if available) separately.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04752982
First Posted
February 7, 2021
Last Updated
July 9, 2021
Sponsor
University of East Anglia
Collaborators
Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, UK, The Stroke Association, United Kingdom
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04752982
Brief Title
Can we Use c-SIGHT for Spatial Neglect in Stroke Survivors' Homes?
Acronym
c-SIGHT
Official Title
A Feasibility Study of a Computerised Spatial Inattention Grasping Home-based Therapy for Stroke Survivors (c-SIGHT)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
February 25, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 30, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 30, 2022 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of East Anglia
Collaborators
Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, UK, The Stroke Association, United Kingdom
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Spatial neglect is a common post-stroke condition in which people may not be aware of anything on one side of the world (usually the same side they lost their movement). Currently, there is no effective treatment for spatial neglect. A therapy called SIGHT (Spatial Inattention Grasping Home-based Therapy) has shown early evidence of improving stroke survivors' spatial neglect (Rossit et al., 2019). SIGHT involves individuals picking-up and balance wooden rods with their less affected hand, independently, without the need for a therapist present at all times. Working with stroke survivors, carers and clinicians we have developed of a computerized version of SIGHT (c-SIGHT; Morse et al., in press). The present trial aims to: 1) investigate the feasibility of a blinded randomized controlled trial of c-SIGHT (active intervention) vs. an attentional control training version of c-SIGHT (sham intervention) in the homes of stroke survivors with spatial neglect; 2) Explore participant's experience using c-SIGHT independently at home; and 3) Explore the potential effects and effect size of c-SIGHT active intervention compared to the attentional control training to inform a future Phase II trial.
Detailed Description
This is a multi-centre, two-arm blinded feasibility clinical trial with an embedded qualitative study. Following baseline assessment, participants will be randomized (using minimization) to either: active vs. sham version of computerised Spatial Inattention Grasping Home-based Therapy (c-SIGHT). Randomization and group allocation will be managed and run by Norwich Clinical Trials Unit (independent from research team and outcome assessors). Participants, carers, outcome assessors, clinical care team and research team will be blinded to participant group allocation. Participants allocated to the active intervention c-SIGHT group will be required to lift and balance three wooden rods of different lengths. Those in the attentional control c-SIGHT group will use the same equipment, but will be required to lift the rods from one end only and not attempt to balance them (an attentional control). During the first training session a therapist (independent from the outcome assessors) will set-up the equipment and train the participant to self-administer the relevant version of c-SIGHT independently (i.e., without the presence of a therapist). Following this training session, participants will self-administer the training for 10 consecutive days (thirty-minute sessions 2 times a day - 'Training phase'). On the last day of the training (day 10) the therapist will return to participant's homes to complete a monitoring visit and collect equipment. To monitor adherence and therapy compliance the therapist will collect photos and videos of the first and last session of the training. A blinded assessor will collect outcome assessments at the end of the training phase (T1) and at one-month post-training (T2). The post-training (T1) data collection visit will also include one-to-one semi-structured interviews with stroke survivor participants and their carers (qualitative study).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Spatial Neglect, Inattention
Keywords
Stroke, Spatial Neglect, c-SIGHT, Feasibility Trial, Telerehabilition, Home-based therapy, Attention
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Participants are randomly allocated (using minimisation) to either the active intervention or attentional control group. Minimisation will use the following parameters: age, days since stroke, side of hemisphere damaged, and neglect severity (measured using the star cancellation test).
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The outcome assessor, stroke survivor, carer, research team and clinical care staff (e.g. GP) will be blinded to group allocation. Participants will not be told if they are in the active or attentional control c-SIGHT group. The set-up and equipment is the same between the two arms and only the instructions differ.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
46 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
c-SIGHT intervention
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Grasp, lift and balance three wooden rods of different lengths.
Arm Title
c-SIGHT attentional control
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Grasp and lift three wooden rods of different lengths from one end only (no attempt to balance rods).
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
c-SIGHT intervention
Intervention Description
The c-SIGHT active intervention involves grasping, lifting and balancing wooden rods using the unaffected hand. C-SIGHT uses a training mat, three wooden rods of different lengths, a laptop (to run the computer program) and a small motion tracking sensor which records the user's session length and trials completed. The participant's existing television is used to present the program (connected to the laptop).
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
c-SIGHT attentional control
Intervention Description
The c-SIGHT attentional control exercises involves grasping and lifting wooden rods from one end using the unaffected hand. Identical to the intervention group, the c-SIGHT attentional control version uses a training mat, three wooden rods of different lengths, a laptop (to run the computer program) and a small motion tracking sensor which records the user's session length and trials completed. The participant's existing television is used to present the program (connected to the laptop).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recruitment rate
Description
Rate of participants recruited into the trial amongst all participants screened
Time Frame
Through study completion, approximately 2 years
Title
Exclusion rate
Description
Rate of participants excluded from participating amongst all participants screened
Time Frame
Through study completion, approximately 2 years
Title
Attrition rate
Description
Rate of participants and data lost
Time Frame
Through study completion, approximately 2 years
Title
Follow-up rate
Description
Rate of participants included at follow-up
Time Frame
Through study completion, approximately 2 years
Title
Time required to collect and analyze data
Description
Time required for data collection and analysis will be computed per participant.
Time Frame
Through study completion, approximately 2 years
Title
c-SIGHT compliance
Description
Measured using short videos of participants carrying out first and final session of c-SIGHT. Following the participant's completion of the trial, videos will be reviewed by the research team to monitor whether participants and therapists deviated from instructions. Photo of set-up of first and last day of the training phase will also be checked to confirm set-up of equipment was correct and constant throughout the training phase.
Time Frame
10 days
Title
Blinding and allocation success
Description
Evaluated by the frequency of unblinding occurred among stroke survivors, carers and outcome assessors and clinical care team. Success of allocation method using minimisation will be evaluated by measuring homogeneity of the two groups on co-variates such as age, time since stroke, hemisphere damage and neglect severity.
Time Frame
Through study completion, approximately 2 years
Title
Adherence to c-SIGHT protocol
Description
The number of trials performed and length will be computed per session via a motion-tracking sensor.
Time Frame
Through study completion, approximately 2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Star cancellation test
Description
The Star Cancellation Test is a paper and pencil test developed to detect the presence of unilateral spatial neglect (USN) in the near extra personal space in patients with stroke.The maximum score that can be achieved on the test is 54 points. A cutoff of < 51 indicates the presence of SN. A Laterality Index or Star Ratio will be calculated from the ratio of stars cancelled on the contralesional side of the page and the total number of stars cancelled. Scores between 0 and 0.46 indicate neglect in the left hemispace. Scores between 0.54 and 1 indicate neglect in the right hemispace.This will be completed by stroke survivors only.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0, before intervention), post-training (T1, after 10 days of intervention) and at follow-up (T2, after 1 month post-training)
Title
Line bisection test
Description
A paper and pencil task that measures spatial biases when marking middle horizontal lines (10 lines of 20 mm length). The deviation in mm from center (bisection error) is averaged and a bisection error > that 6 mm is considered evidence of spatial inattention. Completed by stroke survivors only.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0, before intervention), post-training (T1, after 10 days of intervention) and at follow-up (T2, after 1 month post-training)
Title
Computerised Extrapersonal Neglect Test (CENT)
Description
Computerised visual search cancellation test and a line bisection test that measure spatial neglect in extra personal space via television screens. Stimuli are presented out of reach (e.g., on participant's television), run on a laptop and performed using a wireless remote. A variety of variables are produced including: total cancelled targets, allocentric and egocentric neglect scores, number of intersections and re-cancellations, quality of search, total time, time asymmetry, asymmetry accuracy, asymmetry search speed and bisection error. Formulas adapted from Dalmaijer et al. (2015). This outcome is completed by stroke survivors only.
Completed by stroke survivors only.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0, before intervention), post-training (T1, after 10 days of intervention) and at follow-up (T2, after 1 month post-training)
Title
Oxford Cognitive Screen
Description
The Oxford Cognitive Screen is a short cognitive screening tool specifically designed for stroke survivors inclusive for patients with aphasia and neglect. OCS returns scores and a visual snapshot of a patient's cognitive profile, in a 'wheel of cognition', which at a glance demonstrates the specific cognitive domain impairments in Attention, Language, Praxis, Number and Memory. Completed by stroke survivors only.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0, before intervention)
Title
Broken Hearts test
Description
Paper-and-pencil standardized measure of spatial neglect (part of Oxford Cognitive Screen). Number of targets and distractors cancelled as well as ego and allocentric scores will be computed. Completed by stroke survivors only.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0, before intervention), post-training (T1, after 10 days of intervention) and at follow-up (T2, after 1 month post-training)
Title
Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
Description
The SIS is a stroke-specific, self-report, health status measure. It was designed to assess multidimensional stroke outcomes, including strength, hand function Activities of Daily Living / Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADL/IADL), mobility, communication, emotion, memory and thinking, and participation. An extra question on stroke recovery asks that the client rate on a scale from 0 - 100 how much the client feels that he/she has recovered from his/her stroke. Each item is rated using a 5-point Likert scale. Scoring will be computed for each domain and total according to scoring database: http://www.kumc.edu/school-of-medicine/population-health/research-and-community-engagement/stroke-impact-scale/instructions.html. Completed by stroke survivors only.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0, before intervention), post-training (T1, after 10 days of intervention) and at follow-up (T2, after 1 month post-training)
Title
Spatial neglect visual analogue scale
Description
A self-rating 10-point scale in which the participant will be asked to mark on a vertical line their (or their loved ones) perceived severity of spatial neglect. Completed by the stroke survivor and carer (if available) separately.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0, before intervention), post-training (T1, after 10 days of intervention) and at follow-up (T2, after 1 month post-training)
Title
One item extended test
Description
Observational test of contralesional limb awareness/personal neglect. Participants asked to point with unimpaired arm to six different parts of their body (e.g., ear, shoulder, elbow, side, leg, hand) and receive one of the following scores for each body part: 0 (no movement), 1 (search without reaching), 2 (reaching with hesitation and search), 3 (immediate reaching), with a total score ranging from 0 to 18. Completed by stroke survivors only.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0, before intervention), post-training (T1, after 10 days of intervention) and at follow-up (T2, after 1 month post-training)
Title
Hand laterality task
Description
Computerized task assessing body representation by testing perception of right vs. left hand images. Reaction times (ms) and errors (e.g., percentage) in identifying hands will be computed. Completed by stroke survivors only.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0, before intervention), post-training (T1, after 10 days of intervention) and at follow-up (T2, after 1 month post-training)
Title
Body drawing task
Description
Paper-and-pencil task requiring drawing of a person and self. Analysis will involve looking at symmetry of drawing and size/presence of different limbs. Completed by stroke survivors only.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0, before intervention), post-training (T1, after 10 days of intervention) and at follow-up (T2, after 1 month post-training)
Title
1:1 semi-structured interview
Description
Completed with the stroke survivor and carer (if available) separately. The interview, lasting approximately 15 minutes, will be transcribed and a thematic analysis will explore the usability of c-SIGHT and provide qualitative data about the therapy.
Time Frame
Baseline (T0, before intervention), post-training (T1, after 10 days of intervention) and at follow-up (T2, after 1 month post-training)
Title
Modified Caregiver Strain Index
Description
Questionnaire measuring financial, psychological, social, personal, physical caregiver strain. Carers indicate their agreement to statements from a choice three responses: 'Yes, on a regular basis' (2 points), 'Yes, sometimes' (1 point) and 'No' (0 points). Responses are summed and a higher score indicates greater strain. Completed by carer only (if available).
Time Frame
Baseline (T0, before intervention), post-training (T1, after 10 days of intervention) and at follow-up (T2, after 1 month post-training)
Title
Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS) carer version
Description
The Catherine Bergego Scale is a standardized checklist to detect presence and degree of unilateral neglect during everyday life situations. The CBS uses a 4-point rating scale to report the frequency (e.g., Never, occasionally, frequently, always) of each statement occurring (e.g., "Forgets to groom/shave the left/right part of this/her face"). Responses are summed and the maximum score of 30 a total score of 30 indicates severe neglect. Completed by carer only (if available).
Time Frame
Baseline (T0, before intervention), post-training (T1, after 10 days of intervention) and at follow-up (T2, after 1 month post-training)
Title
Rates of clinical brain scans obtained
Description
Number of clinical scans obtained.
Time Frame
Through study completion, approximately 2 years
Title
System Usability Scale
Description
To assess usability of c-SIGHT. Participants are asked to score the following 10 items with one of five responses that range from Strongly Agree to Strongly disagree. The participant's scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100. Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking. Based on previous research, a SUS score above 68 would be considered above average and anything below 68 is below average. This scale will be completed by the stroke survivor and carer (if available) separately.
Time Frame
Post-training (T1, after 10 days of intervention)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Stroke survivors meeting all of the following criteria (and none of the exclusion criteria) at screening will be eligible to take part:.
18 years and older
At least one-week post-stroke
Stroke confirmed using clinical neuroimaging (head CT or MRI)
Medically stable (as confirmed by the stroke service medical team responsible for the individual's stroke care)
Capacity to give informed consent (as confirmed by the stroke service medical team responsible for the individual's stroke care and/or PI)
Able to follow and execute a two-step command (e.g. "lift and balance this pen/pencil")
Live within 70 miles of the University of East Anglia
Signs of spatial neglect either via clinical assessment (e.g. star cancellation test; BIT) or observation
Exclusion criteria:
History of other neurological conditions (e.g. dementia, brain tumour, Parkinson's disease, previous strokes)
Bilateral impairment in arms (unable to move both arms)
Taking part in a stroke rehabilitation research trial (which includes an intervention)
Carers must meet all the inclusion criteria to take part:
18 years and older
Capacity to give informed consent
Carer of stroke survivor in trial
Live within 70 miles of the University of East Anglia
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Stephanie Rossit, PhD
Phone
0160359 1674
Email
s.rossit@uea.ac.uk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Helen Morse
Email
helen.morse@uea.ac.uk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephanie Rossit, Ph.D
Organizational Affiliation
University of East Anglia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cambridge University Hospital
City
Cambridge
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elaine Amis
Email
elaine.amis@addenbrookes.nhs.uk
Facility Name
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust
City
Cambridge
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Active, not recruiting
Facility Name
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
City
Norwich
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kneale Metcalf
Email
kneale.metcalf@nnuh.nhs.uk
Facility Name
Norfolk Community Health and Care NHS Trust
City
Norwich
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nicky Sweeting
Email
Nicky.Sweeting@nchc.nhs.uk
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The final anonymised data set will be shared with other researchers through an open repository.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Study protocol will be published before or soon after recruitment has begun. The final, anonymised data set will be shared on an open repository (e.g., Open Science Framework) after the study has ended.
IPD Sharing URL
https://osf.io/x2jg9/
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28116988
Citation
Rossit S, Benwell CSY, Szymanek L, Learmonth G, McKernan-Ward L, Corrigan E, Muir K, Reeves I, Duncan G, Birschel P, Roberts M, Livingstone K, Jackson H, Castle P, Harvey M. Efficacy of home-based visuomotor feedback training in stroke patients with chronic hemispatial neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019 Mar;29(2):251-272. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2016.1273119. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32942950
Citation
Morse H, Biggart L, Pomeroy V, Rossit S. Exploring perspectives from stroke survivors, carers and clinicians on virtual reality as a precursor to using telerehabilitation for spatial neglect post-stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2022 Jun;32(5):707-731. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1819827. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
https://www.stephanierossit.com/c-sight
Description
Neurolab page for the trial (news, etc)
URL
http://www.sight.uea.ac.uk
Description
Link to original non-computorized version of SIGHT materials
Learn more about this trial
Can we Use c-SIGHT for Spatial Neglect in Stroke Survivors' Homes?
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs